Re: [Trisquel-users] Why comes Abrowser without Noscript / Librejs?

2013-08-01 Thread shiretoko
Maybe I'm reading this wrong but JavaScript is problematic unless it comes with a free license. Yes, I agree. Non-obfuscated, non-free javascript is better than obfuscated one, but it's not enough. And then there's the question whether minification is obfuscation as many pages come

Re: [Trisquel-users] Why comes Abrowser without Noscript / Librejs?

2013-08-01 Thread shiretoko
Sounds like a good idea, but most important is the possibility to allow/block particular scripts. With this, many websites can be used without running nonfree js. Web pages use much free javascript, this is not the problem. But almost no site uses free javascript only, so we have to choose

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu at this point

2013-08-01 Thread shiretoko
I also think about buying a yeeloong but after everything I've read, watching youtube videos / videos in general will be difficult. I quote this link: http://b.mtjm.eu/lemote-yeeloong.html Gentoo has patches making full-screen low quality YouTube videos playable (used WatchVideo for this),

Re: [Trisquel-users] VirtualBox

2013-08-01 Thread gromobir
@Sachin: You mentioned another command in the issue you linked to. Thus, I tried sudo /etc/init.d/virtualbox start. But this only resulted in No suitable module for running kernel found. @GNUser: Thank you very much for your elaborations. However, I think I didn't manage yet to use the

Re: [Trisquel-users] WebGL

2013-08-01 Thread gromobir
Thank you, dadix. In another thread you mentioned the Intel Open Source drivers. Where did you get them from and how did you install them? Maybe I just need these to fix my problem.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Gnash should be disabled by default?

2013-08-01 Thread Andrew R .
On 01/08/13 09:36, GNUser wrote: But yeah, Noscript is your friend... a very annoying friend who never shuts up, but a friend and a good one. Use it everyone. You can disable the message that comes up when a script is blocked. I used to do this every time I used NoScript. But I don't need to

Re: [Trisquel-users] VirtualBox

2013-08-01 Thread Sachin Dey
On Thursday 01 August 2013 03:54 PM, gromo...@web.de wrote: @Sachin: You mentioned another command in the issue you linked to. Thus, I tried sudo /etc/init.d/virtualbox start. But this only resulted in No suitable module for running kernel found. That happened because the kernel module does

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu at this point

2013-08-01 Thread Andrew R .
On 01/08/13 19:53, shiretoko wrote: Don't know if it's possible to liberate gentoo; we could kick out the default kernel and use linux-libre instead, but I don't know if they have free-only repos. I think Ututo is (or was?) based on Gentoo. But I don't know how English-friendly it is. I recall

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu at this point

2013-08-01 Thread Michał Masłowski
So I think you need some special patches for watching low-res-videos (!) which are only provided by gentoo. The fact that only Gentoo provides them is not important. No one had applied them in gNS nor Parabola since e.g. they might depend on other X.Org versions, recent X.Org broke other

[Trisquel-users] Re : Why comes Abrowser without Noscript / Librejs?

2013-08-01 Thread magicbanana
You two (lembas and quantumgravity) are perfectly right: the non-trivial scripts *must* be distributed under a free software license. And yes, the minimization step, if it exists, should be documented.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Why comes Abrowser without Noscript / Librejs?

2013-08-01 Thread erikthorsen
..Never said it did. Merely that it was used for web content. And yes, yes, agree with the rest of your post, except that you CAN use a computer with a free bios, but generally that involves too many compromises for most people. Much like you CAN browse the web without javascript and you

Re: [Trisquel-users] WebGL

2013-08-01 Thread dadix
I think is working without this ppa. I removed xorg from my system , that ppa and I installed only from trisquel repos. I still have my 3.10 libre-kernel sudo apt-get install libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental libtxc-dxtn-s2tc0 libtxc-dxtn-s2tc-bin I see that cube moving.

Re: [Trisquel-users] WebGL

2013-08-01 Thread erikthorsen
Sounds like a good thing that it's disabled. I mean, really now. Really now. Who thought letting any random website execute whatever it damn well pleases directly on the GPU sounded like a good idea?

Re: [Trisquel-users] WebGL

2013-08-01 Thread onpon4
That's not exactly what WebGL does. It's an API for rendering graphics; yes, the GPU is directly used for this normally, but it's not like the code directly tells the GPU what to do. It tells the browser what to tell the GPU to do (though I think it's more like telling the browser what to

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu at this point

2013-08-01 Thread migatheotaku
He does talk about marrying little girls a lot around here, doesn't he? There's probably some way to do it if you really wanted to, but why would you want to? I honestly can't think of any positives of marrying a kid, or, hell, even a kid that would want to be married at such a young age to

Re: [Trisquel-users] which Diaspora site is good?

2013-08-01 Thread adel . afzal
Thanks MB

Re: [Trisquel-users] Gnash should be disabled by default?

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
Thanks for the clarification. Never tried that myself.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu at this point

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
Yes, it's really a broken system by this point. There are two alternatives to someone who wants to be a little bit safer: 1. Use something like Web of Trust. At least you have the power of community to back you up. 2. Test the site fingerprint manually in

Re: [Trisquel-users] Gnash should be disabled by default?

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
It means that Noscript will block all javascript, making it almost impossible to use the web with it turned on (you have to click in a few dozen permissions for some websites to run). So, yeah, it's annoying. BUT it protects you. So it's a very good friend. Actually, when using the Tor

Re: [Trisquel-users] Why comes Abrowser without Noscript / Librejs?

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
Agreed! If Abrowser should come with noscript, it should be in allow all mode, so that it would only protect against cross-site attacks and such. Now, of course, as I have said before in the forum, I don't have gnash or anything running, I prefer to use the bare minimum, but it was my

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu at this point

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
I don't think he is a pedophile (not what we would normally call one at least). Nor a troll. There seems to be something more to him than we see right now... But yeah, he is annoying and a little crazy, agree on that.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Close ports without UFW

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
Yes, Debian is a very stable and secure distro. And much of their work as improved the whole free software community, the FSF should remember that! But again, just because the FSF says something is not free, it doesn't mean it actually isn't ;) Unless they copyrighted the term free software xD

Re: [Trisquel-users] Open Source Intel drivers for Trisquel have blobs ?

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
Not exactly. While I believe that to be true for most cases, you have to keep in mind that sometimes when you deblob some driver or whatever, you might actually break it only because you forget to clean up the code to work without the blob, and not because it depended on the blob. Like...

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu at this point

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
Ahaha, your avatar actually looks like she just read vPro comments, asking to marry her xD xD Anyway, the point is... I totally agree with you, open standards are the future! And I totally support them. But I was talking about a solution for now, as in I need a free clean computer to use

Re: [Trisquel-users] Community driven content websites

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
Thanks! As a side note (this is not related to community driven websites) I discovered that http://www.techhive.com/ has some (won't say all, I only tried a few) videos related to technologies and such that play with html5 AND theora! =D Actually amazing, one more website that you can

Re: [Trisquel-users] WebGL

2013-08-01 Thread gnuser
I actually like the KISS Keep It Small and Simple. I like websites that use html, css, some free non-malicious javascript... All that hype about flash and such, was a real pain in the back all the way through. I hope as we move away from flash (thanks to html5) we don't get into another

Re: [Trisquel-users] Community driven content websites

2013-08-01 Thread pedrosilva
In order to watch the videos you need to run JavaScript, so no vids for me. The rest of the site is usable though.

[Trisquel-users] Re : Close ports without UFW

2013-08-01 Thread magicbanana
FSF maintains its definition of free software. Even if Debian originated within the FSF, it has its own free software guidelines. Finally, the OSI defines what is open source. Those three definitions cover almost the same licenses but not exactly. The differences can be argued. Why would the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Open Source Intel drivers for Trisquel have blobs ?

2013-08-01 Thread migatheotaku
Typically if a driver gets broken to the point where it doesn't work due to the deblobbing, it would fail to compile as well (at least, I'd hope). I know that, when compiling Linux-libre, it returns a lot of warnings because of it replacing all the firmware blobs with the */(DEBLOBBED)*/

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel is less secure than Ubuntu at this point

2013-08-01 Thread migatheotaku
What would really kick things off is a freedom friendly version of the Raspberry Pi. Those computers are really cool (and for all we know, the future of computing), but unfortunately there exists no freedom friendly device like that yet (that I know of). But just imagine, a ~$35 freedom

Re: [Trisquel-users] VirtualBox

2013-08-01 Thread migatheotaku
Isn't there a package for DKMS for VirtualBox? I know one exists for Parabola, and I use it because I use a custom linux-libre kernel.