Kevin wrote:
> NO ONE believes what David put
> up as his straw man.
It was not a straw man, Kevin. It is part of a misunderstanding
between us. You have some inconsistency concerning dictionary use, which
hopefully will become more apparent later.
Peace be with you.David Miller.
OK name names
Who believes only the original OLDE 1611 is the Word of God?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/16/2005 6:23:38 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An Astute Student would have not gone off on a tangent about the OLDE KJV. NO ONE believes what David put up as
In a message dated 2/16/2005 6:23:38 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An Astute Student would have not gone off on a tangent about the OLDE KJV. NO ONE believes what David put up as his straw man. Does anyone know someone who believes such?
Of course there are. But you would
An Astute Student would have not gone off on a tangent about the OLDE KJV. NO ONE believes what David put up as his straw man. Does anyone know someone who believes such?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems as though, of late, every time I compliment or agree with someone on the right, I get nailed fo
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin wrote:> Pure word of God is what I hold> in my hands. AV1611Are you saying that you only accept the Authorized Version of 1611 as the Pure word of God? Why then do you not quote from it?
http://av1611.com/kjbp/faq/revisions.html
KD says Whats the diffe
It seems as though, of late, every time I compliment or agree with someone on the right, I get nailed for something I have written. But, what the hey -- I am going to take a chance and record a commendation. The point below of David's is actually very good point/question.
And while I
Kevin wrote:
> Pure word of God is what I hold
> in my hands. AV1611
Are you saying that you only accept the Authorized Version of 1611 as the
Pure word of God? Why then do you not quote from it?
Kevin wrote:
> I fervently resist because I was enlightened to
> the fact that I have the very word
I have a Perfect Savoir who has put His Pure Words in a Perfect bookTerry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin Deegan wrote:>Pure word of God is what I hold in my hands. AV1611> >I did not intend to change heresy to heresies just a typo as you know i make a lot o them!> >I fervently resist beca
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Pure word of God is what I hold in my hands. AV1611
I did not intend to change heresy to heresies just a typo as you know i make a
lot o them!
I fervently resist because I was enlightened to the fact that I have the very words of God in my hand. Those that want to deny such ha
Pure word of God is what I hold in my hands. AV1611
I did not intend to change heresy to heresies just a typo as you know i make a lot o them!
I fervently resist because I was enlightened to the fact that I have the very words of God in my hand. Those that want to deny such have an agenda. If
Kevin wrote:
> Aw c'mon try eisegesis NOT "eisogesis"
> It is Anglicized as Isogesis or for the greekettes
> eisegesis Please use the correct spelling if you
> are going to try to correct someones spelling
> Etymology: Greek eis into (akin to Greek en in)
LOL. Well, Kevin, I knew you didn't like
David says Aw, come on, Kevin, you can't even spell it right. Try "eisogesis" not "ISOgesis."
KD SAYS Aw c'mon try eisegesis NOT "eisogesis"
It is Anglicized as Isogesis or for the greekettes eisegesis
Please use the correct spelling if you are going to try to correct someones spellingEtymology:
Kevin wrote:
> On what Authority do you CHANGE
> the Words of God?
I do not change the words of God. God's word was not written in English.
Furthermore, the English language has changed since the KJV. Therefore, I
explain what God's Word is concerning His use of the word "hairesis."
Kevin wro
In a message dated 2/14/2005 3:10:37 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
>I have some experience with gay types
>as well -- almost none of them were
>criminals
Gay types? If you mean that they were homosexuals, then they were criminals
according to the law of God.
In a message dated 2/14/2005 6:04:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The point is that God is not in favor of having the "Thought police" who would discipline those who have wrong thinking. He is in favor of having BEHAVIOR POLICE who discipline those who have wrong behavior.
who think rightly don't have that much more of his attention. On the other hand, those who are perfect in love are highly esteemed by God.
Peace be with you.David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:
neither one's perfect, then;
readers can raise their learning curve from both
gentlemen, eh?
Gentleman
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:20:40 -0500
"David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:>[Servetus] thought Calvin
should be put to death.
highly
esteemed by God.
Peace be with you.David Miller.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:10
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
False ideas precede false actions
heresy is s
False ideas precede false actions
heresy is sin and as such sends people to hell
Gal 5 says HERESIES along with witchcraft, idolatry, fornication Adultery are WORKS of the flesh
2 Pt 2:21 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who pr
John wrote:
> I have some experience with gay types
> as well -- almost none of them were
> criminals
Gay types? If you mean that they were homosexuals, then they were criminals
according to the law of God. Homosexuality is a crime according to God's
law. In fact, homosexuality is a crime t
Kevin wrote:
> First of all heresy and false doctrine
> are sin also
> Titus [sic] 1:10 For whoremongers, for them
> that defile themselves with mankind, for
> menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons,
> and if there be any other thing that is contrary
> to sound doctrine
Sound doctrine is tha
Gary wrote:
> didn't Servetus hold his contrarian views
> without an anti-Calvinist bias?
No. Servetus considered Calvin to be the Simon Magus of Geneva, and he
thought Calvin should be put to death. That is as anti-Calvin as one can
be.
Gary wrote:
> why was he, or, perhaps, on the basis of
OH NO your self image cropped up again
Attempted manipulation of feelings can not pass for an answer.
Stop yer yellin & screamin
The Prerequisite for christian UNITY is Membership
2 CO 13:5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be IN the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, ho
Complain to Mr. Webster.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005
6:09 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
ftr, anothr near
perfect example of anti
In a message dated 2/12/2005 5:28:51 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They deceive themselves and they will deceive you.
Terry -- I have some experience with gay types as well -- almost none of them were criminals, however. But about the above ain't going to happ
In a message dated 2/12/2005 7:33:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First off I am not a Church of Christ Cultist
Actually, I see very little difference between your cultish behavior and that of the C of C -- southern division.
Unity is not arrived at by Cult or Evangel
Those within treat like they are without
Those without don't let in your house neither bid them god bless
God obviously puts a wall of separation between believers and unbelievers
First of all heresy and false doctrine are sin also
Titus 1:10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with
First off I am not a Church of Christ Cultist
Unity is not arrived at by Cult or Evangelical consensus!
As far as a list like I said very simple learned it in Sunday school ( I can have my Sunday chool teacher come over to help you.)
The B I B L E now thats the list for me, I stand alone on the
In the TRADITION of the Nazi UUberman who called Genocide the "Final Solution"
We now call Sodomites "gay" We've come a long way baby.
Are you for softening the words for Fornication, murder, theft also?
One commandants wife liked to have men who had tattoo's;
skined alive so she coukld have the s
ftr, anothr near
perfect example of anti-intellectualism in a 'knowing w/o
learning' style of intepretation:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:08:48 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
sod·om·ite
(sd-mt)n.
One who
eng
anal copulation with another male)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005
2:29 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
This is why I like Gary. He and at least three
othe
In a message dated 2/12/2005 4:37:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John writes: Anyone who believes that Unity in the Faith is non-existent apart from "speaking and thinking the same thing"
(as extended to a specific set of teachings) is a legalist. JD
jt: Depends what
In a message dated 2/12/2005 4:37:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John writes: Anyone who believes that Unity in the Faith is non-existent apart from "speaking and thinking the same thing"
(as extended to a specific set of teachings) is a legalist. JD
jt: Depends what
g..ites whatever ain't conducive
to stereotypicalization while 'sodomites' has the certain homiletical ring
down the streets and alleys of SLC..the Wyatt Earp effect--ever been to
Tombstone? was it WE or Doc that carried the sawed off
shotgun?
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:35:07 -0600 Terry
C
Thanks for the backstory, Terry.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 12, 2005 08:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/11/2005 8:06:00 PM Pacific Standard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that the term 'sodomites', below, includes purveyors of perversions such
as gossip and gluttony reinforces a biblical learning curve, Terry
'sodomite' actually reads as a reference to those who dwelt in Sodom,
where, acc to Scripture, there were numerous/various injustices
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/11/2005 8:06:00 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about perverts? That should cover the whole filty disgusting bunch.
Terry
Depends on whether you are trying to help them or not. The behavior is ver
John writes: Anyone who believes that Unity in the
Faith is non-existent apart from "speaking and
thinking the same thing"
(as extended to a specific set of teachings) is a legalist. JD
jt: Depends what kind of faith you are unified around -
We are free to think and speak whatever we
This is why I like Gary. He and at least three others on this list, is smarter than I. I was thinking that a Sodomite was someone from Sodom but the Professor put it into words better than I could (man, I like being humble !). JD and thanks for the post, G.
In a message dated 2/11/2005
L PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:10
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
ftr, a near
perfect example of anti-intellectualism in a 'knowing w/o
learning' style of
intepretation:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:
that the term
'sodomites', below, includes purveyors of perversions such
as gossip and gluttony reinforces a biblical learning curve,
Terry
'sodomite' actually reads as a reference to those who
dwelt in Sodom, where, acc to Scripture, there were numerous/various
injustices
E.g., Sodom's
Anyone who believes that Unity in the Faith is non-existent apart from
"speaking and thinking the same thing" (as extended to a
specific set of teachings) is a legalist.
JD
Don’t you mean to say “same
thang”? Iz
How’s that for a way with words! J Izzy
==
How about perverts? That should cover the whole filty disgusting bunch.
Terry
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail
Don’t be so hard on JD—he tries
hard. J Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005
6:10 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
ftr, a near
perfect example of anti
In a message dated 2/11/2005 8:06:00 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about perverts? That should cover the whole filty disgusting bunch.
Terry
Depends on whether you are trying to help them or not. The behavior is very disgusting.
By "help them" I am talking about
In a message dated 2/11/2005 6:28:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So sodomites it is then!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:35 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You fail to comprehend that Kevin is criticizing HYPOCRISY not in
In a message dated 2/11/2005 6:06:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is readily available
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you miss it?
What is so important about this list? Are you a L
In a message dated 2/11/2005 3:56:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OhâI thought maybe you meant âudder waistâ. Iz
My humor often rises to the level of a thoughtful listener. The fact that you see "udder" in "utter" proves, to me, that you are one of the thoughtful.
Kevin Deegan wrote:
So sodomites it is then!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:35 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You fail to comprehend that Kevin is criticizing HYPOCRISY not intolerance.
He criticizes those who holler real loud that everyone
So sodomites it is then![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:35 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You fail to comprehend that Kevin is criticizing HYPOCRISY not intolerance. He criticizes those who holler real loud that everyone needs to be tolerant, but then
It is readily available[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you miss it?What is so important about this list? Are you a LEGALIST need a bunch of rules?You act like your ready to gloat cause you think there is no such t
ftr, a near perfect example
of anti-intellectualism in a 'knowing w/o learning' style of
intepretation:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:55:42 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Oh—I thought maybe
you meant “udder waist”.
Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005
4:17 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
In a message dated 2/11/2005 2:12:51 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL
In a message dated 2/11/2005 2:12:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your inability to supply such a list has proven your theology on this point to be an utter waist.
John
waist ( P ) Pronunciation Key (wst)
n.
The part of the human trunk between the bottom of the
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005
3:47 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:33 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL
In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that you guys are talking about two different things. John,
aren't you creating a straw man argument here, trying to make Kevin argue
that unity is based upon full agreement with Biblical do
In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:35 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You fail to comprehend that Kevin is criticizing HYPOCRISY not intolerance.
He criticizes those who holler real loud that everyone needs to be tolerant,
but then they manifest the most intolerant behavior t
In a message dated 2/10/2005 6:26:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you miss it?
What is so important about this list? Are you a LEGALIST need a bunch of rules?
You act like your ready to gloat cause you think there is no such thing. Yet it exists, is right in front of
Well, I am definitely going to save this. Your comments at the conclusion or worth concern. Amen to the post.
JD
In a message dated 2/10/2005 7:10:58 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:36:14 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 2/10/
didn't Servetus hold his
contrarian views without an anti-Calvinist bias?
why was he, or,
perhaps, on the basis of what 'world view' did he become
a citizen of Geneva?
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:14:38 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
while someone says
he's 'anti-Calvinist', partic fo
while someone says
he's 'anti-Calvinist', partic for reasons behind the argument fragment
below, what are the implications for his 'world
view'?
how does 'anti-Calvinism'
impact biblical unity and/or tolerance?
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:35:27 -0500 "David
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
Kevin wrote:
>> So you would tolerate someone disgracing
>> your wifes name &reputation?
John wrote:
> you are not going to leap frog your failure at a
> practical application of your position that unity
> is based upon full agreement with biblical doctrine.
> THAT is what we have been talking ab
LOL! Do I hear a “moo”?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:48
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
Did you miss it?
What is so important about this
Kevin wrote:
> Are you familiar with the Doctrine of separation?
Yes, but it probably is not the same as the doctrine of separation that you
embrace.
Kevin wrote:
> Surely you must be David. I find that there is
> a clear COMMAND for Christians to avoid
> those that are in sin but also those tha
Kevin wrote:
> Are you saying we are to be tolerant of false Doctrine?
Yes, there is a form of tolerance toward false doctrine that should be
practiced. This is because none of us is perfect in knowledge. This does
not mean that when we encounter something false that we should just let it
go
John wrote:
> Kevin is intolerant of all and everyone who
> disagree's with him, including you, David Miller.
> And that is why I find it funny that he was criticize
> others for that very issue -- something you admit
> is clearly a part of who he is.
You fail to comprehend that Kevin is critic
Did you miss it?
What is so important about this list? Are you a LEGALIST need a bunch of rules?
You act like your ready to gloat cause you think there is no such thing. Yet it exists, is right in front of your face but you can't see it.
You won't follow the rules anyway why have a cow?
[EMAIL PROT
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:36:14 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 2/10/2005 5:30:11 AM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are talking about Your Toleration not the
criminal act So you would tolerate someone disgracing your wifes name
&reputation?JD: Like I sa
In a message dated 2/10/2005 5:30:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wev are talking about Your Toleeration not the criminal act
So you would tolerate someone disgracing your wifes name &reputation?
Like I said before -- you are not going to leap frog your failure at a
Wev are talking about Your Toleeration not the criminal act
So you would tolerate someone disgracing your wifes name & reputation?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/10/2005 4:30:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are discussing ToleranceWould you tolerate either s
In a message dated 2/10/2005 4:30:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are discussing Tolerance
Would you tolerate either scenario?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:36:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would a christian Gentle"m
In a message dated 2/10/2005 3:48:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And what was that list of doctrines you are in full agreement with in others? On a practical level, your thesis has been proven to be untenable -- proving that everyone is someone elses false prophet an
In a message dated 2/9/2005 11:42:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin: Reconciled, Just like the Moabites, Jebusites, Hittites, Amorites &others before them!
Got any for neighbors? God Reconciled them right off the map.
John: Yeah, and those dirty old Ninevites -- they re
We are discussing Tolerance
Would you tolerate either scenario?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:36:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would a christian Gentle"man" like you stand by as another man claimed that your wife had multiple husbands? Would you allo
Before I can agree to what is cleared up
DUH[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/9/2005 8:09:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
am sure that is not how you meant it so please be a little clearer. I may be able to accomodate you, but I will have to wait for clarification
And with John just grace no discernment or judgement[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:25:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JOHN If and when the Mormons let down their guard, so to speak -- the moment they become open to meaningful dialogue, that is the
My eyes are "close" to what?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:30:15 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry Bill I see now that John wrote the portion I was responding to.Apparently your eyes completely close when you write or speak. Got to work on that. So
You ENJOY strife & Vitriol[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be honest , now. Did anyone else smile when> they read this statement from the master of> bullhorn evangelism? (This is cool -- I don't even have to come up with a new theme. It's ditto all over again. I would not mind h
So we can never know what is right or wrong?
How did david figure it out?
Thy word is a lamp?
The disunity is exactly because people do not go to The Standard.
For instance your Standard is the Greek
Anothers std is their inner witness
Anothers is their Teacher or preacher
Anothers is their churc
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:36:04 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:25:51 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JOHN: If and when the Mormons let down
their guard, so to speak -- the moment they become open to
meaningful dialogue, that is
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:45:55 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 2/9/2005 12:25:51 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Are you saying we
are to be tolerant of false Doctrine?Why did David say he hates
every False Way?Should we love wolves come into the C
In a message dated 2/9/2005 8:09:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
am sure that is not how you meant it so please be a little clearer.
I may be able to accomodate you, but I will have to wait for clarification.
Or what?
JD
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:48:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but Jesus mentioned only his Mom while dying..interesting no mention of any other person to be cared for..
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:35:11 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mormons claim Ch
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:43:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something tells me if you were in Moses place, you would have stormed into Pharios court and Boldy said "Let my people please have a variance"!
:-)
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:40:14 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mick Jagger wrote Sympathy for the Devil
Where do you guys draw the line or do you?
Moses drew a line in the sand and said Sumpin good 's gonna happen ta you
Was that before or after he took credit for the
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:36:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would a christian Gentle"man" like you stand by as another man claimed that your wife had multiple husbands? Would you allow him to defame her name fconstantly? Would you dialog?
Mormons claim Christ had mult
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:30:15 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry Bill I see now that John wrote the portion I was responding to.
Apparently your eyes completely close when you write or speak. Got to work on that. Sooner or later, you could walk off the deep end.
In a message dated 2/9/2005 7:25:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JOHN If and when the Mormons let down their guard, so to speak -- the moment they become open to meaningful dialogue, that is the time when God will work His will on all parties involved in the dialogue.
MAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult behavior
In a message dated 2/9/2005 4:52:34 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unity with error is subversion to God
Community with error is Complicity wi
Be honest , now. Did anyone else smile when
> they read this statement from the master of
> bullhorn evangelism? (This is cool -- I don't even have to come up with a new
theme. It's ditto all over again. I would not mind having a civil
In a message dated 2/9/2005 12:33:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry, but I didn't smile. Kevin is right. Kevin is very consistent in
that he teaches we should be intolerant. That is why he gives the Mormons a
hard time. Yet, Kevin is not as intolerant as the sodomi
In a message dated 2/9/2005 12:25:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you saying we are to be tolerant of false Doctrine?
Why did David say he hates every False Way?
Should we love wolves come into the Church to devour?
And what was that list of doctrines you are in f
after chopping somebodies' ears
off it seems like they wouldn't be able to hear correctly
someone said you are skilled
in tolerance..what's your thresh hold for pain?
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||
How much has to be said about
Christians today allow all kinds of profane things to be said of God.
As a man I would not let someone talk about my wife in certain ways. The legal system has a term for such, it is called "Fighting Words"
How much has to be said about your Savior before you open your mouth?
Is there not a cause?
Kevin, Prudence is a good friend
of TT. Will you rent her a room for week or two,
please?
Thanks!
G
--
cc. David
Miller
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
More to the point, Kevin, I
think it prudent that you drop this right now
My error, Thank you.Bill Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your apology is accepted.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult behavior
Sorry Bill I see now that John
ill
More to the point, Kevin, I think it prudent that you drop this right now. Will you please accommodate me?
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult behavior
SEE Bottom o
then mick could have been JCs
book keeper
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mick Jagger wrote Sympathy for
the Devil
Where do you guys draw the line or do
you?
||
but Jesus mentioned only his Mom
while dying..interesting no mention of any other person to be cared
for..
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:35:11 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mormons claim Christ had multiple
wives ..
Your apology is accepted.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:28
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cult
behavior
Sorry Bill I see now that John wrote the portion I was responding
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
