I have been running tomcat on a test environment for the past 2 months.I
have lately noticed that,when i keep using it for a while,the server hangs
up and locks up my dbcp thread that connects to oracle.This is very
sporadic.When i shutdown the server,i get this message Waiting for 2
Sessions
is very high that other sessions are
not serializable, either.
So if you want to change this behaviour, you will probably have to
implement your own PersistanceManager.
On 8/18/05, Christoph Kutzinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: why do you want to catch errors during serialization
it is implemented this way, because if one session
isn't serializable the probability is very high that other sessions are
not serializable, either.
So if you want to change this behaviour, you will probably have to
implement your own PersistanceManager.
On 8/18/05, Christoph Kutzinski [EMAIL
replication, right ?
CMIIW.
On 8/17/05, Christoph Kutzinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nishant,
where did you read that distributable will *enforce* serializability?
AFAIK distributable only means that your sessions can be distributed
to different tomcat nodes (i.e. a cluster
, Christoph Kutzinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nishant,
where did you read that distributable will *enforce* serializability?
AFAIK distributable only means that your sessions can be distributed
to different tomcat nodes (i.e. a cluster). It doesn't enforce anything,
you have to make sure
] wrote:
Hi Nishant,
where did you read that distributable will *enforce* serializability?
AFAIK distributable only means that your sessions can be distributed
to different tomcat nodes (i.e. a cluster). It doesn't enforce anything,
you have to make sure that your session attributes are serializable
Hi Nishant,
where did you read that distributable will *enforce* serializability?
AFAIK distributable only means that your sessions can be distributed
to different tomcat nodes (i.e. a cluster). It doesn't enforce anything,
you have to make sure that your session attributes are serializable
that distributable will *enforce* serializability?
AFAIK distributable only means that your sessions can be distributed
to different tomcat nodes (i.e. a cluster). It doesn't enforce anything,
you have to make sure that your session attributes are serializable by
yourself.
I've done this for my testing
Kutzinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nishant,
where did you read that distributable will *enforce* serializability?
AFAIK distributable only means that your sessions can be distributed
to different tomcat nodes (i.e. a cluster). It doesn't enforce anything,
you have to make sure that your session
Hoping for some help from the tomcat experts on this list.
I want to ensure all objects stored in sessions are serializable.
I read that I can put the distributable/ tag in my web.xml file to
'enforce' this.
But I don't see any enforcing happening. I assumed it would throw
exceptions at runtime
Apologies - I omitted the tomcat version: 5.0.28
On 8/16/05, Nishant Deshpande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hoping for some help from the tomcat experts on this list.
I want to ensure all objects stored in sessions are serializable.
I read that I can put the distributable/ tag in my web.xml
the tomcat experts on this list.
I want to ensure all objects stored in sessions are serializable.
I read that I can put the distributable/ tag in my web.xml file to
'enforce' this.
But I don't see any enforcing happening. I assumed it would throw
exceptions at runtime when I did
Seale, Deryl wrote:
Thanks for the information, Jon. I finally realized this when I examined the
two different cookies Tomcat was setting: the first was marked secure, and the
second was not.
I followed the threads you provided, and one of the respondents hinted that
this behavior may
tomcat is getting confused with user
sessions due to (I think) some mod_rewrite rules that switch a user in and out
of SSL. The general requirement I have is to only use SSL in certain parts of
our application (login, user administration, etc), and we use mod_rewrite rules
to enforce
still enforce this rule?
thanks.
-d.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Wingfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: sessions dropping with mod_ssl, mod_jk, mod_rewrite rules
I'm pretty sure Tomcat doesn't allow a session
Hi, there. I have a problem whereby tomcat is getting confused with user
sessions due to (I think) some mod_rewrite rules that switch a user in and out
of SSL. The general requirement I have is to only use SSL in certain parts of
our application (login, user administration, etc), and we use
Forgot to add, we're using Tomcat 5.0.28, mod_jk 1.2.14, and apache 1.3.33.
thanks.
-d.
-Original Message-
From: Seale, Deryl
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 11:48 AM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: sessions dropping with mod_ssl, mod_jk, mod_rewrite rules
Hi, there. I have
05, 2005 3:26 AM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to turn off perssitent sessions in Tomcat 4.1?
Can any one help me out in this issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Thursday, August 04, 2005 11:27 AM
To: tomcat-user
Can any one help me out in this issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 11:27 AM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to turn off perssitent sessions in Tomcat 4.1?
I am waiting for a good response.
Can
Subject: RE: How to turn off perssitent sessions in Tomcat 4.1?
I am waiting for a good response.
Can any body help me out in this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:01 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE
I am waiting for a good response.
Can any body help me out in this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:01 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to turn off perssitent sessions in Tomcat 4.1?
Hi Edgar
Hi,
I am using Apache+Tomcat 4.1.29 for running my application. When I am
restarting Tomcat I am getting persistent session loading exception like
this:
2004-03-11 13:52:18 StandardManager[] IOException while loading
persisted sessions:
java.io.WriteAbortedException: writing aborted
persistent session loading exception like
this:
2004-03-11 13:52:18 StandardManager[] IOException while loading
persisted sessions:
java.io.WriteAbortedException: writing aborted;
java.io.NotSerializableException:
org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade
java.io.WriteAbortedException
is not serializable?
Please clarify my doubts.
Advance thanks to all of u !!!
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Alves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: How to turn off perssitent sessions in Tomcat 4.1?
Hi,
On Tomcat 5.5 you can turn
Hi, I am using the built in security constraints to password protect some
directories in my app. It works fine, but I was wondering when someone uses the
login form to get to the passworded directory or page, is it possible to get
the username and/or password that the user submits in the
AFAIK, no, there is no way to do it. Here at work we've built a whole
security framework that works hand-in-hand with J2EE security,
specifically to deal with shortcomings just like this.
In our framework, we have a filter who has a couple of functions, and one
of them is exactly what you
Hello,
is there a way to force tomcat (or a web-container in general) not to
use cookies to keep track of sessions, but to use url-rewriting with the
;jsessionid=sessID suffix instead?
Regards
Marten
-
To unsubscribe, e
Hello,
how do I track sessions without using cookies or URL-writing?
Following the Servlet API 2.3, the third way to track sessions is by
using the SSL-Layer to hold the ID.
I have tried that out with my installation (Apache 2.0.47, mod_jk2,
Tomcat 5.5.4) and followed the
configuration hints
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Robert F Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 7:26 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache2/Tomcat55/mod_jk and Sticky Sessions
Dave,
Try a Google search for: Apache httpd sticky sessions.
One result that looks
Hi all. I am attempting to setup a loadbalanced set of Tomcat5.5 servers
behind an Apache2 server using mod_jk. The application developers have told me
that the app will require sticky sessions. I have it all configured and
working with the exception of the sticky sessions. I think my
Dave,
Try a Google search for: Apache httpd sticky sessions.
One result that looks particularly useful: http://raibledesigns.com/tomcat/
-Robert
Dave Morrow wrote:
Hi all. I am attempting to setup a loadbalanced set of Tomcat5.5 servers
behind an Apache2 server using mod_jk
Hello,
I'm developing a webapp that is reachable via a couple of domains,
but there is only one webapp in one tomcat.
I need to share the session of a user over these different domains.
What is the best way to guarantee that no session is lost, when the user
switches between two domains ?
Do
config for JDBC persisted sessions that I
could look at as the information in the docs seems a little disjointed.
Also, for those that have it working, what has been their experience
with it?
Thanks,
Peter Johnson
-
To unsubscribe
Hi All,
Does anyone have a working config for JDBC persisted sessions that I
could look at as the information in the docs seems a little disjointed.
Also, for those that have it working, what has been their experience
with it?
Thanks,
Peter Johnson
Hello,
We have a server running Tomcat 4.1.27, mod_jk2, Apache2
hosting 6 applications. Tomcat Manager shows number of
active sessions for each application. At one time one of
the applications had over 300 active sessions, but
applications user monitor would show only 60 authenticated
users. I
Well, unless I misunderstood, the requirement is to keep the session for
webappA alive as long as the session for webappB is alive, so if webappB
is to be alive, then it must have new pages from the server (no need for
a refresh there. Then the webappB's pages (views) could include a
reference
Users List
Betreff: Re: Sessions and keep-alives
I've considered iframes, but unfortunately not an option for us.
From what I understand AJAX can make async calls to the HTTP server
from the webapplication only, not on behalf of another. So if the
popup application is webapp B, and the parent
Hi Patrick -
If not an iframe, why not a gif... There's nothing (in principle I
think*) stopping you having a jsp page that returns a (tiny, invisible)
gif (with the right mimetype) and with appropriate expires/cache-control
headers to make sure that it gets got each time. That's the way some
Interesting solution Tim.. so webapp B would invoke this invisible gif
from webapp A on an interval basis?
-P
On 5/13/05, Tim Diggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Patrick -
If not an iframe, why not a gif... There's nothing (in principle I
think*) stopping you having a jsp page that returns
I'd just include this invisible gif on every page (request) of webapp B.
(bone-headed solution, but why get more tricksy until you need it).
-- Tim
Patrick Lacson wrote:
Interesting solution Tim.. so webapp B would invoke this invisible gif
from webapp A on an interval basis?
-P
On 5/13/05, Tim
I'm curious how this would work? If I open a page with an invisible GIF,
there's no way (without scripting and such) to have the GIF refresh,
right? Or is there something I'm missing?
You can set a meta refresh on the page, but not the GIF itself, as far as
I know anyway.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Hi,
What is your session timeout on tomcat?
It might be that the session simply times out,
so the next tomcat is elected from the load
balancer.
Regards,
Mladen.
Edlira Kumbarÿe7e wrote:
Hello,
It
doesn't seem to work. Each time I refresh the page, it
get served from the same
Thank you for your reply.
I don't think it's the session timeout on tomcat
because, as I said in my previous message,I don't see
a pattern in the time pages are served from the same
tomcat. In other words, a page gets served from
tomcat1 maybe 4 times (each page refresh), then 2
times from
Edlira Kumbarÿe7e wrote:
I don't think it's the session timeout on tomcat
because, as I said in my previous message,I don't see
a pattern in the time pages are served from the same
tomcat. In other words, a page gets served from
tomcat1 maybe 4 times (each page refresh), then 2
I'm using the binary version of mod_jk.
Apache v2.0.54
Tomcat v5.5
JK v1.2.12
Thank you,
Edlira
--- Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edlira Kumbarÿe7e wrote:
I don't think it's the session timeout on tomcat
because, as I said in my previous message,I don't
see
a
hi All!
I'm involved in a project that integrates two disparate web
applications: webapp A is using WebSphere and webapp B is using
Tomcat.
The integration involves Single Sign On, with webapp A being the
primary webapp from which webapp B is launched. webapp B is launched
as a popup-window.
The simplest kludge is an iframe that is hidden and uses a META refresh.
Or look at using ajax.
-Tim
Patrick Lacson wrote:
hi All!
I'm involved in a project that integrates two disparate web
applications: webapp A is using WebSphere and webapp B is using
Tomcat.
The integration involves Single
I've considered iframes, but unfortunately not an option for us.
From what I understand AJAX can make async calls to the HTTP server
from the webapplication only, not on behalf of another. So if the
popup application is webapp B, and the parent webapp A, how can I call
the webapp A server from
.
Does that all make sense? (I'm not sure I described it well)
Frank W. Zammetti
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lacson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/13/05 12:56:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users Listtomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sessions and keep-alives
I've
.
Does that all make sense? (I'm not sure I described it well)
Frank W. Zammetti
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Lacson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/13/05 12:56:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users Listtomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sessions and keep-alives
I've
in
the apache conf. This file specifies workers timcat1
and tomcat2, as well as worker loadbalancer, which is
supposed to balance the load between the two tomcats.
Everything works fine, except for the sticky sessions,
or session affinity. When a page is requested, I need
it to be served from one
According to the Tomcat (5.5.9) documentation after a sessions has
reached a certian period of inactivity it expires. However my
question is when is this expired session marked by the JVM for garbage
collection.
The reason I ask is that our application has an interesting problem.
If we start up
Hey,
you have install my cluster patch for 5.5.9?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34389
I used very heavy the new fastasyncqueue mode without memory problems
Every minute the sessions controlled for timeout. Look with an JMX
Console that the manager active session count
de 2005 17:34
Para: Will Hartung; Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tomcat Users List
Assunto: RES: RES: Nervous about Sessions ...
Thank you very much, Frank...
I had to create the following class
Long ago a multi-client, multi-Oracle application was written using
Struts. Recently, we had a 4 in 22,000 record data integrity issue. I
found one client implementation that used prepared statements but the
primary key was being used e.g. update mytable set a= ?, b=? where
pri_key = + pkey
Whitehurst
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:31
Subject: Nervous about Sessions ...
Long ago a multi-client, multi-Oracle application was written using
Struts. Recently, we had a 4 in 22,000 record data integrity issue. I
found one client implementation
to it. That will prevent multiple requests from stepping on
each other while trying to add their DTOs to the Session.
I haven't looked at Tomcat's code to see how they implemented the
hashCode method of the Session object but it's not the best way to
determine if two Sessions are equal in your
in the package serializable.
Viorel Dragomir
.
..
---
- Original Message -
From: David Whitehurst
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:31
Subject: Nervous about Sessions ...
Long ago
all objects in the package serializable.
Viorel Dragomir
.
..
---
- Original Message - From: David Whitehurst To:
tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:31
Subject: Nervous about Sessions ...
Long
To:
tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:31
Subject: Nervous about Sessions ...
Long ago a multi-client, multi-Oracle application was written using
Struts. Recently, we had a 4 in 22,000 record data integrity issue.
I found one client implementation that used prepared
,
javax.servlet.jsp.jstl.core.Config.FMT_LOCALIZATION_CONTEXT,lc);
(...)
Do you know about any changes related to that in TC 5.5.x?
Thank you!
Paulo
-Mensagem original-
De: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 27 de abril de 2005 12:59
Para: Tomcat Users List
Assunto: Re: Nervous about Sessions
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 27 de abril de 2005 12:51
Para: Tomcat Users List
Assunto: Re: Nervous about Sessions ...
To store a Java Object in session (HTTPRequest or HTTPResponse), just make
any Object (POJO or something more complicated) implement
serializable. Keep in mind, you
:59
Para: Tomcat Users List
Assunto: Re: Nervous about Sessions ...
There *technically* isn't any requirement that things you store in
session be serializable. However, since some app servers use databases
or file systems to persist session information, and that many times is
implemented using
sessions.
Tomcat has different session managers. A simple one that happily consumes
heap until you run out, a more sophisticated version that funnels old
sessions to disk and reloads them on demand, and then the failover aware
sessions.
But, even the generic base version would try to persist session
... I myself might learn something
here! :) Does anyone reading this know a definitive answer?
Conceptually, I guess someone could have changed the session to require
serialization. Perhaps they did this to handle the new cluster/failover
aware sessions.
Tomcat has different session managers
java.io.serializable everytime?
It doesn't. It fails for that case.
The real question is whether you care.
If you're using the RAM based session manager that tries and saves sessions
on Tomcat restart, then you ask yourself if you really care to save sessions
over a restart? (I don't, you may though.)
If you
serialize the objects in session if the
client application isn't placing objects implementing
java.io.serializable everytime?
It doesn't. It fails for that case.
The real question is whether you care.
If you're using the RAM based session manager that tries and saves sessions
on Tomcat restart
Alvim
Cc: Tomcat Users List
Assunto: Re: RES: Nervous about Sessions ...
From: Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 10:59 AM
Hi Paul,
No, I don't know of any changes... I'm actually wondering if this is a
restriction the latest servlet spec places on objects
(users). I found that I was using a HashMap (not threadsafe,
changed that) and I now ..I am wondering whether the use of java simple
types (e.g. client, and user strings) in the session is a good idea.
Well, let's look at the problem.
Sessions are based on a JSESSIONID (typically) which
the way to 40 concurrent) the number of failed clients
hovers around 1/2, sometimes more, sometimes less. It is seemingly
random which ones fail and how many, but there are definately pages
failing.
The strangest part of all this is that I thought something might be
occuring with the Sessions, because
their DTOs to the Session.
I haven't looked at Tomcat's code to see how they implemented the
hashCode method of the Session object but it's not the best way to
determine if two Sessions are equal in your case. The hash code may
depend on the contents of the Session object. I would print out
Is there a way to purge all the sessions on a Tomcat
instance?
Tomcat 5.0.28
JVM 1.4.2..
Regards,
Jimmy Ray
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In TC 5.5.7, the tomcat start/stop script for Linux/Solaris
(/etc/init.d/tomcat) stops tomcat by simply killing the process:
stop)
#
# Stop Tomcat
#
PID=`cat /var/run/jsvc.pid`
kill $PID
;;
Do user sessions ever get a chance to be serialized
/init.d/tomcat) stops tomcat by simply killing the process:
stop)
#
# Stop Tomcat
#
PID=`cat /var/run/jsvc.pid`
kill $PID
;;
Do user sessions ever get a chance to be serialized if tomcat is
stopped in such a manner?
They do if you're not using
In TC 5.5.7, the tomcat start/stop script for Linux/Solaris
(/etc/init.d/tomcat) stops tomcat by simply killing the process:
stop)
#
# Stop Tomcat
#
PID=`cat /var/run/jsvc.pid`
kill $PID
;;
Do user sessions ever get a chance to be serialized if tomcat is
stopped
;;
Do user sessions ever get a chance to be serialized if tomcat is
stopped in such a manner?
They do if you're not using the broken version of jsvc that ships with
Tomcat. The non-buggy jsvc program catches SIGTERM and performs a clean
shutdown of Tomcat.
I have noticed that users are forced
Michael Greer wrote:
List servers = MBeanServerFactory.findMBeanServer(null);
MBeanServer server = (MBeanServer)servers.get(0);
ObjectName objName = new
ObjectName(Catalina:type=Manager,path=/contextPath,host=localhost);
String sessionIds =
SSL sessions
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:01:10 -0600
you can also use DNS round robin,
www.mysite.com resolves to two or more IP addresses.
Filip
Andrew Miehs wrote:
We use F5 BigIPs, but they are probably overkill for your application -
The cisco probably will be as well.
A 'Cheap' software solution
BTW, I believe there is another issue with DNS round robin -- no support for
sticky sessions. There is no assurance that a series of requests (i.e., a
session) for a particular client IP or client with a particular session ID
will be routed to the same server. Also, SSL sticky sessions
Nachricht-
Von: Joseph Shraibman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2005 05:18
An: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Betreff: Getting other Sessions
I want to make an admin page in my application. I needs to be able to
get access to all the current Session objects to access
Hi,
That doesn't answer Joseph's question. It tells him how to access the objects
in his own session but not how to access other peoples sessions. I would be
interested to see how this is done as well.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Slominski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
: Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2005 10:25
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: RE: Getting other Sessions
Hi,
That doesn't answer Joseph's question. It tells him how to access the
objects in his own session but not how to access other peoples sessions. I
would be interested to see how this is done as well.
Ta
Hi Kelly,
To do a software solution you could use the following method.
www.mysite.com - Both servers can answer this request, (for example
round robin dns)
or some form of hsrp (im sure there is a patch for linux to do this)...
and based upon load and a simple script (perl, java, etc)
they
#sessionDestroyed(javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionEvent)
*/
public void sessionDestroyed(HttpSessionEvent sessionEvent) {
}
}
Then you can access the sessions via this session helpers Hashtable.
Finally you need to add the following to your web.xml.
web-app id=WebApp
display-nameblah/display-name
Hi,
looks to me that this was included in a previous version of the API, but
was removed for security reasons:
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/javax/servlet/http/HttpSessionContext.html
Therefore the only way to get all sessions is probably a SessionListener.
HTH
Christoph
Dale, Matt wrote
On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:24 PM, Kelly Vista wrote:
Hi -
We are looking to deploy our app, running on Tomcat 5, soon and are
exploring load balancing options. We are looking at H/W and S/W
solutions, and I was wondering if anyone had any past
experience/advice they would like to
List servers = MBeanServerFactory.findMBeanServer(null);
MBeanServer server = (MBeanServer)servers.get(0);
ObjectName objName = new
ObjectName(Catalina:type=Manager,path=/contextPath,host=localhost);
String sessionIds =
(String)server.invoke(objName,listSessionIds,null, null);
Hi,
I know that the SessionContext has been deprecated and have already used
my own static Map object for storing userID-session mapping when session
is created. But such static Map object that holds all the sessions is only
accessible from within one cluster node (i.e. the one who processed
requirement is that the LB solution support sticky SSL
sessions. I know that H/W LB (like Coyote Point Equalizer and Cisco
LocalDirector) can do the LB + SSL acceleration, which I believe would do
the job.
However, I would be interested to know if there is a S/W LB solution that
people would recommend
We use F5 BigIPs, but they are probably overkill for your application -
The cisco probably will be as well.
A 'Cheap' software solution might be to work with redirects, and 2
separate IP addresses.
ie: ssl1.mysite.com and ssl2.mysite.com - You will need 2 ssl keys
though for this to work.
you can also use DNS round robin,
www.mysite.com resolves to two or more IP addresses.
Filip
Andrew Miehs wrote:
We use F5 BigIPs, but they are probably overkill for your application
- The cisco probably will be as well.
A 'Cheap' software solution might be to work with redirects, and 2
Problem with round robin dns is that you can not guarantee that the web
browser/ client will not make a second request to the dns server during
the session - although very very unlikely.
Andrew
On Feb 22, 2005, at 11:01 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you can also use DNS round robin,
@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Load balancing SSL sessions
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:40:14 +0100
We use F5 BigIPs, but they are probably overkill for your application - The
cisco probably will be as well.
A 'Cheap' software solution might be to work with redirects, and 2 separate
IP addresses.
ie: ssl1
I want to make an admin page in my application. I needs to be able to
get access to all the current Session objects to access their
attributes. Is this possible?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
You can put all the sessions in List or Map when they login or use
HttpSessionListener to listen to session events.
rgds
Antony Paul
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:17:56 -0500, Joseph Shraibman
jks@selectacast.net wrote:
I want to make an admin page in my application. I needs to be able to
get
Antony Paul wrote:
You can put all the sessions in List or Map when they login or use
HttpSessionListener to listen to session events.
That was my fallback plan, if there wasn't an easier way.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Mladen Turk wrote:
Take a look at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/config/workers.html
It clearly states that (big warning in red color)
The name of the worker can contain only the alphanumeric characters
[a-z][A-Z][0-9] and is case insensitive.
So tc1.tc1 is illegal name for the
hello,
i've just tried to set-up tomcat 5.5 with apache2 and mod_jk version
1.2.8 in a load balancing set-up with sticky sessions.
when i give as jvmRoute parameter the string tc1 my sessionids look like:
BF20EF21CC52EA0659B1E079015D7B56.tc1.tc1
and i see in the mod_jk.log file that no worker
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:15:58 +0100, Christian Schuhegger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
i've just tried to set-up tomcat 5.5 with apache2 and mod_jk version
1.2.8 in a load balancing set-up with sticky sessions.
when i give as jvmRoute parameter the string tc1 my sessionids look like
Remy Maucherat wrote:
- Added jvmRoute=tc1 on Engine
- Accessed http://127.0.0.1:8080/servlets-examples/servlet/SessionExample
- Session ID displayed is 8DBBCECBCAD078E18C07401A076734B0.tc1
i've just tried this example myself and you're right. i see only .tc1.
i have a very little webapp which
1 - 100 of 929 matches
Mail list logo
