I'd like to use netconsole to have the possibility of upgrading the
firmware store on a flash, which has u-boot as bootloader which loads
and runs linux.
I plan to use tftp to transfer the new firmware images to the board,
so what I'd like to know if there is any problem using netconsole and
Dear Ottavio,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I'd like to use netconsole to have the possibility of upgrading the
> firmware store on a flash, which has u-boot as bootloader which loads
> and runs linux.
>
> I plan to use tftp to transfer the new firmware images to the board,
>
Copy to list
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Pearse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 March 2008 09:32
> To: 'Nishanth Menon'
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] Uboot-V2: ARM: towards a common
> start-arm.S
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailt
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM custodianship:
>
> Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor
> specific "sub-architectures" it seemed necessary to add new U-Boot custodian
> branches for those architectures.
On 23:19 Fri 14 Mar , Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> This patch adds few routines to configure serdes on 837x targets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> cpu/mpc83xx/Makefile |1 +
> cpu/mpc83xx/serdes.c | 156
> +
This patch will allow code common to all ARM supplied development boards
to be shared.
This patch is also available for test from
git://linux-arm.org/u-boot-armdev.git as branch 080312_move
The patch is made against u-boot commit
e95bcc3661a78ccc094c365ecd2484d00a60f97d:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 05:32:10PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> I think we dont have a seperate list for uboot-v2,
No we have not. This is the right place ;)
> so, just wanted to
> know the opinion of having a single arch/arm/cpu/start-arm.S instead of
> multiple start-arm
Hi Ottavio,
> I plan to use tftp to transfer the new firmware images to the board,
> so what I'd like to know if there is any problem using netconsole and
> tftpd together
I've been using NetConsole in this manner you describe for the
past several months now. It has been working well -- witho
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>> Isn't the lock necessary to use the cache as memory for stack and
>>> initial data?
Thanks, now I understand the original concept of this locking.
But from the technical POV; looking at start.S, mips_cache_lock() is
processed
Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
>> But simply deleting it is definitely not a good idea, as it would most
>> probably break existing board support.
>
> I still think this removal will not break any existing targets, but yes
> agreed. I'll try to introduce a #ifdef alternative.
Patch attached. Any comme
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
> On 23:19 Fri 14 Mar , Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > This patch adds few routines to configure serdes on 837x targets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > cpu/mpc83xx/Makefile
Leia grabbed my lovestick and moaned in delight when she realized I was a full
9 rock hard inches.
http://www.ferialfe.com/
Lindsays pert breasts-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 06:02:29PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:19:42PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > -#define CFG_VSC7385_BASE 0xF000
> > +/*
> > + * NAND Flash on the Local Bus
> > + */
> > +#define CFG_NAND_BASE 0xE060 /* 0xE060 */
> >
> Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM custodianship:
>
> Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor
> specific "sub-architectures" it seemed necessary to add new U-Boot custodian
> branches for those architectures. Fortunately we had some volunteers. Here
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> This patch will allow code common to all ARM supplied development boards
> to be shared.
...
> - @board/integratorap/split_by_variant.sh $@
> + @board/armltd/integratorap/split_by_variant.sh $@
I really dislike the "armltd" name. Is there any sp
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/hmi1001/hmi1001.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/hmi1001/hmi1001.c b/board/hmi1001/hmi1001.c
index 3ecb74a..8bdfe78 100644
--- a/board/hmi1001/hmi1001.c
+++ b/board/hmi1001/hmi1001.c
@@ -1
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
cpu/mips/cpu.c | 21 +
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/mips/cpu.c b/cpu/mips/cpu.c
index 7559ac6..71e5028 100644
--- a/cpu/mips/cpu.c
+++ b/cpu/mips/cpu.c
@@ -25,6 +25,17 @@
#incl
Move things to reasonable place.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/incaip/lowlevel_init.S |6 ++
cpu/mips/start.S |8
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/incaip/lowlevel_init.S b/board/incaip/lowleve
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Shinya Kuribayashi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> + while (1) {
> + cache_op(Hit_Writeback_Inv_D, start_addr);
> + if (addr == aend)
> + break;
Handles machine specific functions by using function pointers.
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/incaip/incaip.c |8
board/purple/purple.c | 10 ++
board/tb0229/tb0229.c | 11 ++-
cpu/mips/cpu.c| 17
Andrew Dyer wrote:
> looking at how cache_flush() is used (see common/cmd_load.c,
> common/cmd_elf.c, etc), I believe this loop should also do a cache_op
> with Hit_Invalidate_I to invalidate the icache.
>
> seems like it would be easier to read if the condition was included in
> the while() state
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:31:11PM +0800, 郭劲 wrote:
> I make all the frequency(timebase-frequency;bus-frequency;clock-frequency)
> value
> on device tree file equal to zero, I think those frequency will filled by
> u-boot
> during bootm, but in fact, the u-boot did not fill any frequency. after b
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Shinya Kuribayashi
> Sent: den 18 mars 2008 18:56
> To: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [MIPS] Introduce machine_restart
>
> Handles machine specific functions by using func
On 02:55 Wed 19 Mar , Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> Handles machine specific functions by using function pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If possible I will prefer a weak function
Best Regards,
J.
--
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@transmode.se>
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> I don't think it is good to use global fun ptrs. These are not
> available until
> relocated to RAM.
Agreed!
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villar wrote:
>
> If possible I will prefer a weak function
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@transmode.se>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> I don't think it is good to use global fun ptrs. These are not
>> available until
>> relocated to RAM.
>
> Agreed!
I got it. Thanks for your comments.
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jean-Christoph
On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM custodianship:
> >
> > Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor
> > specific "sub-architectures" it seemed necessary to add new U-Boot
> > custodian branches for those ar
Hay
I original firwmare in ngw 100
downloaded http://avr32linux.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/PramodeCE "pio led "
blink compiled gcc
and download device run program segmantation fault
What a problem ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This SF.
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rakhchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
post/tests.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/post/tests.c b/post/tests.c
index 698f85c..ed4ef2b 100644
--- a/post/tests.c
+++ b/post/tests.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rakhchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
common/main.c|8 +++-
include/asm-arm/global_data.h|1 +
include/asm-avr32/global_data.h |1 +
inclu
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rakhchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
post/board/lwmon5/dspic.c |2 +-
post/board/lwmon5/fpga.c |4
post/board/lwmon5/gdc.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 dele
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* External Watchdog test;
* dsPIC tests;
* FPGA test;
* GDC test;
* Sysmon tests.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rakhchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c| 19 +++
include/configs/lwmon5.h
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rakhchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c|5 +
include/configs/lwmon5.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/lwmon5/lw
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backlight was switched on even when temperature was too low.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rakhchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
board/lwmon5/lwmon5.c | 24 +---
post/board/lwmon5/fpga.c |
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rakhchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
post/board/lwmon5/gdc.c | 18 --
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/post/board/lwmon5/gdc.c b/post/board/l
From: Yuri Tikhonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To enable this, alternative, configuration the U-Boot board configuration
file for lwmon5 includes the definitions of alternative addresses for header
(CONFIG_ALT_LH_ADDR) and buffer (CONFIG_ALT_LB_ADDR).
The Linux shall be configured with the CONFIG_ALT_
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The following changes since commit b8aa57b5d4d69e8f0810a5e632c0ce41c0f46ee0:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> tools/setlocalversion: use a git-describe-ish format
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.gi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/net/mcffec.c |7 +++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mcffec.c b/drivers/net/mcffec.c
> index 3b81258..71d1960 100644
> --- a/drivers
Hello friends,
I am new to u-boot and I am facing some basic problem.
Q.- How does u-boot detects that my board is mpc8xx? i.e. for eg. in board.c,
in preprocessr directives
#if CONFIG_8xx
when I see the tag of CONFIG_8xx using ctags, then it brings me to
/cpu/mpc_8xx/start.s in which
#defin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 18 mars 2008 20:25
> To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> Cc: Shinya Kuribayashi; Joakim Tjernlund; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [MIPS] Introduce machine_restart
>
> I
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/mcffec.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mcffec.c b/drivers/net/mcffec.c
index 3b81258..40d7bf2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mcffec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mcffec.c
@@ -166,6 +166,1
Can anyone give some hint on what tool to use for programing uboot on Broadcom
BMW board? I had CodeWarrior USB TAP for PPC, will it work? thanks, -Hai-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microso
> On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> > Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM custodianship:
>> >
>> > Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor
>> > specific "sub-architectures" it seemed necessary to add new U-Boot
>> > custodian branches for t
Dear Wolfgang,
The patches by David I've picked up from dtc and applied to track libfdt.
The patches by Kumar improve the "fdt" command.
All patches were posted previously (prior to the merge window opening).
Thanks,
gvb
The following changes since commit fdeb932b1c8a3b615463995c3452d30ee0b12a
Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Hi Stefan,
[This is a resend of a patch sent prior to the merge window opening.
The proposed implementation was discussed extensively. No comments were
received on this latest version of the implementation so it is either OK
or nobody wa
Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Hi Kim,
This is useful if/when Stefan Roese applies the previous patch "Flash
programming progress countdown."
Best regards,
gvb
include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/inc
Hi,Scott
My board is MPC8360EMDS, my bootm command is "bootm uImage ramdisk_ppc
mpc836x_mds.dtb", I used the MPC8360E_PB_K26_20071012-LTIB.iso to generate above
uImage, ramdisk_ppc,mpc836x_mds.dtb.
If I fill the frequency to zero on mpc836x_mds.dts, then the linux-2.6.22 is
crashed, the output
I'm using U-Boot 1.3.2 with AT91RM9200 custom board (based on DK)
At boot time I want to detect that a USB storage device has been
inserted, and then I want to attempt to load an image off it and upgrade
my system.
If I run "usb storage" it always returns 0 - even if there is no USB
storage devic
On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> >> Would it not be better if the Atmel ARM was handled by the Atmel AT91
> >> Product line
> >
> > Could be, I really don't know. I don't remember seeing Atmel ARM patches
> > posted or reviewed by other Atmel than yourself.
>
> They were sent in
On Monday 17 March 2008, Tsi-Chung Liew wrote:
> Provide common configuration in pciauto_config_device() usable for
> all architectures
>
> Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Best regards,
Stefan
===
With this patch we don't need that many #ifdef's in the code. It moves
the subtraction into the macro and defines a NOP-macro when
CONFIG_FLASH_SHOW_PROGRESS is not defined.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Jerry, what do you think? If you are ok with to this one, and
nobody el
51 matches
Mail list logo
