Yang Lei wrote:
I think enabling OSGI can help modularity with a clear definition of
package visibility, so we can have a much cleaner module
dependencies through osgi bundle import/export on package. I think
it will help Tuscany adopters a lot in the scenarios such as: when
implementing new
itest/osgi-tuscany broken (policy-ws missing)
-
Key: TUSCANY-2279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2279
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Graham Charters updated TUSCANY-2279:
-
Attachment: Jira-2279-policy-ws-missing.patch
The following add
No data transformation for fault types
--
Key: TUSCANY-2280
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2280
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Data Binding Runtime
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would be difficult to plug it in
- http://apache.markmail.org/message/4hvdrcafhapy3kyy
Coincidentally i was having a look at this just the other day
ant elder wrote:
We've done a lot of work since last October. We now have a diverse community
of contributors and have demonstrated the ability to attract new committers
to create an even more diverse community, we have shown we can do releases
based on Apache guidelines, and we have shown we
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would be difficult to plug it in
-
How to create ServiceReferences for references using multiplicity=1..n
Key: TUSCANY-2281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2281
Project: Tuscany
Issue
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
We've done a lot of work since last October. We now have a diverse
community
of contributors and have demonstrated the ability to attract new
committers
to create an even more diverse community, we
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node
implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node
implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node
implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:49 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:49 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have a Tomcat TuscanyHost (i.e.
an extension of org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost not related to the
Tuscany host stuff) that will get its addChild method called for each
webapp and we can get a File to the root of the webbapp so call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Edwards resolved TUSCANY-2278.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by an update to AtomBindingUtil in revision 652361
Atom Binding
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:40 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have a Tomcat TuscanyHost
(i.e.
an extension of org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost not related to the
Tuscany host stuff) that will get its addChild method
Ok mike. I will try to create the test cases for testing the generation of
component types from the bpel processes.
Could you tell me if there is any standard format/template that you use in
Tuscany for writing test cases.
Thanks Regards
Ashwini Kumar Jeksani
-Original Message-
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:25 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have a
I've just committed a load balancing demo I've had knocking around for a bit
[1]. It balances HTTP based service calls across tomcat servers configured
with an SCA enabled webapp. It's a work in progress and there are a couple
of points I need some help with
1 - There are currently manual
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
However this all fell apart as the
balancer webapp is based on HTTP redirects and Axis2 doesn't handle them.
Had this worked I had a completely Java demo and I could run the whole
thing
automatically.
So any thoughts
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:00 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
However this all fell apart as the
balancer webapp is based on HTTP redirects and Axis2 doesn't handle
them.
Had this worked I had a completely
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:00 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:52 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:25 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Philipp, thanks for your comments. I think any feedback/findings
you have would be very valuable input. I think the the Distributed
OSGi angle is interesting from the perspective of implementation.osgi.
Regards, Graham.
2008/4/29 Konradi, Philipp (CT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like
I'm having email problems and I haven't received via email either
the post [1] that I sent earlier today on this VOTE thread, or
Ant's response [2] to my post.
I'd like to respond to what Ant said, and the only way I can
think of to do that is to post my response here.
ant elder wrote:
We've
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as
the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally
vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC.
We should be
Irrespective of the versioning question, the current 5 module
breakdown does not go as far as individual implementation types,
binding types and so on. I'm presuming here that the goal would be to
be able to add/remove/replace things at that level rather than
requiring the entire 'extensions'
Enforcing the modularity via OSGi is a good way to validate our
modularity/extensibility story in Tuscany. I think we already have a fairly
well organized module structure in Tuscany (from the maven dependency
perspective). To be consistent, should we consider directly mapping our
module
2008/4/30 Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Enforcing the modularity via OSGi is a good way to validate our
modularity/extensibility story in Tuscany. I think we already have a fairly
well organized module structure in Tuscany (from the maven dependency
perspective). To be consistent, should we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593373#action_12593373
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2280:
---
Is your interface a remotable interface?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2275:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Problem when with Bean[] and null
More comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 9:43 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving support for running in OSGi
2008/4/30 Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593385#action_12593385
]
Cezary Wisniewski commented on TUSCANY-2280:
Yes, my interface is remotable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593385#action_12593385
]
cez edited comment on TUSCANY-2280 at 4/30/08 10:36 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593385#action_12593385
]
cez edited comment on TUSCANY-2280 at 4/30/08 10:35 AM:
Consider the use case where I start with a .componentType file, e.g.:
componentType xmlns=http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0;
service name=HelloWorld
interface.wsdl interface=
http://helloworld#wsdl.interface(HelloWorld) /
/service
/componentType
And I proceed to write a Java impl with
Poor warning issued when annotating private field with @Callback
Key: TUSCANY-2282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2282
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type:
For now, I recommend you to use mvn clean install -fn to continue. And
also please open a JIRA to report the problem you are seeing so that we can
track and fix it.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Wojtek Janiszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Luciano,
I have submitted my signed CLA, and my name now appears in the
Unlisted CLAs section [1].
I have downloaded the latest Tuscany release, and I am going through
the provided samples. I am also attempting a top-down build of
Tuscany, and generally getting my development environment
Hi Raymond, thanks for your comments. I've added some more below.
Regards, Graham.
2008/4/30 Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
More comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593429#action_12593429
]
Gilbert Kwan commented on TUSCANY-2271:
---
Are followings right?
1. protected field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593429#action_12593429
]
gkwan edited comment on TUSCANY-2271 at 4/30/08 1:57 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593429#action_12593429
]
gkwan edited comment on TUSCANY-2271 at 4/30/08 1:59 PM:
Graham Charters wrote:
2008/4/30 Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Enforcing the modularity via OSGi is a good way to validate our
modularity/extensibility story in Tuscany. I think we already have a fairly
well organized module structure in Tuscany (from the maven dependency
perspective). To be
Conversation should end due to non-business exception
-
Key: TUSCANY-2283
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2283
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593441#action_12593441
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2275:
---
Hi,
I debugged the issue and it turned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2275.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Resolved as a user error.
Problem when with Bean[] and null
Update @Property vtest to test un-annotated non-public field
Key: TUSCANY-2284
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2284
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
Raymond Feng (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593441#action_12593441 ]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2275:
---
Hi,
I debugged
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593454#action_12593454
]
gkwan edited comment on TUSCANY-2284 at 4/30/08 3:40 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gilbert Kwan updated TUSCANY-2284:
--
Attachment: T2284.vtest.patch
T2284-vtest.new.zip
T2284.vtest.patch contains
Graham Charters wrote:
Hi Raymond, thanks for your comments. I've added some more below.
Regards, Graham.
2008/4/30 Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
More comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12593478#action_12593478
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on TUSCANY-2271:
--
Q 1. protected field and its
55 matches
Mail list logo
