Ha! Will pernickty Johnson is at it again.
Integrate as a verb I think applies to mathematics.
But if I say My software integrates well I think most
people would
think
A) you have math software ?
or
B) Your English is bad?
Damn! Sir, can't you also get a life?
Ain't this a technical
-Original Message-
From: george r smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:21 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: Question for Donald Kibbey
There are only 10 people in the world who understand binary
and I am not one
of them.
Your not 01, so you must
George, the best commercial integration option available for MV right now is
the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data. When IBM has UO.NET, that
situation may change, but developers must research and understand the
capabilities of both products before making assumptions and decisions - it
In a message dated 3/29/2004 2:28:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
George, the best commercial integration option available
for MV right now is
the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data.
But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
And doesn't
(adjusting tin foil headgear)
You do realize that Micro$oft is really in the hard drive business.
Of course .Net takes up a gazillion megabytes and to use my method of getting to
UniVerse with C# (so you can type in all those cool looking semi-colons) you'll have
to load another half gazillion
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:29 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Question for Donald Kibbey
George, the best commercial integration option available for
MV right now is the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining
Data. When IBM
But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
And doesn't integration require an object?
I can't speak of the Pick Data Provider for .NET, however, the .NET
framework itself doesn't take up a 'gazillion' bytes. The framework (free
download) is between 21 24MB (depending on the
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:57 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: Question for Donald Kibbey
In a message dated 3/29/2004 2:28:38 PM Eastern Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George, the best commercial integration option
available
for MV right
In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:15:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I don't really know what you are after with the
integration requiring an
object. Can you be more specific?
Regards,
Jim
Yes.
Integrate as a verb I think applies to mathematics.
But if I say My
It would have been easier if you just asked me to reread the original post
;-)
I think I know what Tony meant with his statement, but, it isn't appropriate
for me to answer for him so I won't.
Thanks for the English lesson - I think.
Regards,
Jim
[snip]
Integrate in this sense requires a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
George, the best commercial integration option available
for MV right now is
the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data.
But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space?
And doesn't integration require an object?
As in... integration with .. what?
Will
11 matches
Mail list logo
