It appears there are two judges -- The Judge and The Impostor. If judgment has to do with bringing ppl into the relationship [and such is the only judgment presented to the modern day saint] , the judgment is easily assessed. Drive them [the ppl] away and the judgment is not of God. "Impost
(..wanna bat against me?
:)
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:35:48 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the Judge himself actually judges ppl
with understanding, gentlemen--he engenders understanding with wisdom and
righteousness as he goes, as he renders truth truthfully among us who
know him--
the Judge himself actually judges ppl
with understanding, gentlemen--he engenders understanding with wisdom and
righteousness as he goes, as he renders truth truthfully among us who know
him--the stark contrast of your spirits & methods provoke me (to comment:)
(in this context:)
On Mon, 1
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:22:14 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'inspections'
rank among prerequisites for Satan to 'appear' (lookin'
like jt's God to you[?])
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:46:24 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
..& the Moderator smugly postures
himself the same way as you do, Bro; e.g.:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:21:13 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
"..not to [separate the two G] would make
one prone to error.
Error
#2"
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:12:39 -0700 [EMAIL PROTE
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 12, 2006 15:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave
H. get bathing suit.
you copied and pasted...from another site
without actually going to it
^
'inspections'
rank among prerequisites for Satan to 'appear' (lookin'
like jt's God to you)
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:46:24 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sen
keep in mind--you
asked me to expand certain thoughts in this thread for you--what you
read, below, are certain thoughts, or thinking
dynamically expanded, as you requested; however, think of me as a
pitcher, Bro--you're at the plate (imagine this) with a beautiful Minnesota
white ash Micke
the grammar of
the verse, below, is structured carefully by a non-judgmental
author through the power of the HS--it follows the pattern of true
prophecy
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:35:10 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
- Original Message -
From:
intrinsically, below, you've
postured yourself to (be) Judge
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:13:46 -0500 "David
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have withheld judgment
||
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglor
In the biblical concept of the church
I see an avenue for continuing revelation, and if not revelation, certainly interpretation or understanding. If you will, it is in the counsel of many that our understanding of the biblical text is expanded and/or confirmed. How important, it
cd: Gary be a little nicer and I will answer you questions-until then:-(
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/13/2006 12:29:43 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
...e.g., if in your Judgement a few brethren get lost some
Funny. I just don't see David as ever having been young. :-)
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You guys are just upset you didn't get ahold of me when I was young and > ignorant. Maybe if you had encountered me when I was 8, you coul
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/13/2006 10:35:13 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:17:48 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why [does] Satan appear as a angel of light [p
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/13/2006 7:35:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
So then, Dean, are you beginning to adopt a style of writing/communicating that favors the oblique? Did you not recent
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/13/2006 5:33:24 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
What, Judy, do you mean by 'consistently'? (Sorry Dean but I fear Judy's full meaning may not be covered by 'Webster'
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/12/2006 11:36:04 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
[*in JCs judgement, his brethren both already do have &] will have happiness beyond understanding
cd: True Gary but what
You guys are just upset you didn't get ahold of me when I was young and
ignorant. Maybe if you had encountered me when I was 8, you could have
played me like playdough.
Surely you both understand that if I appear incorrect and immoveable to you,
then you likely appear incorrect and immoveable
Someone else who notices! Thanks Blainerb!!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 13, 2006 14:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Behind the
scenes conversations re:David Miller
In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:0
In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:02:28 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both
incorrect and immoveable on at least a portion of that which is under
discussion. What I've got to determine is whether or not it is worth the
I've not forgotten you, David. IMO, you are both
incorrect and immoveable on at least a portion of that which is under
discussion. What I've got to determine is whether or not it is worth the 'ink'
to engage further with you given what I've just said. I'm checking around with
some who've rea
Yet, it is perfectly clear that some [bizarre] doctrinal comments are not the result of the direction of the Spirit and need no refutation. There is proverbial commentary that directs us away from wasting effort against the nonsensical..
jd
-- Original message -- From
Not to mention the fact that the "spirit of the anti-Christ" is rooted in a misunderstanding as relates to the eternity and divine nature of the Incarnate One.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The term "Anti-Christ" is a buzz word f
Gary, please consider that if I was judging ppl here, I would not have
said, "I ... still don't understand." I have withheld judgment
because I don't have all the facts and you certainly have not volunteered much
in the way of clarifying. Are you pleading the Fifth?
David Miller.
-
Not more than someone claiming that God might not agree with
them.
If you are going to suggest that God does not agree with a particular
believer's stance, you should point out how through Scripture why that is
so. Otherwise, it appears that you assume the other person has not prayed
and
The term "Anti-Christ" is a buzz word for Biblical scholars and spiritual
individuals. Studying the books of Daniel, Revelation, 2 Thessalonians, the
epistles of John, etc. give us insight into the nature of this spirit. For
example, consider a phrase like, "Neither shall he regard the God of
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:17:48 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Why [does] Satan appear as a angel of light [partic to
fruit inspectors]
her comment
presupposes that the Moderator ain't the true Judge--wannabes like locusts,
man; even all over each other to rule the world,
eh?
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:33:18 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What, Judy, do you mean by 'consistently'? (Sorry
Dean but I fear J
then, like the Moderator, you also
Judge ppl in your finitude within v narrow human limits (with
perfection, of course)
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:12:57 -0500 "David
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What I did not understand, and still
don't understand, is why Gary did not post the oth
Lance wrote:
> Am I to assume that YOU would be incapable,
> ... of making a legitimate case FOR the maltreatment
> of AT LEAST those three groups I mentioned by believers?
Yes, you should assume that. I could not in good conscience make a
legitimate case that society in general grossly mistreat
Kudos to you for once again identifying the
'syntactical' error by Lance, Debbie, Gary (et al if applicable). THE OPPOSITE
OF KUDOS TO YOU for once again failing to address the 'semantical' issue at
hand! Please demonstrate that you know what that (the issue) is and grant us the
benefit of y
And?
I stated that the quote from Clement that you posted as evidence of
Christians having the wrong attitude toward Christians appeared to be
bogus. What apparently you did was ask Debbie to help, and she apparently
went to the Atheists / Skeptics sites and obtained some 'evidence' for
I read an aritcle by NT Wright this morning in which he spoke of the "beginning" of understanding. And in conversation with Bill Taylor, recently, he commented on just how wonderful it was that our knowledge of science (specifically) put us in a better postioin, as theologians, some of what
Judy:Could 'believers' believe 'false doctrine or
theologies of men'?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 13, 2006 08:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] "The spirit of
Anti-Christ"
Judy:I mean by 'believers' (and, hereafter shall
always mean) those born from above, those participating by the Spirit in the
Son's communion with the Father.
As to the second part of that which you said, I'm
unclear as to your meaning.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Lance, the problem it appears is with your
definition of "believer"
As to the assumption below - I for one would say YES.
Believers have certain
fruit in their lives and it is not the kind you
describe here.
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>David:
Am I to assume that YOU would be inc
The spirit of anti-Christ is not only a spirit coming
against Christ as in those who
crucified Him. It is also a spirit that stands
"in place of" the real Christ as in a false doctrine
or theologies of men that make ppl complacent and give
them a false peace. judyt.
On Mon, 13 Feb 200
Does such shut down any conversation entailing
disagreement?
So then, Dean, are you beginning to adopt a style
of writing/communicating that favors the oblique? Did you not recently rail
against Benny Hinn? Assuming that he were doing so, is G not entitled to adopt a
stance other than your's or DM's? (I then answer my own question) Of course he
is AND
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/13/2006 12:06:09 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
..& his brethren ain't required to be present at your Judgement as you arbitrarily split them into categories which suit your pr
This has been/is being bandied about by David
Miller et al. Perhaps it'd be helpful for those employing it to explain just
what it is that they mean when employing it.
L
David:
Am I to assume that YOU would be incapable, excellent researcher that you
are, of making a legitimate case FOR the maltreatment of AT LEAST those
three groups I mentioned by believers? Am I to assume that, over the course
of the last 20 centuries, believers have not, regularly and, over
What, Judy, do you mean by 'consistently'? (Sorry
Dean but I fear Judy's full meaning may not be covered by 'Webster'
or...)
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 13, 2006 04:56
And?
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 12, 2006 15:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave
H. get bathing suit.
LOL. I found the link to it in YOUR post. LOL. I just
wondered why you didn't share
ONLY when they consistently walk in the light as He is
in the light ..
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:32:34 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[*in JCs judgement, his brethren both already do
have &] will have happiness beyond
understanding
-- On
45 matches
Mail list logo
