Margus,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 9 February 2004 10:23 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UV secondary index
Hello,
I have distributed UV file with total size about 2.5Gb.
I made
David,
I see the same effect on UV 10.0.15 on Win2K3 for Dynamic files, also for
Dictionaries (type 3).
LIST a file: no change to Windows file timestamp.
COUNT the same file: Windows file timestamp is updated.
!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Jeff,
Someone in Oz - maybe PRISM www.pri.com.au IIRC - does a U2 integration with
Microsoft Source Safe.
And someone on this list has created and sells a U2-specifi product. Check
the list archives.
HTH
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Folks,
Our system administrators have recently seen a few examples of System Error
Message 100102 get_expbuf: illegal level 0, current level 0. appearing in
the UV ERRLOG.
Can anyone tell me what this means, and what (if anything) we can do about
it?
UV 10.0.15 on Windows 2003 Server
Thanks
Gwen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gwen Buck
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 9:26 a.m.
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: UNCLASSIFIED [UV] System Error Message 100102
snip
Mike,
I can't tell you what your error
Barry,
Got neither of these verbs in my VOC
We run INFORMATION flavour, which one do you use?
But I've seen that error message before, when a program tried to execute the
DOS command, but the user didn't have the correct rights to cmd.exe.
Your UV users (a local group on the server, normally)
Hmm
When I do that on my W2K3 / UV 10 server, the right-button click menu has
debug greyed out.
Is that a UV 'feature', or have I got something configured wrong?
I am an Administrator of the server, and I installed UV on it, so I should
be fully enabled for this kind of work.
TIA
Mike
Tom,
Some aspects you haven't mentioned:
You are considering going to an 'IBM system', but which of the four
platforms are you thinking about?
Power/AIX?
Power/Linux?
x86/Linux?
x86/Windows?
We moved from HP-UX to IBM x86/Windows, it was no particular drama.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timothy Snyder
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 6:58 a.m.
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: UV - Database backup
[snip]
If you're doing it from the O/S level, you may want to use the
uv
Afraid not, Glenn
-
E:\IBM\UV\binuv -admin
E:\IBM\UV\bin
-
Nothing at all, I'm afraid
:-(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 9:45 a.m.
To:
Sorry LeRoy, I have confused you!
I don't have any problem killing a UniVerse task, I prefer to try this
sequence
LOGOUT pid, then
...\uv\bin\kill pid, a couple of times - almost always works,
then
...\uv\bin\kill -2 pid, then
...\uv\bin\kill -9 pid, then ONLY AS
Bill,
In my entirely unqualified opinion, I think IBM would be absolutely mad to
spend any time or money on an Itanium port. The Itanic looks sure to be
consigned to the trash-heap of history fairly quickly now that Intel have
admitted defeat and adopted the AMD64 instruction set.
I'd sit tight
Mark,
The last time I did this (it was quite a few years ago) we used an old PC
running some free (or very cheap) software that acted as a fax gateway. The
software may even have been called 'faxgate'. We created a text file in a
directory the gateway could see, it found the file, set up the
Ah yes, RAID :-(
Unfortunately you have to get the program into BEBUG state before you can
start the process of profiling, then enter a $ or # at the ever-popular
user-friendly :: prompt, then C, then when the program executes a STOP
it goes back to :: again and you have to enter C again to get
Hmm...
On my Win2K3 / UV 10.0.15 system
* LISTU says '3 users logged on the system.'
* USERS says '5 users logged on the system.'
* UniAdmin says '# of Users: 1', and
* uvlictool report_lic reports '5 license seats are in use.'
?
UniAdmin
Sara,
[@PATH seems to have nothing to do with the DOS Path, by the way!]
You can change the DOS Path in the ENV of your Telnet session (see below),
but this doesn't seem to stick if you DOS out from your UniVerse session [
I end up with Path=C:\Program! - note abrupt truncation at first space,
Like Wol and a couple of others, my participation as a listener and
occasional poster will stop if the medium changes from email to web or
news-group. My employer does not permit desktop internet access - we do have
a large and rich intranet - for reasons of security, of cost (we pay for
TRAFFIC
Hmm ... I thought that what IBM mean by 'embedded database' is
the database you didn't even know you had.
[8 words!]
I.E., there's a database 'embedded' in the software package you bought /
use, but you may have no idea that there is a database in there, and even if
you do understand that fact,
Steve,
Is the U2 database UD or UV?
This might be a 'flavour' issue,
if it's UD try substituting sELECT for SELECT.
if it's UV try WITH LAST NAME LIKE SMI...
or WITH LAST NAME LIKE \SMI...\
HTH
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
We are moving towards Microsoft BizTalk Server as the standard 'glue'
between our disparate systems.
[Yes, I know that the U2 products now talk to IBM's MQ-series products
natively, but we don't have any IBM infrastructure, we're mostly an MS shop.
Another big advantage is that BizTalk
Folks,
Our Systems Admin reports that whenever he tries to RESIZE a DYNAMIC file,
he gets this error message:-
__
RESIZE filename * * *
Unhandled exception raised at address 0x00405CF7 : Access violation
Attempted to read from address
Folks,
I notice that when I do two concurrent processes (like ANALYZE.FILE from one
window and SELECT from another window) on the same large (3GB,64-bit) file,
the 'Pages/sec' count in Win2K3 goes through the roof, even though the
'memory commit charge' is only 176MB out of 2465MB.
Maybe the
22 matches
Mail list logo
