Hi!
Is it possible to add a Timestamp or DateTime column to the database? I am very
interested in how to access these columns with DAS and MySQL because I have not
succeeded in doing this.
Thanks,
Katja
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 03:44:18 -0400
Von: Adriano
Won't the Cart x Item relationship be a many to many relationship ?
Currently, one item can only be in one cart, right ?
You probably looking for something like this
CREATE TABLE CART (
ID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
SUB_TOTAL DOUBLE,
TAX DOUBLE,
TOTAL DOUBLE
);
CREATE TABLE ITEM (
ID
On 11/15/06, Hawkins, Joel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wengatz, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 10:23 AM
To: Hawkins, Joel
Cc: Jim Marino; Wengatz, Nicole; Jasny, Robert
Subject: RE: Bundles and OSGi
I performed now some tests
Yes, it's many to many, I just thought in a simple way to do this, where the
user would define its own items. But many to many is OK ; ).
On 11/16/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Won't the Cart x Item relationship be a many to many relationship ?
Currently, one item can only be in
Hi all,
I was recently asked to chat with a few people about the Ruby support
in Tuscany, so I spent a bit of time looking at the support we provide
in both the C++ and Java sides of Tuscany.
There are a few differences that, in the absence of a spec, we should
try to fix up so that we've at
XSD2Java Generator still generates EMF codes with -noEMF option on
--
Key: TUSCANY-933
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-933
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Hi Jeremy,
I think this investigation is geared more towards optimization for a
particular platform, rather than exclusive support. I agree with you
that our base target should be the OSGi R4 spec, which currently has
broad support in the OSGi community. What Nicole is investigating are
possible
Hi Jeremy,
This worries me a little as I would not like to think that the only
OSGi
implementation that was supported was Eclipse's. When is 4.1 due and/or
does,
for example, Felix offer something similar to this?
BuddyClassLoading is an alternative to the dynamic import feature.
It's currently
I was looking at the Java SDO wiki...
there is a lot of overlap between the web site and the wiki... should we
clean up the wiki and link to the web site where appropriate (get rid of the
duplication) ?
Thanks in advance
Dan
I don't know if it's possible to read TimeStamp, but I'll try. And thanks
for the idea :).
Willian Yabusame Maja
From: Katja [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: New proposal to make DAS/SDO HOW TO
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:14:28
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On 11/15/06, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having a separate source distro for the SCA spec API makes sense
to me. I see that your download page
http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/incubator-M2/downloads/
has already been updated to add this.
I'm not so
Hi Folks,
Raymond suggested that in order for me to get the data binding to work, I
need to clone the ServiceContract and then set the data binding type.
I see that I cannot clone the ServiceContract using the clone() method.
So it means that I need to create ServiceContract from scratch. What
Hi Andy,
Comments inline...
Jim
On Nov 16, 2006, at 4:27 AM, Andrew Borley wrote:
Hi all,
I was recently asked to chat with a few people about the Ruby support
in Tuscany, so I spent a bit of time looking at the support we provide
in both the C++ and Java sides of Tuscany.
There are a few
Hi Katja,
I've just tested to read Date column, and it works. I'm going to paste
my code here for you:
This will be the test table, it's just a simple table with a DateTime
Column.
CREATE TABLE test (ID integer not null AUTO_INCREMENT, date_column date);
INSERT INTO test (date_column)
Hi Willian!
Thank you for the example! You tested with a Date-Column, that worked in my
application, too, because no conversion between the column and the data object
value is necessary.
With DateTime a converter is needed:
SDO format: 2006-11-16T17:22
MySQL format: 2006-11-16 17:22
The
Hi,
The source archives are created by an ant script which exports the source
tree from the SVN repository and zips it up. Maven2 resource filitering is
not in the process at all.
Is there any way to handle this?
BTW, is the title from ${pom.name} mandatory for NOTICE?
Thanks,
Raymond
Per filtering, I think this in regard to binary generation, and copying of those
files in to the jars. But I don't know how or if that applies to the source disto.
May I ask why the need for the ${pom.name} in the NOTICE?
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
The source archives are created by an ant
XSD2JavaGenerator -noEMF option does not work with abstract classes.
Key: TUSCANY-934
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-934
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type:
[snip]
The C++ schema doesn't actually include the script attribute used
above (preferring module instead) - script is supported in the
implementation.
Andy, good catch. I added the missing script attribute to the schema
(under revision r475824).
Script is not used in place of module:
-
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 11/14/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I withdraw my -1.
Ditto. -- justin
Heh - we had no -1 to withdraw, I agreed with you Justin that lazy
concensus is wrong, but we hadn't put a -1 to the actual release.
That's why I replied to your note and
I think I didn't understand what you want. But i tested using TimeStamp and
DateTime:
CREATE TABLE test (ID integer not null AUTO_INCREMENT, timestamp
timestamp, datetime datetime, primary key (ID));
INSERT INTO test VALUES ();
This will create the following row:
| 1 |
Hi all,
I'm doing some integration with the Spring Container and OSGi, and am
having some troubles running behind my company's firewall. What I get is
the following schema validation error when trying to load an application
context:
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-elt.1: Cannot find the
-Original Message-
From: Hawkins, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 November 2006 18:21
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Firewalls and the Spring Container
Hi all,
I'm doing some integration with the Spring Container and
OSGi, and am having some troubles
On Nov 16, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Hawkins, Joel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm doing some integration with the Spring Container and OSGi, and am
having some troubles running behind my company's firewall. What I
get is
the following schema validation error when trying to load an
application
context:
On 11/16/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The C++ schema doesn't actually include the script attribute used
above (preferring module instead) - script is supported in the
implementation.
Andy, good catch. I added the missing script attribute to the schema
(under
On 11/16/06, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand how this would break modularity.
Because it couples together the release lifecycles of two very
independent modules.
Users of the
Tuscany api/spi javadoc will always need the spec javadoc as well.
I'm not sure that that
After looking at (the previous) version 0.9 of the CI spec
and a discussion with Jim and Mike Rowley on the
conversational services section, I am going to try to
summarize my current understanding, Jim, Mike, please
jump in if I mis-state or forget to mention something here.
A conversation is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-934?page=comments#action_12450535
]
Kapil Katyal commented on TUSCANY-934:
--
The generated FactoryImpl class needs to include the following lines in the
generated createMetaData method:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-932?page=comments#action_12450551
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-932:
Actually, this is one of the clarifications in the 2.1 spec. It says this:
The isSet(path) method will never
SDO path accessors need to support names that contain .
-
Key: TUSCANY-935
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-935
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
HttpSessionScopeContainer requires a session to exist
-
Key: TUSCANY-936
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-936
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java
On 11/17/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The C++ schema doesn't actually include the script attribute used
above (preferring module instead) - script is supported in the
implementation.
Andy, good catch. I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-936?page=comments#action_12450646
]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-936:
It looks like the session scope container has not been completely integrated
into the web app runtime and
I was trying to run DAS junit tests against a MySQL database and found
couple issues that i'll track with TUSCANY-937
I also had a question, why do we have to drop and recreate the
CONMGT.SERVERSTATUS table ? This was causing me failures with a simple user
that had all GRANTS in the dastest
If I understood your question correctly, DAS allows a 1:1 and 1:N
relationship,
An application could have multiple components using the same config
file,
or could split the config file based on the components model... but
the
choice is really made by the app developer.
This sounds similar
I've started to create the Shopping Cart and I made this so far:
ShoppingCartConfig.xml
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ASCII?
Config xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation=
http:///org.apache.tuscany.das.rdb/config.xsd; xmlns:xsi=
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
Command name=all carts
I think that what you have can generate most of the how-to... you should
start formatting it on the Wiki.
Also, I think we don't need the application itself as a result of the
how-to, right ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 11/16/06, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a fairly confusing area and I welcome your efforts to clarify this.
On 16/11/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After looking at (the previous) version 0.9 of the CI spec
and a discussion with Jim and Mike Rowley on the
conversational services section, I am going to try to
On Nov 16, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
After looking at (the previous) version 0.9 of the CI spec
and a discussion with Jim and Mike Rowley on the
conversational services section, I am going to try to
summarize my current understanding, Jim, Mike, please
jump in if I mis-state
On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Pete Robbins wrote:
This is a fairly confusing area and I welcome your efforts to
clarify this.
On 16/11/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After looking at (the previous) version 0.9 of the CI spec
and a discussion with Jim and Mike Rowley on
On 17/11/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Pete Robbins wrote:
This is a fairly confusing area and I welcome your efforts to
clarify this.
On 16/11/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After looking at (the previous) version 0.9 of the CI
the implementation must keep track
The definition of scopes was originally in the Java CI spec, then it
was removed with the intention of putting it in Assembly. The spec
group then decided it need to go back to the individual language
specs. I haven't had the chance to update the Java spec
42 matches
Mail list logo
