:
It is on the Tech Connect website. You might need a u2tc login to get to
the product matrix.
https://u2tc.rocketsoftware.com/matrix.asp
Then enter Product desired, and OS:
https://u2tc.rocketsoftware.com/buildmatrix.asp
Regards,
R. Baker Hughes
Senior UV DBA, Wipro/NMG
From: Marc Harbeson
why can the download for the U2 clients not be easy to find on the web
site?!?!?
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
On UniData, a port call would convert a phantom to an iphantom which would
burn a seat.
but until you interact with a user it does not count. (ports count as
interacting with the user)
its in the manual somewhere
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:33 PM, George Gallen
I've used the UO.NET library with no issues with both ASP.NET web sites and
Windows forms applications for years now...
But the devil in the details and those may impact which tool is better
Do the 3rd party tools offer some feature you foresee as a requirement
that UO.NET does not provide?
i would set it with a GPO instead of visiting each and every pc...
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I'm not saying there is no solution.
I'm saying we have 1500 PCs
It doesn't make me giddy to think this is the default setting on newly
installed PCs
Nor
you could also do a reverse DNS (if its setup).
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I've discovered, for useful content on this thread, that using SYSTEM(42)
I can return my IP address, and then, on the SERVER (doing DOS from
Universe TCl command line) I can
if this is what he wants - I've seen it done with pre compiler type options
that injects the code dynamically. but I may not understand the
question as well...
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Martin Phillips
martinphill...@ladybridge.com wrote:
Hi,
I am intrigued by this thread,
Sure would be nice if VSS would cause a dbpause type thing to occur while
snapshot is taking place...
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:29 AM, David Wolverton dwolv...@flash.net wrote:
Hey -- this was a question I got though: Is there a way to make UniData
VSS/Shadow-Copy 'aware'?
Does that
8403 (and up depending on the ini file settings)
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Kevin King ke...@precisonline.com wrote:
What TCP/IP port# does Redback typically use?
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
just note, by the book, your u2 licenses which are sold as embedded product
are nontransferable - by the book.
that's not to say you can't outright go buy new u2 licenses - but again,
(depending on Epicor's VAR agreement with Rocket, IBM, et all) you may not
have transferable u2 licenses.
m
On
This is the reason you always place CASE 1 at the end... :-)
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Sallis
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 11:00 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Strange CASE
Can Domino use the .NET DLL directly? The .NET DLL should work in both x32
and x64.
You have anyone who can write a wrapper for that DLL if not?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
jim.sto...@esc.edu
I think Doug means actually on the U2 server sans client pc.
Doug: is spooling the job as PCL and calling ghostscript out of bounds?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dianne Ackerman
Sent: Tuesday,
Can you at least say southern CA or northern NY or something in the
ballpark of where on earth it is located?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Chelston
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:22 AM
.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Marc Harbeson
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:38 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] PICK Systems Administrator position
Can you at least say southern CA or northern NY
to the traumas of
those that have tried to transition off to other offerings with great
difficulty.
On 4/6/2011 12:46 PM, Marc Harbeson wrote:
Different products within the Epicor offering. The flagship hunk of
junk
- E9 runs on progress.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun
...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Marc
Harbeson
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 11:38 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] PICK Systems Administrator position
Can you at least say southern CA or northern NY or something in
the ballpark
ROTFL - it's just like that super bowl commercial - except it's real
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of fft2...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 5:02 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
deal with it means ON ERROR clause
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Colin Alfke
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 12:42 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] Trigger questions
By definition -
I sure wish UniData had a OnRead trigger :-)
It sure would be handy to mask out fields at the read operation globally
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
Sent: Friday, March 25,
Your admins should be able to exempt u2tech.files.wordpress.com while
leaving wordpress.com locked down...
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Glorfield, Gordon
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 1:35 PM
To:
I 2nd that!
no issues.
Now, if you use classic COM UniObjects - that's a different story. :-)
On 2/18/2011 9:17 AM, Jeff Schasny wrote:
I am developing and using applications with UniObjects.NET on 64 bit
Windows 7 and have had no problems.
Jacques G. wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to know if
I think the performance kick you see in SQL is more related to how multiple
rows are read in a database page from disk...
I could be wrong.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of fft2...@aol.com
Sent:
LOL
In my mind - there would be a operator map tool here - I don't think the
tool could be self aware enough to figure out every possible combination of
everything.
It could certainly guess 80% correctly and be corrected on the remaining
20% on suggesting maps.
I see this with data going from
A session is a open telnet / uniobjects session.
OPEN is the key word (as in active open in use) :-)
It's just like you have now, but a single MAC / IP address is allowed
multiple sessions up to X to combine into 1 license.
I think Enterprise edition already has the 10 device.
It would be
Have you considered placing a wrapper around their program?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
bradley.sch...@usbank.com
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:40 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Sending
Hasnt 3/7/2010 long passed?!?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Address
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:04 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] AUTO: Haydon Bishop is out of the office. (returning
I use Bartender on the host (or on a windows host if NIX)
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:40 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] AccuTerm File Transfer
I
Wouldn't you just SELECT xxx FIRST 100
?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
fft2...@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:38 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] TOP/LIMIT
Woa - this one right here just picked up a large pack of users.
LOL
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:52 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2]
You got to admit, they are good at whatever it is they do... LOL
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 4:37 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] Problem
I would be curious why IBM has decided to do this, and why Rocket?
I can't imagine U2 was not a profit center for IBM.
The good news (I think): The tech pubs should get easier to access now
that IBM is out of the way!!! ROTFL
-Original Message-
From:
Why not set a task lock such as BookingTasks to allow one process to
perform this task at a time? (Or is that an issue?)
When I say task lock, I mean a lock on a scratch record that does not
exist.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
And I usually read a known voc entry to reset its idle time out to keep
it awake.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David A.
Green
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:09 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re:
If this were windows, I would throw memory leak out there.
I've seen certain SELECT statements in Unidata leak - to the point the
U2 PID eventually dies a very bad death back to the shell.
On windows, we can see this using process explorer.
-Original Message-
From:
Dell Poweredge 2900, 4 core, 2 cpu Xeon - 16gb ram, UDT 6.1 - Windows
2003 R2
s = ''
z = STR('*', 1000)
t1 = SYSTEM(12)
FOR i = 1 TO 10
s-1 = z
NEXT i
t2 = SYSTEM(12)
CRT t2 - t1
Output: 1219
___
U2-Users mailing
I'm not sure you want to use this feature - as I believe Indexing may
not behave as expected when using it. :-)
I'm speaking from memory, so it's been a while since I've seen this.
But if I recall correctly, the index stops indexing after it encounters
this record.
(or something like that)
It
Build yourself a heartbeat.
Have it read something from the VOC every now and then. :-D
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Leckie
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 12:33 PM
To:
From TCL: LIMIT?
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 10:34 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Unidata limits - Where are they documented?
I have a
Can't you just FORMLIST them, then list?
Aka:
CLIENTIDS = 1:@AM:2
FORMLIST CLIENTIDS TO 0
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 2:44 PM
To: U2 Mail List
What about something along the lines of splitting the client ID's into
two (or more) lists, selecting, and then MERGE.LIST them together then
list?
Kind of difficult to guess around it without seeing the whole picture.
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
What about updatevoc from DOS? (Does UV have that?)
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony G
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:55 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Requirements for
No, but they do conform to an SQL standard... Just like Oracle, mySQL,
etc.
IF IBM is going to publish an ODBC driver, it should be SQL compliant.
(At least behave the same as any other ODBC driver would minus the VSG
crap)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
If IBM knows CR has not worked right since Version 9 you would think
IBM would have adapted their interface to strip quotes...
Obviously CR running in other OLE-DB environments IS compliant.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
SELECT FIELDS FROM TABLE_ASSOC TABLE_ASSOC could just as well read
SELECT FIELDS FROM TABLE_ASSOC MY_SELECTED_TABLE
It does conform to SQL...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:14 AM
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Harbeson
Sent: 17 September 2008 14:57
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Crystal Reports and UniData
SELECT FIELDS FROM TABLE_ASSOC TABLE_ASSOC could just as well read
SELECT FIELDS FROM TABLE_ASSOC MY_SELECTED_TABLE
It does conform
Have you considered the network might be the issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Dodds
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 5:42 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Server 2003
I have a client that is a running 2003 Server
One acronym: BCI
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kent
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 6:30 PM
To: U2Users
Subject: [U2] Getting daily data from SAP from Universe
Hi all
ideally my client would like Universe to interogate SAP,
Couldn't you just create a wrapper that strips away the extra two and
then calls it? (Have no AccuTerm experience here, just speaking from
the pure U2 point of view)
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brenda Price
Sent: Thursday, July
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Harbeson
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 7:26 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Using ETL to extract data from UD to SQL
Well, MITS does a SELECT against their copy, then against the source
copy and then merge the list. So
Well, MITS does a SELECT against their copy, then against the source
copy and then merge the list. So - the larger it gets - well (Not
to mention I think MITS is a hunk of glorified crap)
I've had no issues using triggers. (My box is huge thou)
Agreed: VSG sucks.
Epicor ETL's CDC is
:-)
We wrote our engine to quarantine records that error out - which dirty
SQL data would cause.
What you do with the quarantined records is up to you. LOL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clifton Oliver
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008
I demoed Epiror's variant of this product, and found that is does indeed
look quite nice, but it still is a batch update / scheduled update tool.
Therefore myself and a few friends went forward with building something
that can perform transactional updates using triggers, BCI and ODBC
client
In this case, simply re-labeling the Enter key as Any would be the
best way to proceed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin Alfke
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 4:13 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Press any key to
Has anyone considered submitting the transactions to said phantom, and
have one process control the writes?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen B
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 10:53 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2]
No, fast systems can generate records faster than SYSTEM(12) - so you
need something to check the timestamp on SYSTEM(12) and handle
accordingly.
We've used a common block to do this.
As far as two users writing the same time/date/mili - well you're going
to need a port ID or a system to lock a
between processes?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Harbeson
Sent: 24 April 2008 14:42
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Guaranteed unique sequential keys
No, fast systems can generate records faster than SYSTEM(12) - so you
Lol
Now you've opened up the GOTO or LOOP REPEAT debate. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DAVID WADEMAN
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:58 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2]
Only needed if you care about eventually running out of locks. LOL It
will run a few thousand transactions before it blows up the system. :-D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:51 AM
To:
I would like to see an individual UDT session consume over 2 gig hehehehe..
My largest one is 27M and itbs a service phantom executing other jobs.
On this wide open topic with no guidance as to what the performance issue is -
we're just throwing rocks at the wall... For all we know it could
I thought 2008 was mostly Vista SP1 deep down underneath all the Aero
fluff.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:45 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] U2 and winserver 2008
Only thing is that if you used subroutines - you would only have to
recompile the subroutines. :-)
For example (with no error checking flags, etc - no use of COMMON, etc)
CALL OPEN.THAT.FILE(F.HPMAST,HPMAST.FILE)
WAITFLAG = False
CALL LOCK.THAT.RECORD(F.HPMAST,HPMAST.KEY,WAITFLAG)
CALL
Or more long term in Louisville. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 12:21 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: Re: [U2]U2
Depends on what the communications environment is?
Our vendor for example recommends that the Web Portals be installed on a
separate web server because Dot Net is memory hungry.
The Web Portals use the RedBack gateway into UniData.
So I think the answer depends on what this environment
I thought that VSS took a point in time snapshot of the entire volume. That
any transactions would be read/write by the OS, and the VSS reader would read
the before data if you will.
From what I can tell the only drawback is the fact that IBM has not integrated
the DBPAUSE into a VSS driver
I have 45 Enterprise UniData 6.1
Just looking for examples of just how large some of you have scaled on Win
before crossing the boundary into Unix, and if you had any issues if you scaled
large scale (say larger than 100 user sessions)
:-)
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by
it's fine.
George Land
www.u2uk.com
On 12/9/07 19:15, Marc Harbeson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 45 Enterprise UniData 6.1
Just looking for examples of just how large some of you have scaled on Win
before crossing the boundary into Unix, and if you had any issues if you
scaled large
My *opinion* is that u2-community needs abolished.
As for the argument I don't have enough bandwidth in the 2000's for text
email - I don't buy it.
I think topics need *END OF THREAD* only when they become obscene, or out of
control - meaning someone is attacking someone else, or each other
I think it's kind of silly to have 2 lists, and silly rules about what can be
discussed where.
I agree that topics can be ignored based on subject line alone.
Other list servers I'm on - this is not an issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Yea - but if ANYONE knows how to avoid the SUBR it would be Trey Miller...
snicker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Eastwood
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:18 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] How to use LOCATE
Our VAR wrote their interface using the Versign Pay Flow Pro package.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 3:42 PM
To: u2-Users
Subject: [U2] Credit Card Processing
Hi all,
Does anyone have
Did you know what on Win32 this will leak memory at releases lower than
7.1 to the point it will core dump?
FOR X = 1 TO 5
Y = GETREADU()
NEXT X
Unconfirmed by IBM that this will to. (Var is still testing it)
FOR X = 1 TO 5
PERFORM SELECT FILE WITH B$Att1 = 'A' AND WITH
Does anyone have a known process that works for getting this access setup?
I've been round and round on this access, and my var does not know what else to
do. The var has no issue granting the access - but IBM has made it SO
complicated that apparently it takes a rocket scientist to figure it
That's why I suggested a web service method - by which each db could
employ whatever methodologies they have available - where the front end
could run the same transaction sets thru different back end API sets.
An example API might be Book Order or Ship Order for example.
I would imagine a full
I think the easiest would be to use a web service approach and have a
test suite that hooks to the two services and runs the same
transactions and time it. (Both DB's on the same hardware if not the
same machine)
How the back end does it - well, that does not matter. If it can be
written, its
Too bad all my experience is in UniData. :-) (Since I'm right across
the river and whatnot)
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Or if IBM legal is the issue - why not provide IBM the image, and let
the users download it from there.
I can't believe IBM is so backward they can't do this. (well, maybe I
can)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Normandin,
Jerry
Sent:
www.mits.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef Lee
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 3:01 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Re: Why are there no MV books?
Dawn,
On the http://www.tincat-group.com/mv/trilogy.html page,
the
Well, for distribution - this would need to be Linux - as I doubt
Microsoft will grant re-dist rights on Win32.
IBM seems to support Linux...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 1:13 PM
To:
Why can't the unpacking of the VM have the IBM license agreement in it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:49 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Incubator - News from the board
What about writing out a temp paragraph and executing that (build the
parameters into the temp PA)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boydell, Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:32 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2]
Or go into uniadmin, and change the shell for user X to CMD.EXE
instead of UDT.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vance Forste
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:42 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Universe on Windows
MERGE.LIST would combine different select lists...
See doc for the different options for the merge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jjuser ud2
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 3:33 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2][UD]
In UniData it does...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 9/1/2006 5:04 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Using DICT items in basic program
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/31/2006 05:42:44 AM:
CUT HERE
soapbox
This whole access think of IBM's is a big pile of crap.
You would think getting end CLIENTS access to what they NEED would be a
simple process - one that even the likes of Microsoft does better than
IBM is doing.
At least under the Informix flag we could get to the damn documents...
-mail to my manager, Nikhil Ramachandran, at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc Harbeson
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 11:09 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - tech support
soapbox
Do you have a license to use ODBC? Or Is your UniData licensed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dana Baron
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 8:11 AM
To: U2-Users
Subject: [U2] ODBC question
Hi,
While we're talking Unidata ODBC...
I'm
I know that issue existed on UniData 5, and Backup Exec 8 or so on Win
NT4 and 2000...
But with UniData 6, Backup Exec 10d, and Win 2003 I have not seen it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 6:27
Can't say I'm seeing the same thing you are...
Any user names on those PID's or SYSTEM?
Otherwise I would look at
http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/ProcessExplorer.html
It may help you identify who/what is starting these process.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or, lookup the existence of a bug, and then tell the var I want patch XX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 6:03 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Knowledgebase access
Kathy,
What about an index on an I-DESC? (Does universe do that?)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 5:03 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Double Indexes
I putzed around with
This is where the FIND command becomes handy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kevin King
Sent: Tue 9/27/2005 4:03 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Good Programming Practice Question.
And here's where the conflict begins.
Allen:
I know we've seen the same crappy code LOL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Allen E. Elwood
Sent: Tue 9/27/2005 4:27 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Good Programming Practice Question.
AhI always put my
WOW!
You go Wally. This time around was a lot faster!
Well done.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wally Terhune
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:13 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] 7.1 - PE is available
7.1 PEs ARE
A vb.net program with UO.NET and SQL drivers can work this task also...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 8:17 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] IBM ODBC vs Ardent ODBC driver
I
How about using file level security, and common area in your
subroutines.
Marc Harbeson
ERP/Systems Administrator
Brinly Hardy Company
O - (812) 218-7206
F - (812) 218-6084
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.brinly.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
No. I'm comfortable in VB.NET.
They (IBM) should have FINISHED the documentation.
The Docs exist for the COM version
Marc Harbeson
ERP/Systems Administrator
Brinly Hardy Company
O - (812) 218-7206
F - (812) 218-6084
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.brinly.com
-Original Message-
From
yea...
some vb.net sample code sure would have helped. only samples are in c#
was not any good c# samples on how to execute a SELECT FILE WITH BLA BLA
BLA also... just a generic SELECT ENTIRE FILE sample. (which is useless)
Otherwise once you get used to how its re-wired I think
The legal run around would be write a transaction interface for MV to
SQL, and float a SQL processor license solution on the web side...
At this point you think why do I want to even use a U2 backend?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Now she eats XML like candy.
:-)
and uses buzz words like Dot Net
-m
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 10:46 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2]: Epicor
Me too. But that
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
