-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date: 12/07/2011 05:00 PM
Subject:Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
I missed this email.
Q: Will UOJ be further developed and supported by Rocket in the future?
A: Yes. There are no plans
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Hi Dan,
Thanks for this information.
Can you tell us if Rocket has any plans to further develop / support the
original COM/OLE version of UniObjects? And in particular, are there any plans
to release a 64 bit version?
Thank you,
Jim Stoner
I've used both. There are syntax differences, especially with the UO,NET
since it adheres to the CLR. Both libraries did what I needed. I don't
know if UO,NET is a better solution, but it looks to me like it has been
kept up-to-date better. I am interested in UOJ because of new
dmcgr...@rocketsoftware.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date: 12/07/2011 05:00 PM
Subject:Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
I missed this email.
Q: Will UOJ be further developed and supported by Rocket
for any insights you care to share!
Jim Stoner
From: Symeon Breen syme...@gmail.com
To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date: 12/07/2011 01:18 PM
Subject:Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
Considering UOJ
] On Behalf Of
jim.sto...@esc.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 1:40 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Hi,
If Rocket is not going to be updating / supporting the original
UniObjects, we're looking at either creating a wrapper for UO.net, or
using UOJ. UOJ
: 14 December 2011 00:21
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
I only have experience with UOJ, so I can't offer any comparison, but I'd
suggest the extensiveness of the feature set of each API may be a moot point
depending on how you use them. For example, I've never
It was confirmed that UOJ isn't going away, which is good for
legacy development.
But my whole point was that for new development we don't need it,
never did.
From: Charles_Shaffer
Tony, What you say is true, and those tools would be
great in the right situation. But I am concerned
about
Analyst
NTN-Bower Corporation
From: Tony Gravagno 3xk547...@sneakemail.com
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org,
Date: 12/08/2011 03:32 PM
Subject:Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
It was confirmed that UOJ isn't going
From: Charles_Shaffer
Maybe I am asking the wrong question. Is there a
better way to interface Domino 8.5 to Unidata than UOJ?
IMO, UOJ probably is the best way. In the absence of anything
approaching a IBM Domino Connector for U2, I'm thinking ODBC
via Easysoft might be the only other
Great information John and Robert. Looks like UOJ is getting mature.
In my situation, it is attractive since we use Domino and Unidata
extensively. But, I do not want to invest my time in something that won't
be supported in the future.
My question for Rocket is Will UOJ be further
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Great information John and Robert. Looks like UOJ is getting mature.
In my situation, it is attractive since we use Domino and Unidata
extensively. But, I do not want to invest my time in something that won't
be supported in the future.
My
Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
charles_shaf...@ntn-bower.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:22 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Great information John and Robert. Looks
From: Charles Shaffer
My question for Rocket is Will UOJ be further
developed and supported by Rocket in the future?
From: Symeon Breen
Considering UOJ and UO.net are the only api's
available for u2 I would have thought yes
There's no good reason for that condition to exist. Rocket
-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
charles_shaf...@ntn-bower.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:22 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Great information John and Robert. Looks like
Tony,
What you say is true, and those tools would be great in the right
situation. But I am concerned about the future of UOJ. My understanding
is that the new Domino will allow jars to be directly accessed from the
Domino Designer. Just want to make sure that UOJ is not going to be
Hello,
Ok created a quick test routine to show problem(attached to end of
post). It simply gets a record from the demo database and dumps the
output, first the the system default character encoding, then setting
file.encoding and finally clientencoding:
$ echo $LANG
en_US.UTF-8
$ java
Hi John,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:01 AM, John Hester jhes...@momtex.com wrote:
We've been using UOJ with WebSphere App Server since around 2003. Not
quite the same as Domino, I realize, but at least under the same IBM
Java middleware umbrella. I can't offer a lot the way of best
practices,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Robert Colquhoun
robert.colquh...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be better for the rocket engineers to decide on a character
encoding to talk to the server with and set it as a separate define(or
hard code it maybe), according to oracle the basic encodings below
The RedHat default is incorrect for UOJ (at least up to
EL 5) and will result in MV delimiters being incorrectly translated
into
other ascii characters.
Thanks for the tip. Looks like we do have a problem with the LANG
setting.
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
I'll check with IBM and see if changing it
Thanks. This is very helpful.
Charles Shaffer
Senior Analyst
NTN-Bower Corporation
From: Tony Gravagno 3xk547...@sneakemail.com
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org,
Date: 12/01/2011 10:18 PM
Subject:Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Sent by:u2-users-boun
Hi,
I'm also interested in any advice / best practices for UO for Java on
Domino. It would certainly be nice to find a small user group to ask
questions and bounce around best practices.
I haven't tried using UniObjects for Java with Domino yet, but I have used
the original OLE/COM version
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org,
Date: 12/01/2011 02:53 PM
Subject:Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
Hi,
I'm also interested in any advice / best practices for UO for Java on
Domino. It would certainly be nice
] On Behalf Of
charles_shaf...@ntn-bower.com
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 1:08 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Uniobjects for Java and Domino 8
Jim Stoner Said
It would certainly be nice to find a small user group to ask questions
and bounce around best practices.
I would definitely
I follow John's policy in all web integration. All external
access comes through a single entry point which identifies the
purpose of the connection and transfers to an appropriate
subroutine. I also include logging abilities in most code, just
in case. Code below is made up for this example
25 matches
Mail list logo
