Re: AW: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results
>
>
> Hans Schmid wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just want to describe our usecase because we make heavy use of the
> > local_worker and local_worker_only flags right now.
> >
>
>
> > We us
still go to
tomcat-01,
but local_worker=1 on ajp13-02 tells new sessions to go to tomcat-02.
When all sessions have expired on tomcat-01 we can shut it down for maintenance.
Exactly the same works in the other direction (including failover if tomcat-02
should crash)
I do not yet see how w
./jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/Response.java
./jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/warp/WarpResponse.java
KR, Hans
- Original Message -
From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
, no discussion please..)
I may be blunt, but TMHO the source and developmant environment is a mess
...
Sorry I have to say this
KR, Hans
;trick" would not have implications for the Servlet API.
When looking at
the Tomcat source I cannot oversee what sources would be affected, especially
those involved
in connectors.
Now that was a long story, who can help me ?
KR, Hans
plications for the Servlet API.
When looking at the Tomcat source I cannot oversee what sources would be
affected, especially those involved in connectors.
Now that was a long story, who can help me ?
KR, Hans
Hi,
a mod_jk 1.2.6 release would be highly welcome.
We are using cvs head in production for a couple of month now without
problems.
thanks,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2004 10:01
> An: Tomca
If the message will not displayed automatically,
follow the link to read the delivered message.
Received message is available at:
www.jakarta.apache.org/inbox/tomcat-dev/read.php?sessionid-17252
,
Hans Schmid
einsurance Agency AG
Information Technology
Bayerstrasse 33
80335 München
Tel: +49-89-55292-860
Fax: +49-89-55292-855
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any other ideas what can cause this java.io.IOException?
I have tested my setup by just replacing the CoyoteConnector with the
corresponding
AJP13Connector in my server.xml (same settings) and everything works fine
again.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Hans Schmid [
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 12:38
> An: Tomcat Developers List
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: java.io.IOException: Read bytes failed in Tomcat
> 3.3.2 with Coyote Connectors
>
>
>
ailed in Tomcat 3.3.2
> with Coyote Connectors
>
>
> Hans Schmid wrote:
> > Sorry, I forgot to mention, that we are using mod_jk 1.2.5 on the Apache
> > side
>
> I'm using the same config at works, jk 1.2.5 and TC 3.3.2 and didn't see
> such problem.
>
Sorry, I forgot to mention, that we are using mod_jk 1.2.5 on the Apache
side
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Hans Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 11:25
> An: Tomcat-Dev
> Betreff: java.io.IOException: Read bytes failed in To
happen
Should I file a Bugzilla Entry?
(we have 3+ years Experience with the Tomcat 3.3 series and AJP13Connectors)
Hans Schmid
einsurance Agency AG
Information Technology
Bayerstrasse 33
80335 München
Tel: +49-89-55292-860
Fax: +49-89-55292-855
Thx, Dave !
It works. I did put debug="true" in my ant javac task and recompiled the
whole thing.
Do you think debuglevel="lines" would work also ?
Regads,
Hans
- Original Message -
From: "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers
citly ?
2. Do I need some switch on de java statement when starting tomcat ?
Kind regards,
Hans
Hi,
this does not look like a Tomcat 3 buglist. More like Jetspeed or Velocity?
At least it is a completely different list as last week.
Something got mixed up in Bugzilla?
While speaking, would it be possible to set up an automated Bug report
for Tomcat 5 as well?
Thanks,
Hans
r on file
/WEB-INF/ttlfunction.tld: (line 20, col 11): Element type "function" must be
declared.
Can anybody help me out in this regards
Functions were added in the JSP 2.0 spec, so you need to use a JSP 2.0
TLD instead of a JSP 1.1 TLD. You must also use a web container that
suppor
eventually if I just shut up ;-)
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/>
Author of O'Reilly's "JavaServer Pages", covering JSP 2.0 and JSTL 1.1
Details at
ook like this
instead:
getLocalName() -> localhost
getLocalPort() -> 8080
getLocalAddr() -> 127.0.0.1
getServerName() -> localhost
getServerPort() -> 8080
getRemoteName() -> bar.com
getRemotePort() -> 1766
getRemoteAddr() -> 4.62.132.17
HTH,
H
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hans,
The behavior change is unrelated to the use of getParameter()
to search for "jsp_precompile". Both Tomcat 3.x and Tomcat 4.x
were bit by this log ago and Craig's fix was applied to both.
In Tomcat 4's c
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hans,
The behavior change is unrelated to the use of getParameter()
to search for "jsp_precompile". Both Tomcat 3.x and Tomcat 4.x
were bit by this log ago and Craig's fix was applied to both.
In Tomcat 4's case, it was prior to the 4.0 release.
Okay, I
o getParameter() that Jasper does in
the same way as it's done in TC 4.
My applogies if I missed a part of the thread that discussed this
solution and found it flawed.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http:/
ou feel and no one can force you to work on it,
of course, but I hope you do even if it's just Beta for another few
months.
So I think we're stuck :-(
I hope not.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <h
Jan Luehe wrote:
Hans,
good point. What about environments that embed Tomcat without following
Tomcat's directory layout, and in which the classloader
hierachy/depth is different from that in Tomcat?
I don't give them that option (with regards to this) in LiteWebServer.
The only pl
Jan Luehe wrote:
Hans,
thanks for stepping in.
sorry, but I don't see which part of our email exchange you found
"very frustrating". As I said, I'm open to suggestions, and if my
patch is deemed useless, I'll revert it. No problem.
[...]
Sorry for not jumping in e
only the applications do, which is what shared/lib is for.
Maybe that cuts down the list enough so you don't have to mess with
an exclusion list at all?
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefio
l let you know.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/>
Author of O'Reilly's "JavaServer Pages", covering JSP 1.2 and JSTL 1.0
Details at
he TC 4.1.24 scripts with TC 5.0.7, and it seems to work
fine. Any chance that these scripts can be added back into TC 5?
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/>
Author of O'Reil
linking !!!
Thanks very much.
p.s. If anybody else is interested in our LB/failover setup I am glad to
provide some info.
Best regards,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Hans Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2003 15:15
> An: Tomcat Dev
an mail you the complete logs offline.
Thanks for looking into this,
Hans
> Then post those log lines here.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Glenn
>
> Hans Schmid wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed the following with mod_jk 1.2.4, Apache 1.3.26 and
> > Tomcat 3.3.1a o
ink that the behaviour in 8.) is wrong. 10.) is starange too.
Thanks for any suggestion if I am completely wrong here
or further looking into this.
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2003 15:56
> An
See
http://tomcatfaq.sourceforge.net/linx.html
cheers,
Hans
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: siddharth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 12:13
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: java processes created by tomcat
>
>
> hello,
>
riate actions if it implements HttpSessionBindingListener," which
I assume mean valueUnbound() will be called. I don't see any signs of
this being done, however. You may want to file a bug report about this.
For a class that implements Serializable, however, everything seems to
work as i
David Thielen wrote:
Hi;
I have an object that implements HttpSessionBindingListener. It calls
valueBound fine. But it never calls valueUnbound. Not when it times out and
not when Tomcat is closed. I am running 4.1.18.
Any ideas?
It works fine in TC 4.1.24, so you may want to upgrade.
Hans
Amy Roh wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable (GA)
The TagLibraryInfoImpl patch attached to bug 14302 is still not
applied, so JSPC fails with an NPE for any web app that contains
a tag library packaged as a JAR file (with the TLD in the JAR file
Costin Manolache wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Good. For JspC, I think there are more urgent problems than the tag
related problem, such as the mangling issues which just got fixed in
Tomcat 5. That's why I didn't bother trying to apply whatever patch was
needed for tags, knowing it woul
tch can easily
be ported to 4.1, why not do it? Even if you refer to some problem I'm
not aware of, fixing the NPE problem can hardly be a bad idea since
it affects _everyone_ who tries to use JSPC with packaged tag libraries
(the majority case in the real world).
> [...]
Hans
--
Hans
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
The patch you mentioned in 14302 was actually applied to TC5.
Right, thanks, but it needs to be applied to TC 4.1 as well. And this
is a stability ballot for TC 4.1 ;-)
Hans
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:07:21 -0800
From: Hans Bergsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [
Actually, let's change that to Beta; it's just one bug after all,
even though it's a fairly important one.
Hans
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[X] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable (GA)
The TagLibraryInfoImpl patch attached to bug 14302 is still not
applied, so JSPC fails
.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/>
Author of O'Reilly's "JavaServer Pages", covering JSP 1.2 and JSTL 1.0
Details at
so? Without it, JspC fails for JSP
pages that use tag libraries with the TLD packaged in the JAR file.
This is the same problem as described by bugs #13212 and #14537.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
[...]
We can support runtime package name addition (when the servlet is
generated, ask the security manager to protect the package). So it
can be optional, i.e. being able to tell jasper to generate servlet
using
it's own classloader and
(I assume) is in control over what goes in it's web app structure, I
just don't see the need for this protection. But I may be totally wrong,
so please enlighten me.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROT
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Hans Bergsten wrote:
See my previous mail; you do _not_ need to have a package statement
for the generated servlet class. Adding it just complicates life.
There is a situation when *not* having the package statement can cause
big problems
ay it's pathced now, it works as in TC 4.0.4. Also
note that this is for precompiled JSP pages only. If there are
security concerns (I know I'm ignorant), let's look at both JspServlet
and JSPC and find a solution that works for both at the same time.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten
ecompilation example does include an extra "admin" subfolder
in the output directory path.
Right.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/>
Author of O'Reilly&#
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remm2003/01/22 03:40:00
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java
Log:
- Fix package name generation.
- Default to "org.apache.jsp" package name.
Why do you need a default pa
the class files are generated in a directory structure that starts
with "org/apache/jsp/"
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/>
Author of O'Reilly's "Ja
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
costin 2003/01/21 15:24:51
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java
Log:
Use the patch submited by Hans ( at least the part related to package ).
I modified it so that if a package is specified, it is used as prefix.
The second patch
, and replace calls
to it with calls to the commons-logging APIs.
Comments?
+0. Do you suggest this for TC 5 only, or also for TC 4.1?
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/&g
I (a) want to lurk a bit before I start
making commits, and (b) I've lost my password/key/procedures and
haven't had the time to figure it all out again ;-)
I _will_ start committing again, but I hope you can have some patience
and apply a few patches I submit in the bug database dat
submitted for
BugID 14302 instead, since it handles special characters in the path
as well. The TagLibraryInfoImpl patch (same BugID) is also required to
support TLDs located in JAR files.
Hans
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +8 -5 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache
I'm +0 for TC 5. Eventually, I hope to find time to help out with TC 5,
but for now I need to focus on TC 4.1.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/>
Author of O&#x
ent instead of using and
tag handlers. That would really make a difference for all apps that
use JSTL, while the potential gains from tag handler reuse depend on
a lot of factors that varies between applications and the runtime
environment.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten&
Johan Åbrandt wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Tim Moore wrote:
This bug seems to be submitted several times a week. Maybe an FAQ would
be in order? (or FOB -- frequently opened bugs haha)
Then again, if people don't search the bug database before submitting a
new one, then I guess they can
Costin Manolache wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Without pooling With pooling Reuse w/o overhead
-
5 threads
Avg.: 330 ms349 ms N/A
Rate:15.2/sec 13.6/sec
ring any bells?
If not, what do you recommend to measure CPU?
Hans
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
[...]
Wow. I would be _very_ curious to see those benchmarks and the "modern"
JVM that was used.
All my tests ( including JDK1.4, IBM vms, GCJ )
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
[...]
Wow. I would be _very_ curious to see those benchmarks and the "modern"
JVM that was used.
All my tests ( including JDK1.4, IBM vms, GCJ ) show that reusing is well
worth the trouble - at least if you have 100s of requests per second
(
ects elsewhere, such as in the application or session
scope). So for the majority of case, the SimpleTag API will be the
best fit.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Software <http://www.gefionsoftware.com/>
Author of O
Costin Manolache wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
evaluation all in one place. To make things even easier, these tag
handlers can _not_ be reused at all. Benchmarks with modern JVMs show
that the gain from reuse is not worth all the trouble. So, for new
tags we recommend using the SimpleTag API
n easier, these tag
handlers can _not_ be reused at all. Benchmarks with modern JVMs show
that the gain from reuse is not worth all the trouble. So, for new
tags we recommend using the SimpleTag API which takes care of the
problem by forbidding reuse.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten
tually will get it. I wrote about it in an article just
after JSP 1.2 was released. Feel free to point people to it if you
get tired of rehashing the same arguments over and over ;-)
<http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2001/11/07/jsp12.html>
Page 2, the "Tag handler
Matt Parker wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:14, Hans Bergsten wrote:
Matt Parker wrote:
I'd like to suggest that catalina perform a forward, rather than a
redirect, for requests that end with '/'. With a redirect, special
configuration is necessary for proxy servers to work cor
in the page correctly. If you use a forward, it can't
do so correctly.
Hans
--- DefaultServlet.java 2003-01-03 16:20:23.0 -0700
+++ DefaultServlet.java.new 2003-01-03 16:20:18.0 -0700
@@ -942,26 +942,18 @@
if (!request.getRequestURI().endsWith("/&quo
mplicit variables if any.
The intention with the EL API is that it should not have any servlet or
JSP dependencies. Some minor tweaks will be included in JSP 2.0 PFD2
to be released pretty soon.
> [...]
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gefion Softwar
within our office.)
Thanks,
Hans
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 7. Dezember 2002 09:59
> An: Tomcat Developers List
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution
>
>
> It would cause ni
ns, I'd like to understand why we can't
just preserve the features we had in TC 4.0.x.
Hans
Brent Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose a change to org.apache.jasper.JspC in Tomcat4.1.12. Specifically, I'd like to introduce a new command line argument:
"-pp" to apply
o, I like
the idea but I am not sure if such a thing would belong to "stock
tomcat".
As long as a feature doesn't break spec conformance, it should be fine.
For this specific proposal (assuming my understanding of it is correct),
I don't see any problems.
Han
s? The same issues (if they are issues) apply to JSTL,
don't they?
Hans
-Original Message-
From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 4:59 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List; Kin-Man Chung
Subject: Re: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization
hey kin-
t; Von: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 10:41
> An: Tomcat Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Nightly TC 3.3.x builds not working anymore?
>
>
> Hans Schmid wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the nightly build of Tomcat 3.3.x seems t
Hi,
the nightly build of Tomcat 3.3.x seems to have stopped at 08-Nov-2002.
Any Idea, why?
Cheers,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Torsten,
You may want to read the section about the tag handler lifecycle in an
article I wrote for ONJava.com:
<http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2001/11/07/jsp12.html>
It explains how the methods are called and how to deal with attribute
values.
Hans
Torsten Fohrer wrote:
Bu
Costin Manolache wrote:
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Removing the CLI and keeping the basic functionality seems like
a good idea.
"CLI" as in ...? Sorry, I'm not familar with this acronym.
Command line interface. jspc.sh, main() and the argument processing.
Ah, I should have k
her parts of the app (servlets, taglibs, web.xml, static stuff,
etc.) and deploy it to Tomcat or any other container. As far as I can
see, there's no need for a proprietary solution to get this to work.
> [...]
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gefion Software http://www.ge
y me, it seems Henri is
using it as well ).
If there are people who want to support the CLI and the other
options - then we can keep them, but if not - I think it's better
to remove them or mark as unsupported.
See above.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gefion Software htt
I understand what the main
problem is, I can help find a solution (primarily for Tomcat 4.1.x; I'm
afraid I don't have enough cycles to get into Tomcat 5 at the moment).
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gefion Software http://www.gefionsoftware.com
JavaServer Pages http://T
I will try by best next week. I have seen this only once
in the logs, I have not been able to reproduce it yet.
I'll do my best to reproduce the error conditions, and see
if it occurs again.
Cheers,
Hans
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 00:08:33 -0700
"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
)
Cheers,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@;apache.org]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Oktober 2002 20:15
> An: Tomcat Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Bug 13736
>
>
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> > +1. As I said above, it proba
-tools in our webapp together with xerces 1.4.0 and xalan 2.1.0
My preference would be. Leave it as it is, but give a short
readme hat to copy where to be abe to use MxInterceptor
Thanks,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: M
Tomcat 4.1 as well
Just a thought,
Hans Schmid
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
needed in some user usecases'
2.) LATER: Things not implemented because it is too complicated with the
current architecture -> these might point us to design problems to be
addressed
and possibly
3.) WONTFIX: There might be some entries which have the same reason as
LATER (too complicated
Hi I miss the following fix in there:
Configuration:
Bug No. Description
7520 Tomcat starts with title 3.3 instead of 3.3.1. Insert version string
during build.
Cheers,
Hans
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet
First, this is clearly a tomcat-user question.
To find out, what is wrong, execute
tomcat.bat run
This will start tomcat in the same window. (TC 3.3.1 at least)
I can't help you with the mySQL question though.
Regards,
Hans
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bill Black
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 19:35
> An: Tomcat Developers List
> Betreff: Re: PROPOSAL: mod_jk2: Group/Instance
>
>
> On Thu, 2 May 2002, Bernd Koecke wrote:
>
> > misunderstood it. After you said tha
all sessions on TC1 have ended, we shutdown TC1 and TC2 serves
everything.
Next update goes in the oposit direction (start TC1, switch lbfactors, wait
for the end of all
sessions on TC2 and finally shutdown TC2.
Thanks,
Hans
> Still to add:
> - display ( nicely ) the infor
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. April 2002 16:39
> An: Tomcat Developers List
> Betreff: Re: AW: PROPOSAL: mod_jk2 autoconfig
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Hans Schmid wrote:
>
> > I
ast if Glenn and few other people step in.
>
> I believe that's going to be very close to 'minimal' pain for the
> regular user while preserving the ability to fine tune everything.
>
> NOTE: jk2 will use a different model for the lb, see next mail.
>
> Costin
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
what about Tomcat 3.3 ?
Does this correspond to Ajp13Connector maxThreads >= the maxiumum number
of Apache httpd processes in this case?
Thanks,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im
> Auftrag von Glenn Nielsen
> Ge
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im
> Auftrag von Glenn Nielsen
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2002 19:28
> An: Tomcat Developers List
> Betreff: Re: AW: mod_jk suggestion, add "request" logging op
Hi,
what about adding 'port' to the list.
For lb workers the worker would be the real one used not 'loadbalancer',
right?
I think it would be really helpful to have this log level.
Cheers,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
jk_uri_worker_map.c (447)]: Into
jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker
Thanks a lot for looking into this,
Best Regards,
Hans
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Hans Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 08:23
An: Tomcat Developers List
Betreff: AW: Native
active most of the time.
(by changing the lbvalue)
Thanks,
Hans
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 02:17
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: RE: Native Connector problems
>
>
>
keep in mind the requirement to be able to update Webapps in
a farm of Tomcats without killing active sessions.
Thanks,
Hans
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Hans Schmid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 18:21
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: AW: TC3.3
clearly the JVM - not Tomcat.
But it is true, you have to make test for your environment.
All the best,
Regards,
Hans
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: T. Kandasamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. November 2001 11:02
> An: 'Tomcat Developers Li
Hi,
just filed a bug on Larrys request
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3467
Thanks for looking into this one.
Cheers,
Hans
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. September 2001 19:39
An: '[EMAIL PROT
this helps a little bit since there seems to be so much confusion in
the user-list about setting up mod_jk.
Best regards,
Hans
--- mod_jk-howto.html.orig Fri May 18 14:22:58 2001
+++ mod_jk-howto.html Fri May 18 14:32:21 2001
@@ -643,14 +643,13 @@
(Optional) Configuring Tomcat to use the
code, and that should not be necessary.
Hans
> --
>
> Jeff Turner wrote:
> > Having a look through bug 652:
> >
> > BodyTag doInitBody and doAfterBody called on tags without body
> >
> > (http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowRe
admin tools, primarily on the Tomcat 4.0 code base.
>
> Votes please?
+1
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gefion Software http://www.gefionsoftware.com
Author of JavaServer Pages (O'Reilly), http://TheJSPBook.com
)
Attatched is a patch.
Best regards,
Hans
jts.html.diff
--- src/examples/jsp/jsptoserv/jts.html.origSun Mar 11 19:38:57 2001
+++ src/examples/jsp/jsptoserv/jts.html Sun Mar 11 19:28:57 2001
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
-Source Code
for JSP calling servlet
+Source Code
+for JSP calling
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
