How very strange - in the non compact version I always pass this argument
anyway, but i had thought that if it was not passed, defcs was assumed
which would be configured correctly on the 2 server.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
Since it's a little slow here I'll open a discussion which is
borderline between Tech and Community.
The thread Uniobjects.Net Compact Framework and Visual Basic
had an interesting resolution. I'd like to see more discussions
on that topic.
If only there were enough people interested in mobile
Tony, there is (at least) a fourth option that I see
4) Not directly connecting to U2 from the mobile phone, but some
intermediate web server in between.
Using a REST or Webservices API from the mobile device would probably be
far more common than directly connecting to U2.
For anyone (if
To further the question, what would be some potential uses of mobile phone with
U2
that would not be covered with website usage with U2, with different screen
layouts?
Or are you talking about smartphone apps?
George Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division
1) I work for a business and write business applications.I have no
interest in writing Rag Doll Blaster or Angry Birds for U2. Well, other
than the resulting large stacks of cash which would enable me to buy a
Ducati 1198s without getting killed by my wife.
2) Apparently. In my case I'm doing
Microsoft has split their development products into 2 areas presentation and
business rules. The presentation people take results given to them by the
business application and present it on the phone and web. The business rules
developers have little to do with presentation. Many
I certainly agree with the concept of pro-actively pushing information to
people via email. Information can be readily accessed from virtually any device
(even the desktop!), and if these notifications are triggered by critical
business events, as well as standard daily reports, then it just
From: Jeff Schasny
1) I work for a business and write business
applications.I have no interest in writing Rag Doll
Blaster or Angry Birds for U2.
Your perspective in your response to #1 is different from #2 so
I'm a little confused. In short, if you look around there are a
lot of business
For George, I think a question about what would be some
potential uses characterizes our community, and is part of what
prompted me to open the discussion. With hundreds of thousands
of apps out there for every mobile device, there are any number
of potential uses for mobile access, regardless of
Excellent points, David.
The presentation people take results given to them by
the business application and present it on the phone
and web. The business rules developers have little to
do with presentation. Many developments in the U2
world are starting to move that way, where the
UV11.1 has been available for AIX for 7 month; for Linux only 3..
I don't know how widely used it is yet.
I have not seen a rash of complaints about 11.1.
We are currently on 10.2.10 / Windows and contemplating migrating to Linux.
UV choices are: 10.3.9 11.1.1.
We do not have a burning need
Possibly, since I don't use a smart phone on a daily basis, I'm still not
seeing the question.
What would be different in programming UV to interface with a mobile device,
vs programming UV to interface with a web browser? Aside from screen layout.
Which was why I asked about potential uses.
Hello Chuck.
You might want to watch out for some issues with permissions being set
incorrectly within a couple of the packages in 10.3.9. These cause an upgrade
to fail. This has been addressed with U2 Support. This might not be a problem
on a clean install rather than an upgrade.
Perry
Hi George
I use a Windows phone 7. With a web page there is a cost of time for
downloading a web page and a performance issue with screen loading. With an
app, I conform to the user interface of the phone which are more intuitive to a
phone user. The app loads quicker and runs quicker.
Good points there David, which I notice a lot of people don't consider
when dismissing the benefits of an app vs web.
Another point is the better offline capabilities of a native app. I'm a
lot of people on Vodafone over here in Australia (myself include) can
understand the importance of this.
Tony, I completely agree with you. I think you are misinterpreting my
sor far ... much penetration to mean isn't appropriate
Take for banking sector, which is typically quite reserved/slow in
uptake of current technology vs the gaming sector on the other side of
the spectrum.
-Original
Sorry, that should have been I'm sure a lot of people as opposed to
I'm a lot of people
I can assure everyone, I am just a single person.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dan McGrath
Sent: Thursday,
17 matches
Mail list logo
