If others in your company are using Mercurial and the idea is to keep
everyone's source in the same repository, I would recommend exploring
Mercurial first. Perhaps you can ask your sql guys for Mercurial help
since they are already using it.
rex
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Wols Lists wrot
On 15/11/11 23:13, Barber, Bonnie wrote:
Thanks I will get a copy of git and take a look at it so we have an alternate
recommendation just in case mercurial does not work out.
Bonnie
I can't remember where I came across it, and what the differences were,
but there was an article some time ba
: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 5:05 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Mercurial/TortoiseHg source version control
On 15/11/11 20:47, Barber, Bonnie wrote:
> I will be glad to, if I ever get it figured out. I am still confused by all
> the new verbiage that goes with i
On 15/11/11 20:47, Barber, Bonnie wrote:
I will be glad to, if I ever get it figured out. I am still confused by all
the new verbiage that goes with it, for instance the statement in the reply
from WOL Lists:
Except that - iirc (I use git) - mercurial is a DVCS, so the concept of check-in/out
PICK person; this is all new stuff to me, LOL!!
>
>
>
> Bonnie
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Rex Gozar
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 1:24 PM
>
Without going in to much detail, this can all be done in Eclipse IDE. I
can copy all of the programs from an account to my workstation which can
then be loaded into any version control system that has an Eclipse plug-in
like MS Team Foundation Server, CVS, Subversion, Git, Mercurial, and
Perforce
Re: [U2] Mercurial/TortoiseHg source version control
Bonnie,
For CVS here, I setup TortoiseCVS to SSH into the linux machine and
checkout/checkin changes to the repository. For Mercurial/TortoiseHg
there should be something similar, e.g. hg push
ssh://hguser@192.168.1.5/hg/, so you can push yo
insensitive, you
could only have one. I don't know hg but this may also be true for the
repository if it's on a Windows server.
Cheers,
Stuart
From: Steve Romanow
Sent: 16-Nov-11 6:44
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Mercurial/TortoiseHg source version co
3:07 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Mercurial/TortoiseHg source version control
Tom,
I keep dictionaries, procs, Q-pointers, programs, and includes in CVS and
Mercurial. What do you mean by "PICK" aware?
rex
___
U2-Users mailing lis
Wol,
Even with DVCS, the convention is to designate one of the repositories
as the "master" so everyone can pull/push (checkin/checkout) their
changes that end up in a tagged release. The change in mindset has
more to do with "file versions" in CVS and Subversion versus "change
sets" in dvcs.
re
Tom,
I keep dictionaries, procs, Q-pointers, programs, and includes in CVS
and Mercurial. What do you mean by "PICK" aware?
rex
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
On 15/11/11 16:19, Rex Gozar wrote:
Bonnie,
I use CVS (currently porting my scripts to use Mercurial) for Universe
program version control.
A lot depends on your "version control" paradigm; many software
developers "checkout" their source code and "build" their software
from scratch. This is w
Does anyone know if PRC has a built-in feature to export all source
code into a flat-file/directory format? Either for the "head" version
or the entire repository? If it does, does it also import? It might
be nice to be able to allow "on the fly" changes to the development
repository, and still
re not
"PICK" aware.
Tom Whitmore
RATEX Business Solutions
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Rex Gozar
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:31 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Mercu
One thing to be aware of with whichever vcs you choose, pat attention
to end-of-line characters.
There are some configuration settings in mercurial to say "these are
always unix files" and will not let an checkin from a windows machine
inadvertently send dos Ctl-M's.
Git for aix is available here
Bonnie,
For CVS here, I setup TortoiseCVS to SSH into the linux machine and
checkout/checkin changes to the repository. For Mercurial/TortoiseHg
there should be something similar, e.g. hg push
ssh://hguser@192.168.1.5/hg/, so you can push your changes to your
designated repository. Is your repos
Behalf Of Rex Gozar
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:19 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Mercurial/TortoiseHg source version control
Bonnie,
I use CVS (currently porting my scripts to use Mercurial) for Universe
program version control.
A lot depends on your "version control
I use Mercurial for my Unidata source code (which is in DIR files).
Have been for maybe 2 years now. I do not try to run a separate
working directory for each dev. I basically act as a company
librarian and commit all changes for the team. It is not optimum, but
it works for us.
On Tue, Nov 15,
Tom,
Would it possible to export all the source code from PRC into a flat
file/directory format for Mercurial?
rex
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Tom Whitmore wrote:
> We use PRC, which is a "PICK" based product. We have seen a marked
> improvement in the whole development cycle since usin
Bonnie,
I use CVS (currently porting my scripts to use Mercurial) for Universe
program version control.
A lot depends on your "version control" paradigm; many software
developers "checkout" their source code and "build" their software
from scratch. This is what I do here; I make changes to the s
We use PRC, which is a "PICK" based product. We have seen a marked improvement
in the whole development cycle since using PRC.
Tom Whitmore
RATEX Business Solutions
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of B
21 matches
Mail list logo