Mighty impressive answer nevertheless... awesome!
On 7 September 2012 11:47, Tony Gravagno 3xk547...@sneakemail.com wrote:
Here are a number of ways to link a telnet client into UV back to its
respective hostname. There's some redundancy here as not all commands
work everywhere.
OK, so as I
you could also do a reverse DNS (if its setup).
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I've discovered, for useful content on this thread, that using SYSTEM(42)
I can return my IP address, and then, on the SERVER (doing DOS from
Universe TCl command line) I can
Worse, I know that on UniData, the IP address 'reported' back to the server
is simply the first address from the IPCONFIG -- even if that address is
non-routable to the server! Very annoying issue I've submitted to Rocket
(actually, it was IBM at the time!) ... Not yet fixed to my knowledge.
The -o as I reported earlier only links it to the instantiating pid which is
of course, much to my dismay, just the tl_service.exe not the actual pid of
the tl_server.exe job.
So every telnet session, on the -o reports the *same* pid.
But in the tasklist of course they each have different
The server runs Universe, the clients telnet to that server, which responds
Login, Password.
So far pretty normal.
Once you are *in* Universe, you can DOS and type Tasklist for example, where
you get a list of all running tasks *on* *the* *server* not on your local PC of
course.
So far we're
nslookup returns some kind of error I'm not at that pc right now
but at any rate, from what I gather this doesn't resolve to *a* device just to
that entire company, site, sector or whatever it's called like joescompany.com
not to joes PC on this desktop, versus joes pc across the room.
I
On 07/09/12 03:19, Charles Stevenson wrote:
A newbie stumped me: Why are Q-Pointers Q pointers ?
The Q lingo comes from the dawning days of Pick.
Why was the letter Q chosen?
Attribute makes sense.
Synonym makes sense.
PQ for Prestored Query makes sense. PR for Proc
Early versions of Pick did not natively have a way to reference the Master
Dictionary at all. That is, you could not open the master dictionary as a file
because there was no reference to it, to use as the text handle against an OPEN.
This is why the MD itself had a Q pointer called MD, which
If you are using device licensing, SYSTEM(51) has some useful information.
Regards. JayJay
Sent from my iPad
On 7 Sep 2012, at 14:59, Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
The -o as I reported earlier only links it to the instantiating pid which
is of course, much to my dismay, just the
another plausible possibility was that after creating the q pointer, the
file had new been Queued for usage.
or perhaps the programmer that named it was hungry, and his wife was making
Quiche that night. hmmm that made me hungry.!
-Original Message-
From:
This system entry is empty.
-Original Message-
From: John Jenkins u2g...@btinternet.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Fri, Sep 7, 2012 9:54 am
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
If you are using device licensing, SYSTEM(51)
Or maybe you create a Quantum Leap from one account to another!?!?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 12:57 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2]
I guess it always depends on where you come from and what you know.
I would say the account philosophy is much cleaner than having duplicate
file pointers.
And of course we have accounts in U2 too - it is the working directory.
I have to admit I always hated to work on PI sites - it was not
On 07/09/12 18:28, Mecki Foerthmann wrote:
I guess it always depends on where you come from and what you know.
I would say the account philosophy is much cleaner than having duplicate
file pointers.
And of course we have accounts in U2 too - it is the working directory.
I have to admit I
From: Wjhonson
How can you tell what device, pc, user, ip, etc is *trying* to
telnet before
they have successfully logged into Universe ? That's the core
problem
layed out more clearly perhaps.
The answer to this is in my detailed post. Since the users aren't
logged-in, LISTU won't show the
I have no Idea what you are talking about.
What is wrong with LOCATE A IN B SETTING C ?
On 07/09/2012 20:44, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/09/12 18:28, Mecki Foerthmann wrote:
I guess it always depends on where you come from and what you know.
I would say the account philosophy is much cleaner than
On 07/09/12 21:44, Mecki Foerthmann wrote:
I have no Idea what you are talking about.
What is wrong with LOCATE A IN B SETTING C ?
Except you've just given me a statement, and I was talking about the
function :-)
The syntax is something like
LOCATE(A,B,1;C)
although as I said, I might have
Much more compact
-Original Message-
From: Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk
To: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Fri, Sep 7, 2012 2:11 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] Etymology of Q-Pointer
On 07/09/12 21:44, Mecki Foerthmann wrote:
I have no Idea what you are talking about.
This comes from the PICK days where code had a 32k limit. I still code using
it this way ( old habits are hard to break )
Dan Goble | Senior Systems Engineer
Interline Brands, Inc.
804 East Gate Drive Suite 100, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
Office: 856.533.3110 | Mobile: 609.792.6855
E-mail:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
On 07/09/12 21:44, Mecki Foerthmann wrote:
I have no Idea what you are talking about.
What is wrong with LOCATE A IN B SETTING C ?
Except you've just given me a statement, and I was talking about the
function :-)
I
I do the exact opposite for exactly the same reasons. :)
I use the Locate function rather than statement because I find it
easier to read and 99% consistent across all platforms.
T
From: John Lorentz
I fully believe that I've never used the function ever since they
introduced
it as an
True about not needing it on PI. But PI could have handled Q-pointers
exactly how UV does today, if they had wanted to.
Personally, I like having 1 F-Pointer and every other pointer a
Q-pointer. Slightly less efficeint, but IMO more manageable.
REPLACE and INSERT functions also allowed (still
The etymology question about Q has deteriorated into a PI vs Pick
discussion.
In the Pick User GoogleGroup, it's about words that rhyme with orange.
No one has the definitive historical answer? I thought maybe our
resident historian, Dawn Wolthuis, would notice my dawning days of
Pick
The cscript below echos to the screen the list of PIDs only.
Nothing else.
So it doesn't get any closer to solving the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Gravagno 3xk547...@sneakemail.com
To: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 6:48 pm
Subject: Re: [U2]
I agree, Tony. The only time I use the statement is if I need to start a
locate at something other than element 1 (to step through each matching
element) or to locate multiple elements with the located value. Here's
an example:
*
* Method of using LOCATE to find multiple occurrences of value
From: Wjhonson
The cscript below echos to the screen the list of PIDs only.
Nothing else. So it doesn't get any closer to solving the problem.
Now you're facing a permissions issue or some other system-specific
detail. I wouldn't have posted without testing and on my system it
works. You need
On 07/09/12 23:14, Charles Stevenson wrote:
True about not needing it on PI. But PI could have handled Q-pointers
exactly how UV does today, if they had wanted to.
Personally, I like having 1 F-Pointer and every other pointer a
Q-pointer. Slightly less efficeint, but IMO more manageable.
27 matches
Mail list logo
