); { to avoid 100% CPU }
At line 4231, right after the end of the try except block.
To me this has little to no effect as the sleep is only done when bMore
is True.
What do you think of this proposal?
Any comments are welcome.
Regards
Olivier Sannier
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
Hello Olivier,
The NotifyDataAvailable sets a flag in an object associated to the
client socket that will then read the available bytes. But it will not
do so immediately
That's the problem. You have to read all available data In the
OnDataAvailable
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
Hello Olivier,
I can't use LineMode, what is transferred is purely binary.
See http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/index.php/Sending_and_receiving_data
that discusses some possible data transfer modes.
Thanks for that link. My code is for a transport layer
Francois Piette wrote:
Designing a system having in mind variable length data will result in a
better system. Variable length can do fixed length easily, not the reverse.
It is variable length, but I'm only writing the socket layer. Basically,
I'm given data in an unknown form and being
Hi,
I have written my own message pump for my project so that I can do
additional processing inside the execute method of the thread.
I based my code on what ThrdSrvV2 is showing but moved on to having
multiple sockets per threads instead of one thread per client like what
the demo is doing.
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
Hello Olivier,
Oke I see. But if you have all your clients attached to same thread,
then it is more easyer to create / destroy the server in that thread,
and you dont have to worry about it at all.
Yes, I know, but I definitely prefer to have the server(s) in one
about 15 minutes of using it.
If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Cheers
Olivier
--
Olivier Sannier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.obones.com/
Retrouvez-moi sur Viaduc :
http://www.viaduc.com/invitationpersonnelle/0023asu3wwgwpzx
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings
Isn't it what CloseDelayed is meant for?
Francois Piette wrote:
You should call Shutdown to gracefully close the connection.
If you want to call close, do it using an intermediate custom message.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of ICS (Internet Component Suite, freeware)
Author of MidWare
,
Why don't you upgrade to v6? It was designed for sharing hidden Windows.
Best Regards,
SZ
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Olivier Sannier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a server here with parts of it written using Indy and parts of it
written using ICS. The two parts
Hi all,
I have a server here with parts of it written using Indy and parts of it
written using ICS. The two parts are distinct, listen on different ports
and do not share any resources. Basically, I'm looking at replacing Indy
with ICS and would like to have both technologies in one service to
Arno Garrels wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Upgrading might be simpler than you think. Just rename ICSv5 folder,
unzip and install v6 package and then rename all ICS unit names so
that they start with OverbyteIcs
Indeed it is easy, however if you have derived classes with
DZ-Jay wrote:
On May 26, 2008, at 09:55, Arno Garrels wrote:
There is a maximum number of user handles, per-process (default 1),
and system-wide (AFAIK $), so this error seems perfectly OK.
Maybe your application leaks handles? If not, you may want to try to
increase the maximum
Olivier Sannier wrote:
Arno Garrels wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Upgrading might be simpler than you think. Just rename ICSv5 folder,
unzip and install v6 package and then rename all ICS unit names so
that they start with OverbyteIcs
Indeed it is easy
Arno Garrels wrote:
Olivier Sannier wrote:
Thanks for the information. I did moved to v6 and had to adapt a few
things (would have been nice if Disposed in TIcsWndControl had been
protected and not private) but it did not help at first.
Why?
Because as soon as all connected clients would
Francois PIETTE wrote:
Here are a few ideas to get high performances:
4) Enlarge winsock buffers
5) Enlarge TWSocket send buffer (BufSize property) to mach actual network
packet size. By default BufSize is the size of a standard ethernet packet.
What values would you recommend for a
Francois PIETTE wrote:
So in execute is it Ok to:
while not terminated do
begin
WSocket.MessagePump;
// check if I need to do something
sleep(100);
end;
// close it all down
Or am I missing the point in the use of the message pump?
Yes, you miss something. The code you've
Hi,
Many thanks for this, it will prove useful for many, especially the SVN
repository.
However, there is one thing that could prove annoying:
The repository has been setup on a non standard port via HTTP which
means that many users won't be able to access it because of security
policies in
Hi,
I just ported an application to ICSv6 and I'm encountering a problem
when closing it down. It gives me an access violation in ntdll.dll,
write of address 0010
Digging around, I discovered that it comes from the call to
GWndHandlerPool.Lock inside TIcsWndControl.DeallocateHWnd
At the
Olivier Sannier wrote:
In my own section, I'm freeing, indirectly, a class that contains a
TWSocketServer which not active.
I know this comes from the indirect nature of my usage of the class, but
still, the order of finalization clauses should not be relied upon, as
it was always
Hello,
Francois Piette wrote:
you add OverbyteIcsWndControl in front (well after other higher priority
units such as FastMM4) of the dpr uses clause, the issue should go away.
Please check and tell me what.
Yes, it works. But I don't really like having useless uses in the dpr,
and this is
Francois PIETTE wrote:
About your changes: It's sure that using FreeAndNil is a good idea.
Checking
Assigned(GWndHandlerPool) is also good but be aware that this would hide
the
exception and still may produce unexpected results since the lock is no
more
used. If you some reason a thread
Olivier Sannier wrote:
I'll try to figure out a way to do this and will submit a patch when I
get it working properly.
Ok, figured it out quite easily. Please see the proposed patch at the
end of this message.
The only question is whether or not I could have read GWndHandleCount
directly
Hi,
I just discovered that overridden has been misspelled in a number of
places throughout ICS where it was written with one d. But in proper
English, it should take two ds. I know that most authors of ICS do not
have English as their native language, and this is not a big deal, but
now that
Hi all,
Any reactions on this?
Cheers
Olivier
Olivier Sannier wrote:
Olivier Sannier wrote:
I'll try to figure out a way to do this and will submit a patch when I
get it working properly.
Ok, figured it out quite easily. Please see the proposed patch at the
end
Arno Garrels wrote:
Olivier Sannier wrote:
Assert(Assigned(GWndHandlerPool), 'GWndHandlerPool is already nil, check
your threads!!!');
I just wonder whether we shouldn't check not GUnitFinalized rather than
Assigned(GWndHandlerPool),
what do you think?
No we should
Arno Garrels wrote:
Olivier Sannier wrote:
Arno Garrels wrote:
Olivier Sannier wrote:
Assert(Assigned(GWndHandlerPool), 'GWndHandlerPool is already nil,
check your threads!!!');
I just wonder whether we shouldn't check not GUnitFinalized rather
than Assigned
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
Maybe somebody know a way to do it in BCB2009? It use to be impossible.
Regards,
SZ
Still is.
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website
It is used indirectly.
The icsbcb package should have bcbie added to its requires list. This
should solve the problem, after a rebuild.
Cheers
Olivier
--
Olivier Sannier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.obones.com/
Retrouvez-moi sur Viaduc :
http://www.viaduc.com/invitationpersonnelle/0023asu3wwgwpzx
Fastream Technologies wrote:
SslContext1-SslOptions = TSslOptions() sslOpt_NO_SSLv2;
is the same as what I did, isn't it?
No it's not the same. What you did does not work as it does not call the
setter for the property. The only way to have it work is the above. And
the same goes for your
Most likely you did not have the correct paths to the include/lib paths
for your project.
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Destructor must be called Destroy, not Free
Markus Mueller wrote:
Hi Wilfried,
I have created an destructor Free, which inherited runs Free of
TWSocket. This
Free is never called; can anybody tell me why?
Are you realy sure it is freed by calling Release if it is never calling
Free?!
wayne forrest wrote:
I am expecting ASCII text yet I get the Chinese
Because you use your buffer as an array of byte, yet you declare it as
an array of Char.
In Delphi 2009 Char is Unicode, hence the chinese characters because two
bytes you received are combined to form one unicode character.
Server seems to be down indeed
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Xavier Mor-Mur wrote:
I write smtp client to send html email from my application.
Html normally is a doc saved as html format. If there are images then
their tag have SRC coded on a way I can't find how it's done.
On Example at end you can see html generated using OpenOffice 3.1.
There is
On 05/09/2010 21:06, Jon Robertson wrote:
If ICS works in D2010, why can't the same source be recompiled in
Delphi XE without change? Why must component vendors insist on
forcing source code changes (even if just the .inc file) for every
version, when there is very likely nothing in the new
On 05/09/2010 23:22, Jon Robertson wrote:
But then again, you must know what you are talking about...
Wow. I'm surprised by the hostility.
Sorry, bad day, you're the last one on the long list of weird remarks to
day...
Based on your JVCL experience, are you aware of anything that should
Hello,
I've seen this happen with other component sets because the components
as well.
The situation triggering this is yet unclear to me, but it is a
combination of putting the component on a form and letting the
application delete it.
It appears, but I'm not quite sure, that finalization of
37 matches
Mail list logo
