Available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/
More FHS compliant and misc fixes in spec files.
Important change from previous version, is that
the rpm didn't use no more IBM SDK 1.3.1 as
default SDK. Read the following RPM info :
---
I am using xerces 2.0.0 in one of my webapps so I need to move xerces.jar
out of /common/lib and into /server/lib. This works just fine with
4.0.2-b2.
With 4.0.2 If I keep xerces.jar in /common/lib and use xerces.jar 1.4.3 in
my web app everything starts up just fine. But if I move xerces.jar
Hi to all,
TC 4.0.2 rpms are available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.2/rpms/
But read the following before rushing :
Tomcat 4.0.2 in light mode need :
servletapi 2.3, regexp 1.2 and xerces 1.x, that
are for some compiled (servletapi), present in
source
De: Brown Bay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: jueves 14 de febrero de 2002 22:42
Has anyone got Tomcat (any version) running under OMVS on S390.
If you have a Linux VM on your S390 it will be easy since we package
Tomcat 3.3/4.0.2 as RPM ;)
BTW, Tomcat is a java apps which could be
What web connectors are available for connecting apache 1.3.x to tomcat
4.0.x? I recall trying to setup mod_webapp a while back but the attempt
failed in frustration and I ended up reverting back to tomcat 3 and mod_jk.
What connectors are available? (urls are good)
Tomcat 4.0.2 support now
Nice page :)
I read :
Tomcat 4.0.2 -- RPM Version
javax.servlet.ServletException: sun/tools/javac/Main
JSP examples will not execute in the default installation. To fix the problem,
you need to manually create a symbolic link between the JAVA_HOME/lib/tools.jar and
the CATALINA_HOME/lib.
You can't configure *apache* with mod_webapp and tomcat so that it
serves .html and .jsp from the same directory - right... (I
can't that's
for sure)
Via mod_jk (supported by TC 4.0.2), you could have tomcat serve
jsp/servlets and apache html, gif (everything which is not jsp/servlet)
In
Does anyone know how I can get the remote address if I am
using mod_proxy? I
tried mod_webapp and had too many problems - has that matured since
Tomcat-4.0? What about using AJP13?
mod_jk is now fully support in TC 4.0.2, with ajp13 and load-balancing
support :)
--
To unsubscribe:
so, what do I need to make work TC 4.0.2-2, apache 1.3.22.1-7
with ajp13
?
mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2.i386.rpm ???
seems to fail
the RPM are built against apache + mod_ssl.
I've got no problem to use Apache 1.3.23-2.8.6 + mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2
mod_jk-1.3-1.0-1.4.0.2 = mod_jk for Apache
The TC 4.0.3 rpm have been reuploaded since
there was a nasty problem in previous upload
and only .asc file where present.
Sorry for the disturbance.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
Second release of RPM uploaded to match update in source tarball.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/rpms/
tomcat3-3.3.1-2.src.rpm
tomcat3-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm
tomcat3-javadoc-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm
tomcat3-webapps-3.3.1-2.noarch.rpm
also added latest IBM SDK 1.3.1
Don't take me as a definitive source as I'm not a commiter (or
even a developer) but I believe there is work to make the RPMs
for tomcat4 more FHS compliant. There is also some debate as
to how FHS compliance should be achieved (proper directory
structure, symlinking in post-install, etc.).
Available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.4/rpms/
This rpm use external rpms from the Jpackage Project (http://www.jpackage.org)
Only needed binary rpm will be present in jakarta rpms directory :
jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.1.cvs20020612-1jpp.noarch.rpm
Hi Milt,
Anyone know anything about the mod_jk directive JkAutoMount? I've
seen some about it in the documentation, in the source, and via a web
search, but it's all a little bit sketchy. It sounds like it can be
used instead of JkMount, to have the web server query the servlet
container for
Hi to all,
Some of you may have experienced problems on heavily
loaded system with mod_jk and Tomcat 3.2/3.3 when using
ajp13.
As you may know, the Ajp13 connection is permanent
and is created each time a WebServer task, for
example an Apache child, have to forward a request
to Tomcat.
And
Use mod_jk for that :)
for TC 4.0 take stuff from :
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
for TC 4.0.1, ajp support is included.
In both case you should take a recent mod_jk like
the one for Tomcat 3.3
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/bin/win32/i386/
-
using mod_jk for connecting TC40 and Apache1.3 works fine for
Windows NT,
2000 and Solaris. I could easily build the connector from
source using the
download and the documentation from
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/.
The only difference between Solaris and Win is that I have
May I recommand you to switch to Tomcat 3.3, for strict
2.2/1.1 RI, which fixes quantities of problems like this ?
The RI for 2.2/1.1 is Tomcat 3.3 today, just take a look
at java.sun.com :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP
there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ? What's
the status of
loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ?
Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly
there won't be
any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ?
State of the art is that today only mod_jk could
Load balancing can be simulate it with several warp connectors
and virtual
host, the load balancing is not more than a very good
configured pooling
connection, that's what is in 4.x
It's not totally true. VirtualHost and warp connectors didn't
do a real load-balancing.
ie: If you have 500
in my application i want two servers(tomcat 3.2.3)
you should upgrade to 3.3 ;)
residing on
two different
machines to cater to requests coming another different
machinewhich keeps
forwarding the requests to either of the servers.Pls guide how
can i achieve
the same.I have added two workers
Tomcat 4.0.2 will support load balancing with mod_jk.
Stay tuned
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
Did you tried the RPM for TC 4.0.1 ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Steve
The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2
to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/
--
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list:
Thanks to forward the request to tomcat-dev instead :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From:
mod_webapp is ONLY for Tomcat 4.0.
For 3.2 and 3.3 (or 4.0), use mod_jk instead
# httpd.conf
AddModule mod_jk.c
JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties
JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log
JkLogLeveldebug
Alias /examples /var/tomcat/webapps/examples
Directory
Hi there!
I want to use tomcat togehter with apache+mod_ssl. However,
accessing my
servlets via SSL doesn't work at all, whereas using normal
http requests it
all works fine. In any documentation about using SSL with
apache/tomcat I
allways find configuration examples for mod_jk, but none for
In any documentation about using SSL with
apache/tomcat I
allways find configuration examples for mod_jk, but none for mod_jserv
(which I use). Is mod_jk a must when using apache/tomcat/SSL?
If not, how
can it be done with mod_jserv?
Yes, mod_jk will forward to your servlet/JSP
the SSL
Take a look at mod_jk in Tomcat 3.3 cvs or
better in jakarta-tomcat-connector.
There is a working version for Apache 2.0 :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8
Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
at my RPMs :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/
-
Henri Gomez
Yes.. but the difference with mod_jk.so is that mod_jk-eapi.so
can use SSL protocol?
How many times I have answered to that ?
eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
noeapi for std apache
I use Apache 1.3.. no matter that??
Roby.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
So use directly :
http
Thanks Jan, I'll add this as readme.txt in
directory :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From:
It was answered many times before.
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09075.html
People should really take a look at :
USER LIST :
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user%40jakarta.apache.org/
DEV LIST :
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/
Hi (.*),
Hope all is well around the globe.
We've been doing some stress testing here with Tomcat
3.2.3 operating
in standalone mode and with apache via the mod_jk ajp13
connector.
We've noticed something interesting which we're not sure about.
Tomcat
I've got a couple of quick newbie questions:
Environment: Apache 1.3.20 on Solaris 8; Tomcat 3.2 (using
mod_jk); Apache
and Tomcat running on the same box.
If I configure and run multiple Tomcat workers on the same machine
(listening on different ports of course), and let's say they
are all
We are using Tomcat 3.2.3, ibm jdk 1.2.2 (aix).
(our) Tomcat has a similar symptom than the bug 1006
described in the bug database : Tomcat standlone
accumulate blocked thread and stop responding.
In TC 3.2.3 the code setSoTimeout is in HttpConnectionHandler !
Isn't it supposed to be fixed in
Thanks for the replies!
Just to be very sure, if I try mod_jk.dll then I'll have to
change this line
in /conf/tomcat-apache.conf
LoadModule jserv_module modules/ApacheModuleJServ.dll
to
LoadModule jserv_module modules/mod_jk.dll
and all of this will stil work with version 3.2.2?
mod_jk use
I would like to force 2 separate iPlanet 4.1 Web servers to
redirect servlet
requests to a Tomcat 3.2.3 servlet engine running on an
additional box. Is
Tomcat capable of keeping session and responding to the
correct, requesting
Web server?
Yes, mod_jk for iPlanet handle that case, I'm
Hello,
I have an error, which will occure, when I refresh in the Web Client
is too fast,
Tomcat will throw an Error (or better mod_jk ?), which popup on
stdout:
java.io.IOException: Broken pipe
at
java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:83)
at
Is there a lite edition of tomcat available for using with
J2ME-CDC-Foundation profile. We want to use tomcat in a memory
restricted
environment. What are the possibilities.
Take a look at tomcat-3.3.
Costin have conducted some test on it's PALM :)
I heard a lot of good things about 4.0. But there are no RPMs
released:(
Can anyone comment the situation with them (or just give URL:)?
We still have problems with related jars, like jdbc2.0ext, jta,
jmx, ldap which are copyrigthed by Sun and so couldn't be
included in RPM
...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Rams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:19 PM
To: GOMEZ Henri
Cc: Manu L'Malin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ssl performance
We just encontered a problem, when a session is started on one tomcat
and then through a load balancer it ends up on the another webserver
that webserver dosen't direct the session to correct tomcat ?
Is this a bug or isn't mod_jk supposed to work that way ?
This is working with
From: Jonathan Eric Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 4.0 RPMs: when
What's wrong with the .zip file?
Jon
Problems with license of all the required jar (jta, jmx, ldap, tyrex).
I asked Craig to have all the jars in a
First mod_jserv, then mod_jk, now mod_webapp.
First ajp12, then ajp13, now warp.
Which Apache connector will be around in the longer term?
Should we abandon mod_jk and ajp1x?
mod_jk is here for a long time, supporting
TC 3.2/3.3/4.0 :)
Why not take a look at mod_jk with TC 4.0 ?
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Typo : s/roto/root/
it's root not roto :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri
Allready answered, just search the mail archive
-Original Message-
From: Mradul Awasthi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EAPI Vs DEAPI
hi ,
i have mod_jk.so file.
i made with
/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs -o
message, but I will
report when we do more testing on it (probably later today).
I will try to switch the logging flag on, to get more error info.
thanx,
-reynir
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12. október 2001 15:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
A little problem was discovered by Nicolas Mailhot,
in the tomcat 3.3, java part, with an incorrect tomcat
init script which wasn't used the new 'nobody' work mode.
Now tomcat run as nobody by default for security purposes.
The RPM has been updated to -2 release and the old one
removed :
RPMs and Linux binaries (i386) are available.
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/
You'll find mod_jk for Apache 1.3 STD and EAPI,
and mod_jk for Apache 2.0 grabbed
from jakarta-tomcat-connectors (20011123).
Apache 2.0.18 is present in iSeries (AS/400)
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/http/services/apache.h
tm
And they use tomcat also
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/http/services/tomcat.h
tml
And to link the both they use mod_jk (ajp12/ajp13/jni)
;)
Some minor glitches appears and reported also
bu Nicolas:
RH 6.x use nobody user to run Apache HTTP server, so
I used also that one to operate tomcat but
RH 7.x use apache user to run Apache HTTP server
===
The new RPM will create a tomcat user which will run tomcat.
Other updates :
-
Hi,
This ques. is Reg. to Multiple Server certificate support at one
Webserver for SSL connection.
How can l map different multiple server Certificates to one
webserver?
Impossible my friend, you could only have ONE SSL Server certificate
by IP adress.
It's a normal behaviour and happen when IIS didn't have
to works anymore with Tomcat (may be thread cleanup on IIS)
No problem here
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint :
It's normal, the error code is in fact a warning code,
telling you that the remote (Apache), closed the connection.
It's just informative :
PS: The latest version of Ajp13 for TC 4.0.1 from
jakarta-tomcat-connectors fix that 'bad report'
You could find the right and corrected jars at :
You could use also Tomcat 3.3 with mod_jk :
JkMount /examples/servlet/* ajp13
JkMount /examples/*.jsp ajp13
JkMount /onjava/servlet/* ajp13
JkMount /onjava/*.jsp ajp13
JkMount /web_change/servlet/* ajp13
JkMount /web_change/*.jsp
).
Travis
thank you,
sebastian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. November 2001 23:45
An: Tomcat Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: mod_jk / Ajp13 config fix on heavily loaded system
Hi to all
If you want a process to be independant from user connection,
disconnection on a Unix boxes (and more generally on any system),
you should make it run as a service.
For example on Linux, you make it run at init time via
script in /etc/rc.d/init.d/.
And to be sure your tomcat has nothing to do
Not necessary, if tomcat 3.x/4.0 forward the Range
information to the end Servlet
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
Tomcat is a _reference_ implementation.
I doubt it will be polluted by non-portable extensions, even
if they seem to
be useful.
Such as connectors to specific web servers? :)
What do you mean ?
While I did post this knowing I was at risk of appearing to troll, I
wasn't, and thought it
http://a.b.c.d:5476/ shows apache default page, as expected.
http://a.b.c.d:5475/ also shows apache default page.
but, http://a.b.c.d:5475/examples/ shows apache's 404 page
'Apache/1.3.20 Server at a.b.c.d Port 5476'
thanks again for your thoughts.
Using mod_jk it should be easy :
Could you
Which connector is the preferred or suggested connector for tomcat 4?
I've seen some people saying they switched back to mod_jk. Is
mod_jk more
desireable until mod_webapp is more advanced?
As a mod_jk developper, I will say use mod_jk with TC 4.0.1
since it support more WebServer and is
I am not sure if this is the right place to post this question, but
since I am desperate, I am doing it anyway. I am using Apache 1.3.9 on
linux RH 6.2 as the Webserver and Weblogic 5.1 as the application
server.
You must contact BEA for that kind of problem.
For large file uploads (5 Mb
I may try to do something to TC 3.3 if nobody volunteer
"Entre truands, les bnfices, a se partage, la rclusion, a
s'additionne."
-- Michel Audiard
-Original Message-
From: Torgeir Veimo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
if i do load balancing with tomcat (w/ mod_jk), what happens
if the two tomcat servers at the same time execute a
synchronized method?
With mod_jk, even in load balancing mode, a request is allways
sent a a SINGLE tomcat !
will they know that they mustn't execute
it concurrently or not? if
There's no connection at all (AFAIK!) between Linux loadable
modules, and
the Jakarta Tomcat project, or the Linux kernel. Or gcc for
that matter,
apart from building mod_jk, which is more an Apache component than a
Tomcat one!
+1
Tomcat works perfectly on Redhat 6.2 and 7.0 boxes, with all
The source are still missing in :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-b3/src/
Regards.
Tomcat 4.0-beta-3 is an update to the Tomcat 4.0-beta-2
distribution that
was released on 30 March 2001. It fixes a further security
vulnerability
related to potentially
Many solutions :
1) You can patch the mod_webapp (I started to do that)
but all your changes will be lost when cvs will be
updated
2) Wait Pier to update the CVS.
The lack of visibility on mod_webapp is a real problem
on Tomcat 4.0. I'm sorry to say if the code is in OpenSource
the
Hi,
each time I post a message I receive :
The original message was received at Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:02:46 -0400
from mercury.drfirst.com [172.1.1.36]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Transcript of session follows -
... while
I've commited code to add time-stamp in mod_jk.log.
Set the new directive, JkLogStampFormat, in mod_jk.conf
JkLogStampFormat "[%Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S]"
-Original Message-
From: Ed Gomolka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Excellent! Which version of Tomcat is that in?
I'm running 3.2.1, and I saw no reference to JkLogStampFormat
in the Tomcat
source.
Thx,
Ed
Yep, it's only on tomcat 3.3 CVS :)
At 11:27 PM 4/4/01 +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I've commited code to add time-stamp in mod_jk.log.
Set the new
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I've commited code to add time-stamp in mod_jk.log.
Set the new directive, JkLogStampFormat, in mod_jk.conf
JkLogStampFormat "[%Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S]"
Cool! Request a feature, and hours later, it's there! :-).
Thanks but not hours, It was
I've finish the TC 4.0b2 RPM (using xerces-j 1.3.1 as XML parser).
It's ready to be uploaded but for TC 4.0B3 the sources are still missing at
:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-b3/src/
Regards
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I've commited code to add time-stamp in mod_jk.log.
Set the new directive, JkLogStampFormat, in mod_jk.conf
JkLogStampFormat "[%Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S]"
Cool! Request a feature, and hours later, it's there! :-).
Thanks but
Yep, it's only on tomcat 3.3 CVS :)
Sounds like I'll be moving to 3.3 before long. :)
Good idea.
The situation is clear :
- No more feature in TC 3.2.x tree (only bug fixes)
Next choice is TC 3.3 (a beta must be out before too long)
and use mod_jk or wait TC 4.0 and mod_webapp.
[admin@ns1 bin]$
/usr/java/jdk1.3.0_02/bin/i386/native_threads/java: error
in lo
ading shared libraries: libX11.so.6: cannot open shared
object file: No such
fil
e or directory
It seems you didn't have X11 installed on your Linux boxes.
Which distrib did you use ?
It's an outdated library (LIBC 5).
I recommand you to install XFree RPMs
"Entre truands, les bénéfices, ça se partage, la réclusion, ça
s'additionne."-- Michel Audiard
-Original Message-From: Brandon Cruz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:57
Hi,
Just trying a clean rebuilt of TC 4.0b2 and got :
Using CLASSPATH:
/var/tomcat4/bin/bootstrap.jar:/opt/IBMJava2-13/lib/tools.jar
Using CATALINA_HOME: /var/tomcat4
Starting service Tomcat-Standalone
Apache Tomcat/4.0-b2
Exception during startup processing
I really suggest you to make apache read a mod_jk.conf
you done by hand.
Keep the auto generation for information purpose.
"Entre truands, les bnfices, a se partage, la rclusion, a
s'additionne."
-- Michel Audiard
-Original Message-
From: Milt Epstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Tomcat 4 has the ability to un/deploy web apps on the fly
(i.e. without
restarting Tomcat). Does anyone know what implications this has on
Apache. In Tomcat 3 mod_jk.conf was used to create maps
between Apache and
your Tomcat webapps. This can only be done at Apache runtime
however as
I running Tomcat as a standalone using SSL.
What i'm hoping to do is that one context with non-SSL and the other
context is with SSL.
Well, that helps clarify the question. Unfortunately, I don't have an
answer for you (i.e. I don't know) -- but perhaps someone else does.
This is certainly a
It's amazing to see that RPM works is still not known ...
For example in 3.3 tree
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3-m2/rpms/
PS: Redhat Linux 6.2 + updates. (rpm -qpi --changelog
tomcat-mod-3.3-m2.1.i386.rpm)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL
If you have an Apache with EAPI you may have also installed
mod_ssl. But did you have th rigth apxs installed ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39
You tell you're using ajp12/ajp13 in Tomcat 4 ?
Are you sure ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original
I was wondering which is the prefered choice for
work with servlets? I am having untold trouble getting Apache-SSL to work
(built it, can't view a page without a seg fault). Whilst not a tomcat
specific issue Apache-SSL is the mentioned way to get SSL working with tomcat.
I've
Well, at the time I had been trying to use Apache-SSL, whci is the method
for SSL
mentioned in the tomcat docs so I assumed was the best one to use.
Needless to say i cou;dnt get the sod to work. I tried using mod_ssl after
finding that stronghold uses it.
I got mod_ss l working so I guess
Redhat RPMs are available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/tomcat/release/v3.2.2-beta-3/rpms/
also mod_jk.so for Linux i386 (STDAPI and EAPI .so )
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/tomcat/release/v3.2.2-beta-3/bin/linux/i386
/
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL
all the RPM :
http://rpmized.free.fr/
You could find there the announce of the RPM and also the
RPM. All jakarta and xml projects packaged are referenced
and also some Apache related (Apache 2.0, apache-mod_ssl...)
Regards
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" [EMAIL
We're deploying on SuSE 7.0 anyway. I prefer SuSE purely because:
a) you get shedloads of apps on the source cd's (less downloading)
b) yast is brilliant for admin stuff
c) They release new versions pretty frequently
Redhat, Suse, Mandrake are all great distribs. You allways get
binaries and
,
17 Apr 2001 09:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71044 invoked by uid 500); Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:51:49 +
Received: (qmail 84272 invoked from network); Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:49:06 +
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:49:03 +0200
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tomcat 3.2.2
Be carefull in using mod_jk statically.
It still changing :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
Tomcat mod_jk was written by Gal Shachor :
"Gal Shachor is a research staff member at IBM.
He wrote his first Servlet container
(ServletExpress) at the beginning of 1997.
Later on ServletExpress (and Gal) merged into WebSphere,
and Gal participated in the development of WebSphere 1, 2 and
Could you be more explicit.
OS, mod_jk version, tomcat version, apache version
Thanks
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
I'm +1 to remove the fdatasync or any other
sync method.
Log must be run with low priority
If Dan agree, I'll remove the datasync. :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP
Now... The short answer... {:-)}
1) nobody is not a good user since it does not usually have shell
associated (check your /etc/passwd). It is better to create user
(e.g., tomcat) with all things which user needs.
Apache HTTP server switch to user nobody (at least under Linux)
since it's
The RPM and the Linux .so are compiled under Linux Redhat 6.2
against Apache 1.3.19.
The stdapi.so is linked against standard Apache 1.3.19 and the
eapi.so againsy Apache 1.3.19 with mod_ssl 2.8.1.
The build use apxs and use DSO.
mod_ssl extends the Apache API and so the two .so files :)
-
-- mod_jserv won't work if you want to use SSL
Why not? SSL stuff in apache is done in apache, and jserv is
only a connector.
The SSL in apache works the same way in mod_ssl, and
mod_jserv. The only
difference is that in Servlet Spec 2.0 (JSDK2.0 which jserv is) has no
notion of SSL (to my
[root@webserver bin]# ./apachectl start
Syntax error on line 8 of /usr/local/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto:
API module structure `jk_module' in file
/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an
Apache module DSO?
./apachectl start: httpd could not be started
I saw
You're using an Apache with EAPI, probably using mod_ssl.
Rebuild mod_jserv.so on your system using apxs.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo