On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Here's what I imagined we'd do:
1. add OSGi entries to each of our JAR manifests
2. have developers maintain them and pay attention to imports/exports
3. use the OSGi build to detect API and SPI
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would be difficult to plug it in
- http://apache.markmail.org/message/4hvdrcafhapy3kyy
Coincidentally i was having a look at this just the other day
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
We've done a lot of work since last October. We now have a diverse
community
of contributors and have demonstrated the ability to attract new
committers
to create an even more diverse community, we
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node
implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node
implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:49 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:40 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have a Tomcat TuscanyHost
(i.e.
an extension of org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost not related to the
Tuscany host stuff) that will get its addChild method
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:25 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
However this all fell apart as the
balancer webapp is based on HTTP redirects and Axis2 doesn't handle them.
Had this worked I had a completely Java demo and I could run the whole
thing
automatically.
So any thoughts
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as
the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally
vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC.
We should be
I
have
need not always be from svn, it could be a source archive for a
release
downloaded separately), etc. I found this info very useful while
investigating JIRAs.
++Vamsi
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed
and samples
use.
...ant
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:09 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you got that example working with the eclipse plugin from the 1.2 RC4
release? I've tried but it crashes with the exception below. It also starts
up all sorts of endpoints, i guess for the workspace
below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Tuscany Project:
- Adriano Crestani adrianocrestani at apache dot org
- ant elder antelder at apache dot org
- Brady Johnson bjohnson at apache dot org
- Frank Budinsky frankb at apache dot org
- Ignacio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Totally +1, What I had in mind was to keep it simple and usable by
someone that does not know much of SCA. What if we create a First
Steps series of articles ?
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:14 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked as I'd like to help expand
This change removes the tomcat host from the sca all jar, is that ok? We did
remove that before at one point and only include the jetty host but it seems
like now we have both again, or did it only ever get done in a release
branch and not synced to trunk? This also changes the hosts so that the
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds ok to me.
...ant
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Yee-Kang Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks, Scott, Ant. I think both could
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED
talking about some sort of virtual component like Ant
mentioned?
Scott
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:49 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, although with non-SCA clients which component would that be? Does
there
need to be a new something like implementation.web but for JSE clients
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
* Typically, users do not do an SVN checkout of the source code and
will not have SVN installed. They are typically provided with a jar file
containing the source code. They will not be able to run SVN
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Regarding whether or not we have consensus and whether we should hold
a vote, consensus is not the same as unanimity. I think we need to
make a decision on this issue (which is relatively minor) and move
forward.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
These are all the additional dependencies brought in with the Tuscany
implementation.bpel extension, are any of them obviously not necessary?
activeio-2.0-r118.jar
axion-1.0-M3-dev.jar
backport
Welcome and have fun
...ant
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Antollini, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello!,
I just read the great news...
This is a great opportunity for me! Thanks for all your confidence and
support.
This all means interesting challenges in the future which I
.
Thanks,
Wang Feng
On 2008-04-10,ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TUSCANY-2145 asks about SCADomain.getService () returning a proxy even
when
the service doesn't exist, but looking back through the SVN history it
looks
like this is intentional. Before I close the JIRA does anyone
:39 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks really good, do you have plans to extend it further like with
adding clients or other extension types?
...ant
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Page Edited : TUSCANY
http://cwiki.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12591978#action_12591978
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2268:
There's two problems I've noticed so far
binding.ws to connect from a SCA domain to a non-SCA (so external)
web service ?
Regards,
Marina.
Le 24 avr. 08 à 12:37, ant elder (JIRA) a écrit :
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment
Ok, although with non-SCA clients which component would that be? Does there
need to be a new something like implementation.web but for JSE clients? or
could there be a virtual component that has references for all the
toplevel component services in the domain (which is kind of what we have now
This looks really good, do you have plans to extend it further like with
adding clients or other extension types?
...ant
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Page Edited : TUSCANYhttp://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY:
Build
your first Web Services
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
From the above, we have 4 +1s and no -1s - although we have a
preference not
to do this from ant. So, the consensus is to make this change.
We haven't held a formal vote, so I don't think we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2241.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, thanks for the fix!
EndpointReference in binding.ws when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12591239#action_12591239
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2249:
Applied in r650408. Note though
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2241.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied in r650504
EndpointReference in binding.ws when wsdlElement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12590878#action_12590878
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2241:
Many thanks for the fix, it looks ok to me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2246.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied in r650101, thanks for the code Greg.
Update
Anyone likely to have any time to take a look at this? If its possible to do
something to fix this it would be good to try to get it done in the 1.1.1
release.
...ant
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric S Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Re:
There's now a preview SDO 1.1.1 release available at
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/. The only
difference between this and the just released 1.1 release is the fix
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240. I'll leave this a little
while before calling a vote to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-1997:
---
Attachment: tuscany-binding-ws-axis2-1.0-T1997-T1893.jar
Attached tuscany-binding-ws-axis2-1.0
This seems like quite a useful fix given the problems it seemed to be
causing with the JMS binding, how about an SDO 1.1.1 maintenance release?
...ant
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Raymond Feng (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder reopened TUSCANY-88:
--
Reopened see user list thread -
http://apache.markmail.org/message/25in5vox5if6xbw2
Support invoking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-88:
-
Attachment: translate.zip
Example of using xml component to invoke an rpc-encoded WS
Support invoking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-88:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-M2)
Java-SCA-Next
Support invoking simple RPC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12590361#action_12590361
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-88:
--
As a start we can support RPC-encoded by using XML
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12590363#action_12590363
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-88:
--
- also Tuscany wsdl parsing code was complaining
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2165.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patches applied, thanks for the fix!
Java runtime should inject service
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2218.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied, thanks for the fixes!
Endpoint URI resolution precedence for binding.ws
at 5:20 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do we get stats from the number of downloads when using mirros ?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:20 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WIth the changes to how
like this
without committership, but would prefer to keep the ability to commit
for when I am able to spend more time on the Tuscany code base.
Brent
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:23 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are receiving this email because you are listed as an Apache
Tuscany
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
In the 1.2 release candidate we've now an Eclipse update site. I can't
find
any mention of this happening anywhere, do we have any doc at all on it
happening somewhere that I missed
, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:31 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current distribution build copies the binary artifacts to the
target-last-successful folder which takes about 130Meg. I'm guessing this is
something to do
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Wang Feng to become a
Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Wang Feng!
...ant
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.1-incubating
release of the Java SDO project.
Service Data Objects (SDO) are designed to simplify and unify the way
in which applications handle data. Using SDO, application programmers
can uniformly access and manipulate data from
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
After a week away I thought we'd have a clearer picture on this. Yesterday I
put together some improvements of the admin app and some of the tutorial
modules. I must say I'm a little lost now as to where I
WIth the changes to how the Incubator release artifacts get distributed via
mirrors now I understood we were supposed to have our website download pages
use a script accessing the mirrors. Looking back at the SCA 1.1 download
page change history it did at one point do that (r17) but then it got
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12589077#action_12589077
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2199:
Thanks for the patch Gilbert. Unfortunately
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12589106#action_12589106
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2165:
Thanks for the lates patch, I've applied
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2195.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied, many thanks for the code
Test cases for ComponentContext API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2199.
--
Resolution: Fixed
So it is, in r644938.
Tests for @Reference annotation
the Tuscany community all the best and hopefully will start
working again with you guys.
Regards,
Rajith
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:23 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are receiving this email because you are listed as an Apache
Tuscany committer. Tuscany is looking to graduate
+1
Samples run, src and samples build from the staging repo, signatures verify,
legal files look ok, looks good to go to me.
...ant
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For map/hadoop if you need a part time mentor till 30 June, ask me. After
that time I'll travel around Spain all summer.
--
Ciao,
And now approved by the IPMC:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/q2f4ax32c65vse6z
...ant
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:00 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Passed with +1s from Adriano, Raymond and me.
...ant
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:05 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
status.
These are the committers who've participated in the last 12 months and
will automatically retain their committer status:
adrianocrestani Adriano Crestani
amita Amita Vadhavkar
ajborleyAndrew Borley
antelderAnt Elder
bjohnsonBrady Johnson
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those who had volunteered as mentors for GSoC 2008, it's time for
us to rank the proposals. In order to facilitate our jobs, I went
trough the list of proposals, and posted links to the Tuscany related
ones in the
In the 1.2 release candidate we've now an Eclipse update site. I can't find
any mention of this happening anywhere, do we have any doc at all on it
happening somewhere that I missed?
...ant
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:45 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wang Feng
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current distribution build copies the binary artifacts to the
target-last-successful folder which takes about 130Meg. I'm guessing this is
something to do with the continuum builds but does anyone know for sure? If
so
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
+1. Many of the items suggested for 2.0 have previously been the
subject of discussions that have not been easy to close. Until
we have agreement on how to approach these things, I think it's
better for 2.0
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut that branch out of
trunk?
I'm asking because I'm interested in working on some improvements of 1.2
in the next few weeks. This shouldn't delay any 2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587513#action_12587513
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2145:
This behaviour was introduced in r570929 -
http
TUSCANY-2145 asks about SCADomain.getService () returning a proxy even when
the service doesn't exist, but looking back through the SVN history it looks
like this is intentional. Before I close the JIRA does anyone have any
comments on if this is/isn't the correct behaviour?
...ant
The current distribution build copies the binary artifacts to the
target-last-successful folder which takes about 130Meg. I'm guessing this is
something to do with the continuum builds but does anyone know for sure? If
so could we change it so it only happens on the continuum machine (have the
.
Thanks,
Wang Feng
On 2008-04-10,ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TUSCANY-2145 asks about SCADomain.getService () returning a proxy even
when
the service doesn't exist, but looking back through the SVN history it
looks
like this is intentional. Before I close the JIRA does
Also check that both Classes loaded with application class loader first
and Single class loader for application are selected in the app config in
the websphere admin panels to make sure its picking up the Tuscany jars from
the app not the one included in WAS.
...ant
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2207.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Applied. Thanks Giorgio.
First steps towards Axis MTOM Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587070#action_12587070
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2195:
I'm a bit confused about the difference between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587085#action_12587085
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2162:
We (as in Apache Tuscany) can not enhance
Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: ant elder
Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
As discussed on the ML SCA Java builds are getting very large. See
http://apache.markmail.org/message/u7ebawcoicyqi55a
Current size for me is 1.5GB so this jira is to track fixes to reduce that.
Looking
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't long since I could do a complete checkout and build of
Tuscany SCA Java in around 400 MB of disk space. Today I was amazed
when I ran out of space despite having cleared over a gigabyte
before starting.
I tend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-2092:
--
Assignee: ant elder (was: Ramkumar Ramalingam)
ConcurrentModificationException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder closed TUSCANY-2092.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Applied in r646335, thanks for the fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12587192#action_12587192
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2212:
- clean up use of multiple releases
+1, good for both projects. And to reply to a comment in the original email
- I'm not sure that we really need an explicit vote for this can just assume
from all the positive comments so far and lazy consensus that its fine
unless someone complains (which i'm sure they wont).
...ant
On Tue,
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:47 PM, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on versioning SCA docs
Assuming two versions of SCA Java, I can see that the following page
will
change to point to two different versions of SCA
Components: Build System
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
Reporter: ant elder
Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
As discussed on the ML SCA Java builds are getting very large. See
http://apache.markmail.org/message/u7ebawcoicyqi55a
Current size for me is 1.5GB
With 1.2 almost out the door how about starting to think about our next
release...
We've had several discussions in the past about restructuring and cleaning
up the distributions, build, and SPIs etc, is this the time to do that?
Looking about the code there's many things that could be tidied up
I've spent all morning reviewing this and its looking pretty good but i've
just hit this NoClassDefFoundError when running the calculator sample with
mvn from an empty local mvn repository:
Running calculator.CalculatorTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.907
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 5:35 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [SCA 1.2] RC3a
I've spent all morning reviewing this and its looking pretty good but
i've
just hit
by case
when the community thinks it's applicable.
Thoughts ?
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg29820.html
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:55 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 1.2 almost out the door how about starting to think about our next
release
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
We may need to branch the documentation also. Normally I would suggest that
we ask for a new space but as our documentation could not be considered
complete for 1.1 and as the suggested first actions are internal
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:17 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding that gave me a missing artifact for javax.jws:jsr181:jar:1.0,
adding
an exclude and explicit dependency looks like it fixes it:
dependency
groupIdjavax.xml.ws/groupId
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:43 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
One bit I liked was section 5.4.4 about using JSPs with SCA, what we
currently have in Tuscany is a bit clunky so i've committed some code
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The current JUnit tests (iTest and vTest) make use of the non-standard
SCADomain.getService API to get a handle to an SCA service. Are there
any plans to provide an API to get a ComponentContext as outlined by
the SCA
I see this too, building the src distro and also building the bin distro
samples with mvn (the Ant builds work ok).
...ant
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded the apache-tuscany-sca-1.2-incubating-src.zip file from
I see we've now a new vtest top-level folder in the trunk and various dev
happening there. Looking back in the mailing list I cant find any discussion
on adding that or what its about, am i just missing the emails or whats
going on there?
...ant
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:43 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
One bit I liked was section 5.4.4 about using JSPs with SCA, what we
currently have in Tuscany is a bit clunky so i've committed some code to
support the taglib as described in that section. So now in a JSP you don't
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
I see we've now a new vtest top-level folder in the trunk and various
dev
happening there. Looking back in the mailing list I cant find any
discussion
on adding that or what its about, am i just
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
201 - 300 of 2554 matches
Mail list logo
