...
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 17:33, Stuart Boydell wrote:
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karl,
Sounds interesting. So you have a screen that is 80 columns by
60 rows. Does that mean that you can than do PRINT @(0,60) to
get the bottom line of the screen? And can you do 132 by 60??
I use
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Karl L Pearson
Sent: 21 April 2004 19:20
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: What client platform do YOU use (Parallel to GUI thread)
I attended a VMWare symposium sponsored by IBM, Novell and a local
(quite large) consulting
Okay, I'll bite.
I use Linux exclusively, other than when forced to run win98 or win2000,
which I do on Linux in a VMware Workstation window, with my Linux
streaming video or audio running in the background... (my personal
touch)
Running gnome-terminal in 80x60 mode, I can connect to our
PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2004 04:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What client platform do YOU use (Parallel to GUI thread)
SO, I think to myself, I wonder what the REAL numbers are?.
According to http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html
Windows 90%+
Mac 4%
Linux
PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What client platform do YOU use (Parallel to GUI thread)
Okay, I'll bite.
I use Linux exclusively, other than when forced to run win98 or win2000,
which I do on Linux in a VMware Workstation window, with my Linux
streaming video
Steve,
I run a terminal emulator (Netterm) in 165x64 mode - no more because that's
the smallest font I can read on the 17 monitor here.
I run this on a Windows client against an aix/UV/SB+ app.
The main advantage being that it just gives me lots of read space for
programs.
And yes, if our users
Does anyone know of a reasonably priced terminal emulator for the Mac
that does *complete* VT100 or Wyse 50 emulation?
--
Regards,
Clif
On Apr 21, 2004, at 16:33, Stuart Boydell wrote:
Steve,
I run a terminal emulator (Netterm) in 165x64 mode - no more because
that's
the smallest font I
Oh, yeah. RTFArchive, huh? laughing
Did so. Found it. Thank you.
--
Regards,
Clif
On Apr 21, 2004, at 17:34, Bruce Nichol wrote:
Goo'day, Clif,
Check your own archive!
Asked this question some short time (months) ago.
Was pointed at a freebie (IIRC) French product.
--
u2-users mailing
Ross,
We do have Mac's here, around 30%. We have some Linux desktops as
well. We even have at least one Mac with Linux loaded. Currently our
Mac's run Comet to telnet into our system. The GUI our vendor expects us
to use is Wintegrate based. It is absolutely terrible for heads down data
Stamina Software
Visage an Evolution in Software Development
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Wells
Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2004 10:47 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: What client platform do YOU use (Parallel to GUI thread
in Software Development
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Debster
Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2004 11:39 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: What client platform do YOU use (Parallel to GUI thread)
dunno about thatThere are many
[snip]
I wonder what the REAL numbers are - I mean theory is one thing, but how do
the numbers stack up in the real world? How many people are there that
actually do use, or WANT to use (I'm talking management want here, not the
gee, if I had my way kind of thing) non-windows platforms on the
When Apple came out with the XServer we were all excited
and started looking at transitioning our servers and clients to
the Apple environment. This project never went anywhere
because IBM would not commit to supporting UniVerse in
that environment. Since Mac and XServer are OS X and
OS X is
In a message dated 4/20/2004 10:01:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
However my previous employer (7 years ago) which was based in
Portland, Oregon had 90% Macs and 10% MS Windows. The accounting department
had the Windows machines. Everyone else (about 200 or so) had
Are you saying UD/SB+ runs *natively* on Macs? Or that UD has an OS layer
for Macs? Or that you used Accuterm/Wintegrate to talk to some kind of
server ? Will
[snip]
No no, UD and SB+ were running on Sun Boxes. The Macs were desktop clients.
We ran an emulator from Carnation Software. The
mac2pick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Gordon Glorfield
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:36 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: What client platform do YOU use (Parallel to GUI thread)
Are you saying UD/SB+ runs *natively
is intended to operate
as an electronic signature under applicable law.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gordon Glorfield
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:36 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: What client platform do YOU use
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron White
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:22 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: What client platform do YOU use (Parallel to GUI thread)
When Apple came out with the XServer we were all excited
and started looking at transitioning our servers and clients to
the Apple
Anyone up for a little straw poll ?
A recurrent theme that I see played out in this related forums is the well, does it
run on MAC or Linux on the Desktop question. Often, when asked, the people that
raised the issue don't have either platform in their installation - it is merely a
standard
SO, I think to myself, I wonder what the REAL numbers are?.
According to http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html
Windows 90%+
Mac 4%
Linux1%
If anything over the last few years windows market share has been increasing as mac
which used
to be in excess of 5% fades slightly
20 matches
Mail list logo
