mturk 2003/10/09 00:19:55
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe
Log:
Latest binaries (built with VC6/SP5)
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +28 -28jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat.exe
Binary file
1.4 +42 -39
mturk 2003/10/09 00:20:48
Modified:procrun README.txt
Log:
Need lots of work...
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/README.txt
Index: README.txt
===
RCS
Kurt Miller wrote:
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:49:39 +0200
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no guarantee that the binaries d/led are not corrupted on your
random mirror, or haven't been tampered with, or if the
http://gump.covalent.net/log/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.html
Buildfile: build.xml
deploy-prepare:
deploy-static:
deploy:
[echo] Target: Catalina - Deploy ...
flags:
flags.display:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23675.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23675.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez a écrit :
Note: I really love Xerces' error messages.
Great it seems to works with :
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
!DOCTYPE web-app
PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN
hgomez 2003/10/09 03:08:43
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/ajp/tomcat4 Ajp13Connector.java
Log:
Remote setKeepAlive (set by the native side).
Fix #23675
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +10 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23675.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hola a todos:
(Many time from my last post, things are settling here, so hope i will
contribute some code in future :) shields up, nacho will be messing
things shortly, now i'm only moderating our lists, and as some person
said time ago moderation is to coding what washing dishes is to
cooking
Ignacio J. Ortega a écrit :
Hola a todos:
(Many time from my last post, things are settling here, so hope i will
contribute some code in future :) shields up, nacho will be messing
things shortly, now i'm only moderating our lists, and as some person
said time ago moderation is to coding what
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
Hola a todos:
(Many time from my last post, things are settling here, so hope i will
contribute some code in future :) shields up, nacho will be messing
things shortly, now i'm only moderating our lists, and as some person
said time ago moderation is to coding what
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:34 PM
Sorry to disagree, but it's impossible to build the said binaries
without expensive compilers. (please do not suggest Cygwin)
Disagreeing is the salt of email lists, so not worries about disagreeing
For 4.1.28:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
For 5.0.13:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
/ballot
Remy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One question.
Why do we need to vote on that?
AFAICT the 4.1.27 was stable.
and the 5.0.12 was Beta.
IMHO we should vote on Release/DoNotRelease.
If for example the 5.0.13 is a less quality code then 5.0.12 do not
release at all,
or vote for a Stable, if you dare ;-).
For 4.1.x, it would be
FYI :
---BeginMessage---
On 9 Oct 2003, at 08:37, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Leif,
No worries about time. You replied before I left for the road, and I
won't
be posting this reply until at least 15 hours after your note.
The platform is Solaris. The application is Tomcat. The major
problem is
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
For 4.1.28:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
For 5.0.13:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
/ballot
They didn't include my late patch to remove setKeepAlive from JTC ?
We should avoid problem with JDK 1.2/1.3 users ,(
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
For 4.1.28:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
/ballot
For 5.0.13:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
/ballot
They didn't include my late patch to remove setKeepAlive from JTC ?
We should avoid problem with JDK 1.2/1.3 users ,(
Ah. That connector is
http://gump.covalent.net/log/jakarta-tomcat-5.html
Buildfile: build.xml
prepare-release:
[mkdir] Created dir: /javastuff/gump/jakarta-tomcat-5/release
[mkdir] Created dir:
Mladen Turk wrote:
One question.
Why do we need to vote on that?
AFAICT the 4.1.27 was stable.
and the 5.0.12 was Beta.
IMHO we should vote on Release/DoNotRelease.
If for example the 5.0.13 is a less quality code then 5.0.12 do not
release at all,
or vote for a Stable, if you dare ;-).
I think
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18485.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Mladen Turk wrote:
One question.
Why do we need to vote on that?
AFAICT the 4.1.27 was stable.
and the 5.0.12 was Beta.
IMHO we should vote on Release/DoNotRelease.
If for example the 5.0.13 is a less quality code then 5.0.12 do not
release at all,
or vote for a Stable,
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Miller wrote:
I guess a user would be willing to manually check the keys of one binary
download, but would not be likely to check the keys of multiple
downloads.
Maybe a solution similar to what the BSD porting systems use would be a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23697.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Mea culpa.
JTC from TC 5 hsa better support for gzip and could now use regexp
to avoid that non compatible browsers use gzip or http 1.1 ;-)
BTW, less branches, less works
There are also many other tweaks (improved buffering = better network
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23697.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23698.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2003/10/09 09:13:30
Modified:jsr152/src/share/dtd web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd
Log:
- Patch by Mark Roth
Remove a superfluous definition for the xml prefix.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +11 -9
Hi all,
like a good girl I have been using the user-mailing-list up to now to search for
user experience installing tomcat on os390.
Most (if not all) contributions are in the form has anyone successfully installed
tomcat on os390? From some other I got partly valuable ideas.
I have been
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this message reaches you guys yet, so here it go again.
Sorry for any inconvenience if you receiving this message twice.
Thanks.
William.
-Original Message-
From: Lee, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:55 PM
To: '[EMAIL
Howdy,
Tomcat 4.1.x implements the endorsed classloader spec. It's compliant
with the Servlet Specification v2.3. What you can do if you want your
webapp to use the latest xerces/JAXP, is:
- Move $CATALINA_HOME/common/endorsed/* to $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib
- Put your later xerces etc. in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23529.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23112.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13983.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13983.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23691.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23112.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23112.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Anna
I don't use tomcat on os390 but by reading you problem I suspect your
problem is solved in cvs, you need at least revision 1.16.2.1
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalOutputBuffer.java?rev=1.16.2.1
or
This won't work since, all jar files in commons/lib, commons/endorsed, and
commons/classes are all visible to the tomcat's commons classloader. So,
there is no difference whether we put the xerces jar files in lib or
endorsed, the one from webapps will be skipped.
I think the question boiled down
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20018.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20018.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23710.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23710.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
building from scratch I'm getting:
BUILD FAILED
file:/disk/raid0/home/jfarcand/jakarta-tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml:147: Warning:
Could not find file /home/jfarcand/jakarta-tomcat/commons-daemon/commons-daemon.jar to
copy.
I've seens some change recently related to daemon. Where is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23691.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2003/10/09 21:08:31
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common ModJkMX.java
Log:
Fix Gump builds.
This should work against both modeler-1.1 and modeler-HEAD, since it seems that
having the oname field in this class is redundant.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5
47 matches
Mail list logo
