Currently the following CVS modules are snapshotted to
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/
jakarta-tomcat jakarta-tomcat-4.0 jakarta-tomcat-5
jakarta-tomcat-catalina jakarta-tomcat-jasper
jakarta-tomcat-connectors jakarta-tools jakarta-watchdog
jakarta-servletapi jakarta-servletapi-4 jakarta-servleta
On 10/6/05, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > There seems to be a problem with those two.
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/ contains what
> > was in jakarta-tomcat-catalina, and jakarta-tomcat-5 appears to be gone.
*grin* Ritually dis
Forgot to add that I'll be on #asfinfra on irc.freenode.net as well.
On 10/5/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mark Thomas wrote:
> > > Mladen Turk wrote:
> > >> Can somebody make a
On 10/2/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Mladen Turk wrote:
> >> Can somebody make a firm statement on the timings?
> >> 1. Until when (Date:Hour:Minute) commits could be done
> >> 2. Wen the CVS will be locked for commit (same format)
>
> This is now set for Wedn
On 8/17/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2. j-t-service, j-t-site, j-t-tools
Ready to do phase-2?
Where should they go in svn:tomcat/?
Which need tags/branches?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 8/17/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assuming everyone else is happy to move the remaining tomcat modules
> to SVN I would suggest the following stages (Watchdog was stage 1).
> I'll give people at least a week to comment on this proposal and
> assuming no -1's start the phase 2 to
On 8/18/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >> Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >> I am +1 for moving the remaining Tomcat CVS modules to SVN.
> >
> > I'm +10^-60 or something.
>
> He he he.
Well, the +10 is promising :)
> > Right after that, we'll need new repositories
On 7/27/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> Following up on my offer to trial a Subversion migration using Watchdog, I
> started to think that it would be a good idea to have an idea of what we want
> our eventual Subversion layout to look like so we could target the Watchdog
> c
, I figure he'll take things from here.
Hen
On 6/17/05, Amy Roh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Funk wrote:
>
> > I can sit around for 2 or 3 hours.
>
> Me too...
>
> Amy
>
> >
> > -Tim
> >
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
>
t-pmc membership.
Create tomcat.apache.org vhost
--
Key: INFRA-387
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-387
Project: Infrastructure
Type: Task
Components: HTTP Server
Reporter: Henri Yandell
Tomcat is moving to TLP, so wil
Unsure if the Tomcat community saw Geir's email asking for volunteers
at JavaOne.
The ASF have a booth there (donated to us) if we can get people to man
it etc. Given that it's the flagship product, will any Tomcat people
be interested in volunteering?
I think the idea is to spend 2 or 3 hours si
On Apr 8, 2005 11:19 PM, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:23 PM
> Subject: Re: New TLP draft
>
> > Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Need to identify just how much of the
On Apr 6, 2005 8:15 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
>
> I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft
> is ok, I will send it there.
>
> Then there are infrastructure taks:
> - renaming mailing lists
19 votes were recorded, and thus the proposed Tomcat PMC is:
Keith Wannamaker (keith)
Mark Thomas (markt)
Larry Isaacs (larryi)
Filip Hanik (fhanik)
Tim Funk (funkman)
Kin-man Chung (kinman)
Henri Gomez (hgomez)
Mladen Turk (mturk)
Costin Manolache (costin)
Jim Jagielski (jim)
Bill Barker (billbar
No new votes in the last 36 hours, so I'll send the results tonight
(when time arrives).
Hen
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:22:54 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Update:
>
> 6 more votes recorded, 2 in the last 24 hours:
>
> Ian Darwin (idarwin)
> Peter
Update:
6 more votes recorded, 2 in the last 24 hours:
Ian Darwin (idarwin)
Peter Rossbach (pero)
Kurt Miller (truk)
Glenn Nielsen (glenn)
Jean-Frederic Clere (jfclere)
Amy Roh (amyroh)
Hen
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:55:24 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just as an upd
Just as an update, I've recorded 11 public/private votes from:
Keith Wannamaker (keith)
Mark Thomas (markt)
Larry Isaacs (larryi)
Filip Hanak (fhanak)
Tim Funk (funkman)
Kin-man Chung (kinman)
Henri Gomez (hgomez)
Mladen Turk (mturk)
Costin Manolache (costin)
Jim Jagielski (jim)
Bill Barker (bil
ose who will be on the new PMC.
> >
> > So before the vote:
> >
> >1. Finalize list of PMC members
> > (all current committers)
> >2. Determine who to collect and tally votes
> > (I propose Henri Yandell)
> >
> >
>
> L
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:39:40 +0100, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:15:24 +0100, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Henri Yandell wrote:
> >>
> >>>Biggest warning I h
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:15:24 +0100, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > Biggest warning I have is that the servitude takes time. It'll be a
> > lot less for Tomcat than it is for me in Jakarta, but it still takes
> > time.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:37:45 -0500 (EST), Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The PMC Chair has "ultimate" authority, since the position is board
> appointed and results in the Chair being a VP of the ASF. There's
> no precedent for "sharing" the role or having a "co-Chair." The PMC
> Chair
Could you send a [RESULT] for this and Cc the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list to
record the addition of new committers?
Thanks,
Hen
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:49:43 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 02:09 PM 3/14/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >Henri Gomez wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 for both
(Bcc'd to all Jakarta dev lists)
Partly an announcement that the Jakarta download pages have been changed
somewhat. Rather than one huge page, it's a whole set of pages. So when
time comes to do your next release, you modify
site/downloads/downloads.xml and run ant.
Source, binary and nightly-b
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:16:03 -0800, Costin Manolache
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I like SVN a lot - and for a new project probably I would choose it if
> there is a choice - sf.net or other places are cvs only. But I don't
> think all the pain for switching tomcat is justified, and switching fe
Just noticed an email on commons-dev.
Subclipse doesn't support the synchonize feature yet.
Hen
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:57:35 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tool-wise, Subclipse is an Eclipse plugin that seems to work fine for
> standard development (check
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this mandatory ? I suspect there'll be a lot of build
> script/doc/habits/tool changes involved. CVS is working reasonably well
> at the moment, and a lot of tools have (finally) very good support for it.
>
> Costin
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> &g
/
jakarta-tools/
I suspect you'll want to have:
repos/asf/jakarta/servletapi/
and
repos/asf/jakarta/tomcat/
I'm not sure if jakarta-tools is in anyway alive. The times on the
files look very old.
Hen
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:27:43 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROT
Just wondering if the Tomcat community have any thoughts on a
migration to Subversion?
The process seems pretty easy, though Tomcat may be more complicated
than the usual CVS module. Infra have the process documented at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/cvs2svn.html
The Jakarta status is in the wiki at
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:58:14 -0800, Costin Manolache
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fully agree. Doesn't matter how small a contribution is ( or looks at
> some later time ), keeping the reference to the author and whatever else
> the author wants to include is the right thing to do ( if the code
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, sebb wrote:
Looks like a *lot* of other projects use the Anakia jars and/or
stylesheets from jakarta-site2 - not just jakarta-tomcat-site...so
perhaps those need to be restored.
Sites with the older l&f:
Taglibs, Velocity, BSF, ECS, JMeter, Lucene, ORO, Regexp, Slide, Tomcat,
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Mark Thomas wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
I've removed the Website Maintenance link too, it no longer makes much
sense and nobody seemed to mind the suggestion of killing it. It has (the
page isn't gone yet, just the link) a lot of stuff about using
jakarta-site2 a
Noel just searched on .html files, there's also:
There's also:
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B2.txt:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B3.txt:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-
I'm also interested in killing:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat-old/
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat-4.0/
Hen
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:00:08 -0500, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone mind if I nuke:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/idedev-r
Anyone mind if I nuke:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/idedev-rdeclipse.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/idedev-rdtomcat.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/idedev-rdnetbeans.html
They look like they're either dead, or long since have become a part
of Tomcat's site.
If they are still live, cou
(this is based on assumptions, so let me know if they are wrong Jason)
I must admit that I lack the experience to be sure of the correct action here.
The image copyrights are easy; things need to be copyright to the ASF,
not to Sun. So they need fixing somehow.
Jason's code is harder.
It doesn
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:40:25 +0100, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fixing the GIFs should be easy. How about the two Java files ? I would
> need an answer from Jason and Craig to see if I can safely remove the
> comments (otherwise we would have to reimplement these, right ?).
Soun
With the String Taglib hat on, +1. Would be nice to have a smaller jar to
link to. [Though I see it can kinda be done now].
With a Commons hat on, +0. Sounds useful, but want to make sure the
Standard Taglib developers still monitor it and that it doesn't get
abandoned. With Standard driving it,
+1.
Another example if I could. The job role of 'Java admin' is growing more
and more at companies. Developers shouldn't be adminning things, but would
you have your unix or oracle admin be the admin of the Java side with zero
Java knowledge?
Jakarta houses the 'Java' community at Apache but th
38 matches
Mail list logo