Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long)
Spark had other uses, Add ozone to the air, reduce the insect bug population, warm up the shack in cold WX, Arc kept you awake, could light your cigar when needed. So outside of minimizing your personal connection with others , what else does digital do ? ( ; > ) 73 Bruce-k1fz On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:34:30 -0500, Mike Waters wrote: Oooh! Vey well said, Dave!! Short and perfect. :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Oct 25, 2017 10:14 AM, "Dave AA6YQ" wrote: "Technologies available before you reached the age of 35 are standard; every op should use them. Technologies that arrived after you reached the age of 35 will kill the hobby." We've heard this with every new technology, going back to the advent of CW in the days of spark. _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Info wanted
Hi Jeff, Will pass your email on to the 160 meter topband reflector. Africa has much noise, & not many noise free areas. Unfortunately your QTH is not in one of them. Noise is additive, so the right directive antenna will help. 73, Bruce-k1fz Hi Bruce: I had lunch with Laurent Miglioriini TZ4XR yesterday. He's in Gao (northern Mali, no power and hence no powerline or other urban noise) and his QRN level on 160 m (and to a lesser extent on 80 m) is also s9. He tried to reduce this by disconnecting from the local power network and running his ICOM off of a battery with everything else off and a ground for the ICOM only. Still s9. I think this is just just the way things are in Mali. I don't think that the radials have anything to do with the QRN which is coming in with propagation. Last year I noticed that QRN gets better later in the year and when it is cold and there are fewer thunderstorms in this part of Africa. In the meantime we are still working on receiving antennas, trying to get the BOGs to provide some "gain" toward EU and NA, increasing signal strength over the noise level. So far neither BOG appears to be doing much. But I also think we need a preamp to increase the signal strength coming off of these antennas, since the preamp in the Elecraft appears not to be sufficient. We expect permission to put up real beverages in about a week. We have a SAL 20 from Array solutions (or SAL 30 if we want to convert it) but can't mount it until a nearby building is finished after which we will be able to put it on the roof. In the meantime, I can hear only the strongest stations and only some of the time on 160. So I think I'll stop calling CQ and just start calling people whom I can hear on the TX antenna. 73, Jeff tz...@aol.com _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: RG-6U
Elan, Need to use the coax impedance that the BOG transformer was manufactured for: If F fitting use 75 ohm coax like RG-6 If SO-239 larger coax fitting ,then use 50 ohm coax like RG-58 or RG-8. 73 Bruce-k1fz Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:07:51 + (UTC), "E.P" wrote: HI is it better to feed the BOG with RG-6U VERSION or normal rg6 ? there is some different i like to try it since i use 50 ohm rg58 wonder is this will make a lot of different ?thank you vy 73 elan g0uut _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Info wanted
Have a friend that is getting noise from raised radials connected to his inverted L antenna. He can not bury the radials due to space problems. Are there any recent solutions to the problem.? Thank you in advance for your input. . 73 Bruce-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: 3C0L
Tim, They were good copy here also one hour before sunset ! I am close to salt water, an inlet just down the hill to the south. One hour early is great propagation though. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 09:48:01 -0400, Tim Shoppa wrote: 3C0L had superb signals on 160M last night and a ginormous pileup. Their signal started out an hour before my sundown, on my NE-facing K9AY loop, but began showing QSB there an hour after my sundown. I then checked and was surprised their signal was so much better on my transmit antenna. This is something I've noticed several times on African DXpeditions. I wonder if "Looking to the NE" makes sense before sundown because this my shortest path to the most darkness, but the further after sundown a more direct E or even southerly path makes more sense. Tim N3QE _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: TZ4AM
Yes Raoul, 160 meters is a competitive band. Not just competing with each other, but with varying conditions, Usually a small/poor transmit antenna needs a large radial field to get a good low angle signal out. Local Noise: Years ago I had a very strong background noise, that turned out to be a neighbors poorly built computer "power supply". Took a long time in the 1990's to find it. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 06:33:04 + (UTC), Raoul Coetzee wrote: I agree! And not everybody have space for good RX antennas.And even if we can install a good RX antenna in limited space, cheap Chinese products are making it worse, it is a struggle to hear anything. The other problem is, I use at least 600 watts on 160m, and some EUs try to work you with a 100 watts and a dipole,and then call you deaf if you cannot hear them. Some do not understand 160m at all. Regards,Raoul ZS1C On Saturday, October 14, 2017, 3:07:12 AM GMT+2, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: Africa is a high noise location. Jeff is working on his antennas, Meanwhile giving as many contacts as he can copy. As his receive antennas improve, hope you find yourself in his log. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 03:23:54 +0300, Saulius Zalnerauskas wrote: But no copy as always. RX problems LY5W www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: TZ4AM
Africa is a high noise location. Jeff is working on his antennas, Meanwhile giving as many contacts as he can copy. As his receive antennas improve, hope you find yourself in his log. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 03:23:54 +0300, Saulius Zalnerauskas wrote: But no copy as always. RX problems LY5W On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:33 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: > Jeff, TZ4AM hopes to be on 160 meters tonight around 0300 UTC. He > likes ~ 1826.5, 1827.5 and usually operates split. > > Band Conditions are not good but hope for an improvement. > > > 73 > Bruce-k1fz > . > _ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: TZ4AM
Jeff, TZ4AM hopes to be on 160 meters tonight around 0300 UTC. He likes ~ 1826.5, 1827.5 and usually operates split. Band Conditions are not good but hope for an improvement. 73 Bruce-k1fz . _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Aurora
Northern lights visible in coastal Maine. May have a radio black out, or enhanced propagation to a area. worked E31A in the last one, Best to keep an "ear" open. 73 Bruce-K1FZ. _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Fwd: DX signals
http://www.newsweek.com/fast-radio-bursts-frb-explained-658554 Don't sound like a net beacon. Ask them if they QSL. ((;>)) 73 Bruce-K1FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: DX signals
Don't sound like a net beacon. Ask them if they QSL. ((;>)) 73 Bruce-K1FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: 160 4 square
Your tower may act as a reflector if ground at the base . If un-grounded,, then no problem. Could take many hours on the tower to work out problems. Its easier to spend the hours with a modeling program while on the ground. W7EL Roy Lewallen P.O. box 66958 Beaverton, OR 97007 Roy sells antenna modeling programs. If someone else does the modeling for you, unseen factors may be left out. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 12:56:44 -0600, "Greg" wrote: Question for the group... From a 140 foot freestanding tower, I will suspend 4 pieces of phillystran 90 degrees apart from the top of the tower. Antenna wire will be attached to the phillystran such that verticals will be dropped to create a 4 square. I will have as much vertical length as practical and still obtain the 4 square spacing required -- but the vertical length certainly will not be close to a quarter wave. The intent is to use the verticals as a 4 square. In thinking of ways to increase the electrical length, should I run wire back toward the tower from the top of the vertical section to get the full 1/4 or use a T with wire going back toward the tower and down the phillystran to create a "top hat" effect -- or does it matter? Obviously this is a compromise but hopefully still an effective antenna with directional gain. Thanks in advance for your thoughts. 73, Greg-N4CC _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Ecipse
Even though Maine was not in the Eclipse path, noticed noise in the West direction was below S-meter zero on 160 meter antennas. Normal lowest noise is East out over the Atlantic ocean.. 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: WD1-A wire
Many Thanks to everyone for the help. Have some WD1-A wire coming. God that was fast ! 73 Bruce-K1FZ On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:33:50 -0400, "kd9sv" wrote: Craig from Radioware may still have some remaining...gary -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K1FZ-Bruce Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:11 AM To: Topband Subject: Topband: WD1-A wire Anyone know of a dealer that sells WD1-A military field telephone wire ? My Beverage antenna hidden in dense trees has failed, thanks to someone who decided to trim up the border line with a chain saw. 73 Bruce-K1FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: WD1-A wire
Anyone know of a dealer that sells WD1-A military field telephone wire ? My Beverage antenna hidden in dense trees has failed, thanks to someone who decided to trim up the border line with a chain saw. 73 Bruce-K1FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: LU5OM shortened dipole (inverted vee) doing a nice job
Good information Gary. Lot of the fun of low band DXing comes from getting new countries, and finding what antenna works best. Yes, In the transition that takes place at gray line time, there is often high angle taking place. As in the past, building our own radio from scratch is not so easy, but lets "have at it" with our antennas. 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:21:27 -0400, "StellarCAT" wrote: that’s a pretty ‘general’ statement! I had a 90’ high inverted L with the bend supported by a tower – it was only about 50’ from a 143’ tower ... it had ~30 100’ radials under it ... and I managed to work 100 countries in 89 consecutive days - from Arizona! That included some pretty rare/distant entities. It worked VERY well as far as I was concerned. I say this only so that someone reading your comment, having only this as an option, isn’t dissuaded from trying it ... if it is what you have available – go for it! As for comparing a V at a low height (for most everyone it WILL be at a low height) to a vertical and saying the V was better would, I believe, suggest a feed system issue I’d think on the vertical. I’d think it would beat out a horizontal, for long distance DX, most of the time – and substantially at that. The vertical that is. OR the ground losses are really substantial. Or both. Just because DX is worked using a low horizontal antenna doesn’t imply something is “good” ... it only implies it is sufficient. “Good”ness is very subjective. but as they, as we all say – do what you have to ... Gary K9RX _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: VK6LK SK
G'day Steve, Robin and Mike were great DX friends. Got together usually weekly to talk about DX.. Early on with poor radios they had QRM problem if they both on 160 meters at the same sunrise time. They decided Mike would take 160 meters and Robin 80 meters (75 SSB) this time period.. Robin had two Beverage antenna toward North America, They were arranged and feed in a V Beam fashion, terminated and high enough so a "Joey" would not take them down. Salt water came up to his QTH underground, so he had a system to catch rainwater from the roof of his house and store it in very large tanks for home use.. His vertical antenna(s) radials were very effective over this below ground salt water possibly acting as raised radials. Robin did work other bands including 40 SSB in his later years. Worked him once on 10 meter SSB from my mobile in the early 1990's. 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:01:08 +0800, "Steve Ireland" wrote: G’day Very sorry to hear of the passing of Robin VK6LK. The passion of Robin and his great friend Mike VK6HD for lowband DXing was an inspiration to me when first arriving in Western Australia in 1989. The old SSB DX window just below 3.8MHz at local sunrise won’t sound quite the same – Robin’s presence there was as regular as clockwork for most of the last quarter of a century. Vy 73 Steve, VK6VZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: VK6LK
Received an email from Kim VK6TM.His father, Robin VK6LK passed away today at 1830 hours WA time. Robin operated both 80 and 160 meters. His main stay was 80 meters while his best DX friend VK6HD operated mainly 160 meters. Robin is on the DXCC honor Roll. He was always eager to work someone who needed a new country. He was a 80 meter beacon on long path most days to North America at his sunrise, Also at times on short path conditions permitting. Very sorry to hear of his passing. 73 Bruce-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: LU5OM shortened dipole (inverted vee) doing a nice job
There are always exceptions. A few years ago there was someone that had a inverted V that worked well for DX. It was found that it was feed with open wire feeders that acted as a vertical antenna with top loading. If your antenna works well be happy. Ham radio is a great hobby. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:14:48 -0400, Don Kirk wrote: Manuel (LU5OM) had been using an Inverted-L on 160 meters, and he recently switched to a shortened dipole installed as an Inverted Vee. Each of the last 3 mornings Manuel has been using his inverted vee and I have heard Manuel (LU5OM) all 3 days, and this Sunday morning I heard him for 1.25 hours running with a very constant signal that was able to overcome static crashes from lightning strikes. I made some recordings for Manuel and created a brief youtube video of him calling CQ on Sunday and here is the youtube video URL for those interested. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P56Rq-vCEEU=youtu.be If Manuel were not transmitting (not calling CQ) you would think the band was dead, but in reality there has been pretty good propagation for long periods of time between Indianapolis Indiana and Argentina the past 3 days that I have listened. Also in the video I tried to briefly demonstrate for Manuel that the reduced RF gain trick provides very little (if any) improvement in my receiver performance on 160 meters when using my very old Kenwood TS-180s (contrary to what most others report with their receivers). Maybe I'm not doing something right, but I've never been able to find noticeable improvements (to any great extent) in my receiver performance by backing down my receivers RF gain control. Just FYI, and 73, Don (wd8dsb) _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: QSL DX users.
QSL net just became clear of the ransomware virus. Back to DXing. Thanks 73 Bruce-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Propagation info
IV3PRK Luis web site: http://www.iv3prk.it/ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Fwd: 160 meter propagation
Been wondering what is going on with "the band"Check out IV3PRK's. Luis's web site for almost 3 cycles. Good info. 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Electro magnetic energy
We see electromagnetic energy of tiny short waves. Sometimes directly, sometimes reflected. See a single color, like a red flower ?,The red frequency is being reflected to our eyes. Our low band antennas can be manipulated to add, reject, or skew signals. Thinking in DC terms, magnets can attract or repel, Like poles repel, opposites attract.. With that in mind found this informative info. https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/7/15741176/gravitational-microlensing-white-dwarf-star-albert-einstein-relativity 73 Bruce-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Aurora
Northern lights extending down into Maine(reports on local 11PM local time news also) 73 Bruce-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: propagation question.
Tim, Many thanks for your research, How do the numbers compare to other years, the same contest ?. Bruce-k1fz On Wed, 24 May 2017 21:18:50 -0400, Tim Shoppa wrote: Bruce, I went and looked at reversebeacon statistics for the two nights before the Chelyabinsk meteor (that would be 13 Feb 2013 and 14 Feb 2013) as well as the night of the strike (15 Feb 2013). The strike was at 0320Z. I specifically looked for 160M EU-NA transatlantic reversebeacon spots and counted the number of such spots. On 13 Feb 2013, there were 636 EU-NA reversebeacon spots. On 14 Feb 2013, there were 776 EU-NA reversebeacon spots. On 15 Feb 2013, there were 1984 EU-NA reversebeacon spots. HOWEVER, there is a confounding factor, which is that ARRL DX CW started on 16 Feb 2013. I think the pickup in spots on 15 Feb could be entirely explained by stations warming up and checking out the night before the night before the big contest. There was one station, LY7M, that was on 160M for several hours before and several hours after the meteor. I plotted a curve of its strength at a NA Skimmer and while there are a couple peak-ups, I don't think the peak-ups are necessarily tied to the meteor strike. You can see the curve I plotted here: http://n3qe.org/ly7m-meteor.png Tim N3QE On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:20 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: > > Watch " Meteor Strike" on some PBS TV stations tonight.Check your > local TV listings for time and channel. > > Did anyone notice an increase in low band propagation for awhile, after > this rather large event ? > > 73 > Bruce-K1FZ > http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html > _ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: propagation question.
Watch " Meteor Strike" on some PBS TV stations tonight.Check your local TV listings for time and channel. Did anyone notice an increase in low band propagation for awhile, after this rather large event ? 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: propagation variables ?
Interesting info http://www.space.com/36934-humans-change-space-weather.html 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Fwd: Re: Loop query
Hi Jake, It is not the best antenna for DX ,, but a good antenna for Field Day. The rather high angle pattern should net you many QSO's. With the match box an acceptable VSWR for the transceiver should be possible. Good luck & have fun. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html On Sat, 20 May 2017 17:55:19 -0400 (EDT), "jcjacob...@q.com" wrote: How do Top Banders, I've got a "theory" question for the collective group. Think Field Day. Full wave loop on 75/80 meters. Coax fed with a 2:1 balun. (I know, use ladder line and a Match Box). Is it usable if you use ladder line down to near ground level into the balun, and coax from there? OR does/should the balun be up in the air at the loop itself?? We're thinking put the balun down near ground so the weight isn't up in the air.. Remember, field day and temp install. What say you all?? 73 K9WN Jake _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Out-door antenna tuning boxes.
Hi Guy, Sorry I do not. I purchased two in different hardware stores and another in a sporting goods store. I needed short boxes to silicon rubber to the concrete support piers. Most boxes were longer, so had to check around. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:02 AM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: heavy duty black fishing tackle box Do you have a manufacturer or model number for those? 73, Guy K2AV _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 173, Issue 8
Charles, Do you have a FCC call sign ? Bruce-k1fz On Fri, 12 May 2017 14:57:57 -0400, Charles Yahrling wrote: Waterproof Boxes The orange waterproof boxes marine flare kits come in make good boxes too as they are taller and have o-ring seals on the hinged lid. You can get them up the road in Searsport, at Hamilton maine, Bruce. They repack the flares (which come in 5-gal steel buckets) to make up kits of various sizes, so i know they have the empty boxes there. hamiltonmarine.com for on-line catalog On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:00 PM, wrote: Send Topband mailing list submissions to topband@contesting.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to topband-requ...@contesting.com You can reach the person managing the list at topband-ow...@contesting.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Topband digest... Today's Topics: 1. Out-door antenna tuning boxes. (K1FZ-Bruce) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:02:43 -0400 From: K1FZ-Bruce To: Topband Subject: Topband: Out-door antenna tuning boxes. Message-ID: 201705121502.v4cf2hy9003...@mail23c26.carrierzone.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Finding a suitable plastic antenna tuning box is often not easy in local rural America. I have found that heavy duty black fishing tackle boxes work well. Many are thick walled, and designed to be out in the hot sun on docks, and in boats for long periods, year after year. They come in various sizes with covers that open for easy mounting of components, and tuning. 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html -- Subject: Digest Footer ___ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband -- End of Topband Digest, Vol 173, Issue 8 *** _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Out-door antenna tuning boxes.
Finding a suitable plastic antenna tuning box is often not easy in local rural America. I have found that heavy duty black fishing tackle boxes work well. Many are thick walled, and designed to be out in the hot sun on docks, and in boats for long periods, year after year. They come in various sizes with covers that open for easy mounting of components, and tuning. 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Solar Flare
There are always nay-sayers as in recent global warming dialogue. Good chance back in the spark transmitter days when someone showed up with a tube oscillator, he was told that all the experts agree you must have to have a spark to transmit (;)) We do not need to run with closed minds. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:17:56 -0500, Cecil Acuff wrote: Hope it does not turn out to be a cyber attack...big deal in the utility industry where I work as an IT specialist. Cecil K5DL Sent using recycled electrons. On Apr 22, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Bruce Whitney via Topband wrote: The effects of GMD on power systems are well known by many engineers in our electric utility industry. The recent failures were unrelated. There is no mystery. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 22, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Steve wrote: The root cause was collision with an ice berg. a well researched TV documentary recently shed brand new light here...apparently they had a nasty coal fire burning in one of the coal bunkers from departure up until the day before the iceberg. It severely warped / weakened one of the walls of the flood compartment walls which happened to be at the exact spot of the iceberg's contact and subsequent ripping of the hull. The plate eventually burst and allowed the next several watertight compartments to flood which made the ship's bow start to tilt. The documentary concluded that if there had been no fire and plate warpage then the ship would have stayed afloat. .they should have never departed while the fire was still burning but after all of the hype and big $ involved, decided to go anyway. The fire info was hushed-up during the official inquiry, I suspect maybe for insurance purposes... fascinating new light. Steve WEB - The VE7SL Radio Notebook: http://qsl.net/ve7sl/ VE7SL BLOG - Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanowaves: http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/ The excitement of learning separates youth from old age. As long as you're learning you're not old. - Rosalyn S. Yalow --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Solar Flare
Hello Jorge, Thanks for the signal information. Always good to hear from you. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:42:44 -0300, Jorge Diez - CX6VM wrote: Hello good condx tonight, some europe, 5V and 8Q7 with good signals 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W 2017-04-22 21:36 GMT-03:00 K1FZ-Bruce : Hi Gene, OK. That is a broad statement. The cause of the Titanic sinking was equipment failures, hi The root cause was collision with an ice berg. The 160 meter band is open 5V7P is strong here. Corona start up Enhancement is taking place. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:44:34 -0400, Gene Smar wrote: Both outages were reported on local (DC) news yesterday as having been caused by utility equipment failure. The root cause of the equipment failure wasn't disclosed. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Solar Flare
Major solar flare. Power outages in NYC and San Fransisco. Aurora noise on what few signals there are on 160.. 73 Bruce-K1FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Propagation
Propagation still peaking north-south. Worked Mario LU8DPM at 0156. We are very close to the same longitude of 70 Degrees. Typical aurora conditions. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Propagation
Propagation still peaking north-south. Worked Mario LU8DPM at 0156. We are very close to the same longitude of 70 Degrees. Typical aurora conditions. 73 Bruce-k1fz file:///C:/Users/Clark/Documents/WEB%20Pages/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Propagation
160 band is coming back slightly/slowly. Propagation is still better S-N, N-S.. More activity is taking place. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: 160 meter long openings - and what it looks like in the sky - de DK7PE
Original Message Subject: Aw: Topband: 160 meter long openings - and what it looks like in the sky - de DK7PE Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:27:33 +0100 From: "Rudolf Klos"To: k...@myfairpoint.net, dk...@rooody.de Hi Bruce, I red about your comments on long 160m openings. By chance I was at the polar circle during the latest solar storm two weeks ago. I have been up there quite a few times during the past two years chasing polar lights but never experienced such an intensity of Aurora Borealis. Here are some pictures I took March 5th to 7th. It was a Kp Index of 5.3 - not bad for 2017. By the way, when I was in TN0CW and TL0CW I experienced outstanding 160m openigs to W6/W7. Later I heard that was solar storms as well... A very interesting phemon. Good DX on 160m! 73s Rudi DK7PE/EA8 Not possible to see the photographs on the topband refelector.-Sorry. _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: 160 meter long openings
Thanks for your input also. Not limited events, my observations have been for ~17 years on 160 meters, and ~ 30 years working a sked with VK6LK on 75 meters. Agree there are varying parameters. An opening on 80 meters does not guarantee a 160 meter opening. that is well known. Observations come more from an 160 meter opening and asking myself "what just happened "? , in the world, and solar system ? Openings are not the same world wide. But we especially like the ones that give us new countries. 73 Bruce- k1fz On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:09:55 + (UTC), bruce whitney wrote: Bruce,Thanks, interesting new info on a very complex subject. Every storm is different. Must use caution with observations from limited events.Rules of physics always the same everywhere but every CME comes with its own differing parameters with respect to the particular conditions and orientation of the geomagnetic field over the course of the event. I'm sure, nothing you didn't know very well but I have been working with GMD/GIC recently and couldn't help but comment. No claim to be an expert.Bruce-W8RA From: K1FZ-Bruce To: Topband Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2017 9:08 PM Subject: Topband: 160 meter long openings My observation are that long 160 meter openings take place at the start of auroras then diminish. This may be why. https://thespacereporter.com/2017/03/study-says-solar-storms-remove-electrons-earths-atmosphere/ 73 Brucw-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: 160 meter long openings
My observation are that long 160 meter openings take place at the start of auroras then diminish. This may be why. https://thespacereporter.com/2017/03/study-says-solar-storms-remove-electrons-earths-atmosphere/ 73 Brucw-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Increasing DX propagation
Its warming up, looking like an early spring. "One sixty" is starting to ramp up with longer, stronger DX I hear complaints --- I can't put in a ground rod, the ground is still frozen. Take a tip from the Electric power companies, who are out there replacing their damaged poles. Use a drill bit to get through the frost,. and yes impact hammers do work also. But drills open up a path without compressing the earth. BIg Box hardware stores like Lowe's, Home Depot and others have drill bit extensions. The shanks are sizes that will fit into 1/4 and 3/8 inch drills. And at the other end there is a fitting that will accept larger bits. Check it out before the DX fades 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: twisted house wiring
As I remember it from an electrician that married a 2nd time to my Aunt. hi. The ground lost its connection and the coiled wrapper became hot like a "hot plate" carrying the current.I was about 10 years old then and just wondering how a radio worked. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:06:26 -0500 (EST), MICHAEL ST ANGELO wrote: BX cable is still required in New York City. I had to use it when I lived in Queens. How did the metal wrapper get hot? Was current passing througgh it? The BX I had included a ground wire; maybe the earlier BX used the wrapper as the ground. Mike N2MS > On February 22, 2017 at 3:45 PM K1FZ-Bruce wrote: > > > > > Live near a housing development with many tenants. The high line on the road > is about 20 feet diagonally from my attic. Getting a lot of noise even with > my house main breaker off. > Appears to be induced into the attic wiring. > > Question. Anyone tried some form "twisted pair with green wire" house wiring > to reduce noise ? > If Yes, how did it work ? > Wiring laws vary from state to state. If anyone has something that worked, > then I can ask local electrical law enforcement about it. > > Years ago they had a BX cable . It was twisted wires inside a metallic > wrapper. When I was very young they used to think the metal wrapper got hot > and started house fires. > > 73 > Bruce-k1fz > http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html > > _ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: twisted house wiring
Live near a housing development with many tenants. The high line on the road is about 20 feet diagonally from my attic. Getting a lot of noise even with my house main breaker off. Appears to be induced into the attic wiring. Question. Anyone tried some form "twisted pair with green wire" house wiring to reduce noise ? If Yes, how did it work ? Wiring laws vary from state to state. If anyone has something that worked, then I can ask local electrical law enforcement about it. Years ago they had a BX cable . It was twisted wires inside a metallic wrapper. When I was very young they used to think the metal wrapper got hot and started house fires. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Echo on 160m yesterday morning
Andy, There was a passenger on an airliner that took photographs of a very large Aurora at that time. . One of the photographs was shown on TV -ABC World News. It is likely that the Aurora sparked all these events. I have noticed that there appears to be a link between the start of an aurora and long path 160 meter openings. 73, DX, Bruce-K1FZ On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:42:58 +, Andy Cook wrote: I think this form of ducting takes place way above the layers of the atmosphere where weather happens. In my experience the magnetospheric ducting is normally localized in impact. If this was really happening in multiple places around the world at the same time on this occasion then I think that is unusual. Andy, G4PIQ -Original Message- From: "K1FZ-Bruce" Sent: 06/02/2017 13:46 To: "g4...@btinternet.com" ; "Topband" Subject: Fwd: Echo on 160m yesterday morning Hi Andy, Ducting takes place over a relatively small area. Depends upon cloud layers and temperature zones This event took place ~ world wide. Band openings between North America to Asia, and Australia. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:20:07 + (GMT), Andy Cook wrote: I think you'll find this was Magnetospheric Ducting. Take a look at some of the articles here http://la3za.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Unusual%20Propagation and here http://folk.uio.no/sverre/papers/2009_MagnetoDucting-QST-LA3ZA.pdf. Delay depends on your latitude - but couple of hundred millseconds is about right and this is a peak time of year for the effect. I've heard this quite frequently on 80m around mid local-evening during the winter, and one occasion - on 3rd Feb last year - very strongly indeed. That night I was able to hear my echoes with just 25mW into a dipole on 80m - but it's often strong enough to be audible with a few watts. I've read papers which suggested it does also occur on 160m. Reports of these being less strong / gone when you switch to a vertical look plausible as well since they apear to require vertical incidence from the ionosphere. 73, Andy, G4PIQ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Fwd: Echo on 160m yesterday morning
Hi Andy, Ducting takes place over a relatively small area. Depends upon cloud layers and temperature zones This event took place ~ world wide. Band openings between North America to Asia, and Australia. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:20:07 + (GMT), Andy Cook wrote: I think you'll find this was Magnetospheric Ducting. Take a look at some of the articles here http://la3za.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Unusual%20Propagation and here http://folk.uio.no/sverre/papers/2009_MagnetoDucting-QST-LA3ZA.pdf. Delay depends on your latitude - but couple of hundred millseconds is about right and this is a peak time of year for the effect. I've heard this quite frequently on 80m around mid local-evening during the winter, and one occasion - on 3rd Feb last year - very strongly indeed. That night I was able to hear my echoes with just 25mW into a dipole on 80m - but it's often strong enough to be audible with a few watts. I've read papers which suggested it does also occur on 160m. Reports of these being less strong / gone when you switch to a vertical look plausible as well since they apear to require vertical incidence from the ionosphere. 73, Andy, G4PIQ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Echo on 160m yesterday morning
Your transceiver switching may not have been fast enough to catch the echo the first time around. On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 11:21:51 -0800, Treewrote: Yup - pretty crazy. Or space aliens were messing with me. On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 9:51 AM, k1fz mailto:k...@myfairpoint.net; target="_blank">k...@myfairpoint.net wrote: Great info Tree, The earth is ~24,000 miles around at the equator, less toward the poles. (Reason we have 24 hours in a day) Your timing would indicate that your echo was heard the second time around. 73 Bruce-k1fz - _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: K1FZ observations
Hi Mike , Have seen tropospheric bending may times over the years. This was different. Worked 2 meters for years in the 1960's Need to keep an open mind. 73 Bruce On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:08:11 -0600, Mike Waters wrote: Hi Bruce, I think what you experienced on channel 13 was a coincidence. Tropospheric VHF and UHF band openings have nothing to do with any kind of enhanced 160m conditions. Tropospheric bending occurs when a cold air mass happens to be beneath much warmer air aloft. The reflection occurs where the two layers meet because of the difference in energy levels. _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Science tonight
FYI For those who watch PBS television. Scheduled tonight are "Super batteries" , followed by "Aurora-fire in the sky" Check your local TV listings for time and channel. 73 Bruce-K1FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: propagation
Well we had very unusual propagation the last few days. A station from Africa CN2CO was coming through after lunch. About 2 PM local time I tuned across him again. . After awhile there was a break in the European pile up, as he repeatedly called CQ. I got a contact, then K1CP worked him also. There are strange propagation events at times. 73 Bruce-K1FZ http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Fw: 160 meter long path
Congrats Price, Thats a tough one. Very limited openings exist. Arnold, W2HCW (sk) did it on 80 meters, but on 160 meters is much more difficult. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:59:27 + (UTC), HAROLD SMITH JR wrote: I remember years ago (25?) working ZL3GQ,SK, on 160. It was around 2100Z. It had to be LP as the short path would have been mostly in day light. 73 Price W0RI _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Working LP from USA to VK6
Hi Steve, I could copy faintly when you were on 1824.5 working Europe. QSB was tough. Think it will be better the next few days as the compressed layers should be better. If I remember right it was around 2125 hours. Split and calling for NA should help. Will be listening as well as others,.. K1CP was copying another VK6 about that time. , K1UO worked VK6LW a couple of days ago LP. 73 Happy New year. Bruce-K1FZ On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:11:57 +0800, Steve Ireland wrote: G’day all and Happy New Year Conditions have been great into Europe over the last few days, making me think LP QSOs into North America ought to be possible again after my sunrise (currently 2115Z). Usually the openings occur from sunrise until about 15 minutes after. To show how far LP can be worked from VK6, Mike VK6HD once worked Jeff K1ZM LP, when Jeff was living in New York. I also recall Mike was heard considerably farther east (maybe into W3 or W8?). If anyone in eastern NA would like to try for a LP QSO, I shall be on/around 1832 most mornings for the next ten days. Vy 73 Steve, VK6VZ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Front End Filters
Rudy, Using topband archives. Try going back to the beginninmg of the emails. It started with "thinking out loud", subject then someone changed the subject. 73' Bruce-k1fz On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 08:46:47 -0500, Rudy Bakalov via Topband wrote: So what problem are we trying to solve here? 73, Rudy N2WQ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Front End Filters
The one they are developing for marketing 'can' have 1 KHZ segment crystals channels.. I would encourage anyone to insert a single crystal in their receiver antenna input to see the difference before considering a purchase. (Careful not to transmit into the experiement) 40 meters is a good test band as usually has many signals after dark.. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:56:07 -0700, Dave wrote: About 15 years ago I built a switchable front end crystal filter, I was going to market it but it was too expensive for the Ham market. It covers 1800 to 1850 in 5kHz segments with a slight overlap so that there are no gaps, each section is a half lattice, the insertion loss is about 6dB but that isn't a problem because I always have about -15dB of attenuation in the receive path input. Nose bandwidth is 5kHz and about 8kHz at -20dB. Lack of noise blanker performance is not a problem because big signals make the blanker useless anyway. I used it during contests when my rig was an IC781, since changing to a more modern rig, an IC7851, the filter provides no significant improvement. For working DX on a crowded band it is useful if your rig does not have a good roofing filter. HNY /MX Dave AA0RS _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: "Thinking out loud"
Thanks for the information Stew. Originally I tried it at my parents QTH on 40 meters when I was teenager. Was licensed in 1950 as W1TJQ. Ideas get lost and time goes by. In the 1920 Hugo Ginsburg ( not sure of his last name spelling) in a book at the Belfast Library said silicon looked promising as a rectifier. It took to early 1950/ late 1940's for it to be re-discovered. Thanks again. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:51:50 + (UTC), GALE STEWARD via Topband wrote: Years ago at the W3GM M/M station, Gerry had several crystal filters (50 ohm Z input & output) in the 40M RX path. As I recall, these were about 20-30 khz wide (each) and were of slightly different center frequencies so that most of the 40M CW band could be covered. I DO remember that they worked very well. I never saw one for 160. 73, Stew K3ND From: K1FZ-Bruce To: Topband Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 3:41 PM Subject: Topband: "Thinking out loud" We know that limiting the noise pick up from more directions of an antenna we can usually hear better. We also know if we limit the noise from a receiver IF we can hear less noise, and better yet, if we have a roofing filter earlier in the receiver we can eliminate even more noise in relationship to the wanted signals. What if we take it a step further, could we limit the band-with of the antenna signal with a crystal lattice for 160 meters before the receiver. Years ago I played around with a single crystal at the input of an old tube type receiver. It was remarkable what I could hear on 40 meters, on what seemed to be one frequency. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: "Thinking out loud"
Thanks Mirko and Matt, This is not on the market yet, but should do a lot for noise on 160 meters. Bet a tube transmitter had naysayers. Need a spark to transmit. hi. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:18:56 -0600, Matt Murphy wrote: This appears to be the 4O3A unit. I hadn't realized these existed, so I'm glad you posted the question: http://www.4o3a.com/index.php/products/ham-radio-gear/crystal-front-end-unit/ On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:47 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: Thanks Mirko, Very Good information. What is needed is to reduce noise more (lower) than signals. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:36:30 +0100, S57AD wrote: As far as I recall, Inrad sells front-end xtal filters. Some 25 years ago when I lived in Belgrade, at YU1EXY we had two six-pole filters for SSB part of 40M band but I can't recall and difference with or without those filters. Beside those two xtal filters we used 8 pole Cohn LC filter with 4-gang variable capacitor and with very step curve (I think it was 600 or 800 Hz at -6 dB), which drastically reduced noise and QRM. We could hear 3rd or even 4th layer of callers in 40m pile-ups. As for xtal front end filters, I think 4O3A produces such a filters to be used at in-band stations, but didn't have chance to try & use them... 73, Mirko, S57AD 2016-12-22 21:57 GMT+01:00 K1FZ-Bruce : > Tim, > > My single crystal was in the 1950's. > A crystal lattice could take in much of the 160 meter band and be > pratical. > Thanks for your input. > 73 > Bruce > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:49:12 -0500, Tim Shoppa wrote: > > Bruce - It has long been rumored that the big EU multi-multis have > a crystal filter at their run frequency receivers. e.g. if they are running > on 7003.4, they have a crystal filter in front of their receiver for > 7003.4. have never observed that in my visits but maybe in decades past, > when receivers had less damage range, it would've made sense. Also a good > reason to put up a fight for ownership of YOUR run frequency HI HI > > I believe EMRFD has a schematic for a single-frequency receiver, maybe > not exactly like you described but similar in principle. Let me see if I > can dig it up. > Tim N3QE > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:41 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: > > > We know that limiting the noise pick up from more directions of an antenna > we can usually hear better. We also know if we limit the noise from a > receiver IF we can hear less noise, and better yet, if we > have a roofing filter earlier in the receiver we can eliminate even more > noise in relationship to the wanted signals. > What if we take it a step further, could we limit the band-with of the > antenna signal with a crystal lattice for 160 meters before the receiver. > Years ago I played around with a single crystal at the input of an old > tube type receiver. It was remarkable what I could hear on 40 meters, > on what seemed to be one frequency. > 73 > Bruce-k1fz > http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband - End forwarded message - _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: "Thinking out loud"
Thanks Mirko, Very Good information. What is needed is to reduce noise more (lower) than signals. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:36:30 +0100, S57AD wrote: As far as I recall, Inrad sells front-end xtal filters. Some 25 years ago when I lived in Belgrade, at YU1EXY we had two six-pole filters for SSB part of 40M band but I can't recall and difference with or without those filters. Beside those two xtal filters we used 8 pole Cohn LC filter with 4-gang variable capacitor and with very step curve (I think it was 600 or 800 Hz at -6 dB), which drastically reduced noise and QRM. We could hear 3rd or even 4th layer of callers in 40m pile-ups. As for xtal front end filters, I think 4O3A produces such a filters to be used at in-band stations, but didn't have chance to try & use them... 73, Mirko, S57AD 2016-12-22 21:57 GMT+01:00 K1FZ-Bruce : > Tim, > > My single crystal was in the 1950's. > A crystal lattice could take in much of the 160 meter band and be > pratical. > Thanks for your input. > 73 > Bruce > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:49:12 -0500, Tim Shoppa wrote: > > Bruce - It has long been rumored that the big EU multi-multis have > a crystal filter at their run frequency receivers. e.g. if they are running > on 7003.4, they have a crystal filter in front of their receiver for > 7003.4. have never observed that in my visits but maybe in decades past, > when receivers had less damage range, it would've made sense. Also a good > reason to put up a fight for ownership of YOUR run frequency HI HI > > I believe EMRFD has a schematic for a single-frequency receiver, maybe > not exactly like you described but similar in principle. Let me see if I > can dig it up. > Tim N3QE > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:41 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: > > > We know that limiting the noise pick up from more directions of an antenna > we can usually hear better. We also know if we limit the noise from a > receiver IF we can hear less noise, and better yet, if we > have a roofing filter earlier in the receiver we can eliminate even more > noise in relationship to the wanted signals. > What if we take it a step further, could we limit the band-with of the > antenna signal with a crystal lattice for 160 meters before the receiver. > Years ago I played around with a single crystal at the input of an old > tube type receiver. It was remarkable what I could hear on 40 meters, > on what seemed to be one frequency. > 73 > Bruce-k1fz > http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband - End forwarded message - _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: "Thinking out loud"
Thanks Mirko, Very Good information. What is needed is to reduce noise lower than signals. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:36:30 +0100, S57AD wrote: As far as I recall, Inrad sells front-end xtal filters. Some 25 years ago when I lived in Belgrade, at YU1EXY we had two six-pole filters for SSB part of 40M band but I can't recall and difference with or without those filters. Beside those two xtal filters we used 8 pole Cohn LC filter with 4-gang variable capacitor and with very step curve (I think it was 600 or 800 Hz at -6 dB), which drastically reduced noise and QRM. We could hear 3rd or even 4th layer of callers in 40m pile-ups. As for xtal front end filters, I think 4O3A produces such a filters to be used at in-band stations, but didn't have chance to try & use them... 73, Mirko, S57AD 2016-12-22 21:57 GMT+01:00 K1FZ-Bruce : Tim, My single crystal was in the 1950's. A crystal lattice could take in much of the 160 meter band and be pratical. Thanks for your input. 73 Bruce On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:49:12 -0500, Tim Shoppa wrote: Bruce - It has long been rumored that the big EU multi-multis have a crystal filter at their run frequency receivers. e.g. if they are running on 7003.4, they have a crystal filter in front of their receiver for 7003.4. have never observed that in my visits but maybe in decades past, when receivers had less damage range, it would've made sense. Also a good reason to put up a fight for ownership of YOUR run frequency HI HI I believe EMRFD has a schematic for a single-frequency receiver, maybe not exactly like you described but similar in principle. Let me see if I can dig it up. Tim N3QE On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:41 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: We know that limiting the noise pick up from more directions of an antenna we can usually hear better. We also know if we limit the noise from a receiver IF we can hear less noise, and better yet, if we have a roofing filter earlier in the receiver we can eliminate even more noise in relationship to the wanted signals. What if we take it a step further, could we limit the band-with of the antenna signal with a crystal lattice for 160 meters before the receiver. Years ago I played around with a single crystal at the input of an old tube type receiver. It was remarkable what I could hear on 40 meters, on what seemed to be one frequency. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- Mirko S57AD _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: "Thinking out loud"
160 meters is above the broadcast band. 3rd order should be above 160, not lower. lattice filters, many near 9 MHZ. for single sideband transceivers, are used successfully. Could take out more noise, than adding. All the arguments against this could also be used against roofing filters. 73 Bruce On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:56:21 -0800, "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" wrote: Crystal filters are known to have a 3rd order intercept point. Depending on how many AM BCB stations impinge on your filter, you could get intermods. Switching in an attenuator ahead of the filter should help, if you can stand the increase in noise figure. Rick N6RK On 12/22/2016 12:41 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: We know that limiting the noise pick up from more directions of an antenna we can usually hear better. We also know if we limit the noise from a receiver IF we can hear less noise, and better yet, if we have a roofing filter earlier in the receiver we can eliminate even more noise in relationship to the wanted signals. What if we take it a step further, could we limit the band-with of the antenna signal with a crystal lattice for 160 meters before the receiver. Years ago I played around with a single crystal at the input of an old tube type receiver. It was remarkable what I could hear on 40 meters, on what seemed to be one frequency. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: "Thinking out loud"
Tim, My single crystal was in the 1950's. A crystal lattice could take in much of the 160 meter band and be pratical. Thanks for your input. 73 Bruce On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:49:12 -0500, Tim Shoppa wrote: Bruce - It has long been rumored that the big EU multi-multis have a crystal filter at their run frequency receivers. e.g. if they are running on 7003.4, they have a crystal filter in front of their receiver for 7003.4. have never observed that in my visits but maybe in decades past, when receivers had less damage range, it would've made sense. Also a good reason to put up a fight for ownership of YOUR run frequency HI HI I believe EMRFD has a schematic for a single-frequency receiver, maybe not exactly like you described but similar in principle. Let me see if I can dig it up. Tim N3QE On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:41 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: We know that limiting the noise pick up from more directions of an antenna we can usually hear better. We also know if we limit the noise from a receiver IF we can hear less noise, and better yet, if we have a roofing filter earlier in the receiver we can eliminate even more noise in relationship to the wanted signals. What if we take it a step further, could we limit the band-with of the antenna signal with a crystal lattice for 160 meters before the receiver. Years ago I played around with a single crystal at the input of an old tube type receiver. It was remarkable what I could hear on 40 meters, on what seemed to be one frequency. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: "Thinking out loud"
We know that limiting the noise pick up from more directions of an antenna we can usually hear better. We also know if we limit the noise from a receiver IF we can hear less noise, and better yet, if we have a roofing filter earlier in the receiver we can eliminate even more noise in relationship to the wanted signals. What if we take it a step further, could we limit the band-with of the antenna signal with a crystal lattice for 160 meters before the receiver. Years ago I played around with a single crystal at the input of an old tube type receiver. It was remarkable what I could hear on 40 meters, on what seemed to be one frequency. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Bad Timing
Signal strength is lower on my Receiving delta antenna. Found a rodent hole where the coax cable goes under frozen ground. Not a good holiday gift, but. plugged the hole with. d-CON. Antenna is still usable...so far. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: test message to topband
Thanks Tim. Will un-install the other one. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 19:55:55 -0500, Tim Duffy wrote: Hello Bruce, I have been using ESET NOD32 for 10 years - without problems. It is the number one rated virus protection. 73 Tim K3LR -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K1FZ-Bruce Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 7:47 PM To: Bill Cromwell; Topband Subject: Topband: test message to topband Thanks Bill, From emails from other topband users . Think my virus program may be trying to tell me that the original email has been modified. I have malware protection, and ESET NOD32 anti virus. Ever hear anything negative about either one ? Noticed it - first email after NOD32 installation. Think that will be my first un-install. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 19:21:50 -0500, Bill Cromwell wrote: Hi Bruce, I looked at my copies of your last two messages (from the "?" post) and I don't see them. I do see extraneous blank spaces here and there - probably where you question marks appear for you. Computers with different fonts and especially with different 'formatting' specs (user configurable) do all sorts of nasty things like that. It may be your computer and it might be the server software at any one of the servers along the way. My best to you getting it sorted. 73, Bill KU8U On 12/14/2016 01:38 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: Test message. Question mark research. _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- bark less - wag more _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: test message to topband-different computer
Test message. Question mark research. _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Question marks
On topband, someone is adding many question marks to my last two postings. What does that accomplish ? 73 Bruce-K1FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Bowtie Flags
Earl, K6SE (sk) advanced loop antennas on 160 meters. For information-See Page 34, July 2000 QST magazine. The small 160 meter bandwidth allows loop optimization k6SE gives dimensions. George Walter AA7JV helped the TX3A Chesterfield DXpedition group with interconnected two half delta loops. For more information check "low Band DXing" 5th edition page 7-106. Loop antennas optimized for the 160 meter band have been used in various folded loop configurations for some time.. 73 Bruce-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Bowtie Flags
Nick, Although I did not measure it, the front to back, and front to side is better, overall more quiet. It is receiving toward the Caribbean. Europe, and USA stations, are lower in signal strength. Can often work Caribbean and South American stations through a small pile up when they are not working split. In my case it was a worth while change. The original plan was to be able to drive my car under it. 73 Bruce-K1FZ On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:35:14 +, Nick Hall-Patch wrote: What specific improvements did you note when the Delta was raised Bruce? Thanks, Nick VE7DXR At 16:23 12-12-16, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: Dennis, Is there a photo or sketch available of your antenna anywhere by email ? Note: Height above ground helped a lot when my receiving Delta antenna was re-installed higher. The bottom wire went from 3 feet up to ~6 feet at my QTH. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html _ Nick Hall-Patch Victoria, BC Canada _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Bowtie Flags
Dennis, Is there a photo or sketch available of your antenna anywhere by email ? Note: Height above ground helped a lot when my receiving Delta antenna was re-installed higher. The bottom wire went from 3 feet up to ~6 feet at my QTH. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:00:12 + (UTC), Dennis W0JX via Topband wrote: Mike and Don, I have been using an expanded version of a DHDL here since November 2011. I was forced into going this way because the neighborhood around me has become very noisy and the antenna seems to be less susceptible to noise than my other antennas. I call it the Dual Flag array. I essentially expanded the DHDL deltas into the shape of a flag. My flags are large, approximately 24.5 feet tall and 32.5 feet long and separated by three feet. The wires cross in the middle rather than at the bottom so the flags are 180 degrees out of phase. They are similar to a Waller Flag antenna in some respects. My dual flag antenna is supported in the middle by a 31 foot pole made up of military fiberglas poles and the ends are supported by two trees. The bottom wire is 6 feet above ground. The feed transformer was wound on a binocular core with two turns on the primary and 7 turns secondary giving 918 ohms when fed with 75 ohm cable. I think my load resistor is 1290 ohms at the back of the second flag. You can put a variable pot there and tune for best F/B but that is not necessarily the best RDF. I have found my dual flag array to be the quietest RX antenna in my RX system. It works very well on 160 through 40 although the pattern turns broadside on 40 meters. It beats all my 450 foot beverages hands down and is a great compliment to my HiZ 4 square which is now on the main RX of the K3 with the dual flag on the sub RX. You can also build a switching system to reverse directions but the circuit is rather complicated so I have two of these dual flag antennas pointed in different directions. I manually switch directions by moving the transformers and loads around using banana jacks when really need to grab a new country. As with all antennas of this type, an effective common mode choke at the feed point is an absolute must.SInce a rotatable version would be very difficult to build and support on a tower, the next logical step would be a smaller true Waller Flag like NX4D's Big Waller. I must give credit to George AA7JV who modeled this antenna for me and provided the inspiration through his TX3A DHDL RX antenna. 73, Dennis W0JX _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Fwd: Re: Electric Fence Noise at W9RE
- Noise usually comes when vegetation starts touching the lowest wires. ' Roundup' weed control can be a help. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:41:59 -0500, James Wolf wrote: I have a horse farm behind me that has electric fences all over their smaller pens and larger pastures. When it is installed correctly and the sender is working correctly they are quiet. Unfortunately, his are not. In some places he has the hot wire mounted below the lowest fence board to keep the dogs from moving in certain areas where some of the wire is touching the ground. The whole place needs completely redone. Luckily, setting the NB on the radio to its lowest setting keeps the pops away and the intermod is tolerable except in contests. I can usually just walk the fence and hear it arcing, or I can tell which section is arcing by putting my one good ear next to the wire and listening to it ring. I used to put ferrite beads and capacitors in the older controllers to roll off the sharp transition of off and on; I don't have to do that any longer. The bottom line is that if installed correctly and if using any recent controllers, you won't be bothered. Jim - KR9U ___ Funny thing about electric fences... I lease out 9 acres of my property in KH6 to a farmer who has an electric fence around that part of the property. As far as I can tell it is totally silent. I parked my truck next to the fence, tuned to 1710 kHz and other than background noise, it was totally quiet...no pops etc. No antennas up yet, but this certainly looks promising. Any thoughts? Bill K4XS/KH7XS _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Improving condx?
A few weeks ago someone called it "the midnight effect". (local time) It is closer to sunrise in Europe for some, but quite some time before sunrise for others. Have fun ! 73 Bruce-K1FZ On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:55:29 -0500, Art Snapper wrote: Conditions to EU were better than I have seen so far this season I was only on from 0430-0500z, but even that was impressive. Tom 4O/KC0W was very loud. In fact, he was louder than he is at our sunset peak. 73 Art NK8X On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:46 PM, wrote: > Greetings Topbanders. . . > > I got on the air on TB late last evening about 11:00 p.m. Central Standard > Time and had a pleasant surprise. I had been QRV 160 earlier in the > evening and found conditions to EU to be poor (when I have trouble copying > SV3RF, F5IN, HA8RM, etc., things are bad). However, I got back on later > having suspicions that maybe conditions were beginning to improve so I > started calling CQ. I was pleasantly surprised and ended up working 32 EU > stations (not a bad run from here in the Midwest). It wasn’t a continuous > run as I stopped to tune around from time to time to see what else might be > going on. I could have worked more stations but was tired and went to bed. > The real surprise was well over half the EU stations worked were either new > call signs for 160m or all time new call signs. I was careful to make sure > I was getting call signs accurately so I’m confident the “unique” call > signs were indeed valid. As we get further into the season I’ve noticed > the past week or so this pattern of improving conditions as EU SR > approaches. It most definitely has not always been that way this season > here in Iowa. In any case, it might pay for you stateside guys to stay up > a little late as EU seems to waiting. > > 73 and compliments of the Season. . .Dave, W0FLS > _ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband - End forwarded message - _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: 1809.2 kHz constant dashes
Very weakly hear it to my West from Belfast Maine. Not detectable in any other direction. Bruce-k1fz On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 01:17:46 -0500, Don Kirk wrote: I'm hearing what sounds like a stuck Key sending dashes (rate approximately 20 dashes sent in 10 seconds). Does not appear to be a local signal and heading approximately 90 degrees from Fishers Indiana (which is near Indianapolis). Hard to get super accurate heading right now due to Thunder Storms in Southern US, but definitely close to 90 degrees from me. Anyone else hearing and please provide heading from your location. At 0600 UTC it is peaking about S7. Don (WD8DSB) _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: New use for Noise Canceling box
Tree, Years ago I had a very similar noise. Seemed to be in the power lines as I drove around with my car radio at AM 1700 KHZ. Purchased a MFJ 1026 even though a naysayer said it could not work with the noise in the power lines. After experimenting with 'noise antennas' into the auxiliary input , a close to ground antenna to my south worked well. Was able to totally null out the noise and work DX again. I lived with this for a couple of years until the big Ice Storm of 1998. Everyone in the lost power. I got an old power generator going and got on the air, and there was no noise. As the power company was fixing the broken power lines, I was listening and watching. Immediately when a neighbor got power , the noise was back. Contacted the neighbor and found him to be cooperative. After some testing, found the problem was his computer. it had one of those Chinese power supplies that became well know with time. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/ On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 06:01:23 -0800, Tree wrote: Last night - around 8 PM or so - this HUGE noise signal showed up on 160 - sweeping up the band slowly. Probably a DC power supply with signals every 80 kHz or something. But - it has some energy all over the ban - thus rasing my noise floor. Sorry if I was an alligator last night. I put a Beverage up to the East just before the contest started - so I had two RX antennas - the other being a Hi-Z 4 square. The Hi-Z said the noise signal was East - perhaps a bit stronger in the South direction than North - so call it just South of East. The Beverage picked it up very well - so it agreed. A feeble attempt at DFing last night was unsuccessful - but will be tried again if it stays on during the daytime. It is still on this morning before Sunrise. The nasty part of the noise is about the same signal strength as most good signals coming in that are not local (looking at the band scope). It has a 10 kHz or so wide peak. I was able to put the two RX antennas into a MFJ-1026 - with the output going to the RX input of my K3 - and adjusted the controls to null out the noise. With a local signal - I have been able to obtain deep nulls and this proved to be true with this noise. I was actually running guys on the East coast right in the middle of the worst part of the noise after doing this. This technique would likely be useful for those who have a similar noise situation - so I wanted to share. You obviously don't need a beverage for the "noise" antenna - just something that is good at picking up the noise and perhaps nothing much else. If you have a neighbor that has a noisy device - just put something that is close to their house. It's a battle out there to keep your noise sources under control. I'll report back if I am successful in finding this one. 73 Tree N6TR / K7RAT _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Inverted L Radials
This is normal, but without the radials your RF is mostly heating up the earth. If you make the L a little longer, then insert a variable capacitor at the feed point, you should be able to find a higher feed point with the radials connected.. With trial and error 'juggling' the extra wire length and capacitance. you can get very close to 50 ohms, and get a good signal out for DX. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:59:57 + (UTC), james soto via Topband wrote: Hi allLast year i install an inverted L antenna for 160 with few radials different lenght.ohms was between 20 to 25 ohms and swr about 2.2 . This past weekend i was checking thethe antenna with the mfj analyser and i proceed to disconnect the radials from the groundrod and just leave the ground portion of the coax attach to the ground rod and the reading wasSWR 1.2 and 50 ohms. are this normal ? Thanks KP2BH / jimmy _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Noise sources in general
Yes, basically true, but in my case most of the noise is coming from one direction. Antennas with deep nulls have allowed me to work DX. Also use a MFJ-1026 to help with nulls. We are drifting toward more noise in the world not less, with human population increases. We all need to live somewhere. If only we could live noise free. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:14:22 -0600, daraym...@iowatelecom.net wrote: The reality is it ultimately becomes unsolvable regardless of antenna options. 73. . .Dave, W0FLS -Original Message- From: K1FZ-Bruce Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:32 PM To: Topband Subject: Topband: Noise sources in general When I moved here in rural Belfast Maine, year 1990, I only had three close neighbors. As time has gone on, have new single house neighbors, then the city okayed a low-income housing development. Have from 24 t0 32 families within about 500 feet. Noise you bet, too many to correct. Inhabitants keep changing. Good antennas are the only solution so far. 73 Bruce-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Noise sources in general
When I moved here in rural Belfast Maine, year 1990, I only had three close neighbors. As time has gone on, have new single house neighbors, then the city okayed a low-income housing development. Have from 24 t0 32 families within about 500 feet. Noise you bet, too many to correct. Inhabitants keep changing. Good antennas are the only solution so far. 73 Bruce-k1fz - Forwarded message from daraym...@iowatelecom.net - Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:57:51 -0600 From: daraym...@iowatelecom.net Reply-To: daraym...@iowatelecom.net Subject: Topband: Noise sources in general To: Guy Olinger K2AV , Joe Galicic , topband@contesting.com With ever burgeoning sources of manmade noise (various energy efficient lights, switching supplies, computer related hardware, etc.) it would seem the only real way to escape the noise problem is to abandon the the urban/suburban areas and move to the country. Even then casinos, wind energy farms, and other commercial enterprises can move in to create unsolvable, multiple noise sources from multiple directions killing the prospects for a low noise environment, especially on TB. My noise floor on TB out here in the Iowa countryside has gone from somewhere in the -130 dbm range to about -107dbm (or more)@250 Hz bandwidth during daytime hours. . .and it's not power line noise. New houses have popped up 1/2 - 3/4 mile away and with every new one the noise floor continues to creep upward. My biggest noise source used to be electric fences in various directions, which the NB took care of nicely. Now the problem has changed and can't really be solved. . .except to perhaps move out further. 73. . .Dave, W0FLS -Original Message- From: Guy Olinger K2AV Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:17 AM To: Joe Galicic Cc: List, TopBand ; William Hill Subject: Re: Topband: Plasma TV noise We can all thank our lucky stars that plasma TV has got to the point where vanishing popularity has got its numbers down to where it no longer has economy of scale. Economics are killing it. What you can do at your neighbor's party is to pour some Pepsi inside his TV and hasten it's demise. Sledge hammers would work too, but it's hard to be covert using a sledge hammer. The replacement will be LED-based, which happily now has both quality and economics of scale tilting positive. The new radio killer will be solar cells that have individual controllers so a shadow on one part of a panel doesn't kill the whole panel. New battle, new economics, new solutions. 73, Guy K2AV _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband - End forwarded message - _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Strange resistance between Beverage ground rods
True Yuri. Yes, much of it- low in frequency. This is why we wind our isolated antenna transformers to pass 160 meters and above, with very low primary to secondary coupling capacity to minimize passing of these frequencies. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:47:40 -0500 (EST), Yuri Blanarovich wrote: Don't forget that in the ground there are "travelling" Eddy currents, being generated by all kinds od "services". The worst are in the areas where trolley services, electric trains and other high power services use ground as the other conductor or just being there. They can get so bad that they can "eat" gas lines, water lines and cause accelerated corrosion and breakage. They would definitely affect any "ground" measurements and interfere with measurements. Yuri K3BU.us MVmanor.com On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:24 PM, Jon Zaimes wrote: > As I recall mine are typically in the hundreds of ohms or low thousands, never as high as 20k, even on a 950 ft wire. I do see large variations of these across my 12 acres, even significantly different readings on each wire in a staggered phased pair. We have two different soil types, which may be a factor. My ground rods are typically 3-5 feet, and water table is usually a few inches deep or less. 73/Jon AA1K Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote: I have reflection transformers at the end of every two wire Beverages which I try to test by measuring the wires on the feed end. I remove the transformer from the two wire WD1-A and check the resistance between the two wires which tells me that through the reflection transformer I have continuity. It measures about 40 ohms wire to wire, this is done when I notice any performance change of the antenna. Now come the next test that baffles me completely. When I measure from either wire to my ground rods alone, to see what the return resistance is, I get reading in the vicinity of 20K across the 900 foot run. I understand that if the reading was very low it would defeat the whole Beverage principle. But is 20K Ohms reasonable, very good, or marginal? I use three foot foot rods at either end and when I pull one out yesterday before moving it the bottom 1/4 was moist and muddy. That Southern end of several reversible Beverages is located about 100 feet or less from a sal t marsh or salt pond. I also have to such antennas made up of ladder line a DX Engineering components. They all appear to be working well even though large grass has reach and covered portion of some of them. But my question is what is a reasonable or good return ground resistance for a 600' or 900' Beverage. I haven't found any sources of information expect the saying that the higher Resistance the better. Is this correct? Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: BOIG antenna changes
Years ago, before 1920, Harold Beverage ran a "wave antenna" wire on the ground on Mount Desert Island, Maine over the rocks on the shore line to a Navy Barrage receiver, near Otter Cliff's. He discovered its directional properties. Later about ca ~1948 Albert E. Weymouth, Original W1BX call sign, had me, a 9 year neighbor kid, help him with a wire on ground, and also with a buried under ground wire antenna. I bring this up because I recently heard someone on 160 SSB give a, now middle age ham, credit for inventing the BOG antenna. Many times I have inquires from those new to 160 meters and interested in a BOG antennas. With Beverage as part of the name Multi band operation is assumed. Research by Luis, IV3PRK at HC1PF has confirmed that the antenna is a one band device when expecting a real good pattern. Reduced directivity can be found on other bands Please check out both of Luis WEB pages: http://www.iv3prk.it/new-page.htm http://www.iv3prk.it/bog-modeling.htm A name change has been talked about, but never got going. Wire on ground is most descriptive, with WOG a single letter change. Started the ball rolling (slowly) by changing the bogantennanotes wording, and will continue as time permits.. http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/ 73 Bruce-K1FZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Out the back door propagation.
I'm in mid-coast Maine. W1AW is in Newington CT. On a good low angle night I can see over 20DB front to back on their signals.. To night I see 6db at best. This can be from aurora,... or when 10 meters is"hopping" with signals most of them North-South, 160 meters is not so good. (or Maybe an opening to CE, LY, PY. For me at least, tomorrow at sunrise is a good morning to sleep in. hi 73 Bruce _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: question
Hi Luis, Your question about the BOG wire. After my last email thinking possibly you were writing about single wire BOGs. In this case the wire size is not important other than large enough not to break.. The insulation should be good I like plastic insulation. My opinion: Better to try one BOG antenna first, solve the problems, then add more. Bruce-k1fz Hi, I have several questions, I am interested in setting up antennas reception BOG in a key antenna RCS-10, I would like to put in the same key 6 BOG's and 2 Beverages I already own, each Beverage is also 0 degrees to 600 feet that look about the USA and Europe at 45 degrees to 700 feet. I would like that the BOG's were cut and functioned for 40-80-160 between Good and Very Good was excellent for the 3 bands that is almost impossible. They can be placed in the same Swiche all antennas? As it would be better to feed them with 59 or RG6 RG? The cable from the key to the radius is 40 meters RG 59 or better RG6? I know that each antenna must place a ground rod, I can make a copper tube 1.50 meters? I use Bafles duplex wire gauge 20 or 22 that is right or should be thicker? How far should I place each transformer to not interact or be fed antennas key interaction is reduced? For now these are the questions that I have to do. Thank you very much and I look forward to the answers. Sincerely HK6P LUIS PD was experimentacion but if anyone knows more and can save money by not consult those who know _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: question
Hello Luis, The BOG wire is not the gauge of the wire, but the impedance. Many transformer suppliers are using 150 ohms. BOG antennas react with the earth it rest (sits) upon. The BOG length to get a good pattern varies a lot with the local earth. It is basically a one band antenna, although you may be able to hear signals on other bands. The transformers can be wound for the coax cable impedance that you specify. My opinion , recommend that you only try one BOG antenna, after you solve the problems to find the right length to get a good front to back, Then attempt to add more BOG antennas. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/index.html I have several questions, I am interested in setting up antennas reception BOG in a key antenna RCS-10, I would like to put in the same key 6 BOG's and 2 Beverages I already own, each Beverage is also 0 degrees to 600 feet that look about the USA and Europe at 45 degrees to 700 feet. I would like that the BOG's were cut and functioned for 40-80-160 between Good and Very Good was excellent for the 3 bands that is almost impossible. They can be placed in the same Swiche all antennas? As it would be better to feed them with 59 or RG6 RG? The cable from the key to the radius is 40 meters RG 59 or better RG6? I know that each antenna must place a ground rod, I can make a copper tube 1.50 meters? I use Bafles duplex wire gauge 20 or 22 that is right or should be thicker? How far should I place each transformer to not interact or be fed antennas key interaction is reduced? For now these are the questions that I have to do. Thank you very much and I look forward to the answers. Sincerely HK6P LUIS PD was experimentacion but if anyone knows more and can save money by not consult those who know _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: : how to check a BOG
Yes, wide sweep from 1000KHZ to about 7000KHZ Had to drive the ground rod a few times. My last estimate of removal wire resulted in the wire "too short' Had to add wire. Had enough of driving, and removing ground rods. Was one that wedged in the ledge rocks and is still there. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 15:33:44 -0400, "N2TK, Tony" wrote: Bruce, Did you sweep from say the AM band up to 40M to find the null? Was the null pronounced? I assume as you shortened the wire you hooked up to a terminating resistor and repositioned the ground rod? Tnx N2TK, Tony -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K1FZ-Bruce Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 3:02 PM To: Art Snapper ; Topband Subject: Topband: : how to check a BOG I purchased a MFJ 5014 noise generator for $ 39.95 (it took awhile to get here, think they build to order.) At Mid-day time to reduce interference, set it way out, with about 20 feet of wire sitting on the ground in the direction of the BOG null. Tuned frequencies on the receiver to find minimum signal, trimmed the BOG wire to bring the null into 160 meters. "Worked like a charm" 73' Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/ On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:57:41 -0400, Art Snapper wrote: I took a hint from Luis HC1PF. A small 1.8+/- clock oscillator and a wire attached to a pole is what he used. I found said oscillator on eBay. It worked, but I am not sure the near field results should be taken for granted. 73 Art NK8X p.s. Still trying to figure out the computer problem that plagued me during the SP, and is gone now! On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bob K6UJ wrote: How do you plot the directivity of your BOG ? I am toying with the idea of either transmitting from my car HF rig (milliwatt sig) and plotting the pattern from diff directions or is it possible to transmit with the BOG with a real low milliwatt sig ? I was thinking then I could drive around with my HF rig in the car in about a half mile radius and see if I could plot the pattern. This might not be doable, but thought I would throw it out there. How do you test your BOG ? Bob K6UJ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: : how to check a BOG
I purchased a MFJ 5014 noise generator for $ 39.95 (it took awhile to get here, think they build to order.) At Mid-day time to reduce interference, set it way out, with about 20 feet of wire sitting on the ground in the direction of the BOG null. Tuned frequencies on the receiver to find minimum signal, trimmed the BOG wire to bring the null into 160 meters. "Worked like a charm" 73' Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/ On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:57:41 -0400, Art Snapper wrote: I took a hint from Luis HC1PF. A small 1.8+/- clock oscillator and a wire attached to a pole is what he used. I found said oscillator on eBay. It worked, but I am not sure the near field results should be taken for granted. 73 Art NK8X p.s. Still trying to figure out the computer problem that plagued me during the SP, and is gone now! On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bob K6UJ wrote: How do you plot the directivity of your BOG ? I am toying with the idea of either transmitting from my car HF rig (milliwatt sig) and plotting the pattern from diff directions or is it possible to transmit with the BOG with a real low milliwatt sig ? I was thinking then I could drive around with my HF rig in the car in about a half mile radius and see if I could plot the pattern. This might not be doable, but thought I would throw it out there. How do you test your BOG ? Bob K6UJ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Propagation
Seeing a large front to back on antennas tonight indicating low angle propagation. Good for the contest 73 Bruce _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Fwd: Re: inv. L
I waterproof with silicon as best possible, and the most important part is make an upside down U turn in the coax at the end. Water does not "like" to flow up hill in most cases. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:16:08 -0400, Art Snapper wrote: I had a few hours free yesterday afternoon, so I began the dual 80/160 radiator inv. L project. In the process, I found that water had entered the coaxial center insulator that was used at the feedpoint of the antenna. Does anyone have a favorite solution for a weatherproof, coaxial feedpoint for this type of antenna??? The radials are attached to several load center ground bars, that are screwed into a copper pipe that is driven into the ground. The pipe gives me a rigid mounting point for some kind of insulator or standoff. BTW, after a temporary fix, I ran some quick SWR tests. There appears to be very little interaction between the elements. At least from an SWR perspective. de Art NK8X ᐧ On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Art Snapper wrote: > I was considering adding a second vertical element to my 160 inverted L. > This one would be roughly a quarter wave tall for use on 80. > > I tried modelling in Eznec, but wasn't comfortable with the results. I may > have screwed it up. > > Has anyone tried it for real? Is it a big compromise on either band? Would > a switch at the feedpoint have any benefit? > > My inverted L has about 50 radials. > > 73 > Art NK8X > _ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: BOG antennas
We have learned a lot about BOG antennas thanks to research by Luis, IV3PRK/HC1PF. The initals BOG was for Beverage On Ground. He found that it did not function as a Beverage when on the ground, but the pattern was better, noise generally lower. It may require a preamplifier in the radio room.- Depends upon the receiver/transceiver. The 200 foot length is the starting point for a wire 'right' on the ground. As it disappears under vegitation , you may have to shorten it a couple of years, or use a stick with a hook at the end to pull it out of the weeds. Best to read Luis's research pages to get an idea what is going on. http://www.iv3prk.it/new-page.htm http://www.iv3prk.it/bog-modeling.htm 73 Bruce-k1fz _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: WD-1-A Field telephone wire.
Bottom line -This wire works well in two wire BOG antenna applications. Something to think about. Steel strands are off set by four copper strands. If we so afraid of steel magnetically interfering with the signal why are we using steel towers for transmit.? Yes they are galvanized, but zinc is a rather poor conductor, but better than steel. One needs to take into consideration that the tower is a fat conductor. each leg is in parallel with the others. Like resistors in parallel resistance is lowered, so losses are OK as is. Some how we took something that is working well and are trying to say it is not. Typically we develop products the opposite way around. Please don't loose any sleep over it, but if you do, could go work some DX. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Soldering radials?
Hi Matt, We can not ever have enough radials, especially with a less than a 1/4 wave vertical. Shorter antennas can get competitive if enough radials are used. Recommend solid wire because oxidation from water can corrode the stranded faster. Each strand is loosing conductivity. Solder them where they cross each other. If not connected, voltage differences leak power away. Takes time but in mid winter, it worth it. Busting through a pile up easily can bring a smile. 73 Bruce- k1fz On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:27:58 -0400, Matthew King - KK4CPS wrote: All this talk of radials makes me wonder about my radial field The area that the radials live in has been burned in a backfire. It has a wide variety of wire in it, mostly stranded copper. I'm sure the insulation is no more now that it's been burned. I'm quite sure they're corroded now, most likely on each strand of each wire. The million dollar question, now - are the radials ruined? Would I realize better coverage if I were to replace them? Inquiring minds want to know 73 Matt AK4MK _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Soldering radials?
WLBZ AM radio 620 KHZ. in Bangor, Maine in the early 1960's had a reduction in the ground wave signal most noticeable over 40 miles. We found the radial connections installed in the 1920's were in tough shape. Ran new radials and inter-connected with silver solder. After the work was completed could copy the station ~130 miles distant in Portland Maine on a car radio. 73 Bruce-k1fz PS remember how long those old car radio antennas were? hi http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:16:09 -1000, Merv Schweigert wrote: I had soldering problems here in the salt air until I switched to no lead plumbers solder and pure resin flux. have not had a problem since, I have radials and connections over 7 years old that are in great shape, exposed to the elements. YMMV 73 Merv K9FD/KH6 > I'd like to get the latest thinking from the group > on soldering radials. What I currently thinking > is as follows: > > SOLDER SELECTION: > > 1. Tin lead doesn't hold up in the weather. > > 2. "Stay Brite" 3% silver solder (97% tin, > no lead) is known to work well, but is expensive, > and has a considerably higher melting point > than 63/37. > > 3. Lead free plumber's solder obviously works > in water pipes, but does it hold up outdoors > in the rain? What is the melting point? > > FLUX SELECTION: > > 1. Pure rosin. Hardest to work with, but minimum > corrosion issues. > > 2. Activated rosin. Easier to work with. What > corrosion issues are there? > > 3. Acid core plumber's flux. Very easy to work > with, very corrosive. Does this hold up in the > rain, etc? > > (I remember the dire warnings that Heathkit manuals > had about not using acid core solder, but I > guess that doesn't apply to radials.) > > CRIMPING? > > Has anyone tried crimping as an alternative to solder? > > Rick > N6RK > _ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > . > _ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Fw: WD-1 Wire impedance
RF measured two different batches of the Plastic covered WD-1A wire. One was 130 ohms and the other was 150 ohms. Lot of hams use it for two wire beverages with good luck. 1. Remember postings saying Beverage wire size could be very small if it could be physically supported. This because the current on the wire is so small the loss is small. This wire does have some copper strands, think it was four.. 2. Then because the impedance is so low that almost any insulation is adequate. I put up a temporary beverage 4 or 5 years ago -(time flies) My wire just running over the branches along a tree line- no insulators.. It was, yes I 'll say it again, 'temporary' for a few months but years later it is still working well. The wire is tough, made for war time use... It stands up well.. I do stay away from the old original type with a lot of twist, as believe there is 'some' cancellation. (like as in twisted pair) 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:00:23 -0400, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote: But believe the WD1A really works well at this QTH in both forward and reverse modes. I have made many direct comparisons on extreme DX on 160 and the WD1A was the difference it too to hear the weak signal. My tests on the VK0 and VP8 Dx-peditions with a 600 foot single wire Beverage and the WD1A reversible configuration of the same length made me a firm believe in the WD1A Beverage ability. Furthermore the WD1A is cheap, strong, easy to construct just passing over limbs of small trees. In fact it is so strong that when a deer (yes we have them here) gets caught up in them the far end boxes, until I put in break away jumpers, was the victim. On 10/10/2016 4:41 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (rich...@karlquist.com) Add cleanup rule | More info Hi Herb and all, When I was in the Army, 1958 to 1960,, I was a "Field Communications Crewman". It meant, I helped string telephone wire. We used what was called WD-1TT. It was two separate conductors. They were twisted, not molded together. Each conductor was made of 3 steel wires and 4 copper wires making a 7 strand conductor. It might have been 4 steel and 3 copper. I have never found listings for WD-1TT on eBay. We spliced it by stripping about 10 inches from each conductor and tying a square knot and twisting the loose end on the conductor and covering with friction tape and then Scotch electrical tape. We could run 3 telephone circuits on 2 wires and ground with isolation transformers. Regards...Price W0RI With steel being very lossy AND magnetic AND frequency dependent, the characteristic impedance of this stuff is likely to be complex and frequency varying. I don't see how it would ever work well for a reversible beverage. Rick N6RK _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: 160 meter starter antennas
To: Aravind Balasubramanian Hello Aravind, If phased on 160 the close spacing creates many problems for the phasing and very low impedances. Coax cables need to be different length than 80 meter cables. Years ago I had phased on 80 meters, and switched to to a non phased on 160. Used the non fed tower as a tuned reflector against ground. Required a lot of switching relays. It worked better than a single vertical, but not great. Got some front to back that was useful on receive. It was a lot of years ago, unable to remember all the details. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 02:17:21 +0530, Aravind Balasubramanian wrote: i just planted my first topband antenna. a homebrew extended length butternut 2 v with homebrew tbr160 coil on a 30 feet pushup mast to help me squeeze a slooping radial in my 40 feet x 45 feet tiny terrace. i was able start my 160m dxcc ac with a ua4 on lotw. Want to add one more hf9v and convert it into a 2 el phased array for 80m with a compromise spacing of 50 ft (max diagonal spacing available). rx is a challenge. max allowed power of 400 w dc input to final in vu land is another challenge. i plan to build a dual waller flag http://nx4d10.wixsite.com/waller-flag/page3 and place it as far away from the diagonal line of the phased array as possible. what kind if interaction/detuning/directivity hit should i expect. for 160m/cqww cw contest weekends i can try installing the flag in my neighbours terrace temporarily. assuming i add another tbr160 to the 2nd hf9v can i expect any directivty gained by the 80m phasing on 160m. i will keep the linear happy by using a tuner. has anyone modelled something similar? any tips/suggestions welcome. 73 de Aravind vu2abs _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: 160 meter starter antennas
Good Info Dave, Thanks. In Maine, one contest Weekend, about year 1999-2000 worked 103 countries. Lots of countries in Europe not that far away in the Northeast direction. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:49:04 -0500, daraym...@iowatelecom.net wrote: Success also depends a lot on your location. Working 119 DXCC from a 70' inv vee from NY is a whole lot easier than doing it, for instance, out here in the Midwest (Iowa). YMMV. . .73. . .Dave, W0FLS -Original Message- From: Joe K2UF Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 11:45 AM To: 'Topband' Subject: Re: Topband: 160 meter starter antennas I Have an inv V hanging off of my 70 foot tower. Because I live on a suburb lot the legs of the antenna are bent to fit the lot (really ugly). I have worked DXCC (119) with that minimal antenna. It can be done but you have to be patient. 73 Joe K2UF _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Flag close to tower?
WB6RSE has done exceedingly well with his Roof Mounted rotatable Flag antenna that is very close to his transmit vertical. See March 2011 QST magazine. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:52:25 -0700, Bob K6UJ wrote: I am thinking of trying a rotatable flag for 160. I have a small lot and the farthest distance I can install the flag from my tower is 35 feet. Since it will be rotatable I assume I can aim the null at the tower to minimize any intereaction. Is it worth trying or not ? I read somewhere that the K9AY loop antenna can perform fairly close to a tower, but how about a flag ? Bob K6UJ Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html _ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: 160 meter starter antennas
The rorary Flag antenna by WB6RSE was in March 2011, QST magazine. He has done exceeding well receiving with his Flag antenna on 160 meters.. 73 Bruce-k1fz On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:07:31 +, Arthur Delibert wrote: I have good luck with a pennant antenna, using a DX Engineering pre-amp at the antenna. I live in a densely populated suburb, where it seems like every neighbor has every RF noise-maker ever invented, and the antenna does a pretty good job except for neighbors that are right off the front end of the antenna. The down-side is that it's fixed direction; but I have seen info about someone who built one on a rotating platform. There's a ton of information about how to make them at http://www.angelfire.com/md/k3ky/page37.html Art Delibert, KB3FJO North Bethesda, MD - From: Topband on behalf of K1FZ-Bruce Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 11:47 AM To: Topband Subject: Topband: 160 meter starter antennas This is the time of year that many of us in the Northern Hemisphere have been waiting for. DX is coming up, long and stronger. Many 'old timers' have their antennas "ready to roll". New comers to the band may want an inexpensive starter receive antenna, If there is space a beverage is a good forgiving antenna. For limited space: Despite some criticizing, a loop antenna can result in many DX contacts. Even SWL's in the AM radio BCB like them. Yes there are always better antennas, but many of us started with in-expensive wire types. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html flag_loop_antennas - QSL.net www.qsl.net Recommend a 900 ohm low capacitance primary antenna connection. Isolation: Less than 6pf (3-4pf typical) inter-winding capacitance for minimum common mode transfer ... _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: 160 meter starter antennas
Hi Paul, Glad you are ready to work DX Are the Beverage antenna transformer and termination resistor close to the ground rods, with short interconnect wires.? Are your coax cables buried to help with noise pick up.? Some of the small metal loops are not as good as the larger wire home built ones. DX is getting much better most notice-able at sunrise & sunset. 73 Bruce On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:25:25 +0100, Paul Mclaren wrote: I am in that category only having put up inverted L for 160m as an extension on my 40m quarterwave vertical recently. Receive antennas are Wellbrook loop and a couple of 40m beverages point NE/SW on top of a 7 foot high boundary wall. This was only put in place in the summer so yet to try my first winter and can't really believe I will hear anything Stateside or beyond - my best DX so far with limited effort is A65. The beverages are not very directional on 160m but hear into the local suburban noise better than the loop plus they work well on 80m and 40m RX as a bonus. I'll take any criticism going but for a normal UK house my garden is pretty average so I have to make do. Regards Paul MM0ZBH Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: 160 meter starter antennas
This is the time of year that many of us in the Northern Hemisphere have been waiting for. DX is coming up, long and stronger. Many 'old timers' have their antennas "ready to roll". New comers to the band may want an inexpensive starter receive antenna, If there is space a beverage is a good forgiving antenna. For limited space: Despite some criticizing, a loop antenna can result in many DX contacts. Even SWL's in the AM radio BCB like them. Yes there are always better antennas, but many of us started with in-expensive wire types. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/flag_antennas.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: midnight peaks
Larger numbers of low-banders came up at NA ~midnight from both sides of the Atlantic. More fun for all. 73 Bruce-k1fz I often get a peak from 11:30 to 12:30 from Europe Work F8IQS, G4ERZ, G3ROO, SV3RF, LY2OU, LA7THA, G4UFK, and others Even though its near midnight here, it is aproaching sunrise there .73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: BOG Question
Hi Glenn, I got my BOG working very well in the early spring time. up to 8 S units F/B. Through the summer it got very dry (drought) here in Belfast. The F/B went slowly down to 2 to 3 S units depending upon the direction & incoming angle. Last night we got a huge thunder shower and the F/B on some neighborhood noises are over 4 S points. I had been thinking that I would use the garden watering can to wet the ground, if ground conditions did not change. (BOG length Is now only 171.5 feet long) Bogs are very dependant upon ground conditions. I would never stop using one though. There have been noise conditions so severe that a BOG was the only antenna that I could copy DX on. At an earlier time, one of my original BOGs had a strange ~7 MHZ impedance change. QTH info: (While not the original house, the lot goes back to the 1790s Never know what will be found when digging in the ground. Checked the BOG length with a metal detector and found a very old water pipe. Removed a large section of the pipe and the impedance change went away. A BOG antenna will work, and a BOG antenna will work very well, and also can work exceeding well. The exceeding well is difficult to maintain. A resonant circuit that variables keep changing mostly from the rain, but also vegetation growth.. A lawn mower and watering can is good solution for Summer time DXing. Winter time snow takes care of the most active DX season. Had purchased a MFJ-5014 "White Noise Generator" and adjusted the wire length for best 'front to back' low in the 160 meter band. Posting to the topband reflector to also help others . http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/ 73 Bruce-k1fz On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 15:53:38 -0400, Glenn Kurzenknabe wrote: Hi Bruce, The WX is supposed to start getting cooler, so I am planning some work on my BOG’s... A couple of things came up and I would like your opinion They will lay on top of some of my TX radial field --- radials are buried They will intersect the control cable from the Hi-Z RX array and the feed line of it and a couple of other antennas, all above ground. BOG’s are insulated wire. After a few misfires with BOG’s I am looking forward to trying them with your design and notes, this time!! Am I in trouble??? Thanks and 73 de Glenn, K3SWZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: : BOG Question
Stew, A BOG can do a good job untermnated. If too long they self terminate. Depends upon the soil as to length. Check youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTXvcEwgUsU Also check ..http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes/ The biggest mistake is making the BOG antenna too long. Try not to go over 200 feet for 160 meters. Longer will work in some locations soil like desert, sand, other non/ partial conductiing types. 73 Bruce-K1FZ On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:18:28 + (UTC), GALE STEWARD via Topband wrote: I'm thinking of trying a BOG as I could run it across the corner of my neighbor's field (after he's finished mowing for the season.) My questions are: Can a BOG be used un-terminated and is it then bi-directional, as is a conventional beverage? In a terminated BOG, is the maximum received signal direction into the terminated end or into the feed transformer end? The reason for these questions is that I could easily position the BOG to the EU direction but the feed point end needs to be at the NE end (toward EU). It's not possible to run a feed line across the end of the field to the "far" end of the BOG. I didn't see these issues addressed in anything that I could find online. Any info appreciated... 73, Stew K3ND _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Bev for V3-land
Bill, Re-read his email. He is not asking about a transmitter antenna, only a Beverage antenna. Bruce, On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:42:26 +, william radice wrote: You do understand he will still need a transmit antenna? Bill On 8/14/2016 11:05 AM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote: Martin, A beverage antenna is, in general, much more forgiving of local problems. A good choice for the conditions you have. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 10:29:26 +0200, Martin wrote: Topbanders, a fellow ham is setting up his station in V3-land and asked me to give him some hints on beverages. I'm far from an expert but fortunatelly there are lots here on this reflector. The location is in the area Belmopan / Spanish Lookout / San Ignacio, so very far from the coast. It is a hill sloping down in all directions. There is a layer of soil over rocks , the rocks are visible some places. I believe the ground is not very conductive. Should he go for (reversible) beverages or should he choose something else? Preferable directions? Once set up, the station can be rent. _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Bev for V3-land
Martin, A beverage antenna is, in general, much more forgiving of local problems. A good choice for the conditions you have. 73 Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 10:29:26 +0200, Martin wrote: Topbanders, a fellow ham is setting up his station in V3-land and asked me to give him some hints on beverages. I'm far from an expert but fortunatelly there are lots here on this reflector. The location is in the area Belmopan / Spanish Lookout / San Ignacio, so very far from the coast. It is a hill sloping down in all directions. There is a layer of soil over rocks , the rocks are visible some places. I believe the ground is not very conductive. Should he go for (reversible) beverages or should he choose something else? Preferable directions? Once set up, the station can be rent. -- Ohne CW ist es nur CB.. 73, Martin DM4iM / V31iM _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Aurora
8-2-2016 Early evening weather forecaster says Aurora tonight 11PM to 2 AM Eastern time. Bruce-k1fz http://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband