Allistair Crossley wrote:
Hi,
I thought I had this sussed but it seems I haven't :( 2 tomcats, 1 machine, JK to balance with stick sessions. The following configuration works in that JK routes requests to both the tomcats and so on.
Did you set the jvmRoute=tomcat1 inside server.xml Engine
Hi Mladen,
Damn, no, I didn't :) Thanks very much indeed, seems to have done the trick :)
Cheers, Allistair.
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 August 2005 17:17
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: load balancing 2 tomcats on 1 machine question
Hello
I don't know if this solution is more effictive than the other one (load
balancing by using Apache server with different Tomcat instances)
But the two one don't realise a random access :
-cluster uses rules
-apache uses a simple round-robin scheduling algorithm ; so after a
disconnection
Not exactly. Apache itself can't do load balancing. You could use a
dedicated Tomcat instance to loadbalance to backend Tomcats in the same
way as you described using Apache however either way you are still left
with a single point of failure. Neither Tomcat nor Apache can
loadbalance by
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:46 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: load-balancing
Sng Wee Jim wrote:
I am using IIS 5.0 on Win2k Server edition. Will jk 1.2.9 solve the
issue for IIS too?
IIS and Apache on Windows are single child systems so the runtime data
was already
I am using IIS 5.0 on Win2k Server edition. Will jk 1.2.9 solve the issue for
IIS too?
- Jim
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/9/2005 2:30 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: load-balancing
Sng Wee Jim wrote:
I am load-balancing
Sng Wee Jim wrote:
I am using IIS 5.0 on Win2k Server edition. Will jk 1.2.9 solve the issue for
IIS too?
IIS and Apache on Windows are single child systems so the runtime data
was already shared among all clients.
I speak here about 1.2.8. Previous versions have lb code broken.
You'll have to
Sng Wee Jim wrote:
I am load-balancing tomcat 5.0.28 using JK1.2/AJP1.3.
Cool ;)
I noticed the loadbalancer virtual JK worker redirect requests to the tomcat
instances in a round-robin fashion, without taking into account which tomcat
has a higher number of active sessions.
You must note what jk
may
be getting directed to a server that is not available.
Someone pls correct me if I'm wrong about that.
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Load balancing
are definitely
not supported.
Again, pls correct me if I'm wrong.
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Load balancing SSL sessions
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:01:10 -0600
Hi Kelly,
To do a software solution you could use the following method.
www.mysite.com - Both servers can answer this request, (for example
round robin dns)
or some form of hsrp (im sure there is a patch for linux to do this)...
and based upon load and a simple script (perl, java, etc)
they
On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:24 PM, Kelly Vista wrote:
Hi -
We are looking to deploy our app, running on Tomcat 5, soon and are
exploring load balancing options. We are looking at H/W and S/W
solutions, and I was wondering if anyone had any past
experience/advice they would like to
We use F5 BigIPs, but they are probably overkill for your application -
The cisco probably will be as well.
A 'Cheap' software solution might be to work with redirects, and 2
separate IP addresses.
ie: ssl1.mysite.com and ssl2.mysite.com - You will need 2 ssl keys
though for this to work.
you can also use DNS round robin,
www.mysite.com resolves to two or more IP addresses.
Filip
Andrew Miehs wrote:
We use F5 BigIPs, but they are probably overkill for your application
- The cisco probably will be as well.
A 'Cheap' software solution might be to work with redirects, and 2
Problem with round robin dns is that you can not guarantee that the web
browser/ client will not make a second request to the dns server during
the session - although very very unlikely.
Andrew
On Feb 22, 2005, at 11:01 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you can also use DNS round robin,
@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Load balancing SSL sessions
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:40:14 +0100
We use F5 BigIPs, but they are probably overkill for your application - The
cisco probably will be as well.
A 'Cheap' software solution might be to work with redirects, and 2 separate
IP addresses.
ie: ssl1
Hi Pete. If you do a search on this list, i posted last week an email
with the configurations that work ... check it out.
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Fournier, Pete wrote:
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:38:14 -0400
From: Fournier, Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:]
[uri:/jkstatus/*]
group=status
/ END workers2.properties
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 11:02 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Load Balancing Configuration
Hi Pete. If you do a search on this list, i
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Load Balancing Configuration
Found the message. Unless I am reading it wrong that is for Clustering.
I am looking at configuring Load Balancing with sticky sessions.
I have managed to get the adaptor to route requests to each of the
Tomcat instances since I originally
Hi,
I got this workers2.properties from wrox.com. It claims to support load balancing by
using more than one tomcat jvms.
In their setting, they have several startup scripts for each tomcat instance. Does it
mean that I need to have a unique tomcat installation folder, and a unique
Hi Balaji,
Are you trying with or looking for any loadbalancing? If you are trying,
what you are trying with?
If you are looking for here is some link that should work greate for you.
But obviously, you find .. no good documentation.
mod_jk2 documentation
i have no idea what you are talking about i just want to get unsubscribed out
of this website
i have no idea what you are talking about i just want to get unsubscribed out
of this website
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 June 2004 08:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load-balancing with MS IIS and tomcat 5
i have no idea what you are talking about i just want to get
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Load balancing
the docs for jk2 suggest :
tomcatId is Automatically set to the localname ( host:port ) and
that it Must match the JVM route on tomcat the server.xml Engine
element, for load balancing
So maybe:
[channel.socket:172.16.10.39:8009]
info=Ajp13
with many host names.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Charles P. Killmer
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 3:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing
Well I have it set up like this, but it isnt working quite right.
Workers2.properties
[shm:]
info=Shared memory file. Required
Charles
Since you have the same context being used for both sites, the traffic gets
load-balanced across both sites.
[uri:/*]
info=JSP examples, map requests for all JSP pages to Tomcat.
context=/
If you need certain kinds of traffic to go to one site and certain others to
go to the other
to do this? Should I be looking at something other than
tomcat?
Thank You
Charles
-Original Message-
From: HIRODE,KARTHEEK (HP-Boise,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:55 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Load balancing
Charles
Since you have the same
=Site2/
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Charles P. Killmer
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:58 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing
Well heres my problem then. I have two sites. Site1.com and Site2.com.
I need to use jsp. And I want to be able to have the default file
the docs for jk2 suggest :
tomcatId is Automatically set to the localname ( host:port ) and
that it Must match the JVM route on tomcat the server.xml Engine
element, for load balancing
So maybe:
[channel.socket:172.16.10.39:8009]
info=Ajp13 worker, connects to tomcat instance using AJP 1.3
Hi,
With one tomcat instance ( = 1 JVM) running 10 apps, if one causes the
machine to crash for whatever reason (malicious code, infinite loop,
OutOfMemoryError, etc.), the other 9 are hosed as well. Thus separation
is frequently desirable.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
- stability
No more to say than Yoav.
- performance
You may observe better performance with several vms on one server:
- Depending on the quality of the thread implementation
in your java vm and the os.
- Depending on the quality of the gc implementation you may
gain
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:36:49PM -0400, Adam T. Gautier wrote:
: The configuration would be easier, definatly...
configuration, maybe.
maintenance, probably not. ;)
One of my clients had a large-scale J2EE setup. (Not Tomcat, but bear
with me.) Several VMs ran on the server, but a single
seems I just found myself a little workaround for this problem by
setting the timeout property of the loadbalancer to 60.
now instead of showing the 500 error from tomcat jk2 waits up to 60
seconds, which is far long enough for the context to load.
so no 500 errors no more. Still if someone
, April 15, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Does the shm play a role in this? I note that you have the following:
[shm]
info=Scoreboard. Requried for reconfiguration and status with multiprocess
servers.
file=anon
#size=104856
The docs at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/configwebcom.htm
l#How%20Load%20Balancing%20Works have been improved. Try reading them
again.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL
-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Thanks but it doesn't seem to make any difference. For each tomcat server I
added sections like the following
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Yes. I did a full stop and start of apache. There are no errors in the log
files either. Do you, or anyone else, have a workers2.properties file of a
working system that you are willing to share? I've gone through
]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Yes. I did a full stop and start of apache. There are no errors in the log
files either. Do you, or anyone else, have a workers2.properties file of a
working
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:42 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Thanks. The only change that you made to the tomcat server.xml conf file is
assigning your
:/webtest/*]
info=Test JSP Page
group=lb
[status:]
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Yes. I did a full stop
page, kind of strange.
Yang
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Does the shm play a role in this? I note that you have the following
Some members of this list have reported that the load
balancing is broken as the instances of mod_jk[2]
don't know the load of each other. So mod_jk[2] will
balance to some extend but not as good as it could/should.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think you intend this to come to me.
Hi,
I think you need to further define the workers with
{ajp13:psahammerhead:8009]
channel=channel.socket:psahammerhead:8009
group=lb
...
etc
hope this helps.
Yang
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Zeimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL
Thanks but it doesn't seem to make any difference. For each tomcat server I
added sections like the following:
[ajp13:psahammerhead:8009]
channel=channel.socket:psahammerhead:8009
group=lb
tomcatId=psahammerhead
It still only wants to use one of the servers. There are other properties that
: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing with apache2, mod_jk2 tomcat 5.0
Thanks but it doesn't seem to make any difference. For each tomcat server I
added sections like the following:
[ajp13:psahammerhead:8009]
channel=channel.socket:psahammerhead
pablo wrote:
maybe I am just missing something. I noticed that in my server.xml
there is a portion that is commented out and is specific to JK2 load
balancing .
!-- You should set jvmRoute to support load-balancing via JK/JK2 ie :
Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost:8009 debug=0
Thank you . It was exactly what I needed to get over the hump. I just
did as you said and tested it. Thanx a million .
On Mar 30, 2004, at 1:45 PM, Chris Egolf wrote:
pablo wrote:
maybe I am just missing something. I noticed that in my server.xml
there is a portion that is commented
My humble 2p worth...
In your rebuild, perhaps you might consider avoiding the built-in session
vars altogether. After getting caught with them in ASP a few years ago I
vowed to avoid them altogether. My latest JSP app implements pseudo-session
vars via a few classes and a db table, which takes
In practice, the load on the DB is the killer right?
atleast in my experience, that is the killer unless you use a good database like
sybase, db2 or oracle. my .2 cents.
peter lin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My humble 2p worth...
In your rebuild, perhaps you might consider avoiding the
Disable all of the auto reloading features of tomcat. The mem leak
seems to be centered there. Or at least, I haven't had a OOME since I
turned that stuff off.
You would need clustered sessions of some sort. They either need to be
persisted across the network using filip's code (tomcat 5 has
Peter Lin wrote:
snip
In practice, the load on the DB is the killer right?
/snip
Peter,
I have no personal experience, but that's what the docs that I've read say -
the db access becomes the limiting factor.
One further advantage of db-based session vars is that you can see in
real-time what
My experience is the same.
hope it helps
-reynir
Angus Mezick wrote:
Disable all of the auto reloading features of tomcat. The mem leak
seems to be centered there. Or at least, I haven't had a OOME since I
turned that stuff off.
You would need clustered sessions of some sort. They either need
Derek Clarkson wrote, On 3/15/2004 10:32 PM:
We have an app written in a mix of JSP, servlets and struts across 3
instances of apache, tomcat and an RMI server. To say that it's a pile of
smelly stuff is an understatement, however it works (mostly) and our
customers depend on it. At least once a
Hi,
To keep it up, you will need to setup session replication (See your
Cluster element in server.xml), either in-memory or JDBC. Both are
supposed to work.
However, that implies several things:
- Your session must contain Seralizable objects only.
- Your performance will be worse (how much
Hi,
Looks like a permissions issue.
Is Apache running as nobody? Does it have rights to
/conf/balancing.conf? ( which seems to located from the root directory
of your server ).
shyam wrote:
Hi All,
Can somebody help me with this. I am struck . thanks a lot
From: shyam [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Aadi Deshpande [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:49 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: load balancing with apache2
Hi,
Looks like a permissions issue.
Is Apache running as nobody? Does it have rights to
/conf/balancing.conf? ( which seems
Subject: Re: Load Balancing Problem...Urgent
Kok Wei, Koh wrote, On 2/1/2004 1:33 AM:
Why not go with the latest:-
* apache 1.3.29
I would recommend Apache 2.0.48 myself as it has the mod_deflate module
which enables gzip compression and can save a LOT of bandwidth as well.
I've been using
Hi Nicholas,
It is great to see undergraduates students (especially from Malaysia),
using Tomcat in their projects ;-) High five dude!
Ok first of all, if you're building a web application you may want to
consider placing Apache 1.3.x in front of your Tomcat instance, to serve
a all static
Kok Wei, Koh wrote, On 2/1/2004 1:33 AM:
Why not go with the latest:-
* apache 1.3.29
I would recommend Apache 2.0.48 myself as it has the mod_deflate module
which enables gzip compression and can save a LOT of bandwidth as well.
I've been using Apache 2 along with mod_jk and load-balanced
Yes you can cluster and load balance tomcat using mod-jk2 Connector
-Original Message-
From: Dean Searle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Load balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
I have searched around to find this and have
I knew you could do that with apache and tomcat, but I'm looking at only Tomcat itself
and nothing else.
-Original Message-
From: Asif Chowdhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 11/11/2003 14:37
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject:RE: Load balancing a standalone
balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
I knew you could do that with apache and tomcat, but I'm looking at
only
Tomcat itself and nothing else.
-Original Message-
From: Asif Chowdhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 11/11/2003 14:37
To:Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject: RE: Load
14:44
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject:RE: Load balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
Howdy,
Yes, you can do with tomcat standalone. See
http://www.filip.net/tomcat/tomcat-javagroups.html
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Dean Searle [mailto
: RE: Load balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
Thank you very much, Yoav.
Reading through it looks like I would need the assistance of Apache
anyways, or can I have an instance of Tomcat listening on port 80 and
do
the load balancing?
Dean
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing a standalone Tomcat 4.1
Thank you very much, Yoav.
Reading through it looks like I would need the assistance of Apache
anyways, or can I have an instance of Tomcat listening on port 80 and
do
the load balancing?
Dean
-Original Message-
From
On Tue, November 11, 2003 1at 1:52 am, Dean Searle wrote:
Reading through it looks like I would need the assistance of Apache
anyways, or can I have an instance of Tomcat listening on port 80 and do
the load balancing?
As Yoav hinted, you can use any type of load balancer in front of Tomcat.
Mats Andersson wrote:
How do I define two workers for load balancing in workers2.properties?
There is
an example for the old jk, but I can't find any for jk2.
Hi mats,
i'm sure that the idea is the same
define 1 worker for your first TC5
1 worker for the second TC5
1 worker
Thanks for your reply, but I need something more specific. I don't think
the syntax of the workers.properties
is the same as in workers2.properties, so I would like to know _how_ to
define the load balancer.
Does anyone have an example workers2.properties file?
Thanks!
Mats
jerome moliere
Hi here is a sample workers.properties that you can use.
worker.list=tomcat0, tomcat1, loadbalancer
worker.tomcat0.type=ajp13
worker.tomcat0.host=localhost
worker.tomcat0.port=8009
worker.tomcat0.cachesize=100
worker.tomcat0.lbfactor=100
worker.tomcat1.type=ajp13
worker.tomcat1.host=localhost
Hi,
My reply was for load balancing with Apache
What I mean is that there should be something similar for IIS.
Regards
AB
|-+---
| | Mats Andersson |
| | mats.andersson@|
| | xantus.se |
| |
Thank you for your answer. The configuration file below works for jk,
but I want to use jk2 because it
does not cause exceptions to be thrown at startup and it does not hang
tomcat during shutdown in later
tomcat releases (has something to do with Managed beans).
I have found some information
Joe Harmon wrote:
Please, please, please, can someone help.
MOd_JK2 issue: If I am using mod_jk2.dll (tried several builds) I get
the round robin to function, but not the stick sessions. All three
instances of Tomcat are running on the same box using the same files
with different ports. Here
Vladyslav Kosulin wrote:
Joe Harmon wrote:
Please, please, please, can someone help.
MOd_JK2 issue: If I am using mod_jk2.dll (tried several builds) I get
the round robin to function, but not the stick sessions. All three
instances of Tomcat are running on the same box using the same files
That fixed it thanks
Joe Harmon
Web Services Support
Novell Inc. - The leading provider of Information Solutions.
(801) 861-9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/11/2003 7:09:05 AM
Joe Harmon wrote:
Please, please, please, can someone help.
MOd_JK2 issue: If I am using
Hi,
Can you use the jvmRoute parameter?
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Maris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2003 16:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Load balancing
Hi,
I am working with a load balanced configuration (1 Apache and 2 Tomcat instances on
the same machine).
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 09:52, Roberts, Eric wrote:
Hi,
Can you use the jvmRoute parameter?
The above might work; I have not tried it.
One thing I did was to turn on the Tomcat web listener and then I can
directly access each Tomcat instance by port (Tomcat1 on Server 1 is
port 8081 and
Solved: I added the following to each of my tomcat server.xml files in the
Engine tag:
Engine jvmRoute=localhost:8009 . to tomcat1
Engine jvmRoute=localhost:8019 . to tomcat 2
-Original Message-
From: Michael Cardon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12,
I don't have access to a HP-UX box, but at a guess, the HP-UX Apache uses
the pre-fork MPM. What you are seeing is pretty typical of that case. At
the very least, you need to be using the worker MPM for this to work at the
moment.
You'll also have to upgrade your version of mod_jk (at the very
Hi Kavita,
what clustering library are you using.
There are several options that we can offer you to do.
1. Try the clustering that is going to ship with Tomcat 4,
http://www.filip.net/tomcat-clustering.html
2. Take out Apache out of the equation to make sure your clustering is
working
Unless you have session replication going on between the two Tomcats (or
are running Tomcat 5...doubtful since it is in its infant stages), you
will always lose your session if you get sent from one Tomcat to
another.
Ben Ricker
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 12:09, Kavitha ranga wrote:
Hello,
I
#worker.
worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=tomcat1,tomcat2
#
# END workers.properties
#
-Original Message-
From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 1:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Load balancing and Sticky sessions
: Load balancing and Sticky sessions
Unless you have session replication going on between the two Tomcats (or
are running Tomcat 5...doubtful since it is in its infant stages), you
will always lose your session if you get sent from one Tomcat to
another.
Ben Ricker
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 12:09
between
the 2 tomcats I am losing my sessions.Also we are on jdk1.3. Any suggesions
in highly appreciated.
Thanks for the quick response.
Kavitha
From: Ben Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load balancing
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load balancing and Sticky sessions
I think I did not make my point clear. I have to rephrase my question.
we have Apache 1.3 and 2 tomcats(4.0 ) running on 2 different servers. The 2
servers are on SUN cluster and we
idea to have a look at:
http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat/
-Original Message-
From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Load balancing and Sticky sessions
Unless you have session replication going on between
I already looked at the ubeans site but it does not detail how to load
balance Tomcat 3.3.
Abraham
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:41 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Load balancing Tomcat 3.3 from Apache
benefit in addition to the info already posted pertaining to
httpd.conf and workers.properties.
John
-Original Message-
From: Abraham Kang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Load balancing Tomcat 3.3 from Apache
about this.
Thanks,
Abraham
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:05 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Load balancing Tomcat 3.3 from Apache with mod_jk or
mod_jser ve -- SOLVED
My point was that the load balancing
http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat
I haven't seen a resource for doing that with Tomcat 3.3.x, but that doesn't
mean there isn't one or that nobody has done it.
John
-Original Message-
From: Abraham Kang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 1:26 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Load balancing Tomcat 3.3 from Apache with mod_jk or
mod_jser ve
http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat
I haven't seen a resource for doing that with Tomcat 3.3.x, but that doesn't
mean there isn't one or that nobody has
A good HOWTO: http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat
John
-Original Message-
From: Abraham Kang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Load balancing Tomcat 3.3 from Apache with mod_jk or mod_jserve --
SOLVED
Ok, Here is my setup:
Hmmm, after digging through some more of the docs, it looks like the
inprocess workers aren't available for Apache. Is this correct?
But I'm still curious. would the setup I outlined work on a server on which
the inprocess workers are supported?
George.
- Original Message -
From:
Hi,
it seems that you want to use mod_jk on the nodes as balancer. We don't use it
in that way. We have a load balancer in front of our nodes, which has a standby
balancer, if the first one goes down. If we want to get your requested behavior,
we had to configure this on our load balancer, not
Hi Brend,
Hi,
it seems that you want to use mod_jk on the nodes as balancer. We don't use it
in that way. We have a load balancer in front of our nodes, which has a standby
balancer, if the first one goes down. If we want to get your requested behavior,
we had to configure this on our
Piavka [mailto:piavka;cs.bgu.ac.il]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: load balancing with routing with mod_jk in cluster
Hi Brend,
Hi,
it seems that you want to use mod_jk on the nodes as
balancer. We don't use it
in that way. We have
Users List
Subject: Re: load balancing with routing with mod_jk in cluster
Hi Brend,
Hi,
it seems that you want to use mod_jk on the nodes as
balancer. We don't use it
in that way. We have a load balancer in front of our nodes,
which has a standby
balancer, if the first
:
Subject:Re: load balancing with routing with mod_jk in cluster
Hi,
it seems that you want to use mod_jk on the nodes as balancer. We don't
use it
in that way. We have a load balancer in front of our nodes, which has a
standby
balancer, if the first one goes down. If we want to get your
Bernd thanks for your reply.
There is one more question i have.
I have 3 nodes N1,N2,N3 each runs apache and tomcat. On node N1 i want
to run lb_worker1 which will route all requests between all nodes.
All apache servers will send requests to this lb_worker1.
On node N2 i want to run
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
