Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Tomcat 3.3 (final release)

2001-09-10 Thread Bill Barker
As I said on another post, I don't know of any major problems with 3.3. So were I allowed to vote, mine would be +0 since I won't have time to keep up with such a fast moving target. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:39

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-12 Thread Bill Barker
As I expected (having spent enough time on encoded URLs), I can't reproduce 1483 against B2. It always finds the correct session both in stand-alone and Ajp13. - Original Message - From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:31 AM

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-12 Thread Bill Barker
. Was it: 1482 Ignored session ids in encoded URLs Thanks, Larry -Original Message- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues As I expected (having

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-12 Thread Bill Barker
?) r-unparsed_uri to preserve encoding. Therefore, any mod_rewrite munging of r-uri is invisible to mod_jk. This is the issue to which Larry is referring, not Apache module ordering. Keith | -Original Message- | From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Wednesday, September

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-12 Thread Bill Barker
Shouldn't 461 be re-classified as a 4.0 issue? ServletRequest.setCharacterEncoding is a new feature of 2.3. - Original Message - From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:31 AM Subject: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Hi All, I have

Re: URI handling in tomcat 3.2.3

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
While 3.3 has this behavior as the default, it can be disabled in the config by: DecodeInterceptor safe=false / Since the release is scheduled to happen by the end of the month, you might consider jumping straight to 3.3. - Original Message - From: Lars Oppermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

[PATCH][ Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
Let's try that again. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:52 AM Subject: [DO NOT REPLY: Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO

Re: [PATCH][Bug 3581] New: Ctx() : Error creating validation mark - java.io.FileNotFoundException

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
with Linux that often, so I'm not sure of the cause. Would this be a have to run as root or some other permissions issue? Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
I interpreted #111 to be the graceful restart clean-up problem that was fixed some months ago. - Original Message - From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:13 PM Subject: RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues 7. Evaluate whether

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:06 PM Subject: RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Thanks. Do you know if just 3.3 was affected or 3.2.x as well? If you can give me a clue as to what was changed, I can try to determine this. Larry -Original Message- From: Bill

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-PLAN-3.3

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
At least with isTomcatAuth=false and mod_ssl configured properly, 274 should work now. I don't have a system configured to be able to test it (e.g. no user certs), but mod_ssl will set REMOTE_USER to the CN, and Ajp13 will allocate a SimplePrincipal to match the REMOTE_USER. - Original

Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

2001-09-13 Thread Bill Barker
Re. 7) Since there is only one facade per Request and only one Request per thread, you could avoid synchronized all together by having an instance of SimpleDateFormat in either the Request or the facade. That would just leave ServerCookie using DateTool, where the hit would be minimal. Just me

[PATCH] Make getDateHeader Thread-safe TC3.3B2

2001-09-14 Thread Bill Barker
These should satisfy Larry's item #7. I've simply added synchronized blocks to DateTool.formatOldCookie, since I'm fairly certain that there currently is no path to these functions (so it can't hurt anything). ** This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above

Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-25 Thread Bill Barker
This is now implemented automatically in the ApacheConfig module. By default it does: JkMount /myapp/* ajp13 Turning this off (via forwardAll=false), then it outputs all of the defined mappings (including j_security_check for form auth contexts). - Original Message - From: Bojan Smojver

Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
I don't get this with RC1. From tomcat-log with debugging enabled for Sessions and Decode: 2001-09-26 11:04:29 - DecodeInterceptor: Before /index.jsp%3bjsessionid=xx7xdv3ca1 2001-09-26 11:04:29 - DecodeInterceptor: After /index.jsp;jsessionid=xx7xdv3ca1 2001-09-26 11:04:29 - SessionId: Url

Re: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
Yes. - Original Message - From: Keith Wannamaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:57 AM Subject: RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI() Are you using mod_jk? | -Original Message- | From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent

[PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
While checking to see how mod_jk handled the ;jsessionid= in the URL, I was horrified to see how easily it would be to take control of the server with a relatively small buffer overflow. I'm not really an Apache person, so I'm certain that this can be improved on. ** This message is

Fw: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
Urm, let's try that again with a patch that at least compiles.. - Original Message - From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk While checking to see how mod_jk

Re: [PATCH] Potential buffer overflow attach in mod_jk

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
or jk_pool_strdup. That would be a better way to solve the problem. Apache modules should and do avoid os memory-allocation routines like the plague. I think uw_map-p would be ok, but please do some testing. Thanks, Keith | -Original Message- | From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-29 Thread Bill Barker
It seems that I must have been bad in a past life, since my Karma isn't high enough.:) I've added the code to re-encode the URL to DecodeInterceptor on my machine. If you want it right away, I can post a diff. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-30 Thread Bill Barker
there is zero hit for pages that don't ask for RequestURI). Currently, nobody uses unparsedURI, and it is arguably a protocol violation if a servlet serves different pages for equivalent URIs - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday

Re: Volunteers for: - RE: TC 3.3: getRequestURI()

2001-09-30 Thread Bill Barker
What I get for trying to do this on a computer without javac installed. Diff file with typos fixed and exceptions handled. - Original Message - From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 12

Re: SCRIPT_NAME and PATH_INFO with extension mapping

2001-09-30 Thread Bill Barker
Actually, Google is one of the few sites that do cache pages with query strings (try searching for tmwx if you don't believe me). - Original Message - From: Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: Re: SCRIPT_NAME and

Re: SCRIPT_NAME and PATH_INFO with extension mapping

2001-09-30 Thread Bill Barker
As much as my personal preference is the same as Jon and Costin, it seems that section 11.1 rule #3 explicitly dis-allows extension mappings to have a PATH_INFO. spec-quote If the last segment in URL path contains an extension (e.g .jsp) the servlet container will try to match a servlet that

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3851] - SingleThreadModel ignored

2001-09-30 Thread Bill Barker
While pooling was a very nice feature of JServe (which I have personally taken advantage of in the past), the operative word in the spec is may. The 3.x and 4.0 implementations are entirely within their rights within the spec to simply synchronize. In other words, this comes under the if it

[PATCH] [Bug 3905] New: - request.getIntputStream()/Reader.close() problem.

2001-10-01 Thread Bill Barker
Since I'm still low on the Karmic scale, I'll post this here. Basically, I simply implemented the close method in the facade so that it can continue to be recycled. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:32 AM Subject: DO NOT

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3961] - FactoryConfigurationError on Servlet+JSP+taglib

2001-10-04 Thread Bill Barker
I know that Costin has strong feeling on which Jaxp version we should ship with (I just don't remember what they are:). Does anyone else have an opinion? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:51 PM Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug

Bug 3961 [aka Jaxp version for 3.3]

2001-10-04 Thread Bill Barker
This still fails against HEAD. It's probably not serious enough to block the release Monday (since there is a very annoying work-around), but I personally would prefer to ship with this one CLOSED. However, I'm not a Jaxp expert, so if Nacho/Costin want to weigh in, I'd appreciate the help.

Re: [PATCH] SingleThreadModel Pool for TC 3.3

2001-10-05 Thread Bill Barker
I've looked at it, and will check it in after 3.3 goes final. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 6:07 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] SingleThreadModel Pool for TC 3.3 Thanks David. I don't like STM, but since it's part of the

Re: [VOTE] New Committer

2001-10-18 Thread Bill Barker
+1 - Original Message - From: Christopher Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:02 PM Subject: [VOTE] New Committer I would like to nominate Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] for committer status. His recent contributions include several

Re: [PATCH] SingleThreadModel Pool for TC 3.3

2001-10-27 Thread Bill Barker
As promised, I've just checked this in. I've modified the original patch slightly so that the configuration can be set as options to Servlet22Interceptor. I've also added an option to disable pooling so that we don't get flooded with why doesn't my CounterServlet work anymore messages.

Re: t3 and sun.com

2001-10-27 Thread Bill Barker
Yeah, well, but the're not really involved with the 3.3 branch. - Original Message - From: Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:07 PM Subject: RE: t3 and sun.com They have slow reflexes??? Hey, but aren't some guys from Sun working

Re: Welcome to the Tomcat 4.0 F.A.Q. on-line forum.

2001-10-31 Thread Bill Barker
I know that Jon has already pointed out that Sun is going to sue the 3.x branch out of Jakarta in five months, but is there any chance of setting this up in the mean time for 3.x? - Original Message - From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED];

Re: How does Tomcat handle discarded-request

2001-11-01 Thread Bill Barker
This depends on the version of Tomcat, and to some extent whether you are running Tomcat behind another web server. - Original Message - From: Hu, Xuebing [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: How does Tomcat handle discarded-request

Re: How does Tomcat handle discarded-request

2001-11-01 Thread Bill Barker
Generally with 3.2.x it will throw there, but it may throw later due to buffering. And since the browser has closed the connection, no you can't send/receive anything further. Of course, there is nothing to prevent you inclosing your code in a try {} finally {} block if workBean needs to do

Re: Tomcat to support other keystore types?

2001-11-01 Thread Bill Barker
This is probably outside of the development plans for 3.2.x. I'm +1 for supporting this in 3.3.1 I'm going to let the 4.0 people answer for themselves (e.g. I'm +0). - Original Message - From: Meren, Libby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:30 PM

Re: Question on JServ - High Priority

2001-11-02 Thread Bill Barker
At http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/ there are documentation links on the left side of the page. Select the version you are using. In the future, questions like this should be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Samatha Sajja [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gdb gets SIGSEGV from JVM when running Tomcat 4.0 (Redhat 6.2, JDK 1.3.1_01)

2001-11-02 Thread Bill Barker
Wot?, you passed up your chance to experiance an W2K and XP coaster? - Original Message - From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:00 PM Subject: Re: gdb gets SIGSEGV from JVM when running Tomcat 4.0 (Redhat 6.2,

Re: Ajp14 and Ajp13

2001-11-15 Thread Bill Barker
I'm in favor of this, since the protocol is only being extended, not really changed. However, I think that one of the extensions that should be implemented early on is a version negotiation so that the newer side can gracefully degrade in the future without having to rely on the user changing

Re: Portable SSL Support

2001-11-16 Thread Bill Barker
In j-t-c I could see putting in RequestBase. However, since connector development (with the possible exception of Http10Interceptor, which isn't in j-t-c) is frozen in 3.3, I can't really see modifying Request. - Original Message - From: Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat

Re: Portable SSL Support

2001-11-16 Thread Bill Barker
+1 - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; EKR [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:53 PM Subject: Re: Portable SSL Support On 16 Nov 2001, Eric Rescorla wrote: William Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was

Re: TC 3.3, Production Quality

2001-11-16 Thread Bill Barker
No objection here. - Original Message - From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:44 PM Subject: TC 3.3, Production Quality I've noticed that on the main TC page of Jakarta site, TC 3.2.x is still listed as production quality

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs index.xml

2001-11-18 Thread Bill Barker
You forgot to remove the is in beta testing from the 3.3 description. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 5:49 PM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs index.xml bojan 01/11/18 17:49:33 Modified:xdocs

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs index.xml

2001-11-18 Thread Bill Barker
of described releases is changed? In other words, Tomcat 3.3/4.0 first and then others. Bojan Bill Barker wrote: You forgot to remove the is in beta testing from the 3.3 description. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 5:49

Re: [VOTE] Change the order of releases mentioned on the TC web page

2001-11-18 Thread Bill Barker
[X] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support it. [ ] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be able support it. [ ] -0. I don't agree with the proposal but I won't stop it. [ ] -1. I disagree with the proposal and will explain my reasons. Bojan -- To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Michael Smith

2001-11-19 Thread Bill Barker
+1 - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:29 AM Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Michael Smith Hi, I'd like to nominate Michael Smith [msmith at apache.org] as a committer on the

Re: TC 3.3: For Servlets only

2001-11-22 Thread Bill Barker
Commenting out JspInterceptor effectively removes JSP support. Now you either need to define a *.jsp mapping in your web.xml, or hack WebXmlReader (line 67 of Final) so that it doesn't add a default *.jsp mapping. - Original Message - From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Dev

Re: Info on customizing jspc - jasper

2001-11-27 Thread Bill Barker
This is off-topic for the dev list. You'll probably get a better response from [EMAIL PROTECTED] What you want is @page extends=my.jsp.page.class % - Original Message - From: Alberto Romei [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:32 AM Subject: Info on

Re: [PATCH] jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin

2001-11-27 Thread Bill Barker
I don't like to step on 4.x toes, or I'd do it my self. But isn't it time to change the subject to [VOTE] and make Jazmin a committer? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:04 PM Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 Release Plan

2001-11-27 Thread Bill Barker
[ ] +1: I approve this plan, and I'll help [X] +0: I approve this plan [ ] -0: I'm against this plan, but I won't veto it [ ] -1: I'm against this plan, and my reason is: /ballot Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: http protocol version question

2001-11-28 Thread Bill Barker
These types of questions are better addressed at [EMAIL PROTECTED] The short answer is that Tomcat 3.x currently supports only the 1.0 protocol. Tomcat 4.x also supports the 1.1. protocol. - Original Message - From: yuexiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] New Committer: Jazmin Jonson

2001-11-28 Thread Bill Barker
+1 - Original Message - From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:04 AM Subject: [VOTE] New Committer: Jazmin Jonson As Bill Barker suggested, I would like to propose Jazmin Jonson as a new committer. She has contributed

Re: TC 3.3: For Servlets only

2001-11-28 Thread Bill Barker
] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Bill Barker' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:06 PM Subject: RE: TC 3.3: For Servlets only This calls for adding some kind of attribute noJsp=false in WebXmlReader interceptor to not add *.jsp to every context.. Saludos

Re: [PATCH] TC 3.3 WebXmlReader.java

2001-11-28 Thread Bill Barker
Since I had the file open anyway, I've gone ahead and put this one in as well. - Original Message - From: Schreibman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:27 AM Subject: RE: [PATCH] TC 3.3 WebXmlReader.java Ouch! Here

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java

2001-11-29 Thread Bill Barker
You can't return true always, since the spec (section 8.4.2) says that any value for jsp_precompile other than none, true, or false will return error code 500. - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November

Re: AJP Todo

2001-12-01 Thread Bill Barker
I have no objection to help porting ${Server}Config to 4.x, but I'm still a Catalina novice. The 3.3 API is more command and control, so it is easier to get to the information. It will take me a little time to find out how to get the servlet-mappings in Catalina. - Original Message -

Re: getPathInfo problem

2001-12-05 Thread Bill Barker
A JSP page (that is using the default *.jsp mapping) can't have PathInfo (section 10.1 of the 2.2 spec, or 11.1 of the 2.3 spec). If PathInfo == null, then IMHO, then Tomcat cannot determine a valid file path, and so must return null from getPathTranslated (section 5.5, resp section 4.5).

Re: Configuration(1)

2001-12-06 Thread Bill Barker
I'm too over-committed to projects right now to give more than +0, but it is a very enthusiastic one :). I have cases where I want some contexts to have different mapping options from others, and it is a nightmare to maintain. I'm guessing that the context name is one of the entries in

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

2001-12-06 Thread Bill Barker
Since no one else responded, I've gone ahead and checked in Eric's changes. I haven't actually tried to build against PureTLS, but I assume that Eric has. If I've missed anything in this commit, please let me know and I'll try and include it asap. - Original Message - From: Eric Rescorla

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

2001-12-06 Thread Bill Barker
also be a nice feature. - Original Message - From: Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:52 PM Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since no one else responded

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

2001-12-07 Thread Bill Barker
The Ajp13 spec? :) - Original Message - From: Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 6:59 AM Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Vote] New committer: Eric Rescorla

2001-12-07 Thread Bill Barker
+1 - Original Message - From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:11 AM Subject: [Vote] New committer: Eric Rescorla As you may know, Eric Rescorla is one the few specialists in SSL in the world, author of one of

Re: [VOTE] New Watchdog Committer: Ryan Lubke

2001-12-07 Thread Bill Barker
+1 - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:08 AM Subject: [VOTE] New Watchdog Committer: Ryan Lubke NOTE: I'm posting this here because Watchdog was originally contributed to Apache along with Tomcat,

Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support

2001-12-07 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; EKR [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:43 PM Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support It compiles with or without JSSE, and runs fine without an SSL

Double check idiom broken - Tomcat uses it ?

2001-12-06 Thread Bill Barker
I'm cross-posting since this started on the user list. In Tomcat 3.3, JspServlet is largely deprecated (even if not yet @deprecated). It is only still included in case some 3.2.x user really needs it for something. It is much more likely to be removed in a future release than fixed. That

Re: AJP Todo

2001-12-09 Thread Bill Barker
to a war file). - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 4:17 PM Subject: Re: AJP Todo On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Bill Barker wrote: Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 17:17:31 -0800 From: Bill Barker

Re: AJP Todo

2001-12-09 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:29 PM Subject: Re: AJP Todo If the web app is deployed as a directory, you can call context.getDocBase() for this. If the context is

Re: [j-t-c] ajp and headaches

2001-12-10 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:56 PM Subject: Re: [j-t-c] ajp and headaches The tomcat4.0 adapter - yes. The connector code ( low level Request, etc ) are based on MessageBytes, etc. It needs

Re: AJP Todo

2001-12-10 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Incze Lajos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:02 AM Subject: Re: AJP Todo What's wrong with this? (ServletContext method javadoc both 2.2 and 2.3) Absolutely nothing. And indeed this is the

Re: AJP Todo

2001-12-10 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:59 PM Subject: Re: AJP Todo On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Bill Barker wrote: Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:00:35 -0800 From: Bill Barker [EMAIL

Re: error handling and method signatures

2001-12-12 Thread Bill Barker
If you are talking about status codes, I'm -1. That should be passed through from Tomcat without change. If Tomcat hangs up, then there is almost no useful information available, so there isn't much to report. If the client hangs up, then like jk1, we should just stop processing and return OK

Re: org.apache.tomcat.util.net package in tomcat 3.x

2001-12-13 Thread Bill Barker
I'm +1 on the move. However I think that we should hold off on removing it from 3.3 just yet, and just agree to freeze development there. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 6:49 AM Subject: Re:

Re: Jk2: error handling and method signatures

2001-12-13 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:28 PM Subject: Re: Jk2: error handling and method signatures So far I have a -1, if Bill doesn't change his vote we'll keep the current mechanism. But if we

Re: AJP Todo

2001-12-13 Thread Bill Barker
The ${Server}Config files are about as good as I can get them. Any remaining improvements would require someone that knows more about Catalina than I do. The main improvement that I can think of would require an API change in Catalina, but this configuration method will likely be obsolete by

Re: bugzilla issue status change..

2001-12-14 Thread Bill Barker
I agree. And don't be overly concerned with making a mistake and closing a report prematurely, since a developer could always reopen it. And the person reporting it will almost certainly reopen it :). Thanks for your offer to help! Costin Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Tomcat 3.3 deployment - last minute problem

2001-12-18 Thread Bill Barker
The only thing that I can think of is that your javac doesn't support the -encoding switch. Is it possible that you have an old copy of tools.jar somewhere? Jasper writes out the .java file in UTF8 encoding, which is then passed to javac to compile to a .class. If javac is trying to read the

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util JavaGeneratorTool.java

2001-12-18 Thread Bill Barker
Oh, well, I guess I had to screw up eventually :-( Thanks for cleaning up my mess. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:39 PM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util JavaGeneratorTool.java

Re: Load balancing - fail-over support with mod_webapp

2001-12-18 Thread Bill Barker
I'm going to ignore the complete problem case where you have configured Apache to be the default servlet, and index.html is a frameset with 'n' jsp frames (which will typically result in 'n' different sessions). This is why mod_webapp only supports forwardAll, and forwardAll is the default for

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util J avaGeneratorTool.java

2001-12-19 Thread Bill Barker
- From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:09 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util JavaGeneratorTool.java Oh, well, I guess I had to screw up eventually

Re: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1

2001-12-19 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:25 AM Subject: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0.2 beta 1 ballot [X ] +1: Make the release [ ] -1: I'm opposed to the release until the following issues are fixed: /ballot

Re: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5390

2001-12-25 Thread Bill Barker
the inclusion/exclusion of Http10Interceptor can make any difference either. I'm including the developer list in the reply, in the hopes that someone else can spot what I'm missing. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 24

Re: Ajp13 wrong Response

2001-06-29 Thread Bill Barker
I've seen it, but couldn't track it down. I haven't seen it come back in M4, but haven't been testing M4 long either. - Original Message - From: Angel Aray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Ajp13 wrong Response I am

Re: Ajp13 wrong Response

2001-07-02 Thread Bill Barker
I take back my previous post. This is still happening in M4 (and I'm still clueless why). - Original Message - From: Angel Aray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Ajp13 wrong Response I am having a problem which is very

Re: Web server integration / NameTrans stage

2001-08-09 Thread Bill Barker
You probably want to start with org.apache.tomcat.modules.config.NSConfig (it's 3.3 name, I don't know where it lives in 4.0), and see what needs to be changed to go from NS-iPlanet. - Original Message - From: Colin Wilson-Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix

2001-08-15 Thread Bill Barker
Personally, I agree with Justin and Costin that mod_jk should be able to use the uri field. Having said that, I'd like to point out that the mod_jk.c in j-t-c is flat-out broken. It doesn't handle the case where the '?' itself is encoded. Since this case is part of a currently popular attack

Fw: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix

2001-08-15 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix It is actually worse than that. TC3.3B1 (with the mod_jk that it ships with, I haven't tried j-t-c yet

Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix

2001-08-15 Thread Bill Barker
/path/to/ROOT/h1 followed by lines like: img align=middle src=doc:/lib/images/ftp/file.gif width=32 height=32a href=index.jspindex.jsp/abr - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH

Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix

2001-08-15 Thread Bill Barker
1.3.17 (with negotiation_module removed to prevent that problem). - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [TC3.2.3][PATCH] mod_jk / mod_rewrite bug fix Apache2.0 + mod_jk

randomFile in SessionIdGenerator TC3.3B1

2001-08-16 Thread Bill Barker
I just lost half an hour of my life trying to set up TC3.3B1 on a Windows box because I forgot to remove the randomFile attribute on SessionIdGenerator. For the benefit of us under-priviledged people who have to live on systems like Windows and Solaris, could this attribute please be moved

Re: Session creation and destruction - Tomcat 3.3.

2001-08-17 Thread Bill Barker
The default checkInterval for org.apache.modules.session.SessionExpirer is 60 seconds. That means that on average, you can expect it to take 30 seconds before it looks. - Original Message - From: Prasanna Uppaladadium [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001

Re: Patch to bug #345 complete ?

2001-08-20 Thread Bill Barker
It looks like 3.3B1 already handles 304 (o.a.tomcat.modules.generators.StaticInterceptor). However, I haven't actually tested it (static files handled by Apache). - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:13 AM

[BUG] TC3.3B1 ignores transport-guarantee in web.xml

2001-08-20 Thread Bill Barker
It seems that everybody is delegating the checking of transport-guarantee to somebody else, and as a result it is never checked. Fortunately, this is easy to reproduce: 1) add a user-data-constrainttransport-guaranteeCONFIDENTIAL/transport-guarantee /user-data-constraint to the

Re: custom 404s from a servlet ?

2001-08-20 Thread Bill Barker
I'm sure that other people are going to flame this thread as off-topic, but the answer is to call response.sendError(HttpServletResponse.SC_NOT_FOUND,someweirdlink doesn't exist); return; - Original Message - From: yhs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 20,

Re: [PATCH] Potential security problem with '?' in jsp file name TC3.3B1

2001-08-22 Thread Bill Barker
I've confirmed that this also happens with TC3.3B1 stand-alone: $ telnet localhost 8080 GET /%3f%41%3d%42.jsp HTTP/1.0 insert directory listing here - Original Message - From: William Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:48 PM Subject:

Re: Configuring Jaspers Compiler Options

2002-01-04 Thread Bill Barker
Tomcat 3.3 (which it seems is the version you are using) doesn't pass the -encoding flag to Jikes (which is causing other headaches on the user list :). At the moment, there is no way to suppress the -encoding flag being passed to javac. The only work around at the moment is to use Jikes (or

Fw: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5390

2002-01-04 Thread Bill Barker
I was never really involved in the 3.2.x development, so I'm sending back to the list to try and get ideas on how to get 3.3 to act more like 3.2.x in the deprecated case. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:39 PM

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5724] - Error page not displaying

2002-01-07 Thread Bill Barker
Tomcat 3.3 looks like it has the same problem, only worse (since it will fail a static jsp:include that lives in WEB-INF). However, the check isn't really needed in 3.3, since if the request came from the user AccessInterceptor would have already failed it. If nobody objects, I'll remove the

Re: TC 3.3.3 with Apache stack space error

2002-01-07 Thread Bill Barker
There is a problem with 3.3.1 prior to about 12/31 (reported as bug 5390, reopened) that could be this one. I'm in the process of moving the StreamHandlerFactory into a module (where it really belongs), but haven't finished testing it yet. - Original Message - From: Ray Pitmon [EMAIL

Re: Possible Explanation - Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5684] - WEB-INF/lib jar file loading and operations problems.

2002-01-07 Thread Bill Barker
I don't see any problem with adding an option to LoaderInterceptor11 to force it to use a SimpleClassLoader (the descendent of AdaptiveClassLoader) even on a Java2 platform. There are some trade-offs, since SimpleClassLoader is really meant for Java1.1 platforms, but for a lot of people they

Re: Todo list for 4.0.2 b2

2002-01-07 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: Todo list for 4.0.2 b2 Hi, Here goes the list: - Tag the JK + util directories in j-t-c with some tag (Costin proposed jk_14) - Build the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >