[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-18 Thread Stéphane Graber
My two cents here are that we should: - Rapidly fix the LXC_DEVEL situation across all supported Ubuntu releases. - Separately prepare a new package for noble which performs the Debian merge and introduces the needed transitional packages to get users from the current Ubuntu-specific naming

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu Jammy/Kinetic

2023-10-23 Thread Stéphane Graber
This was definitely a mistake made when preparing the original LXC 5.0 snapshot for upload in Ubuntu. LXC_DEVEL=1 should only ever be set when dealing with current snapshots of the upstream codebase. Shipping an older snapshot with LXC_DEVEL=1 set will cause any tool that consumes liblxc and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2009738] Re: no lxc manpage

2023-03-13 Thread Stéphane Graber
We don't track snap bugs on Launchpad, nor is this something we can fix as it's indeed a missing feature of snaps. If snapd ever grows support for landing manpages on the system (similar to what it does with bash completion profiles), we'll be able to use our manpage generate showed above to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1987625] Re: lxc: FTBFS against glibc 2.36.0

2022-08-26 Thread Stéphane Graber
We've fixed those upstream already and will be in the next upstream point release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987625 Title: lxc: FTBFS against glibc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959993] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2022-06-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Have confirmed the packages to be functional on both focal and impish. Tried installation, upgrade and basic container creation, deletion and normal operations. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal verification-needed-impish ** Tags added: verification-done-focal verification-done-impish

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1967620] [NEW] [FFe] LXC 5.0 LTS

2022-04-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Public bug reported: LXC 5.0 LTS will very soon be released. The upstream release has been held up due to an incomplete port to meson (and deprecation of autotools), it's otherwise been ready to go for a few months. As far as LXC releases go, it's a very light one. Comparing it to current

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959047] Re: systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

2022-03-24 Thread Stéphane Graber
Uploaded to the queue ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959047 Title: systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959047] Re: systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

2022-03-24 Thread Stéphane Graber
Okay, that looks promising. Can you add the SRU sections to the description describing those testing steps? Then I can upload to the SRU queue referencing this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959047] Re: systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

2022-03-24 Thread Stéphane Graber
Uploading a LXD SRU to bionic with the one commit cherry-picked shouldn't be too hard. But we'd need someone to sort out the SRU paperwork as I have no idea how we'd even test the fix. ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959993] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2022-02-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
Uploaded the exact same thing to impish queue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959993 Title: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release) Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959993] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2022-02-15 Thread Stéphane Graber
Thanks Brian, my memory of this whole thing clearly dates back a long time then ;) I still remember some of the discussions of what we'd expect people to be doing in such cases and whether we'd ever officially support (as in test/validate) upgrade paths other than release to release+1 and LTS to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960847] Re: lxc autopkgtests failures with cgroupv2 on jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Stéphane Graber
The autopkgtest script in the Ubuntu package has: # Skip some tests due to cgroup v2 incompatibility if [ -e /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/memory.current ]; then [ "$testbin" = "lxc-test-apparmor-mount" ] && \ ignore "$STRING" && continue [ "$testbin" =

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960847] Re: lxc autopkgtests failures with cgroupv2 on jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Stéphane Graber
Marking this invalid against LXC as the code in the archive for package testing is handling this case properly already. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960847

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959993] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2022-02-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
(We technically had the same issue with the previous upload as 4.0.6 was higher than what hirsute shipped at the time, though in that case the EOL for hirsute was just a month or so away making the case for skipping that SRU even stronger :)) -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959993] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.12 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2022-02-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
In general, it's indeed a problem for such cases, though there are a few mitigating factors here: - This would only be a problem for those who upgrade from focal to impish. My understanding is that there is no direct upgrade path to achieve this, you'd need to go throughgroovy and hirsute, both

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960094] Re: lxc/1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 undefined symbol: strlcat in Focal

2022-02-08 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** No longer affects: lxc (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: lxc (Ubuntu Focal) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960094] Re: lxc/1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 undefined symbol: strlcat in Focal

2022-02-07 Thread Stéphane Graber
I think the strlcat thing is a red herring or an indication that the test environment is somehow in a bad shape. This could be explained if there was two versions of liblxc on the system for example. Outside of that, I'm also seeing: ``` lxc-start tmp.KEpxw2rh0e 20220205081512.354 ERROR

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1502604] Re: autopkgtests fail in LXC testbed

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1502604 Title: autopkgtests fail in LXC testbed Status in Auto

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1510108] Re: pre-installed lxc in cloud-image means loss of access to 10.0.X.0/24

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Closing as these days we only have LXD preinstalled on those images and LXD does a lot more validation and only creates the networks on first use. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591124] Re: LXC: Cannot create a container with the specific alias "tasks"

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591124 Title: LXC: Cannot create a container with the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1226855] Re: Cannot use open-iscsi inside LXC container

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Closing the LXC side of this bug as there's nothing we can really do here. It's either a kernel issue (needs support for their socket option within a network namespace) or an open-iscsi issue where they could have some kind of fallback mechanism. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1303756] Re: make lxc-console work non-confusingly by default on touch images

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu Touch hasn't been a thing for a few years and UBPorts hasn't really been hitting this issue as far as I know. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522992] Re: /usr/bin/lxc-stop:11:strlen:prune_init_scope:try_get_abs_cgroup:do_cgm_get:cgm_get

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522992 Title: /usr/bin/lxc-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642767] Re: starting any container with umask 007 breaks host system shutdown. lxc-stop just hangs.

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Moving over to the kernel as a userspace process shouldn't be able to cause such a hang regardless of what it does so this looks like a kernel bug (lock related by the looks of it). ** Package changed: lxc (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1549391] Re: /proc/sched_debug Information Leak

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Closing as it's not really LXC's job to try and change that one. These days we'd recommend distros to change default permissions or ideally get that changed at the kernel level. Short of that, we do have some documented recommendations in our production environment doc for LXD:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1515615] Re: Disk quotas don't work in LXC containers

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
@brauner do you know what's the state of quotas in a VFS idmapped shifted world? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515615 Title: Disk quotas don't work in LXC

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813362] Re: lxc-top flash error and blkio write is always zero

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Could you recheck with the current LXC (4.0.12) as the cgroup code was reworked quite extensively. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1646462] Re: lxc-create cannot setgid

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646462 Title: lxc-create cannot setgid Status in lxc:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1857542] Re: lxc-checkpoint needs the criu package

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
CRIU is once again in the archive (Ubuntu is just following what's in Debian for this one). ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886790] Re: lxc 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 ADT test failure with B/5.4 kernels (device_add_remove_test)

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1881292] Re: Linux 5.7: autopkgtest failures - lxc-test-cloneconfig && lxc-destroy

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Did we ever see this one again or was it just transient? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881292

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883041] Re: libpam-cgfs fails to create freezer cgroup writable by user

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883041 Title: libpam-cgfs fails to create freezer cgroup writable by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887919] Re: autopkgtest failure with libselinux 3.1

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887919 Title: autopkgtest failure with libselinux 3.1 Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907307] Re: lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 5.10.0-7.8

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Are we still seeing this? The failure looks a lot like it could be a legitimate kernel issue. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1532314] Re: Buffer overflow in cgmanager

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: libnih (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916669] Re: autopkgtests flaky for hirsute across various architectures

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Seems green lately ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916669 Title: autopkgtests flaky for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917601] Re: lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 5.8.0-45.51

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917601 Title: lxc 1:4.0.4-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1917187] Re: lxc cgroup2: containers unbootable

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
The error you're getting is coming from systemd in the container which for some reason is trying to mount a cgroup1 hierarchy rather than using cgroup2 like the rest of your system. You may be able to workaround that by using `lxc.init_cmd` to pass /sbin/init with additional arguments to change

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931064] Re: lxc autotest failure with kernel >= 5.13

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Marking as invalid as this wasn't an LXC bug but a kernel bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931064 Title: lxc autotest failure with kernel >= 5.13 Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931064] Re: lxc autotest failure with kernel >= 5.13

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=591a22c14d3f45cc38bd1931c593c221df2f1881 ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957934] Re: error in man page for lxc.container.conf

2022-02-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957934 Title: error in man page for lxc.container.conf Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950787] Re: systemd-sysusers cannot mount /dev in privileged containers (to pass credentials)

2021-11-12 Thread Stéphane Graber
Closing the LXD task as there's not really anything we can do there. The options here are pretty much: - Do nothing, if it's just privileged containers, it's usually not a big deal - Significantly rework apparmor mount handling logic and policies so this can be safely allowed - Ship unit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950787] Re: systemd-sysusers cannot mount /dev in privileged containers (to pass credentials)

2021-11-12 Thread Stéphane Graber
If this only fails in privileged containers, then I probably wouldn't worry about it too much, those aren't the default and a LOT of things break in privileged containers, so I don't think it's worth doing distro changes to accommodate this, assuming the container otherwise still boots. For cases

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950787] Re: systemd-sysusers cannot mount /dev in privileged containers (to pass credentials)

2021-11-12 Thread Stéphane Graber
Privileged containers have a much stricter apparmor policy applied than unprivileged containers. That's because unprivileged containers primarily rely on the user namespace to prevent breakout and taking over of the host whereas privileged containers rely entirely on apparmor. As apparmor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1937945] Re: old gpg keyserver no longer works

2021-08-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937945 Title: old gpg keyserver no longer works Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923232] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2021-05-24 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hello Serge, or anyone else affected, Accepted lxc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923232] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2021-04-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
Moving to Triaged, LXC does have a comprehensive autopkgtest test suite which runs both unit and integration tests and is integrated with Ubuntu. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => Opinion ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Opinion => Triaged ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923232] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2021-04-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/lxc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923232 Title: SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release) Status in lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-22 Thread Stéphane Graber
Christian submitted https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/18559 which got turned into https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/18684 and has now been merged in upstream systemd. We've both tested the resulting systemd and can confirm that /run/udev is now properly populated. Please cherry-pick

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu containers team (ubuntu-lxc) => Christian Brauner (cbrauner) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914062

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu containers team (ubuntu-lxc) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
This is a systemd/udev bug. We're aware of the CONTAINER_INTERFACE and it being wrong doesn't mean we need to change LXD to make it similarly wrong. LXD containers need to have udevd running to function properly, so you'll need to undo that change. If there is a bug in how udevd now behaves,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
Making /sys read-only will break very very many things that we have no intention of breaking. LXD is also completely init system agnostic and we have no idea what the init system in a particular container may be. ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915091] Re: Nautilus shows LXD storage pool in sidebar

2021-02-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Ok, so the mount table output confirms that your LXD default storage pool isn't visible in the host's mount table, so that's not what's triggering nautilus. Also, if that was the case, I'd have seen it on my own machine a long time ago ;) My best guess is that it's the loop device (also called

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915091] Re: Nautilus shows LXD storage pool in sidebar

2021-02-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Can you show `cat /proc/self/mountinfo` on your host? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915091 Title: Nautilus shows LXD storage pool in sidebar Status in lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915091] Re: Nautilus shows LXD storage pool in sidebar

2021-02-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hmm, LXD's mounts are in a separate mount namespace invisible from the host, so I don't quite get how this is possible ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915091

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905245] Re: "Failed to parse bus message: Invalid argument" with Linux 5.8

2021-01-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Now that we have the 5.8 kernel in HWE for focal, all my servers are hitting this, both on metal and in containers. This causes things like "systemctl show" to show an error as well as partial data. It really feels like this should have been fixed before the rollout of the 5.8 kernel through

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891903] Re: "File exists" error while starting container

2020-08-17 Thread Stéphane Graber
The cpuset "error" is normal, it just means the directory was already there and is getting recycled. The boot_id permission problem has already been fixed upstream. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888705] Re: lxc ftbfs against libselinux 3.1

2020-07-24 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Brauner (cbrauner) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888705 Title: lxc ftbfs against

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1868456] Re: "sudo: setrlimit(RLIMIT_CORE): Operation not permitted" error when using sudo in 20.04 LXD container

2020-06-22 Thread Stéphane Graber
We'll want that sudo fix included in Ubuntu. It's the usual catch with unprivileged containers only being able to lower their limits and never raise them so there's nothing we can really do about it in LXD. ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884635] Re: lxc 1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux-5.8 5.8.0-1.2

2020-06-22 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Brauner (cbrauner) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884635 Title: lxc 1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1 ADT

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1835660] Re: initramfs unpacking failed

2020-06-18 Thread Stéphane Graber
All LXD virtual machines are hitting this too. Run: - lxc launch images:ubuntu/focal/cloud f1 && lxc console f1 And you'll see it show that message. As mentioned above, boot then still goes ahead and you get a login prompt, but as that may not always be the case. For example in linux-kvm, that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883041] Re: libpam-cgfs fails to create freezer cgroup writable by user

2020-06-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
How are you logging in and can you confirm that this path does hit libpam_cgfs? Also look in /var/log/auth.log for potential errors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668049] Re: lxd cannot shutdown container

2020-06-03 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668049 Title: lxd cannot shutdown container Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1734410] Re: systemd: handle undelegated cgroup2 hierarchy

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
There is no /sys/fs/cgroup/unified on xenial, closing. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1645037] Re: apparmor_parser hangs indefinitely when called by multiple threads

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645037 Title: apparmor_parser hangs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668049] Re: lxd cannot shutdown container

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
Is this still an issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668049 Title: lxd cannot shutdown container Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1555760] Re: Too many levels of symbolic links /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
I've not seen this issue in quite a long time at least on bionic/focal, so will tentatively mark it as fix released. If someone still hits this, please tell us on what release and we'll add some SRU tasks. ** Changed in: binfmt-support (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1634199] Re: In 16.10, LXD won't work with enforced dsnmasq profile

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634199 Title: In 16.10, LXD won't work with enforced

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1519499] Re: Shutdown failure: Assertion 'sd_id128_randomize() >= 0' failed at ../src/core/dbus.c:657, function bus_on_connection(). Aborting.

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519499 Title: Shutdown failure: Assertion

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648143] Re: tor in lxd: apparmor="DENIED" operation="change_onexec" namespace="root//CONTAINERNAME_" profile="unconfined" name="system_tor"

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Xenial) ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Yakkety) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1709536] Re: snapd 2.26.14 on ubuntu-core won't start in containers anymore

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: layer-snap Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709536 Title: snapd 2.26.14 on ubuntu-core won't start in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876475] Re: lxc can't assign ipv4 address from lxc-container config file

2020-05-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Yes, different versions of different distros will have different behavior as to what they do with pre-existing network config. Point is, it's racy and unreliable, the only way to get guaranteed behavior is to make sure that nothing else attempts to manage the network when you've already

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876475] Re: lxc can't assign ipv4 address from lxc-container config file

2020-05-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
LXC always does the same thing, it preconfigures your network namespace. Now if the OS you're running in the container runs its own network configuration tool, that pre-made configuration will likely get reset or mangled. If you want to use those config keys, you need to make sure you're not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
The main leak was in dqlite and has now been included in master, the next rebuild of the snap (likely later today) will include it. ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
https://github.com/lxc/lxd/pull/7167 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871487 Title: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
https://github.com/canonical/raft/pull/123 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871487 Title: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Ok, can you post the output of "ls -lh /proc/PID/fd/" where PID is the PID of the "lxd --logfile ..." process and the PID of the "daemon.start" script (lxd's parent process)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Can you show `lxc info` please as well as `ls -lh /proc/self/fd` inside that "reproducer" container? I just tested it here and I'm seeing: ``` root@bionic:~# ls -l /proc/self/fd total 0 lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 9 20:57 0 -> /dev/pts/1 lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 9 20:57 1 -> /dev/pts/1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1857046] Re: lxc 3.0.4-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux 5.5.0-2.3

2020-04-06 Thread Stéphane Graber
Considering fixed as we now have 4.0.1 in the archive, if this still happens, let us know. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870539] Re: package liblxc-common 3.0.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobre-escrever '/usr/share/man/ja/man1/lxc-user-nic.1.gz', que também está no pacote lxc-uti

2020-04-06 Thread Stéphane Graber
This has already been fixed in 4.0.1-0ubuntu1 ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870539 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869330] Re: Hangs after eoan -> focal release upgrade on shutdown

2020-04-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Wrong package as that's against the LXD snap and not any archive package. The issue sounds like: https://github.com/lxc/lxd-pkg-snap/issues/39 If you have any idea on how to reliably reproduce the issue, please comment in the Github issue as it's something we'd really like to get rid of... **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869661] Re: lxc 3.23 (?) breaks nested lxd with snaps

2020-03-31 Thread Stéphane Graber
This is now fixed in all channels and our own validation now checks for this too. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1867535] Re: [FFe] LXC 4.0.0 LTS

2020-03-30 Thread Stéphane Graber
The release announcement finally got pushed out here: https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/lxc-4-0-lts-has-been-released/7182 The main new features are: - cgroups: Full cgroup2 support - cgroups: Freezer support in CGroup2 - cgroups: eBPF device controller support in CGroup2 - config: Add

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869661] Re: lxc 3.23 (?) breaks nested lxd with snaps

2020-03-30 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hmm, I thought we pushed all the nesting fixes to stable on Friday. Our own nesting tests are all clean but it's possible we're not hitting this particular exec case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659590] Re: containers won't start after lxc and apparmor upgrades in trusty

2020-03-29 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659590 Title: containers won't start after lxc and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1575757] Re: Can't install kernel-nfs-server inside lxc container

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
There's nothing particularly safe for us to do here out of the box. Using an alternative profile or appending to the profile (in LXD's case) is your best bet. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1389954] Re: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389954 Title: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569679] Re: lxc failed to do lxc-checkpoint again

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569679 Title: lxc failed to do lxc-checkpoint again Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1240757] Re: Bridge not created if bind9 is on

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240757 Title: Bridge not created if bind9 is on Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861880] Re: lxc-attach command does not return error exit code if the command is failed

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861880 Title: lxc-attach command does not return error exit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858799] Re: lxc ADT test failure on Bionic with linux-raspi2-5.3 arm64

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858799 Title: lxc ADT test failure on Bionic with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1760848] Re: lxc-create can't create bionic container on xenial

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
We're now using distrobuilder to build pre-made images avoiding the mess that was those scripts. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1866124] Re: ps -eo lxc no longer shows a task's lxc container

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866124 Title: ps -eo lxc no longer shows a task's lxc container

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659590] Re: containers won't start after lxc and apparmor upgrades in trusty

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
anyone still affected by this? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659590 Title: containers

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776381] Re: lxc-test-api-reboot will hang with autopkgtest

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
It's not currently failing based on recent logs anyway. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776381 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1843383] Re: lxc, please bump epoch to 1

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1837537 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837537 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1837537 FTBFS since lxc has different version numbers in Debian and Ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794523] Re: lxc-net.service is not properly ordered with network-online.target

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hmm, no, that would be wrong. Wants=/Requires= would cause lxc-net to not start if network- online.target is missing or if it fails. We only want to start after it if it does exist, which is what After does. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1840639] Re: Version 3.0.3 breaks lxc-usernsexec

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
What are your subuid/subgid allocations like? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840639 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1828255] Re: It's too easy to accidentally delete a container rather than a snapshot

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
There is configurable prompting for those that want it. We also refuse to delete running containers. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >