[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923232] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2021-05-24 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hello Serge, or anyone else affected, Accepted lxc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923232] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2021-04-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
Moving to Triaged, LXC does have a comprehensive autopkgtest test suite which runs both unit and integration tests and is integrated with Ubuntu. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Incomplete => Opinion ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Opinion => Triaged ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923232] Re: SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release)

2021-04-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/lxc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923232 Title: SRU of LXC 4.0.6 to focal (upstream bugfix release) Status in lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-22 Thread Stéphane Graber
Christian submitted https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/18559 which got turned into https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/18684 and has now been merged in upstream systemd. We've both tested the resulting systemd and can confirm that /run/udev is now properly populated. Please cherry-pick

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu containers team (ubuntu-lxc) => Christian Brauner (cbrauner) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914062

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu containers team (ubuntu-lxc) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
This is a systemd/udev bug. We're aware of the CONTAINER_INTERFACE and it being wrong doesn't mean we need to change LXD to make it similarly wrong. LXD containers need to have udevd running to function properly, so you'll need to undo that change. If there is a bug in how udevd now behaves,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914062] Re: NetworkManager-wait-online.service in 1.28.0-2ubuntu1 fails to start in LXC

2021-02-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
Making /sys read-only will break very very many things that we have no intention of breaking. LXD is also completely init system agnostic and we have no idea what the init system in a particular container may be. ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915091] Re: Nautilus shows LXD storage pool in sidebar

2021-02-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Ok, so the mount table output confirms that your LXD default storage pool isn't visible in the host's mount table, so that's not what's triggering nautilus. Also, if that was the case, I'd have seen it on my own machine a long time ago ;) My best guess is that it's the loop device (also called

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915091] Re: Nautilus shows LXD storage pool in sidebar

2021-02-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Can you show `cat /proc/self/mountinfo` on your host? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915091 Title: Nautilus shows LXD storage pool in sidebar Status in lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915091] Re: Nautilus shows LXD storage pool in sidebar

2021-02-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hmm, LXD's mounts are in a separate mount namespace invisible from the host, so I don't quite get how this is possible ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915091

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905245] Re: "Failed to parse bus message: Invalid argument" with Linux 5.8

2021-01-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Now that we have the 5.8 kernel in HWE for focal, all my servers are hitting this, both on metal and in containers. This causes things like "systemctl show" to show an error as well as partial data. It really feels like this should have been fixed before the rollout of the 5.8 kernel through

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891903] Re: "File exists" error while starting container

2020-08-17 Thread Stéphane Graber
The cpuset "error" is normal, it just means the directory was already there and is getting recycled. The boot_id permission problem has already been fixed upstream. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888705] Re: lxc ftbfs against libselinux 3.1

2020-07-24 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Brauner (cbrauner) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888705 Title: lxc ftbfs against

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1868456] Re: "sudo: setrlimit(RLIMIT_CORE): Operation not permitted" error when using sudo in 20.04 LXD container

2020-06-22 Thread Stéphane Graber
We'll want that sudo fix included in Ubuntu. It's the usual catch with unprivileged containers only being able to lower their limits and never raise them so there's nothing we can really do about it in LXD. ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884635] Re: lxc 1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux-5.8 5.8.0-1.2

2020-06-22 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Brauner (cbrauner) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884635 Title: lxc 1:4.0.2-0ubuntu1 ADT

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1835660] Re: initramfs unpacking failed

2020-06-18 Thread Stéphane Graber
All LXD virtual machines are hitting this too. Run: - lxc launch images:ubuntu/focal/cloud f1 && lxc console f1 And you'll see it show that message. As mentioned above, boot then still goes ahead and you get a login prompt, but as that may not always be the case. For example in linux-kvm, that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883041] Re: libpam-cgfs fails to create freezer cgroup writable by user

2020-06-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
How are you logging in and can you confirm that this path does hit libpam_cgfs? Also look in /var/log/auth.log for potential errors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668049] Re: lxd cannot shutdown container

2020-06-03 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668049 Title: lxd cannot shutdown container Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1734410] Re: systemd: handle undelegated cgroup2 hierarchy

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
There is no /sys/fs/cgroup/unified on xenial, closing. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1645037] Re: apparmor_parser hangs indefinitely when called by multiple threads

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645037 Title: apparmor_parser hangs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668049] Re: lxd cannot shutdown container

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
Is this still an issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668049 Title: lxd cannot shutdown container Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1555760] Re: Too many levels of symbolic links /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
I've not seen this issue in quite a long time at least on bionic/focal, so will tentatively mark it as fix released. If someone still hits this, please tell us on what release and we'll add some SRU tasks. ** Changed in: binfmt-support (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1634199] Re: In 16.10, LXD won't work with enforced dsnmasq profile

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634199 Title: In 16.10, LXD won't work with enforced

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1519499] Re: Shutdown failure: Assertion 'sd_id128_randomize() >= 0' failed at ../src/core/dbus.c:657, function bus_on_connection(). Aborting.

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519499 Title: Shutdown failure: Assertion

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648143] Re: tor in lxd: apparmor="DENIED" operation="change_onexec" namespace="root//CONTAINERNAME_" profile="unconfined" name="system_tor"

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Xenial) ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Yakkety) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1709536] Re: snapd 2.26.14 on ubuntu-core won't start in containers anymore

2020-06-01 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: layer-snap Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709536 Title: snapd 2.26.14 on ubuntu-core won't start in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876475] Re: lxc can't assign ipv4 address from lxc-container config file

2020-05-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Yes, different versions of different distros will have different behavior as to what they do with pre-existing network config. Point is, it's racy and unreliable, the only way to get guaranteed behavior is to make sure that nothing else attempts to manage the network when you've already

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876475] Re: lxc can't assign ipv4 address from lxc-container config file

2020-05-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
LXC always does the same thing, it preconfigures your network namespace. Now if the OS you're running in the container runs its own network configuration tool, that pre-made configuration will likely get reset or mangled. If you want to use those config keys, you need to make sure you're not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
The main leak was in dqlite and has now been included in master, the next rebuild of the snap (likely later today) will include it. ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
https://github.com/lxc/lxd/pull/7167 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871487 Title: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
https://github.com/canonical/raft/pull/123 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871487 Title: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Ok, can you post the output of "ls -lh /proc/PID/fd/" where PID is the PID of the "lxd --logfile ..." process and the PID of the "daemon.start" script (lxd's parent process)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871487] Re: anon_inode:[eventfd] leaked on vgs invocation inside lxd container

2020-04-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
Can you show `lxc info` please as well as `ls -lh /proc/self/fd` inside that "reproducer" container? I just tested it here and I'm seeing: ``` root@bionic:~# ls -l /proc/self/fd total 0 lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 9 20:57 0 -> /dev/pts/1 lrwx-- 1 root root 64 Apr 9 20:57 1 -> /dev/pts/1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1857046] Re: lxc 3.0.4-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux 5.5.0-2.3

2020-04-06 Thread Stéphane Graber
Considering fixed as we now have 4.0.1 in the archive, if this still happens, let us know. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870539] Re: package liblxc-common 3.0.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobre-escrever '/usr/share/man/ja/man1/lxc-user-nic.1.gz', que também está no pacote lxc-uti

2020-04-06 Thread Stéphane Graber
This has already been fixed in 4.0.1-0ubuntu1 ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870539 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869330] Re: Hangs after eoan -> focal release upgrade on shutdown

2020-04-02 Thread Stéphane Graber
Wrong package as that's against the LXD snap and not any archive package. The issue sounds like: https://github.com/lxc/lxd-pkg-snap/issues/39 If you have any idea on how to reliably reproduce the issue, please comment in the Github issue as it's something we'd really like to get rid of... **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869661] Re: lxc 3.23 (?) breaks nested lxd with snaps

2020-03-31 Thread Stéphane Graber
This is now fixed in all channels and our own validation now checks for this too. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1867535] Re: [FFe] LXC 4.0.0 LTS

2020-03-30 Thread Stéphane Graber
The release announcement finally got pushed out here: https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/lxc-4-0-lts-has-been-released/7182 The main new features are: - cgroups: Full cgroup2 support - cgroups: Freezer support in CGroup2 - cgroups: eBPF device controller support in CGroup2 - config: Add

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869661] Re: lxc 3.23 (?) breaks nested lxd with snaps

2020-03-30 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hmm, I thought we pushed all the nesting fixes to stable on Friday. Our own nesting tests are all clean but it's possible we're not hitting this particular exec case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659590] Re: containers won't start after lxc and apparmor upgrades in trusty

2020-03-29 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659590 Title: containers won't start after lxc and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1575757] Re: Can't install kernel-nfs-server inside lxc container

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
There's nothing particularly safe for us to do here out of the box. Using an alternative profile or appending to the profile (in LXD's case) is your best bet. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1389954] Re: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to discover and enable

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389954 Title: Make .lxc domain name resolution easier to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569679] Re: lxc failed to do lxc-checkpoint again

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569679 Title: lxc failed to do lxc-checkpoint again Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1240757] Re: Bridge not created if bind9 is on

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240757 Title: Bridge not created if bind9 is on Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861880] Re: lxc-attach command does not return error exit code if the command is failed

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861880 Title: lxc-attach command does not return error exit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858799] Re: lxc ADT test failure on Bionic with linux-raspi2-5.3 arm64

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858799 Title: lxc ADT test failure on Bionic with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1760848] Re: lxc-create can't create bionic container on xenial

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
We're now using distrobuilder to build pre-made images avoiding the mess that was those scripts. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1866124] Re: ps -eo lxc no longer shows a task's lxc container

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866124 Title: ps -eo lxc no longer shows a task's lxc container

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659590] Re: containers won't start after lxc and apparmor upgrades in trusty

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
anyone still affected by this? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659590 Title: containers

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776381] Re: lxc-test-api-reboot will hang with autopkgtest

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
It's not currently failing based on recent logs anyway. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776381 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1843383] Re: lxc, please bump epoch to 1

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1837537 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837537 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1837537 FTBFS since lxc has different version numbers in Debian and Ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794523] Re: lxc-net.service is not properly ordered with network-online.target

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Hmm, no, that would be wrong. Wants=/Requires= would cause lxc-net to not start if network- online.target is missing or if it fails. We only want to start after it if it does exist, which is what After does. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1840639] Re: Version 3.0.3 breaks lxc-usernsexec

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
What are your subuid/subgid allocations like? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840639 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1828255] Re: It's too easy to accidentally delete a container rather than a snapshot

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
There is configurable prompting for those that want it. We also refuse to delete running containers. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1837537] Re: FTBFS since lxc has different version numbers in Debian and Ubuntu

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
lxc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Stéphane Graber (stgraber) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837537 Title: FTBFS since lxc has different version n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1787436] Re: lxc 3.0.1-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux 4.18.0-5.6

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Based on autopkgtest history, this must have gotten fixed somehow. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1857046] Re: lxc 3.0.4-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux 5.5.0-2.3

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
@brauner any idea what that's about? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857046 Title: lxc 3.0.4-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux 5.5.0-2.3 Status in lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1508744] Re: Upgrade to Ubuntu 15.10 Broken: lxc-net.service fails on upgrade

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** No longer affects: lxc (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508744 Title: Upgrade to Ubuntu 15.10 Broken: lxc-net.service fails on upgrade Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1758168] Re: [16.04] checkconfig: Warning: new{u, g}idmap is not setuid-root

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758168 Title: [16.04] checkconfig: Warning: new{u,g}idmap is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776214] Re: please package lxc 2.1.1 for xenial updates

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
We only package LTS releases in Ubuntu. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776214 Title: please

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1757229] Re: Oracle containers will fail to start because of missing /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/dev

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Our pre-generated oracle images are tested daily and seem to be working fine. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750654] Re: "lxc-create -B best" fails on non-btrfs/zfs system

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750654 Title: "lxc-create -B best" fails on non-btrfs/zfs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713726] Re: lxc 2.0.8-0ubuntu6 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-7.8

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713726 Title: lxc 2.0.8-0ubuntu6 ADT test failure with linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1700500] Re: lxc-net incompatible with systemd-resolved

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1715537] Re: package lxc1 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Error was visible in the log, address/port already in use. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715537

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1625235] Re: lxc doesn't follow xdg basedir spec if XDG_DATA_HOME is set

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625235

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673687] Re: lx-ls crashes and dumps core

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673687 Title: lx-ls crashes and dumps core Status in lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1699903] Re: lxc-sshd won't start with 2.0.8

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699903 Title: lxc-sshd won't start with 2.0.8 Status in lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1699919] Re: lxc copy between hosts preserves original uid/gid

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699919 Title: lxc copy between hosts preserves original uid/gid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1699592] Re: lxc-create fails for debian jessie armhf

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
We don't use those template scripts anymore and foreign architecture was never really supported in the first place (and indeed inconsistently between templates). ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1614232] Re: python-lxc attach_wait prevents further keyboard input

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Is that still a thing on 3.x or higher? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614232 Title: python-lxc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1619238] Re: #cloud-config in user.user-data not running without ip

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619238 Title: #cloud-config in user.user-data not running without ip

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607096] Re: lxc-container-default-with-mounting profile systemd permission denied

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
report matches a setup for 16.04 with upstart instead of systemd and no cgroup-lite or similar pre-mounting the right cgroup, error is correct, host setup is likely the issue. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1532069] Re: Can't create a container with a loop backing store in 1.0.8

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532069 Title: Can't create a container with a loop backing

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1620774] Re: lxc container does not start: cgroupfs failed to detect cgroup metadata

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620774 Title: lxc container does not start: cgroupfs failed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594751] Re: lxc-ls doesn't show nested containers when using an alternate lxc path

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594751 Title: lxc-ls doesn't show nested containers when using an

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1556931] Re: lxc: adt testing failing across the board on ppc64el

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556931 Title: lxc: adt testing failing across the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1302053] Re: lxc-start with bad container name gives strange err message

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302053 Title: lxc-start with bad container name gives

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1549391] Re: /proc/sched_debug Information Leak

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
So options here are to apparmor block it, assuming that no common piece of software relies on it or to mask it with lxcfs (though that still allows access to user, so not necessarily ideal). I'm a bit confused as to why this data is accessible to unprivileged users in the first place, wouldn't

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1684481] Re: KVM guest execution start apparmor blocks on /dev/ptmx now (regression?)

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1684481 Title: KVM guest execution start apparmor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1758380] Re: unpriveleged containers no longer could start due to start.c: lxc_spawn: 1555 Failed initializing cgroup support

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758380 Title: unpriveleged containers no longer could

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1751780] Re: lxc-snapshot crashes when removing non-existing snapshot

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751780 Title: lxc-snapshot crashes when removing

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1674679] Re: lxc autopkgtest fails if http_proxy not set

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1674679 Title: lxc autopkgtest fails if http_proxy not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1713674] Re: Starting Xenial lxc without cap_sysadmin fails

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713674 Title: Starting Xenial lxc without

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1586608] Re: Can not start nested trusty container inside trusty container

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
trusty is EOL, cgmanager/cgproxy are dead and nesting works way better now thanks to cgroup namespaces. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1511197] Re: PCI Device Access Through /proc/

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1527374] Re: CVE-2015-8709

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** No longer affects: lxc (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527374 Title: CVE-2015-8709 Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1556110] Re: package lxc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 子程序 已安裝的 post-installation script 傳回了錯誤退出狀態 1

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556110 Title: package lxc (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1590547] Re: LXC package for trusty no longer has configuration files

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590547 Title: LXC package for trusty no longer has

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594751] Re: lxc-ls doesn't show nested containers when using an alternate lxc path

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Is that still an issue with the modern lxc-ls (3.x or higher)? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1521151] Re: init: lxc-instance main process terminated with status 255

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
trusty is EOL and upstart is unsupported at this time. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521151

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1472929] Re: undefined symbol: cgmanager_get_pid_cgroup_abs_sync

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472929 Title: undefined symbol: cgmanager_get_pid_cgroup_abs_sync

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1441307] Re: lxc-clone makes new copies of each hardlinked file

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Looking at the current LXC code, "-H" is part of our rsync flags now. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1436722] Re: lxc domain setup instructions are incorrect

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436722

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1359224] Re: Feature request: Add support for multiple bridges

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1445539] Re: Can't create vivid lxc on trusty

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
We're now relying on lxc-download which doesn't have such problems. A backported version of lxc in trusty will work fine, though trusty is eol now. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1532069] Re: Can't create a container with a loop backing store in 1.0.8

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
Has anyone seen this on something recent? Say LXC 3.x or 4.x? ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1537939] Re: apparmor profile for /var/lib/lxd denies mount operation on container creation

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537939 Title: apparmor profile for /var/lib/lxd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1544157] Re: lxc exec not working in xenial

2020-03-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544157 Title: lxc exec not working in xenial Status

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >