>To see if APR could run on AS/400, you just need to download the
>Apache2.0alpha drop and build it. If the httpd could run
>properly than APR works on AS/400!
I've take a look at APR and there is no reference to AS/400.
There is nothing related to OS/400 in config.guess.
AS/400 is a very
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: mod_webapp status?
I subscribed to apr-list to start learning more on APR.
Having a cross system IO portable library is really a good
thing.
I'm also working on AS/400 and if APR could run on this
OS it will be a very good thing
7:00 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: mod_webapp status?
>
>
>On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
>> >Since mod_jk is using just a few APR-like functions, the transition
>> >woulnd't be difficult - but it's important to do it at the
>righ
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >Since mod_jk is using just a few APR-like functions, the transition
> >woulnd't be difficult - but it's important to do it at the right time.
> >
> >And IMHO that should come as a decision from tomcat-dev - I would feel
> >very bad if Henri or Dan would
>Since mod_jk is using just a few APR-like functions, the transition
>woulnd't be difficult - but it's important to do it at the right time.
>
>And IMHO that should come as a decision from tomcat-dev - I would feel
>very bad if Henri or Dan would decide to switch to APR without
>a serious discus
> Let's say, webapp needs to use 10% of APR, but that 10% represents 90% of
> its complexity (shmem, mutexes, I/O)... Even if it's not final when Tomcat
4
> goes final, that shouldn't prevent us from using it... It's a good
library,
> and why doing ourselves what others are already doing (and are
> Are you volunteering to help do that? :-) If so, that would be great.
>
> Craig McClanahan
>
But I don't know the underlying architecture of mod_webapp. How is it
different from mod_jk? Is it not using the ajp protocol? And can you give
me some pointers?
(plesase don't point me to
http://
>
> Oh, let me see... APR can't be built as static library? (i.e. libapr.a).
If
> it can be built as static library, we don't create a new problem to the
> user. But obviously, the work has shifted to the one who build mod_webapp
> (Sam or Pier?), and of course the developer have to know how to b
- Original Message -
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: mod_webapp status?
> >
> > I agree and t
Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: mod_webapp status?
>Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:09:41 +
>
>Dave Oxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but APR is meant as
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: mod_webapp status?
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> > >GOMEZ Henri typed the
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
>
> > Dave ...under a bit less snow in England :)
>
> It was just snowing this morning.. Thank god it ended..
>
I was "fortunate" enough to be in Boston for their big storm a couple of
weeks ago. Twelve inches of snow in a few hours ("falling"
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >GOMEZ Henri typed the following on 10:21 AM 3/22/2001 +0100
> Chambery is under rain, but no snow yet in town ;-)
> >>>
> >>>Barcelona is not yet sunny but it will be sunny and hot today,
> >>>I am born in La Tronche (35 kms from Chambery)!
> >>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > You are 100% correct. Let me give a bit more detail. Covalent is
> > currently using APR in many of our modules that work with Apache 1.3.
> > This is actually harder than a module that works with
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You are 100% correct. Let me give a bit more detail. Covalent is
> currently using APR in many of our modules that work with Apache 1.3.
> This is actually harder than a module that works with a different web
> server, because there are some overla
Punky Tse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> APR is a great piece of code but it will restrict Tomcat
>> to have only one front-end, Apache Web Server.
>
> I think the advantage to use APR is that there is no need to worry about
> portability across all pl
GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm rewriting it using APR... As we speak...
>>>
>>> Pier (under the snow in Dublin)
>>>
>>
>
> APR is a great piece of code but it will restrict Tomcat
> to have only one front-end, Apache Web Server.
GO and read what APR is, before saying some
The original intention for mod_jk was to use APR whenever it's ready. Gal
wrote most of the "general" code trying to stay as close as possible to
APR semantics.
Since mod_jk is using just a few APR-like functions, the transition
woulnd't be difficult - but it's important to do it at the right t
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >
> > >> I'm rewriting it using APR... As we speak...
> > >>
> > >> Pier (under the snow in Dublin)
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > APR is a great piece of code but it will restrict Tomcat
> > to have only one front-end, Apache Web S
Dave Oxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but APR is meant as a library of API's that are
> separate from Apache2 and should therefore be able to be used with
> Apache1.3. What I would be concerned about is that there hasn't been a final
> (let alone beta) of APR/Apache2 an
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >No, that is not exactly the goal of APR, it is USED by APACHE2.0 but
> >should/could be standalone. But it means probabably 2
> >portables run time for the
> >non-Apache servers.
> >
> >I prefer to use apr_socket_create() than to see several #ifdef
> >#else #endif in mod_w
>GOMEZ Henri typed the following on 10:21 AM 3/22/2001 +0100
Chambery is under rain, but no snow yet in town ;-)
>>>
>>>Barcelona is not yet sunny but it will be sunny and hot today,
>>>I am born in La Tronche (35 kms from Chambery)!
>>
>>!!! Un voisin !!!
>>
>>I'm pleased to see that many t
GOMEZ Henri typed the following on 10:21 AM 3/22/2001 +0100
>>> Chambery is under rain, but no snow yet in town ;-)
>>
>>Barcelona is not yet sunny but it will be sunny and hot today,
>>I am born in La Tronche (35 kms from Chambery)!
>
>!!! Un voisin !!!
>
>I'm pleased to see that many tomcat use
>No, that is not exactly the goal of APR, it is USED by APACHE2.0 but
>should/could be standalone. But it means probabably 2
>portables run time for the
>non-Apache servers.
>
>I prefer to use apr_socket_create() than to see several #ifdef
>#else #endif in mod_webapp, the portability problems sh
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >> I'm rewriting it using APR... As we speak...
> >>
> >> Pier (under the snow in Dublin)
> >>
> >
>
> APR is a great piece of code but it will restrict Tomcat
> to have only one front-end, Apache Web Server.
No, that is not exactly the goal of APR, it is USED by APAC
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Punky Tse wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 6:21 AM
> Subject: RE: mod_webapp status?
>
>
> > >> I'm rew
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 6:21 AM
Subject: RE: mod_webapp status?
> >> I'm rewriting it using APR... As we speak...
> >>
> >> Pier (under
>> I'm rewriting it using APR... As we speak...
>>
>> Pier (under the snow in Dublin)
>>
>
APR is a great piece of code but it will restrict Tomcat
to have only one front-end, Apache Web Server.
A solution will be to add ajp13 support to Tomcat 4.0.
I saw 3 main advantages :
1) Tomcat 4
Correct me if I'm wrong, but APR is meant as a library of API's that are
separate from Apache2 and should therefore be able to be used with
Apache1.3. What I would be concerned about is that there hasn't been a final
(let alone beta) of APR/Apache2 and is therefore subject to change. If
APR/Ap
"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
>
> jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Eric L. Anderson" wrote:
> >>
> >> What is the current status of mod_webapp? I have tried building the connector
> >> from cvs but the build fails with webapplib. The errors seem to indicate
> >> there
> >> are
jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Eric L. Anderson" wrote:
>>
>> What is the current status of mod_webapp? I have tried building the connector
>> from cvs but the build fails with webapplib. The errors seem to indicate
>> there
>> are some missing source files.
>>
>> wa.c:69: `w
"Eric L. Anderson" wrote:
>
> What is the current status of mod_webapp? I have tried building the connector
> from cvs but the build fails with webapplib. The errors seem to indicate there
> are some missing source files.
>
> wa.c:69: `wa_connections' undeclared (first use in this function)
> wa
What is the current status of mod_webapp? I have tried building the connector
from cvs but the build fails with webapplib. The errors seem to indicate there
are some missing source files.
wa.c:69: `wa_connections' undeclared (first use in this function)
wa.c:69: (Each undeclared identifier is re
What is the status of the warp connector?
I am currently using catalina/jasper in a production
environment. But I definitely have need for
mod_webapp.
Thanks,
Dave
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a
34 matches
Mail list logo
