Using uvadmin
I have run the wizard and am getting this error
FAILED TO CREATE CERTIFICATE REQUEST
ERROR GENERATING KEY PAIR
RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CANNOT BE SEEDED PROPERLEY
I have googled it but there is only 1 IBM hit and that's just a line in
the basic manual that says it comes
I believe he's posted here in the past. If not, then it was cdp. Try
searching for him in the archives for either of those forums.
--
daw
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roosa, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:27 PM
To:
Hi all.
Is there any way to start the unirpcd daemon with a timeout value, in a
Windows box, like in unix unirpcd -timeout999?
Whe have done it successfully under Linux, that is quite vulnerable under
viruses or unstable communications.
But is the first time we see this kind of Denial Of
hey all,
we are beginning to use subversion for version control and I was
wondering if there was good way to lock code besides the usual READU
in a program or AE/EDing the record.
I would like to be able to lock the program when a user checks it out
and while tyhe above methods would
Augusto,
I believe you want to go to Administrative Tools\Services and locate the
UniRPC service. From there you can stop the service and then right click on
it an go to properties. At the bottom you should see a field to enter start
parameters. This is where you would put your timeout setting,
I worked at a site that actually used SourceSafe to check in/out
programs. This worked fairly well in a lot of ways, but it is a shift
in how source code is stored and accessed. The nicest thing is the
historic versioning and comparing features.
John Israel
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Dayton
Doug:
Q1. What editor is in use... If it is a Samba or FTP editor like EditPlus, I
would expect locking to happen at the OS level.
Q2. Is U2 the database for SubVersion?
--Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of doug chanco
Sent: Thursday,
It appears that SourceSafe is a Microsoft product. Thus, I expect that
it would not be the best fit in a Unix shop.
--B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Israel, John R.
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:01 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Yes and no. Since basic program files are just Unix Dirs and the source
code is just text, you could map these files via Samba so that Windows
could see it cleanly and use it that way. It might take a little
playing, but we did something like that and it worked to some extent.
Might not be the
Look into cvs or Subversion. I have not used either for UV Basic files,
but either would work and both are opensource. As stated, it would
require a little infrastructure and a paradigm shift in the way you
work, but the benefits would probably be worth it.
Israel, John R. wrote:
Yes and
Maybe check sourceForge or some other Open Source site. Or Google CVS
(Concurrent Versions System).
John Israel
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Dayton Superior Corporation
721 Richard St.
Dayton, OH 45342
937-866-0711 x44380
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The pricing link at Microsoft.com points to buying a copy of Visual Studio
2008. It looks like it is built-in.
--Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Israel, John R.
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:47 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Brutzman, Bill wrote:
Doug:
Q1. What editor is in use... If it is a Samba or FTP editor like EditPlus, I
would expect locking to happen at the OS level.
we have developers that use ultra edit (a windows editor) vi (on both
unix/windows) and some that like AE/ED as well as a couple using
Sorry all maybe I was not clear, I am using subversion BUT would like to
lock the code at the pick level at the same time that its checked out of
subversion.
dougc
Israel, John R. wrote:
Maybe check sourceForge or some other Open Source site. Or Google CVS
(Concurrent Versions System).
we COULD use source safe as Israel pointed if source code is kept in
unix directories they can be samba mounted on a PC and then checked into
and out of source safe.
The main issue I am trying to get resolved is to lock the record at the
pick level , in case someone does nto check out a code
Catalog locally and you will never need to re-catalog (assuming local
cataloging is acceptable).
or
Catalogging hundreds of pgms should not be a big deal.
SELECT BP (or SELECT BP_O)
CATALOG BP FORCE
John Israel
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Dayton Superior Corporation
721 Richard St.
Dayton, OH 45342
In the last recent go-around, the way that this was handled was to create a
littlle file and use the following little subs...
DICT LOCKED.RECORDS
Field.Field.FieldConversion..Column.
OutputDepth
Name..NumberDefinition...
Doug,
The 2 cleanest methods I can see are:
a) Set the permissions at the OS level at checkout time. If they don't have
write permission the checkin will fail (after they've made all their changes
8-D )
b) During checkout, back the real source code to another name
'cool.screen.io.sub.BKP' and
Locking in the SVN repository isn't setting the working copy permissions on
the next update?
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
You could look at SQLising the BP file. Having a SICA, you could restrict
read and update to all users and have a BASIC program manager with the
AUTHORIZATION command, handle check out, check in, compilation, etc. This
means that programs could only be accessed through the program manager and
doug chanco wrote:
The main issue I am trying to get resolved is to lock the record at the
pick level , in
case someone does nto check out a code and then tries to edit it when
another developer
already has it checked out, since most of our developers use a pick
aware editor as
long as the record
Hi,
Just thought I'd pop in and let you know that PRC will do all of that
software / code locking (including control items, dictionaries, other stuff
in hashed files) from the Pick/U2 level. It controls access automatically
when you use the tools you normally use, such as ED, AE and many others.
Thanks, Mike.
But the field you talk about is temporary, according to Microsoft.
The main problem is that unirpcd.exe doesn't understand the timeout
parameter.
You can reproduce this behaviour by telneting any Universe server on port
31438:
After that, any new RPC conection (UVADMIN i.e.)
My experience says that you have to be careful copying the catdir directory.
You can get some corrupt data because of the funny characters in the object
code stored in catdir. Be careful and verify the content, maybe with
VCATALOG, before you stash it away. You will have to verify it each time
BP files have to be either type 1 or type 19 (directories). Not
having a file header, you can't have a SICA, can you? Same reason you
can't have indexes or transaction logging on them. At least that's my
understanding. I'd love to find out there is a way to do it.
Regards,
Clif
On May
Was the copy done with the COPY verb, or with the host O/S file copy?
Regards,
Clif
On May 15, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Tom Dodds wrote:
My experience says that you have to be careful copying the catdir
directory.
You can get some corrupt data because of the funny characters in
the object
Hi Clif
You are right, you cannot SQLise 1,19 file types. However I think the
authorisation command would still work if you changed the OS permissions.
Regards
David Jordan
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
27 matches
Mail list logo
