Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-09 Thread Graham Powell
To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client Graham Powell wrote: When I get the FEAT response, where do I look for the results? Although I think this is irrelevant since I have found the spec for the server and the only FEAT supported is UTF8

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-09 Thread Graham Powell
: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client When I get the FEAT response, where do I look for the results? The results are parsed by the component into numerous ftpFeatxxx types so applications know whether specific features are supported. You need to log LastResponse to see

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-09 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
I may well have some more questions soon on another little project based on the Overbyte FTP Server demo program. Just make sure you start with the V7 FTP server this time, there are numerous improvements and new commands over V5 and V6. I run in on my public web site: ftp://www.magsys.co.uk/

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-08 Thread Graham Powell
client in Vancouver. Graham -Original Message- From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On Behalf Of Arno Garrels Sent: 06 March 2010 19:36 To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client Graham Powell wrote

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-08 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
I thought strings were dynamic. The string was always cleared before each FTP command. Strings are dynamic, but TWSocket returns buffers not strings, and you normally use MOVE to fill a string, which means increasing the size manually. I shall investigate your MLST idea. Can you post the

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-08 Thread Graham Powell
] On Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd Sent: 08 March 2010 14:17 To: twsocket@elists.org Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client I thought strings were dynamic. The string was always cleared before each FTP command. Strings are dynamic, but TWSocket

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-08 Thread Arno Garrels
@elists.org Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client I thought strings were dynamic. The string was always cleared before each FTP command. Strings are dynamic, but TWSocket returns buffers not strings, and you normally use MOVE to fill a string, which means

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-08 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
When I get the FEAT response, where do I look for the results? The results are parsed by the component into numerous ftpFeatxxx types so applications know whether specific features are supported. You need to log LastResponse to see them all as literals, but I'm sure your program does that for

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-08 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
BTW: I think the OverbyteIcsFtpTst demo doesn't set the UTF-8 code page correctly. Some weeks ago I read in an FTP-RFC (cannot recall the number) that if the UTF-8 Feat is returned by the server and an OPTS UTF8 ON command failed it has to be assumed that UTF-8 is already active on the

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-06 Thread Arno Garrels
Graham Powell wrote: The directory listing contains a list of story identifiers which look something like this 123454678:12345678:12345678 The date and time of the story is one of the fields. So the listing gives me the stories I need to download and the timestamp. When a story changes I

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-05 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
As I have mentioned in previous posts some months ago I am interfacing to an Avid iNEWS newsroom server and polling by using the dirAsync command sent every 3 seconds. Are you checking for changes to a specific file, or just looking for new files in general? If the former, using the MLST or

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-05 Thread Graham Powell
it. If it disappears from the list I delete it. Regards Graham -Original Message- From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd Sent: 05 March 2010 11:40 To: twsocket@elists.org Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte

[twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-04 Thread Graham Powell
Every time I upgrade from the old FPiette software to any of the Overbyte versions I have been experiencing the occasional problem. I cannot reproduce the problem in the office, but customers report odd effects. Each time the finger starts to point to the FTP component. Bear in mind that the

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-04 Thread Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
Every time I upgrade from the old FPiette software to any of the Overbyte versions I have been experiencing the occasional problem. What problem? You need to supply detailed logs showing the specific component versions being used, commands sent and received and the errors. the application

Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client

2010-03-04 Thread Francois PIETTE
Every time I upgrade from the old FPiette software to any of the Overbyte versions So my question to anybody in the know is this: Is there any fundamental difference in the way these two FTPClient components work? These are basically the same components. What you name Overbyte versions is