[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

- Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 8:26 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed Question - is gump building aga

Re: svn commit: r291334 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 1:42 PM Subject: svn commit: r291334 - /tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt +[4.1.32] Commons Daemon + Upgrade to 1.0 + I hope you plan to upgrade to 1.0.1, since 1

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Catalina.java CatalinaProperties.java ContextConfig.java Embedded.java

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 10:52 PM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Catalina.java CatalinaProperties.java ContextConfig.java Embedded.java co

Re: bug 36867

It's not clear from the report (at least to someone with my lack of Jasper experiance :) that the report isn't against a problem with a JSP-Document (aka XML-format). Unlikely, but it needs to be checked before setting as INVALID. - Original Message - From: "Leon Rosenberg" <[EMAIL

Re: New repository org

A big -1 to the reorg, since then it won't be possible to checkout Trunk without also checking out all of the branches as well. - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 3:55 AM Subject: New repository

Re: New repository org

- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:46 AM Subject: Re: New repository org Bill Barker wrote: A big -1 to the reorg, since then it won't be possible to checko

Re: New repository org

- Original Message - From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 9:11 AM Subject: Re: New repository org - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To

Re: New repository org

- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 2:04 PM Subject: Re: New repository org >Bill Barker wrote: >> It occurs to me that I may have misunderstood, and you were j

Re: Ajp13 wrong Response

I've seen it, but couldn't track it down. I haven't seen it come back in M4, but haven't been testing M4 long either. - Original Message - From: "Angel Aray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Ajp13 wrong Response > > I

Re: Ajp13 wrong Response

I take back my previous post. This is still happening in M4 (and I'm still clueless why). - Original Message - From: "Angel Aray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Ajp13 wrong Response > > I am having a problem which i

Re: Ajp13 wrong Response

Actually, you don't need to load the system (that's the good news). It's not a synchronization problem. It looks like it is a problem with error handling, but I haven't tracked down where so I can't send a patch yet. It seems that when you get an error, the writer gets stuck in it's last succes

Re: Ajp14 and Ajp13

I'm in favor of this, since the protocol is only being extended, not really changed. However, I think that one of the extensions that should be implemented early on is a version negotiation so that the newer side can gracefully degrade in the future without having to rely on the user changing con

Re: Portable SSL Support

In j-t-c I could see putting in RequestBase. However, since connector development (with the possible exception of Http10Interceptor, which isn't in j-t-c) is frozen in 3.3, I can't really see modifying Request. - Original Message - From: "Eric Rescorla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Dev

Re: Portable SSL Support

+1 - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "EKR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:53 PM Subject: Re: Portable SSL Support > On 16 Nov 2001, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > "William Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes

Re: TC 3.3, Production Quality

No objection here. - Original Message - From: "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:44 PM Subject: TC 3.3, Production Quality > I've noticed that on the main TC page of Jakarta site, TC 3.2.x is > still listed as production quality

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs index.xml

You forgot to remove the "is in beta testing" from the 3.3 description. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 5:49 PM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs index.xml > bojan 01/11/18 17:49:33 > > Modified:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs index.xml

now... > > BTW, do you think it would be better if the order of described releases > is changed? In other words, Tomcat 3.3/4.0 first and then others. > > Bojan > > Bill Barker wrote: > > > > You forgot to remove the "is in beta testing" from the 3.

Re: [VOTE] Change the order of releases mentioned on the TC web page

> [X] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support it. > [ ] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be able support it. > [ ] -0. I don't agree with the proposal but I won't stop it. > [ ] -1. I disagree with the proposal and will explain my reasons. > > Bojan > > -- > To unsubs

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Michael Smith

+1 - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:29 AM Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Michael Smith > Hi, > > I'd like to nominate Michael Smith [msmith at apache.org] as a committer on

Re: TC 3.3: For Servlets only

Commenting out JspInterceptor effectively removes JSP support. Now you either need to define a "*.jsp" mapping in your web.xml, or hack WebXmlReader (line 67 of "Final") so that it doesn't add a default "*.jsp" mapping. - Original Message - From: "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "T

Re: Info on customizing jspc - jasper

This is off-topic for the dev list. You'll probably get a better response from [EMAIL PROTECTED] What you want is <@page extends="my.jsp.page.class" %> - Original Message - From: "Alberto Romei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:32 AM Subject

Re: [PATCH] jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin

I don't like to step on 4.x toes, or I'd do it my self. But isn't it time to change the subject to [VOTE] and make Jazmin a committer? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:04 PM Subject: [PATCH] jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapp

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 Release Plan

> [ ] +1: I approve this plan, and I'll help > [X] +0: I approve this plan > [ ] -0: I'm against this plan, but I won't veto it > [ ] -1: I'm against this plan, and my reason is: > > > > > Remy > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: http protocol version question

These types of questions are better addressed at [EMAIL PROTECTED] The short answer is that Tomcat 3.x currently supports only the 1.0 protocol. Tomcat 4.x also supports the 1.1. protocol. - Original Message - From: "yuexiang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] New Committer: Jazmin Jonson

+1 - Original Message - From: "Amy Roh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "tomcat-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:04 AM Subject: [VOTE] New Committer: Jazmin Jonson > As Bill Barker suggested, I would like to propose Jazmin Jonso

Re: TC 3.3: For Servlets only

AIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Bill Barker'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:06 PM Subject: RE: TC 3.3: For Servlets only > This calls for adding some kind of attribute noJ

Re: [PATCH] TC 3.3 WebXmlReader.java

Since I had the file open anyway, I've gone ahead and put this one in as well. - Original Message - From: "Schreibman, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:27 AM Subject: RE: [PATCH] TC 3.3 WebXmlReader.java > Ouc

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java

You can't return "true" always, since the spec (section 8.4.2) says that any value for jsp_precompile other than , "true", or "false" will return error code 500. - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday,

Re: AJP Todo

I have no objection to help porting ${Server}Config to 4.x, but I'm still a Catalina novice. The 3.3 API is more command and control, so it is easier to get to the information. It will take me a little time to find out how to get the servlet-mappings in Catalina. - Original Message - Fro

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

I agree with Costin on waiting for more comments. I've done a first look over, so I'm happy to do start doing the ci (say at the end of the week?). It looks like there may be some API changes to fully integrate with j-t-c (esp. JNI), but it shouldn't be a problem to port these to 3.3.x. - Ori

Re: getPathInfo problem

A JSP page (that is using the default "*.jsp" mapping) can't have PathInfo (section 10.1 of the 2.2 spec, or 11.1 of the 2.3 spec). If PathInfo == null, then IMHO, then Tomcat "cannot determine a valid file path", and so must return null from getPathTranslated (section 5.5, resp section 4.5). Ser

Re: Configuration(1)

I'm too over-committed to projects right now to give more than +0, but it is a very enthusiastic one :). I have cases where I want some contexts to have different mapping options from others, and it is a nightmare to maintain. I'm guessing that the context name is one of the entries in jkworkers

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

Since no one else responded, I've gone ahead and checked in Eric's changes. I haven't actually tried to build against PureTLS, but I assume that Eric has. If I've missed anything in this commit, please let me know and I'll try and include it asap. - Original Message - From: "Eric Rescorla

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

at least for PureTLS) would also be a nice feature. - Original Message - From: "Eric Rescorla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:52 PM Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support > &qu

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

The Ajp13 spec? :) - Original Message - From: "Eric Rescorla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 6:59 AM Subject: Re: Submission

Re: [Vote] New committer: Eric Rescorla

+1 - Original Message - From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:11 AM Subject: [Vote] New committer: Eric Rescorla > As you may know, Eric Rescorla is one the few specialists in SSL > in the world, author

Re: [VOTE] New Watchdog Committer: Ryan Lubke

+1 - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:08 AM Subject: [VOTE] New Watchdog Committer: Ryan Lubke > NOTE: I'm posting this here because Watchdog was originally contributed > to Apache along with To

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

- Original Message - From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "EKR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:43 PM Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support > It comp

Double check idiom broken - Tomcat uses it ?

I'm cross-posting since this started on the user list. In Tomcat 3.3, JspServlet is largely deprecated (even if not yet @deprecated). It is only still included in case some 3.2.x user really needs it for something. It is much more likely to be removed in a future release than fixed. That being

Re: AJP Todo

ase (as opposed to a war file). - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 4:17 PM Subject: Re: AJP Todo > > > On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Bill Bark

Re: AJP Todo

- Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:29 PM Subject: Re: AJP Todo > > If the web app is deployed as a directory, you can call > context.getDocBase() for this. If the contex

Re: [j-t-c] ajp and headaches

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:56 PM Subject: Re: [j-t-c] ajp and headaches > The tomcat4.0 adapter - yes. The connector code ( low level Request, etc ) > are based on MessageBytes, etc. I

Re: AJP Todo

- Original Message - From: "Incze Lajos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:02 AM Subject: Re: AJP Todo > What's wrong with this? (ServletContext method javadoc both 2.2 and 2.3) Absolutely nothing. And indeed this is

Re: AJP Todo

- Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:59 PM Subject: Re: AJP Todo > > > On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Bill Barker wrote: > > > Da

Re: error handling and method signatures

If you are talking about status codes, I'm -1. That should be passed through from Tomcat without change. If Tomcat hangs up, then there is almost no useful information available, so there isn't much to report. If the client hangs up, then like jk1, we should just stop processing and return OK t

Re: org.apache.tomcat.util.net package in tomcat 3.x

I'm +1 on the move. However I think that we should hold off on removing it from 3.3 just yet, and just agree to freeze development there. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 6:49 AM Subject: Re:

Re: Jk2: error handling and method signatures

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:28 PM Subject: Re: Jk2: error handling and method signatures > So far I have a -1, if Bill doesn't change his vote we'll keep the current > mechanism. But

Re: AJP Todo

The ${Server}Config files are about as good as I can get them. Any remaining improvements would require someone that knows more about Catalina than I do. The main improvement that I can think of would require an API change in Catalina, but this configuration method will likely be obsolete by the

Re: bugzilla issue status change..

> > I agree. And don't be overly concerned with making a mistake and closing > a report prematurely, since a developer could always reopen it. And the person reporting it will almost certainly reopen it :). > > Thanks for your offer to help! > > > > > Costin > > > > Craig > > > -- > To unsubscri

Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

The only thing that I can think of is that your javac doesn't support the -encoding switch. Is it possible that you have an old copy of tools.jar somewhere? Jasper writes out the .java file in UTF8 encoding, which is then passed to javac to compile to a .class. If javac is trying to read the .j

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util JavaGeneratorTool.java

Oh, well, I guess I had to screw up eventually :-( Thanks for cleaning up my mess. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:39 PM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util JavaGeneratorTool.java

Re: Load balancing - fail-over support with mod_webapp

I'm going to ignore the complete problem case where you have configured Apache to be the "default servlet", and index.html is a frameset with 'n' jsp frames (which will typically result in 'n' different sessions). This is why mod_webapp only supports forwardAll, and forwardAll is the default for

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util J avaGeneratorTool.java

rror. Fortunately the internal test > > revealed this one. > > > > Larry > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:09 AM > > > To: Tomcat Developers List &

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:25 AM Subject: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1 > > [X ] +1: Make the release > [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed: > > > > > Th

Re: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5390

n again, I can't see how the inclusion/exclusion of Http10Interceptor can make any difference either. I'm including the developer list in the reply, in the hopes that someone else can spot what I'm missing. - Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "

Re: Configuring Jaspers Compiler Options

Tomcat 3.3 (which it seems is the version you are using) doesn't pass the -encoding flag to Jikes (which is causing other headaches on the user list :). At the moment, there is no way to suppress the -encoding flag being passed to javac. The only work around at the moment is to use Jikes (or hac

Fw: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5390

I was never really involved in the 3.2.x development, so I'm sending back to the list to try and get ideas on how to get 3.3 to act more like 3.2.x in the deprecated case. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5724] - Error page not displaying

Tomcat 3.3 looks like it has the same problem, only worse (since it will fail a static jsp:include that lives in WEB-INF). However, the check isn't really needed in 3.3, since if the request came from the user AccessInterceptor would have already failed it. If nobody objects, I'll remove the che

Re: TC 3.3.3 with Apache stack space error

There is a problem with 3.3.1 prior to about 12/31 (reported as bug 5390, reopened) that could be this one. I'm in the process of moving the StreamHandlerFactory into a module (where it really belongs), but haven't finished testing it yet. - Original Message - From: "Ray Pitmon" <[EMAIL P

Re: Possible Explanation - Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5684] - WEB-INF/lib jar file loading and operations problems.

I don't see any problem with adding an option to LoaderInterceptor11 to force it to use a SimpleClassLoader (the descendent of AdaptiveClassLoader) even on a Java2 platform. There are some trade-offs, since SimpleClassLoader is really meant for Java1.1 platforms, but for a lot of people they don'

Re: Todo list for 4.0.2 b2

- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: Todo list for 4.0.2 b2 > Hi, > > Here goes the list: > - Tag the JK + util directories in j-t-c with some tag (Costin proposed > jk_14) > - Build the c

Re: KPMG-2002003: Bea Weblogic DOS-device Denial of Service

This may be too kludgy, but my quick test shows that "aux.ver" returns -1164447360 for lastModified. Less kludgy would be to simply add a complete list of DOS devices to the "keywords" that are mangled. - Original Message - From: "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Develop

Re: KPMG-2002003: Bea Weblogic DOS-device Denial of Service

.apache.tomcat.startup.EmbededTomcat at org.apache.tomcat.util.compat.SimpleClassLoader.loadClass My preference would be to build a solution on isFile() if it can be worked out. I still need to investigate where the test might best be applied. Larry -Original Message- From: Bill Barker

Re: KPMG-2002003: Bea Weblogic DOS-device Denial of Service

PT9 AUX Do you know of any others? Larry -----Original Message- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 1/8/2002 7:43 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Subject: Re: KPMG-2002003: Bea Weblogic DOS-device Denial of Service 1.3.0_01 returns true for isFile on my Win-NT box. I

Re: KPMG-2002003: Bea Weblogic DOS-device Denial of Service

NUL is about the only case-sensitive one in NT/W2K. - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:49 AM Subject: Re: KPMG-2002003: Bea Weblogic DOS-device Denial of Service > > > A quic

Re: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 "aux.jsp" DOS problem and a Tomcat 3. 3.1 release

- Original Message - From: "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:26 PM Subject: Re: Dealing with the Tomcat 3.3 "aux.jsp" DOS problem and a Tomcat 3. 3.1 release > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > So far th

Re: Possible Explanation - Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5684] - WEB-INF/lib jar file loading and operations problems.

I checked in the change to LoaderInterceptor11 to allow it to optionally use the SimpleClassLoader (which is mostly the code from AdaptiveClassLoader) even under Java2. It should show up in tonight's nightly. To enable it, you set the use11Loader="true" attribute on the LoaderInterceptor11 eleme

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/proposals/StreamHandler/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config - New directory

Could somebody who knows CVS better then I do explain why I can't ci files from here? The message is: cvs server: could not stub branch HEAD for /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat/proposals/StreamHandler/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/ tomcat/util/net/Attic/StreamHandlerFactory.java,v - Original Message --

Re: Possible Explanation - Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5684] - WEB-INF/lib jar file loading and operations problems.

em but I got to admit that > the tomcat code is pretty hefty to trace through due to my lack of > experience with the code. Are servlet classes loaded from a jar any > different from regular classes loaded from a jar? > > Any thoughts? > > Regards, > Mike > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release

> > [ ] +1 Make the release > [X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help > [ ] -0 Bad idea > [ ] -1 No, because: > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3.1.txt

Which AJP is planned to go with this? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:39 PM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3.1.txt > larryi 02/01/21 13:39:37 > > Added: .RELEASE-PLAN-3.3.1.tx

Re: The problem with "/"

Actually, the default-servlet is supposed to handle requests for static resources. It sounds like what you want is something like: default *.gif - Original Message - From: "Peter Sojan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:22 PM Subject: The

Re: jdk1.3.1 and tomcat 3.3a core dumping?

Of course, there is always the issue that there is absolutely no need to run 3.3a on a Solaris box (which is why I really can't be bothered to download it to check this out, since my primary production environment is Solaris). If you're not running Windows, than there is no advantage to using 3.3a

Re: The problem with "/"

I'm not primarily a 4.x developer, but in theory the following should work: URL res = config.getResource(request.getPathInfo()); if(res != null) { RequestDispatcher rd = config.getNamedDispatcher("default"); rd.forward(request,response); return; } // Your processing here. Undec

Fw: Possible Explanation - Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5684] - WEB-INF/lib jar file loading and operations problems.

l these problems > are fixed. > > Thanks again for everything. > > Regards, > Mike > > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:42 PM >

Re: [VOTE] New Committer: Manveen Kaur

+1 - Original Message - From: "Patrick Luby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:40 AM Subject: [VOTE] New Committer: Manveen Kaur > All, > > I would like to propose Manveen Kaur as a committer. She has provided a > significant number of patches

Re: Load balancing in Tomcat 4.0.x?

If you had checked the "Users List" instead of the "Developers List", you'd know that load balancing is working with 4.0.2-B2. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:18 PM Subject: Load balancing in T

Re: Tomcat 4: segmentation fault/violation problems

The JDK for Solaris requires lots of O/S patches (Sun takes the Linux view, "if my application isn't working, patch the kernel" ;-). At a guess, I'd say that most of the Solaris problems are resulting from people too lazy to install the O/S patches when they try to install the JDK (despite the ve

Re: pageEncoding and Jasper

- Original Message - From: "Kevin Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:55 AM Subject: RE: pageEncoding and Jasper > > pageEncoding should be the encoding of the file containing > > the page, should not it? > >

Re: Apache/Tomcat/mod_jk growing TIME_WAIT counts

I've been running a nearly identical (except for the hardware) configuration for quite some time now without problems. I don't have enough information to give an answer, but if I had to guess, I'd say that your KeepAliveTimeout is set way too high. Some TIME_WAITs are just the cost of doing busi

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3.1.txt

> >Bugs to investigate & fix or resolve/leave as LATER: > +4600 Tomcat 3.3 redirect behavior differs from Tomcat 3.2 > + (try to make 301 or 302 configurable) > + > +4416 URI En/Decoding not working > + (investigate and fix if feasi

Re: Multiple URLs/Single IP

This is largely what NameVitualHost(s) are for in Apache. See: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#namevirtualhost - Original Message - From: "Micael Padraig Og mac Grene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 8:25 AM Subject: Multiple URLs/Sin

Re: Multiple URLs/Single IP

The underlying VirtualHost entries can then Include the directives to the Tomcat instance that handles that vhost. If you want one Tomcat, then you can use mod_rewrite (within the VirtualHost) to direct to the correct Context. - Original Message - From: "Micael Padraig Og mac Grene" <[EMA

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3.1.txt

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:36 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3.1.txt > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > > > >

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3.1.txt

>Issue Description >1 Must be able to compile and run under JDK 1.1.8 > + FIXED >2 Address Cactus failures running with Tomcat 3.3 > + Tried but not 100% successful yet. >From what little I've seen, I've never really understood

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6267] - RequestDispatcher breaks on URLs with anchors

Actually, Larry is right. However, what is being asked for is rather silly. Personally, I'd go for INVALID since section 8.1 (of the 2.3 spec) only talks about paths, not URIs. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:59 A

Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

I've found an XP machine to try this on, and can pretty much confirm that it is an un-read POST body. The print statements show that the bad test has (at the end): Content-Length: 11 Available:11 The servlet is finishing so fast that the body isn't even available by the time shutdownInput i

Re: Tomcat 3.3 - Cactus Issue

Tomcat to read the > body (using request.getParameter("xxx")) the problem will disappear ? Correct. Then Tomcat will read the body (blocking until it comes). > > Could it be because for this test case (testPostMethod) HTTP parameters > are sent both in the URL _and_ in t

Re: pageEncoding and Jasper

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:26 PM Subject: Re: pageEncoding and Jasper > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: pageEncoding and Jasper > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:49:39 -0800 (PST) >

Re: [4.0.2] [VOTE] Final release

> > [ ] +1 - I support this release and I will help > [X] +0 - I support this release > [ ] -0 - I do not support this release, because: > Actually, more like 0.4, since I'll help with ApacheConfig etc. > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-m

Re: header value too long - 400 error - is that good?

> > In that case tomcat generates HTTP 400. I checked in > the source code and it seems that the header value > size limit is set to 4K. > Could you please give more infromation about your setup. In particular, the version of Tomcat that you are using, and if applicable, the Connecter you are usi

Re: Jakarta 2001 PMC: Last chance for correction of voter list.

gt; Andy Armstrong andya > Andy Riedel ariedel > Arieh Markel arieh > Arnout Kuiper arnout > Arron Bates arron > Arun Jamwal arun > Arundhati Bhowmick aruna1 > asmuts asmuts > Juozas Baliuka baliuka > Henri Yandell bayard > Brendan Burns bburns > B. C. Holmes bcholmes &g

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/ajp/tomcat4 Ajp13Request.java

It's a trust issue. By default, 3.3 doesn't trust IIS's/Apache's authentication and will check it again. I agree that we should implement tomcatAuth in 4.0.3 if at all. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Seguin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Th

Re: BUG 5722 : Forward to page display a blank page

In fact, I'd almost 'fixed' this before going back and re-reading the servlet spec. I just can't find enough wiggle room in section 8.1 (of either 2.2 or 2.3) to allow this. If anyone else can find a way to interpret the spec differently, I'd be more than happy to change this for RC1. The diffe

Re: Web server integration / NameTrans stage

You probably want to start with org.apache.tomcat.modules.config.NSConfig (it's 3.3 name, I don't know where it lives in 4.0), and see what needs to be changed to go from NS->iPlanet. - Original Message - From: "Colin Wilson-Salt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday,

Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix

Personally, I agree with Justin and Costin that mod_jk should be able to use the uri field. Having said that, I'd like to point out that the mod_jk.c in j-t-c is flat-out broken. It doesn't handle the case where the '?' itself is encoded. Since this case is part of a currently popular attack on

Fw: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix

- Original Message - From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix > It is actually worse than that. TC3.3B1 (with the mod_jk that it ships

Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix

d by lines like: index.jsp - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix > On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Bill Barker wrote: > > > I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >