Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-13 Thread Woodward, Bob
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 5:14 PM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question Interestingly, it still fails after I remove the process from the field. There is nothing in any field definition to control the logic flow. -Original Message

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-13 Thread Lunt, Bruce
-Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, Bob Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 9:14 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question Hi Bruce, Make a brand new screen with just the four WORK fields

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-13 Thread Wjhonson
I like these SB+ questions. It lets the rest of us non sb plusers peer into the torture chamber. -Original Message- From: Lunt, Bruce bl...@shaklee.com To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 13, 2012 11:14 am Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question Hi Bob

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-13 Thread David Wolverton
...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 1:19 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question I like these SB+ questions. It lets the rest of us non sb plusers peer into the torture chamber. -Original

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-13 Thread Wjhonson
Sent: Tue, Mar 13, 2012 11:42 am Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question FAR from torture Once you get productive on SB+, you can churn out creens that are consistent and easy to use by end-user clients faster than ust about any other product. I'd recommend SB+ to anyone starting a new roject

[U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Lunt, Bruce
Hi All, I have created a new screen in SB+. The data is built into the work record and then I want to have the user be able to go through the lines one at a time in order to change a date field. The date field itself will only be able to be changed when another associated date field is not

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Woodward, Bob
Kevin! BobW -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 10:40 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] SB+ screen question Hi All, I have created a new screen

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Lunt, Bruce
12, 2012 12:09 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question Hi Bruce, It may have to do with your concept of how the work flow is going in screen and the way your process is working to control your entry. If you have access to a copy of Kevin King's green System Builder book SB

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Woodward, Bob
for these. You said they are just @WORK variables, right? -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:53 PM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question Hi

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Lunt, Bruce
entries for these. You said they are just @WORK variables, right? -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:53 PM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Woodward, Bob
willing to explore possibilities with you. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 3:20 PM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question Yes they are MV fields

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Marco Antonio Rojas Castro
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:20:26 -0700 Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question Yes they are MV fields. There is nothing on the LI# or Award fields. The sequencing is left to right with no extra processing and they are just @WORK variables. I tried to move

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Lunt, Bruce
Nice idea ... No luck -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Marco Antonio Rojas Castro Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 3:54 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question Try

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Lunt, Bruce
, March 12, 2012 3:35 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question So theoretically, the one process is what's causing the skipping action of the Earned Date field. To test that theory, take it off completely. This should let the cursor move between the LI# and Earned Date field

Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

2012-03-12 Thread Boydell, Stuart
Have you got the /FD Allow Amend slot set to Y or N? -Original Message- Interestingly, it still fails after I remove the process from the field. There is nothing in any field definition to control the logic flow. ___ U2-Users mailing list