Do you use this? It doesn't seem like it can be that easy. Wouldn't
this delete too much information? The licensing/configuration on the
secondary server is different than on the primary. Do you exclude these
directories some how?
Amy Raisanen
[snip]
recommendation is to write a script to
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for asking.
AD FileCaddy
We offer a product called FileCaddy which consists of two programs:
TAPE.DUMP and TAPE.LOAD.
TAPE.DUMP dumps all the files in an account to tape, including dictionaries
and sub-files, except for those dictionaries designated as DC type files to
Why not something simple that works everywhere, like
loop
readnext id else exit
...
repeat
/Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Mecki Foerthmann mec...@gmx.net wrote:
have you tried LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID DO ?
MAJ Programming
I moved data from a GA R91 machine to Universe using Account saves and some
modified programs from U2.
To read the tape and write a tape file on the disk to use to restore from:
Navigate to c:\ibm\u2\bin and run:
UVMT -d\\.\tape0 -bBLOCKSIZE -t fread filename to Restore to
U2 provided the
That of course would most likely not compile on our UniData system, since
unlike D3 it's case sensitive and I don't think it supports lower case Basic
code.
And if there is even a remote chance the code might be ported to D3 one day
and you write it in upper case, you are right of
Chuck:
It has been quite a while since I've done one, but I've done several in the
past.
When making the tape on Mentor Pro:
T-ATT 512
T-ONLINE
SAVE SYSTEM acct (FTYC
On UV using UniAdmin:
Choose Import
Select your tape device
Set your block size
Check the Use Type 19 Files box
I forget if
Hi Michael,
I believe (correct me if I'm wrong please) that the C option with the SAVE
verb causes it to produce a backward-compatible account or file save - ie
backward compatible with R83.
And, if I remember correctly, R83 records were limited to 32k.
So, if you're going to use the C
Dave:
Indeed you are correct. We would do a T-DUMP at 512 on the files with items
over 32K to work around this. It would seem your products take all of that
into consideration. I wish I had known about these tools back then.
Michael
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Dave Taylor
