Re: mod_jk problem

2004-01-28 Thread Lukas Larsson
PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 7:13 PM Subject: RE: mod_jk problem garaz_user wrote: Hello, I put the test.jsp in ROOT folder, and I put JKMount in the mod_jk.conf file, which I probably shound't do but all is working now (except apache

Re: mod_jk problem

2004-01-27 Thread Lukas Larsson
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:25 PM Subject: Re: mod_jk problem Lukas, I haven't been following this thread too closelyso maybe I've missed some of your earlier explanation... If you are going through port 8080, there is no mod_jk or mod_jk2 involved

RE: mod_jk problem

2004-01-27 Thread Guy Rouillier
into Apache's httpd.conf? ./Lukas - Original Message - From: Jeff Tulley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:25 PM Subject: Re: mod_jk problem Lukas, I haven't been following this thread too closelyso maybe I've missed some

Re: mod_jk problem

2004-01-27 Thread Mark Eggers
Lukas, There are a lot of ways to start out exploring jsp programming. 1. Create a directory under %CATALINA_HOME%/webapps and modify Tomcat's server.xml a) For example, create a beg-jsp directory b) Add the following context in server.xml !-- Beginning JSP context for experimenting with raw

RE: mod_jk problem

2004-01-26 Thread Guy Rouillier
Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 10:03 PM Subject: Re: mod_jk problem Please see the following: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TomcatWeb or http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Tomcat/Links Lots of information, including several step

Re: mod_jk problem

2004-01-26 Thread Lukas Larsson
Message - From: Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:39 PM Subject: RE: mod_jk problem Lukas Larsson wrote: Thx for the reply. I folloes your second link and found this site (http://johnturner.com/howto/apache2-tomcat4127-jk-rh9

RE: mod_jk problem

2004-01-26 Thread Guy Rouillier
. ./Lukas - Original Message - From: Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:39 PM Subject: RE: mod_jk problem Lukas Larsson wrote: Thx for the reply. I folloes your second link and found this site (http

Re: mod_jk problem

2004-01-26 Thread Jeff Tulley
JkUriSet is only availabel in jk2 or??? ./Lukas - Original Message - From: Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 9:39 PM Subject: RE: mod_jk problem Lukas Larsson wrote: Thx for the reply. I folloes your second link

RE: mod_jk problem

2004-01-25 Thread Brandon Goodin
That is the most informative link i know of. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html -Original Message- From: Lukas Larsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:33 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: mod_jk problem Hello Does anyone know

Re: mod_jk problem

2004-01-25 Thread Mark Eggers
Please see the following: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TomcatWeb or http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Tomcat/Links Lots of information, including several step-by-step documents. HTH /mde/ just my two cents . . . . __ Do you Yahoo!?

Re: mod_jk problem

2004-01-25 Thread Lukas Larsson
] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 10:03 PM Subject: Re: mod_jk problem Please see the following: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TomcatWeb or http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Tomcat/Links Lots of information, including several step-by-step documents. HTH /mde

Re: mod_jk load balancing question

2004-01-20 Thread David Rees
Rahul Kuchhal wrote, On 1/19/2004 3:25 PM: Hi! I have a question about the load balancing capabilities of JK connector. If this is not the correct forum to ask this please let me know. We have been using a single apache load balanced equally between two Tomcat machines, using JK connector. Now

Re: mod_jk compile issue

2004-01-17 Thread David . Vann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/16/2004 10:50 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: mod_jk compile issue You should really use a more recent version than the one that ships with 4.0.6, but that's another story :). I don't use HP, so

Re: mod_jk compile issue

2004-01-17 Thread Bill Barker
PROTECTED] 01/16/2004 10:50 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: mod_jk compile issue You should really use a more recent version than the one that ships with 4.0.6, but that's another story :). I don't use HP

Re: mod_jk compile issue

2004-01-16 Thread Bill Barker
You should really use a more recent version than the one that ships with 4.0.6, but that's another story :). I don't use HP, so I'm not completely sure what libtool does there, but the '.sl' file is almost certainly (a link to) what you want. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL

Re: MOD_JK (Apache+Tomcat)

2003-12-30 Thread Hari Om
Thanks Jerry, My Apache and Tomcat are working independently.ie when I run http://my.domain.name:8080/kuki or http://my.domain.name:8080/examples ...it works just great problem only occurs when I use connector MOD_JK. Any related informaiton is appreciated.. HARI OM Hello, I am

Re: MOD_JK (Apache+Tomcat)

2003-12-30 Thread HARI OM
any update on this? - Original Message - From: HARI OM [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: MOD_JK (Apache+Tomcat) Hello, I am using APache 2.0.47 and Tomcat 4.1.27 on SuSE Linux 8.1 I am working on the Connector MOD_JK.SO

Re: MOD_JK (Apache+Tomcat)

2003-12-30 Thread Jerry Ford
Here's how I did it: http://www.katzenjammer.us/~jford/apache/tomcat/connectors/mod_jk_setup.shtml Not exactly your setup (I use Apache 1.3.27 and Red Hat 9.0) but maybe it will help. Jerry HARI OM wrote: any update on this? - Original Message - From: HARI OM [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MOD_JK (Apache+Tomcat)

2003-12-29 Thread Jerry Ford
Hari: You're trying to do too much too soon. Get the Apache - Tomcat connection through mod_jk to work before you try to get your own webapp to work. Use the Tomcat example servlets to verify that mod_jk is correctly installed and functional. If you can run the servlets through Apache

Re: mod_jk handling all content (not just dynamic)?

2003-12-22 Thread Christopher Schultz
Chris, [Sat Dec 20 13:41:33 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (500)]: Attempting to map URI '/admin/something.html' [Sat Dec 20 13:41:33 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match Even if I comment out all JkMounts in httpd.conf, this problem

Re: mod_jk handling all content (not just dynamic)?

2003-12-22 Thread Chris Boyce
Yep. I've restarted apache many times, and have noticed other unrelated changes taking effect. I only have one apache instance on the machine. My Jk section in httpd.conf looks like this: # Load mod_jk # LoadModule jk_module /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so AddModule mod_jk.c

Re: mod_jk installation

2003-12-19 Thread Federico Fernandez Cruz
Dahyalan, If you have installed apache 2.0.x you should use ./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/sbin/apxs And make sure you can access it with your user rights! Maybe you can do a su - root... Let me know if you have any problem... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Federico,

RE: mod_jk installation

2003-12-19 Thread dhayalan
Subject: Re: mod_jk installation From: Federico Fernandez Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, December 19, 2003 3:30 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dahyalan, If you have installed apache 2.0.x you should use ./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/sbin/apxs And make

Re: mod_jk + Apache 1.3 Tomcat 4.1.29 on OSX (Panther)

2003-12-19 Thread Michael Griffith
the right way... Cheers! MG - Original Message - From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:47 PM Subject: Re: mod_jk + Apache 1.3 Tomcat 4.1.29 on OSX (Panther) First guess (and all I can do is guess at this point :): Apache needs

RE: mod_jk only usable from localhost

2003-12-18 Thread Chakravarthy, Sundar
1. Make sure machine is visible ping computername 2. Make sure apache is serving pages http://computername 3. Make sure tomcat works in standalone mode http://computername:8080 4. Then edit httpd.conf , tomcat's server.xml ( see docs )

Re: mod_jk only usable from localhost

2003-12-18 Thread Jerry Ford
Jeremy: I just solved the exact same problem on my setup (Apache 1.3.27 - Tomcat 4.1.27 via mod_jk). In my case, it was because I had enclosed the Tomcat config statements in httpd.conf in a virtual host block. I forget why I had done that, but I had asked a lot of questions on this forum

Re: mod_jk + Apache 1.3 Tomcat 4.1.29 on OSX (Panther)

2003-12-18 Thread Bill Barker
First guess (and all I can do is guess at this point :): Apache needs (at least) r-x permissions on all of the path elements leading up to Tomcat. Michael Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there something special about how to get mod_jk + Apache 1.3/Tomcat

RE: mod_jk Tomcat and Apache httpd two different machines?

2003-12-17 Thread Asif Chowdhary
Yes its possible. I installed the mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll in apache/modules. Here is what I put into the diffrent config files: httpd.conf: just one single row like this: LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll Then I added a worker2.properties in Apache/conf/ like this: [logger]

RE: mod_jk Tomcat and Apache httpd two different machines?

2003-12-17 Thread James R. Marcus
workers.properties (Tomcat)--- -Original Message- From: Asif Chowdhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 5:12 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: mod_jk Tomcat and Apache httpd two different machines? Yes its possible. I installed the mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Sullivan, Patrick
Check you tomcat logs for Ajp13Connector[8883] Opening server socket on all host IP addresses Ajp13Connector[8883] Starting background thread Ajp13Processor[8883][0] Starting background thread Ajp13Processor[8883][1] Starting background thread Ajp13Processor[8883][2] Starting background thread

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread William R Briggs
Return Receipt Your RE: mod_jk worker help please!! document

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Stephanie A Bickel
: Subject: RE: mod_jk worker help please!! 12/05/2003 09:56 AM

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Jeff Tulley
I'll go through the potentially obvious mistakes: 1) Are you sure you are editing the correct workers.properties? 2) Have you cleared out the mod_jk.log before trying again, maybe the messages are old I'm sure you probably have done all of this, but I know that these mistakes, while obvious, are

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Stephanie A Bickel
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] com cc: Subject: RE: mod_jk worker help please

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Stephanie A Bickel
] com cc: Subject: RE: mod_jk worker help please

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread David O'Brien
Sullivan, Patrick To: Stephanie A Bickel [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] entura.Orgcc: Subject: RE: mod_jk worker

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Stephanie A Bickel
] Subject: RE: mod_jk worker help please!! 12/05/2003 11:20 AM

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread David O'Brien
] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] .orgcc: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: mod_jk worker help please!! 12/05/2003 11:20 AM

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Stephanie A Bickel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] .orgcc: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: mod_jk worker

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Sullivan, Patrick
you, Patrick Sullivan -Original Message- From: Stephanie A Bickel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:04 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: mod_jk worker help please!! David - I added the jvmroute but it still is not working. The whole problem

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Stephanie A Bickel
] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: entura.OrgSubject: RE: mod_jk worker help please

RE: mod_jk worker help please!!

2003-12-05 Thread Stephanie A Bickel
: entura.OrgSubject: RE: mod_jk worker help please

Re: mod_jk binaries?

2003-11-21 Thread Bill Barker
Luke Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Everybody! my name is luke I'm trying to connect apache 1.3 with tomcat 4.1. IS there some obvious thing or document I am missing? What I have read has told me to get binaries for mod_jk...My problem is there are no

Re: mod_jk, missing post parameters

2003-11-20 Thread Luca
Hi I have exactly the same problem but not solution. I tried with mod_jk2 too. I have the same problem. Now I’m trying with apache for Windows. I want see if is OS problem. Is a bug of mod_jk/mod_jk2? Luca --- Marco Manini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have this configuration: - a

RE: mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0

2003-11-20 Thread Asif Chowdhary
Hi Peter, where you able to find rpm for mod-jk2 for redhat 9.0. I have not been able to find? Thanks Asif -Original Message- From: Peter Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:24 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0 Hi

Re: mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0

2003-11-20 Thread Peter Maas
Not yet... didn't expect that to be the problem... P Asif Chowdhary wrote: Hi Peter, where you able to find rpm for mod-jk2 for redhat 9.0. I have not been able to find? Thanks Asif -Original Message- From: Peter Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:24

Re: mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0

2003-11-20 Thread Oscar Carrillo
I would suggest using more than one as a reference in case something is misunderstood or vague. My tutorial is below: http://daydream.stanford.edu/tomcat/install_web_services.html I link to many other sites that are useful, and I believe John Turner's site (which I link to) links to an RPM

RE: mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0

2003-11-20 Thread Asif Chowdhary
Thanks for the help -Original Message- From: Oscar Carrillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:14 PM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_jk + apache 2.0.40 + redhat 9.0 I would suggest using more than one as a reference in case something

Re: mod_jk 1.2 so Bug ?

2003-11-20 Thread Christopher Schultz
Sundar, The latest mod_jk1.2 binary for Solaris 8 , apache 2.x , tomcat 4.x does not connect with tomcat. Are Apache and Tomcat both running on the same machine? Are your port numbers in workers.properties correct? -chris - To

Re: mod_jk in multiple site environnement

2003-11-18 Thread Tim Funk
You define JkWorkersFile /projects/site1/conf/workers.properties once and only once. Then your JkMounts can be defined per vhost -Tim Mike Baroukh wrote: Hi. I am managing a server wich host many site. Each have it's own jvm. To make things simple, each site have a piece of httpd.conf wich

Re: mod_jk or mod_jk2

2003-11-12 Thread Tim Funk
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/connectors.html#vs -Tim Dionisio Ruiz de Zarate wrote: Hello i must to put one server with apache 2.0.47 and tomcat 4.1.29 in production. what is better for use in production state? mod_jk or mod_jk2? which is more stable?

Re: mod_jk or webapp on solaris with apache2

2003-10-28 Thread Bill Barker
David Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] See subject :-) This is actually a two-parter, though... 1) Which should I use? We are running apache2 and tomcat on solaris, on the same machine. The tomcat usage is fairly light (a small percentage of the total

Re: mod_jk 1.2 binary for Linux?

2003-10-25 Thread Manolo Ramirez T.
Hi, I sugest that you compile the src, it's not to dificult if you now the steps, download it from here: http://apache.towardex.com/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2-src-current.tar.gz to compile (in Redhat 9): $ tar xzf XXX $ cd XXX/jk/native/ $ sh buildconf.sh $

Re: mod_jk 1.2 binary for Linux?

2003-10-25 Thread Oscar Carrillo
I would recommend compiling it, and it doesn't seem that there's a linux binary available for download. I will be adding JK2 tutorial (only JK1.2 for now) shortly on my site, but looking at it now and John Turner's site, you should be able to figure it out. I find that it's always a gamble using

Re: mod_jk 1.2 binary for Linux?

2003-10-25 Thread Oscar Carrillo
Silly me. I thought you were looking for ModJK2.0. You should have no problem. And full instructions are on my site as well. http://daydream.stanford.edu/tomcat/install_web_services.html Oscar On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Manolo Ramirez T. wrote: Hi, I sugest that you compile the src, it's not

Re: mod_jk 1.2 binary for Linux?

2003-10-25 Thread Stu Statman
Oscar Carrillo wrote: Silly me. I thought you were looking for ModJK2.0. Heh, no prob. We'll go to 2.0 eventually, but we're not quite ready (organizationally) to take that leap quite yet. You should have no problem. And full instructions are on my site as well.

Re: mod_jk 1.2 binary for Linux?

2003-10-25 Thread Stu Statman
Manolo Ramirez T. wrote: Hi, I sugest that you compile the src, it's not to dificult if you now the steps, download it from here: http://apache.towardex.com/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2-src-current.tar.gz to compile (in Redhat 9): $ tar xzf XXX $ cd

Re: mod_jk 1.2 binary for Linux?

2003-10-25 Thread Bill Barker
You should be able to get the RPM from http://www.jpackage.org. Stu Statman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am unsure if I'm asking this question in the right forum, and while I did a quick look through the archives, I may be repeating a question that someone else

Re: mod_jk binary for Solaris 9

2003-10-15 Thread Johan Louwers
Take a look at http://www.johnturner.com/ - Original Message - From: Kellam, Jeannie K Priest [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:42 PM Subject: mod_jk binary for Solaris 9 Hi, Does anyone have a Solaris 9 (sparc) binary for

Re: mod_jk

2003-10-13 Thread Bill Barker
Stuart Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I'm running mod_jk and in the mod_jk logs i'm seeing quite a lot of this. If the server is quite busy the occurance of this increases. [Mon Oct 13 08:50:47 2003] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (381)]: Error

RE: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
1. mod_jk doesn't balance the load on the base of packets. 2. mod_jk works with sticky sessions so only new sessions are balanced. I belief but am not shure that it's just round robin. 3. Bill Barker claims that the load balancing is broken as the instances of mod_jk don't know

RE: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread tomcat
1 Understood, it was just to get some ballpark indication 2 Surely then the new session would be balanced to the faster machine, and I would see more activity on them. 3 That would explain everything :( Would a move to mod_jk2 be of any use, or should I get someone to put their hand in their

RE: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread David Rees
On Fri, October 10, 2003 at 5:47 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Ralph Einfeldt wrote: 2. mod_jk works with sticky sessions so only new sessions are balanced. I belief but am not shure that it's just round robin. 2 Surely then the new session would be

Re: mod_jk lbfactor strangeness

2003-10-10 Thread Bill Barker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 Understood, it was just to get some ballpark indication 2 Surely then the new session would be balanced to the faster machine, and I would see more activity on them. 3 That would explain everything :( Would a move to mod_jk2 be

RE: mod_jk feature question

2003-10-08 Thread mms
Renato, But there is a situation where I need to let Tomcat server everything BUT images ( *.gif and *.jpg ). How can I do this with mod_jk ? If it's not possible to do with mod_jk, is it possible to do in another way (like mod_rewrite maybe ? ) hava a look at mod_rewrite for Apache.

Re: Mod_Jk - write failed?

2003-10-01 Thread Dan McCullough
Is this part of the setup of mod_jk or was mod_jk working before? If this is the setup for mod_jk the mod_jk.conf doesnt always get created you might need to find a copy of what it should look like and create your own. Pretty easy and then it works. Look at the John Turner doc for Windows. ---

RE: Mod_Jk - write failed?

2003-10-01 Thread Sullivan, Patrick
Message- From: Dan McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:13 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Mod_Jk - write failed? Is this part of the setup of mod_jk or was mod_jk working before? If this is the setup for mod_jk the mod_jk.conf doesnt always get created

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat 3.2.4

2003-08-30 Thread Bill Barker
AFAIK, the latest-and-greatest should still work with 3.2.x. Armenio Pinto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, can anyone tell me, please, where can I find the most suitable version of mod_jk to use with Tomcat 3.2.4? Thanks in advance, Arménio Pinto

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat 3.2.4

2003-08-30 Thread Marco Tedone
I'm using mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll with Tomcat 4.1.27 and everything is working fine. Marco - Original Message - From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 4:39 AM Subject: Re: mod_jk and Tomcat 3.2.4 AFAIK, the latest-and-greatest should still

RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-28 Thread Peter Anning
? I guess it won't be able to be setup like this with uneven nos. of Tomcat and apache -Original Message- From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 August 2003 09:03 To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers See

RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-28 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:02 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers Will failover work in this configuration? I guess it won't be able to be setup like this with uneven nos. of Tomcat and apache

RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-28 Thread Peter Anning
-Original Message- From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 August 2003 05:29 To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers As I understand it, the failover should be handled by the external load balancer. Why shouldn't

RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-28 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
See below: -Original Message- From: Peter Anning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:44 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers If Apache yet it's asociated tomcat is down is up then the loadbalancer

RE: mod_jk and Tomcat Lose Touch

2003-08-28 Thread Fred Whipple
This is what I thought, too, originally. However it wouldn't make sense since very few times do resources become *fewer* by default as software versions increase. With that in mind, and a hunch up my sleeve, I actually did some interesting testing. My test platform is my notebook, running RHL

RE: mod_jk and Tomcat Lose Touch

2003-08-27 Thread Fred Whipple
Looks like there is a mismatch between the workers.properties and the server.xml (Tomcat's config file). The server.xml sets up Tomcat. More importantly, it sets up a Connector which opens a socket connection on a defined port (Look for the Connector' section in the Service section of the

RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-27 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
| | | | T1T2 -Original Message- From: Peter Anning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:14 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

RE: mod_jk forwarding scheme problems - https requests

2003-08-27 Thread Purvis Robert
Did you try: scheme=https as an attribute in the https Connector in server.xml ? -Original Message- From: Rudolf Schamberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 August 2003 16:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk forwarding scheme problems - https requests Hello, did anyone

RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-27 Thread Peter Anning
/ \ /\ A1A2 | | | | T1T2 -Original Message- From: Peter Anning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:14 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat Lose Touch

2003-08-27 Thread John Turner
Sounds to me like an OS resource issue. Total number of allowed open connections, etc. Since it worked on 7.x and not on 9, I would consider that a default changed somewhere, somehow. John Also, the same Apache 1.3.X and Tomcat 3.X and 4.X configurations worked perfectly on Red Hat 7.3, it

RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-27 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
See below: -Original Message- From: Peter Anning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:20 AM To: Tomcat.Users.List [EMAIL PROTECTED]@www.peteranning.com Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers Http request 1 is sent to A1

RE: mod_jk and Tomcat Lose Touch

2003-08-26 Thread Ben Ricker
hangs forever. Apache logs the request nothing in the Tomcat logs suggest to me it's receiving the request. Thanks, -Fred -Original Message- From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_jk

Re: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-26 Thread jerome moliere
Peter Anning wrote: Hi, I am trying to implement the following configuration: +++ Cisco Load Balancer +++ | | (http) |

Re: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-26 Thread Peter Anning
...getting knowledge from implementations (other tomcats from your second Apache server) will break those abstractions You may be right about this. However as I add Apache servers to the Apache layer without some kind of colaboration between the servers it would seem that the problem

Re: mod_jk load balancing with multiple apache servers

2003-08-26 Thread Ben Ricker
I have the exact same configuration but I do not do session replication because of the fact that our app was not written correctly (something about serializing variables and ours are not serialized; it will take a code audit and rewrite to accomplish it). Anyway, here is what you can do:

RE: mod_jk and Tomcat Lose Touch

2003-08-26 Thread Fred Whipple
In the settings you put in httpd.conf, you should have added a 'LogLevel' directive. If you did not, then you can! The line I have is: JkLogLevel error Change the 'error' to debug and restart Apache. This worked well, and yielded some errors: ** [Tue Aug 26 16:25:19 2003]

Re: mod_jk and Tomcat Lose Touch

2003-08-25 Thread Ben Ricker
What kind of error are you getting that makes you thing they are losing touch. Check the mod_jk log and see what kind of errors it is throwing and post an example. Ben Ricker Wellinx, Inc. On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 10:54, Fred Whipple wrote: Hi all, On one of our servers, we were running Red Hat

RE: mod_jk and Tomcat Lose Touch

2003-08-25 Thread Fred Whipple
, the request simply hangs forever. Apache logs the request nothing in the Tomcat logs suggest to me it's receiving the request. Thanks, -Fred -Original Message- From: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: mod_jk problem with serving jsp from apache root dir...from tomcat alias dir is ok

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Klein
I 'figured' out the problem I was having...or at least got things working. In addition to: JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 I also had to add a servlet context to server.xml: Context path= docBase=/www/html/VxAppliance debug=0/ Originally docBase said ROOT, which I guess is Tomcat's root dir as opposed to

Re: mod_jk v1.2.5

2003-08-14 Thread John Turner
AFAIK, still coming if ever. John NormW wrote: Good afternoon all. What has become of the mod_jk binaries for v1.2.5? Still coming or some place other than: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/ ? TIA Norm

Re: mod_jk problem with serving jsp from apache root dir...from tomcatalias dir is ok

2003-08-14 Thread John Turner
JSP end up as servlets. Thus, they fall under the web app realm. They are not distinct pages like HTML or PHP. You do have to match your Apache config to your Tomcat config. Tomcat is not integrated into Apache as PHP is...Tomcat is a distinct environment, and can stand by itself without

Re: mod_jk-problem with rewritten urls

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Barker
This is supposed to be fixed in the upcoming mod_jk 1.2.5. It's still being evaluated, but you can get the early-access from http://cvs.apache.org/~glenn/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.5-src.tar.gz. Karsten Dello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] dear list, i have

Re: mod_jk v1.2.5

2003-08-11 Thread NormW
10:22 PM Subject: Re: mod_jk v1.2.5 AFAIK, still coming if ever. John NormW wrote: Good afternoon all. What has become of the mod_jk binaries for v1.2.5? Still coming or some place other than: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/ ? TIA Norm

Re: mod_jk

2003-07-31 Thread John Turner
This came up yesterday. According to one poster, putting DirectoryIndex index.jsp in your httpd.conf VirtualHost block would cause Apache to translate http://192.168.168.45/rtizon; into http://192.168.168.45/rtizon/index.jsp;. However, it doesn't work at all for me, never has, and I have

Re: mod_jk

2003-07-31 Thread Eric J. Pinnell
Hi, Just an FYI... I'm looking our JK2 config now and DirectoryIndex is not set with index.jsp. The only thing that I can find is the welcome-file is index.jsp. The application pulls up index.jsp by default when you go to http://host/context/ I don't see any redirects as this application

Re: mod_jk

2003-07-31 Thread John Turner
What about http://host/context without the trailing /? John Eric J. Pinnell wrote: Hi, Just an FYI... I'm looking our JK2 config now and DirectoryIndex is not set with index.jsp. The only thing that I can find is the welcome-file is index.jsp. The application pulls up index.jsp by default

RE: mod_jk

2003-07-31 Thread Ray Madigan
: Thursday, July 31, 2003 7:24 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk This came up yesterday. According to one poster, putting DirectoryIndex index.jsp in your httpd.conf VirtualHost block would cause Apache to translate http://192.168.168.45/rtizon; into http://192.168.168.45/rtizon

Re: mod_jk

2003-07-31 Thread Eric J. Pinnell
works. It doesn't appear, at least on the surface, that they developer did anything special to get it to operate that way. -e On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, John Turner wrote: What about http://host/context without the trailing /? John Eric J. Pinnell wrote: Hi, Just an FYI... I'm

Re: mod_jk on windows

2003-07-25 Thread John Turner
Subject: Re: mod_jk on windows If its defined in Tomcat's server.xml, it should already be in mod_jk.conf. You don't want duplicate entries for JkMount. John Ravi Pachipala wrote: I defined JKMount in httpd.conf. However, I find it to be already generated in mod_jk.conf under tomcat

Re: Mod_jk on Solaris - has anyone actually ever built it?

2003-07-25 Thread John Turner
I built it for Solaris 8. Good luck building it for 6, it took me three days and 2 reinstalls of the OS to get it to build on 8. John Max Jester wrote: Help! I am having trouble building mod_jk.so on Solaris 2.6 - and the binary directory for 2.6 at the jakarta site is empty. Has anyone

Re: Mod_jk on Solaris - has anyone actually ever built it?

2003-07-25 Thread Eric J. Pinnell
You might want to try JK2. I am able to build mod_jk2.so on Solaris 7 and 2.6 and 7 are pretty close to each other. You might want to give it a whirl. -e On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, John Turner wrote: I built it for Solaris 8. Good luck building it for 6, it took me three days and 2 reinstalls

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >