You can have the servers on different machines. Look more on mod_jk2
configuration.
As I know, mod_jk2 project is no longer maintained so it's better to switch to
mod_jk.
Viorel Dragomir
.
..
---
- Original Message -
Try ...
In the workers2.properties
Change
host=ipaddressoftheremotemachine
Regards
Guru
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 August 2005 14:17
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Apache and Tomcat on separate hosts?
I finally got
As I know, mod_jk2 project is no longer maintained so it's better to switch
to mod_jk.
With our java apps, mod_jk has an issue that causes apache to crash every 3-4
days. mod_jk2 does not, so it's doubtful we will be changing.
Jeff Schroeder
Web Administrator
Comair, Inc.
Hello guys,
Could you please give me the steps to making mod_jk for tomcat?
Regards
Raj
On 7/5/05, Alan Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ganesan malairaja writes:
hi guys ..
i am confused now.. i need help undeerstanding apache and tomcat ..
what purpose each serve and
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 08:25, Rajasekar wrote:
Hello guys,
Could you please give me the steps to making mod_jk for tomcat?
Regards
Raj
mod_jk is an apache module. I am running apache2 and tomcat4 on linux and I
downloaded the binary module from
ganesan malairaja writes:
hi guys ..
i am confused now.. i need help undeerstanding apache and tomcat ..
what purpose each serve and how to link both them ...
Apache is a web server - with lots of usage and good experience with in
terms of security facing the internet. You can get
Sounds like some sort of memory/trash collector
thrashing. Do you have enough memory? Does it run
slowly when you run just static web pages and not your
app? It could be some funky code in your app.
--- Lars Nielsen Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I am using Apache 2.0.54 and
-
From: Mark Winslow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4. juli 2005 14:46
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache Jakarta-Tomcat using very slow
Sounds like some sort of memory/trash collector
thrashing. Do you have enough memory? Does it run
slowly when you run just static web pages and not your
Users List
Subject: Re: Apache Jakarta-Tomcat using very slow
Sounds like some sort of memory/trash collector
thrashing. Do you have enough memory? Does it run
slowly when you run just static web pages and not your
app? It could be some funky code in your app.
--- Lars Nielsen Lind [EMAIL
I used these in reference to Tomcat 5.0.28 and Apache 2. Maybe they will
send you in the right direction.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/install.html#page-header Build apache,
compile, install etc..
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/11/20/tomcat.html?page=1
configuration extras.
I won't argue with no. 1 since I don't use SSL connectors in Tomcat.
However, no. 2 can be mitigated with the commons-daemon project among
other tricks and IMHO, not a valid argument against having Tomcat out front.
Just my thoughts on the subject. :-)
-David
Mark wrote:
I was very interested
On 5/19/05, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was very interested in the discussion concerning Apache vs Tomcat
WRT Performance. While I cannot argue with the performance numbers, I
do like putting Apache in front of Tomcat for 2 reasons that I have
found so far.
1. SSL. If I am going to be
I don't know about others, but I prefer to run tomcat on port 8080 and
then setup the router to redirect port 80 to 8080. it's rather easy to
setup these days.
peter
On 5/19/05, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/05, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was very interested in the
OK, so I will admit that I am out of the loop with regards to #2. But
I still have an issue with storing and passwords required to open key
files in the clear. Is there some function that will handle this for
me...
On 5/19/05, Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about others, but
Mark wrote:
OK, so I will admit that I am out of the loop with regards to #2. But
I still have an issue with storing and passwords required to open key
files in the clear. Is there some function that will handle this for
me...
Assuming that the file is sensibly protected with OS security if an
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Mark wrote:
I was very interested in the discussion concerning Apache vs Tomcat
WRT Performance. While I cannot argue with the performance numbers, I
do like putting Apache in front of Tomcat for 2 reasons that I have
found so far.
1. SSL. If I am going to be serving
David Smith wrote:
I won't argue with no. 1 since I don't use SSL connectors in Tomcat.
However, no. 2 can be mitigated with the commons-daemon project among
other tricks and IMHO, not a valid argument against having Tomcat out front.
Just my thoughts on the subject. :-)
I'll just add to the
Hi,
not sure I understand your question (twice a time?). If you are
wondering if you can have them both running at the same time the answer
is yes. To have Tomcat and Apache work together you need mod_jk or
mod_proxy.
mod_jk can be found here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/
Torsdag den 7. april 2005 01:36 skrev jesper:
I made a brief how-to on SUBJECT.
I guess an url would be usefull to
http://zvf.dk/how-to/index.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Try the virtual host directive in httpd...
I think you can do something there
Though I will be implementing the same tomorrow :)
Regards
Vaneet
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Wiggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:59 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Geoff Wiggs wrote:
I have a 'newbie' jk2 / Tomcat question.
I am running Tomcat behind Apache with mod_jk2 interfacing the two.
snip
Just so you are aware, jk2 is deprecated in favor of jk. As of version
1.2.10 of jk, most useful features in jk2 should be in jk.
See
Probably there is a problem in source, perheps try use transparent porxy to get
apache and tomcat working together and check result
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:38:27 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a new user of this stuff - except AIX. With the default installs , I
can get to both Apache
Thanks for you're help but I still can't get it working yet. I downloaded and
compiled j2k and I think at this point it is a properties configuration issue,
but I'm not sure.
This is the line I added to http.conf
LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so
From the apache error log,
[Thu Nov 18
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:23:14AM -0500, Peter O'Reilly wrote:
: I can browse my website, www.123.com, but when I click a button the servlet
I need to execute doesn't and I get a Apache error. I know its a connector
issue because I can browse www.123.com:8080/mydir and get to the site, click
Her goes,
It's JK2
1 My httt.conf has this line,
LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so
2 In the same directory as the http.conf file above i have
workers2.properties with the following entries,
*STARRT WORKERS.PROPERTIES ***
[logger]
Ah im in the same boat as you. Though I can get one site working well with
mod_jk2 but multiple instances are not working unless I map all extensions
using uri in workers2.properties.
How many instances are your running? 1 or multiple? dealing with one is
very easy.
John
Running Red Hat Fed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many instances are your running? 1 or multiple? dealing with one is
very easy.
If by instances, do you mean root processes- then 1 of each.
I am running multiple connector threads for httpd and java, but
everything is running on the same machine.
This should be a
Hello,
I meant multiple tomcats running on different ports on the same machine.
Im currently working on getting this working since ive gone too far to
turn back to mod_jk.
Also - I hear rumor (may be true) that mod_jk2 is no longer in dev and
focus is on pulling features from mod_jk2 to mod_jk.
Ive also read somewhere that mod_jk2 isnt suitable for multiple jvm hosting.
mod_jk2 is so devious, it isn't suitable for torturing your worst enemy.
I don't want too much of my geekdom to show, but this bad boy is
going to be one of the horrendous programs uploaded to the Monolith in
3001
QM,
I would like to see an article that will covers the mod_jk connector. The link you
posted only uses the HttpConnector.
nyhgan
QM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the OP: if you're upgrading from Tomcat v4 - v5, feel free to take a
gander at this:
But the real problem is the versions no the combination between tomcat
a apache
I install tomcat 4 and apache 1.3.x - and tomcat 3... and tomcat 4 and
apache 2...
but tomcat 5 - and apache 1.3.29.
I had a problem with ajp13Connector appear in the tomcat 5's API
but no
1) Complete sentences and a full description would be nice. I don't
know about anyone else on this list, but you aren't giving me enough to
know what's going on with your system.
2) What exactly are you looking for? I have Apache 2.0.48, Tomcat
5.0.25 (5.0.27 is on my list of todo's), and
1) there were other messages ... ;)
2)
Operative System: Debian
Apache : 1.3.29
Tomcat: 5.0.27
mod_jk: 1.2.x
I had installed the binaries and tomcat haven´t the ajp13Connector
now a try to install the sources
At 07.48 12/8/04, you wrote:
1) Complete sentences and a full description would be
Have you tried defining a connector in your server.xml like this:
Connector port=8009
address=192.168.38.247
enableLookups=false
redirectPort=8443
debug=0
protocol=AJP/1.3 /
Note the protocol spec in the last attribute. This
To the OP: if you're upgrading from Tomcat v4 - v5, feel free to take a
gander at this:
http://www.brandxdev.net/misc/tomcat_upgrade.site
It's a little raw, but covers the Connector issue (among others).
-QM
--
software -- http://www.brandxdev.net
tech news --
Hola,
Perhaps one of the links here would be useful?
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/Tomcat/Links
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: César Martínez Cabanas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
I have the same problem.
Apache 1.3 - mod_jk2 - tomcat 5.0.25
Everthing works fine but I don't want to configure every webapplication
in the workers2.properties. URL's like
http:/xxx.xxx.xxx/javawebapps/webapp1/
http:/xxx.xxx.xxx/javawebapps/webapp2/
...
hi,
I have to correct one line:
...
Host name=xxx.xxx.xxx/javawebapps debug=0 appBase=javawebapps
...
Regards
Oliver Nautsch
Oliver Nautsch wrote:
hi,
I have the same problem.
Apache 1.3 - mod_jk2 - tomcat 5.0.25
Everthing works fine but I don't want to configure every webapplication
in the
Exactly. I have been on this user list for months and I still haven't seen anyone
solve the mod_jk connector issue for apache and tomcat 4.1.x or above. Now, I switch
back to use Tomcat3.3 instead because it runs more stable than tomcat4.x and 5.x
We can't wait forever like this. Maybe
Before you restart, what sort of forensics do you do? e.g.
- check whether the Tomcat process really is unavailable
- check network connectivity between Apache/Tomcat
- check limits on the Tomcat and Apache processes, such as number
of open sockets
My tomcat process is ruunig, I can access
: Daniel Gibby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:28 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: apache, mod_jk, tomcat hungs
All I can say is you are not alone. Requests of our sort never seem to
be answered, and we've been asking them for months.
Actually, by being answered I'm
All I can say is you are not alone. Requests of our sort never seem to
be answered, and we've been asking them for months.
Actually, by being answered I'm not saying that people don't post
replies, I just mean that I don't know of anyone who has fixed this
issue on their system.
It sure sounds
Thank for being in te same boat ...
Do you mean restarting nightly could help getting less of these locks ?
Kind regards
Beat De Martin
Switzerland
All I can say is you are not alone. Requests of our sort never seem to
be answered, and we've been asking them for months.
Actually, by being
Well, I just started restarting nightly last night. My lockups have been
happening less often than that, so I'm guessing that this will prevent
further lockups, unless my site usage goes up significantly.
Daniel
Beat De Martin wrote:
Thank for being in te same boat ...
Do you mean restarting
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:26:47PM +0200, Beat De Martin wrote:
: I'm using Tomcat 3.3.1, Apache 1.3.27 and mod_jk 1.2.4.
^
Do you have a test system on which you can try out Tomcat 4.1 or 5?
Even if you've found a legit Tomcat 3.x bug, IIRC that product is not
under active
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:42:18AM -0400, Myles Moutoux wrote:
: Does anyone know where the connectors for
: other linux platforms are located? Does anyone have a functional
: configuration that I could use as an example.
Have you checked the archives yet?
I'm pretty sure this has been
Howdy,
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/Tomcat_2fLinks
including http://www.connecties.com/cymulacrum/tomcat5/book1.html.
Maybe one of these days users will research before ranting. One can
only hope...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Myles
QM wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:42:18AM -0400, Myles Moutoux wrote:
: Does anyone know where the connectors for
: other linux platforms are located? Does anyone have a functional
: configuration that I could use as an example.
Have you checked the archives yet?
I'm pretty sure this has
Compile the jk2 source yourself. Binaries available for linux do not seem
to work for most folks. The source is easy to compile.
Drew
-Original Message-
From: Myles Moutoux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 11:08 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache 2
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:08:26AM -0400, Myles Moutoux wrote:
: I have checked the archives and there is nothing for tomcat 5, which is
: supposed to be the newest release. I have also seen quite a few of the
: post, but, again they all refer to prior versions and I've tried using
: the
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 16:08, Myles Moutoux wrote:
I have checked the archives and there is nothing for tomcat 5, which is
supposed to be the newest release. I have also seen quite a few of the
I agree that tomcat5 + mod_jk2 documentation is very lacking, yes,
there's discussions on the
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.0
/src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.0-src.tar.gz
- untar it
- go to jk/native directory
- use configure :
./configure --with-apxs=/your/path/to/apache2/apxs
- make the stuff
make
- copy the mod_jk.so to
]To: Tomcat Users
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: apache 1.3
tomcat 5.0.19 03/17/2004 04:59
PM
Please respond
:
Subject: RE: apache 1.3
tomcat 5.0.19 03/17/2004 04:59
PM
Please respond to
Tomcat Users
List
Shapira,
I have a question!
If I use Tomcat5 standalone in production, do I still need to configure
the mod_jk
:
Subject: RE: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19
03/17/2004 04:59
--
4.1.301.3.29 mod_jk 40.59
I didn't compile mod_jk2 with 1.3.29, but would guess that would be
the recommended method if you are needing to use apache 1.3.29 and
tomcat 5.0.
-walter
From: Emerson Cargnin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19
Date: Wed
Thanks Filip. I only found the thread of mails starting March 17 with
the title Horrible memory leak in tomcat 5.0.19 If this is indeed
the mails you advised me to look at, here is what I found out:
Our setup differs in a way that we are using mod_jk 1.2.5 instead of
2.0.2. So mod_jk
there was an earlier email about a mem leak in the connector for mod_jk,
please go through the last weeks emails and let us know what you find out.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Asim Alp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 7:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject:
Mine worked fine when I tried it.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:48 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19
a second question: may I use the same mod_jk.so I used with tomcat 3.2.3
any answer to this question
Emerson Cargnin wrote:
my question is: does tomcat 5 have automatic generation of
mod_jk.conf and if does, is it the same of 3.2.3?
Emerson Cargnin wrote:
for the first question, any answer? :)
Hi all
I'm migrating a tomcat 3.2.3 isntallation to version
a second question: may I use the same mod_jk.so I used with tomcat 3.2.3??
Emerson Cargnin wrote:
any answer to this question
Emerson Cargnin wrote:
my question is: does tomcat 5 have automatic generation of
mod_jk.conf and if does, is it the same of 3.2.3?
Emerson Cargnin wrote:
for
Emerson,
a second question: may I use the same mod_jk.so I used with tomcat 3.2.3??
The configuration of mod_jk is independent of the Tomcat version. As
long as the version of Tomcat that you are using supports mod_jk (really
ajp13), you can use mod_jk with it (including any existing
I have a complementary question, taht I know that i have being asked
before, but didn't find any answer, it's related to my previous question:
- Tomcat 5 can be used directly (in production) without apache??? For
serving static pages and images??? I mean, there are anybody using it
direct in
Message-
From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:16 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19
I have a complementary question, taht I know that i have being asked
before, but didn't find any answer, it's related to my previous
question
for the first question, any answer? :)
Hi all
I'm migrating a tomcat 3.2.3 isntallation to version 5.
When using 3.2.3, I used to use automatic mod_jk.conf-auto generation
for use by apache. Does version 5 has the same feature? Or do I have
to configure it by hand?? any how-to?? It's not
my question is: does tomcat 5 have automatic generation of
mod_jk.conf and if does, is it the same of 3.2.3?
Emerson Cargnin wrote:
for the first question, any answer? :)
Hi all
I'm migrating a tomcat 3.2.3 isntallation to version 5.
When using 3.2.3, I used to use automatic
Message-
From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:16 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19
I have a complementary question, taht I know that i have being asked
before, but didn't find any answer, it's related to my previous
question
Nope,
you only need jk or jk2 if you are using another webserver as a front-end to
Tomcat.
Adrian Lanning
- Original Message -
From: Galam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 5:59 PM
Subject: RE: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19
Shapira
:
Subject: RE: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19
03/17/2004 04:59
,
etc.). If you are going to use tomcat as a stanalone sever you don't
need to connect to apache.
Short answer = no.
Randy Harrison
Developer, eWatch Services
PR Newswire
612 243-0601 x1120
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Galam
cc:
Subject: RE: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19
03/17/2004 04:59
PM
Please
Dean,
I want apache to handle static content
and tomcat to handle servlet related
stuff (jsp, etc). I am wondering how
to specify that in httpd.conf. If I set
DocumentRoot to /home/mywebsite/webapps/ROOT/
that will work for http://mywebsite.com/ but
it will not find myapp. If I set it to
At 09:18 AM 2/10/2004, Brent Parker wrote:
My Config: Redhat 9, Apache 2.0.47, mod_jk 1.2.6, Tomcat 4.1.29
It takes a second request (to port 80) to get a jsp or servlet output to
display in the browser: I type in the url (jsp or servlet) and hit Enter,
the browser (Mozilla and IE) spins
Not sure what you're asking ...
-Original Message-
From: Enrique Herrera Noya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 9:12 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2
Filip Hanik (lists) wrote:
downgrade to 4.1.27that should
If you have Apache/Tomcat running as a single instance or context, but not
Apache as a stand alone, can you still use httpd.conf and .htaccess to
tweak settings. The problem I am having is that I have a servlet that
will not run on Netscape (doesn't matter what version). It's just
treating it
downgrade to 4.1.27that should solve it :)
Filip
-Original Message-
From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:37 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: Apache 2.0.48 + Tomcat 4.1.29 + Mod_jk2
Does anyone have Tomcat 4.1.29 running in-process with
Filip Hanik (lists) wrote:
downgrade to 4.1.27that should solve it :)
what???
with 4.1.29 not found ?
and with 4.1.27 found?
thank you
Enrique
P.S. i apology for my spanglish
Filip
-Original Message-
From: David Short [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:37
I, too, am having difficulty getting Apache 2.0.48 to load Tomcat 4.1.29
in-process. Apache installed and runs just fine, Tomcat installed and runs
just fine on it's own (I can access the examples JSPs and servlets, etc.)
and I'm using the latest mod_jk2.dll (in the Apache2\modules directory). I
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/
Any where it say tomcat 4.1 (its probbaly the same for 5)
-Tim
John Bell wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a how-to please.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Thanks a lot!!!
Davide Gurgone!
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/
Any where it say tomcat 4.1 (its probbaly the same for 5)
-Tim
John Bell wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a how-to please.
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi,
Can anyone point me to a how-to please.
Regards,
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 9:19 am -0500 2003/11/19, Carlton Ellis wrote:
Trying to setup a development environment on my Mac running OS 10.3
(Panther). Everything I see refers to Tomcat 4.1 - and nothing
quite fits. Has anyone done this yet? I have placed Tomcat in
/Library/Tomcat/jwsdp-1.3 and the Apache 1.3 is
I've never tried it, but change the path to c:\progra~1.
John
Lawence wrote:
Dear All,
I need to accomondate some old cgi scripts on my website but primarily it uses java. I am wondering which comb is better in terms of simplicity and usability.
By the way, I tried to enable CGI support
I just finished configuring my Tomcat system to run CGI scripts but that
was on a Solaris system. The main thing I can point out is make sure
your JDK is up to date and if it is not be sure to read the
compatibility issues on updating from an older version to a new one.
Allen
-Original
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/connectors.html#vs
-Tim
Vaga Bond wrote:
Hey Guys,
I've recently setup Apache2 and Tomcat 5 separately
and was wondering if mod_jk or mod_jk2 can be used to link the two of
them. Secondly, what's the difference between mod_jk and mod_jk2?
/server and
JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/i386/client. I can't get to work without jni either.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.47, Tomcat 5.0.5, JK2 connector 2.0.2
It can't find
Jay,
Try going to http://hunter.campbus.com or for an archive of stuff try
http://tor.ath.cx/~hunter/apache/. Chris aka 'Hunter' (the person behind it
all) has compiled many win32 apache servers with SSL enabled.
Hope this gets you where you want to be.
Stuart
-Original Message-
From:
[Thu Aug 07 12:39:45 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 -2
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Pat
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.47, Tomcat 5.0.5, JK2 connector 2.0.2
Are either of those
in scoreboard
[Thu Aug 07 12:39:45 2003] [error] mod_jk child init 1 -2
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Pat
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Tomcat
Users List
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.47, Tomcat 5.0.5, JK2
I have libjvm.so under JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/i386/server and
JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/i386/client. I can't get to work without jni either.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.47
It can't find libjvm.so. Do you have that installed?
Alternatively, does it work without JNI?
John
Pat Pomatto wrote:
Hi,
Im running on Linux Apache 2.0.47, Tomcat 5.0.5 and trying to use JK2
connector 2.0.2 which I built successfully. I configured the connector
with jni. I cannot seem
Hi,
I have gotten Tomcat 5.0.4/Apache 2.0.47/JK2 2.0.2 working on a Solaris 7
box. I set it up just like you would set it up in the FAQs.
My comment echos John's advice. Forget the jni and just stick to TCP
sockets.
-e
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Pat Pomatto wrote:
Hi,
I'm running on Linux
A Tomcat 404 generally means there is no Context configured in server.xml
to match the request. In your case, it would typically mean that you're
missing something like:
Context path=/webapp docBase=webapp
/Context
John
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:57:16 -0700, Bongrip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try using the AJP13 connector in http.conf instead of the Coyote/AJP13
connector.
Also, comment out tomcat-standalone. i.e. comment out where Coyote
starts on port 80.
Hope this helps.
-Ruchi
-Original Message-
From: Bongrip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003
Did you configure mod_jk? JkMount, JkLogLevel, etc?
- change JkLogLevel to info and post the results from mod_jk log file
- post JkMount and the URL you are trying to use, as well as your Apache
virtual host config
John
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:50:57 -0700, Bongrip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Tomcat never starts on port 80 by default.
John
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:57:43 -0400, Ruchi Dayal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try using the AJP13 connector in http.conf instead of the Coyote/AJP13
connector.
Also, comment out tomcat-standalone. i.e. comment out where Coyote
starts on port 80.
Hope
I apologize.
It was a typo.
-Ruchi
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.1 mod_jk, not working
Tomcat never starts on port 80 by default.
John
On Wed, 16
What does your mod_jk configuration in httpd.conf look like?
Any errors in mod_jk.log?
Does the 404 error come from tomcat or apache?
At 12:50 16.07.2003 -0700, you wrote:
I build an apache 1.3.27 server and mod_jk as a DSO and it loads correctly
and is recognized by the apache server.
The
I think mod_jk works both with Coyote and old AJP13 connector (did for me
at least).
The tomcat http port on 8080 shouldn't cause any trouble, besides it helps
with testing -
if the JSP Page is accessible over 8080 then Apache/mod_jk is the problem.
At 15:57 16.07.2003 -0400, you wrote:
Try
John Turner wrote:
Did you configure mod_jk? JkMount, JkLogLevel, etc?
- change JkLogLevel to info and post the results from mod_jk log file
- post JkMount and the URL you are trying to use, as well as your Apache
virtual host config
John
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:50:57 -0700, Bongrip [EMAIL
Simon Pabst wrote:
What does your mod_jk configuration in httpd.conf look like?
Any errors in mod_jk.log?
Does the 404 error come from tomcat or apache?
At 12:50 16.07.2003 -0700, you wrote:
I build an apache 1.3.27 server and mod_jk as a DSO and it loads
correctly and is recognized by the
1 - 100 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
