Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-08 Thread Taylor
@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 8:56 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God Better totake your own counsel first Bill before you try to foist it on others. Bye On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:20:08 -0700

Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-08 Thread Judy Taylor
You may need to take another trip Bill because the understanding you have come back with is that of the Church Fathers who by their words and actions (fruit) negated their profession. On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:43:39 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been there and back, Judy;

Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-08 Thread Judy Taylor
Not the God you appear to subscribe to. I serve the One who says what he means and means what he says On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:43:39 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been there and back, Judy; that's how I got my understanding. I'll tell you, though, you ought to go.

Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-08 Thread Dean Moore
cd: Well Said Judy. - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 1/7/2006 6:58:01 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:02:57 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-08 Thread ttxpress
myth (doctrinal donkey drivel) On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:57:56 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Saul..after being knocked from his donkey ..

Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-08 Thread Taylor
By the way, I don't want to leave yous thinking that hupostasis meant the same to the patristics that "understanding" means to us. To them, this word came closer to meaning "standing-under." The humanity of Christ stood under his divinity by way of union. Were it not for that

Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-07 Thread Lance Muir
- Original Message - From: Debbie Sawczak To: Lance Muir Sent: January 07, 2006 15:55 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God [I'm quite excited because in the course of writing the second paragraph below, I became aware of knowing something important.] From what

Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-07 Thread Judy Taylor
Lance would you please tell me why you must run everything by this woman? Do you think she is smart or something like that? She may be but she knows nothing of what I am about - she hasn't a clue so why complicate things further with one more pointless and useless opinion?. On Sat, 7 Jan

Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-07 Thread Judy Taylor
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:02:57 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - From: Debbie Sawczak To: Lance Muir Sent: January 07, 2006 15:55 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God [I'm quite excited because in the course of

Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-07 Thread Taylor
@mail.innglory.org Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 4:56 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:02:57 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - From: Debbie Sawczak To: Lance Muir

Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ as the incarnate God

2006-01-07 Thread Judy Taylor
Better totake your own counsel first Bill before you try to foist it on others. Bye On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:20:08 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hey Judy, I've got an idea: Why don't you go to the desert for about forty years.We'll see if when you get back, you've gained some