[Bug 1749015] Re: 4.16 - VBOXGUEST not built

2018-03-06 Thread Fjodor
Seems to be fixed with rc4: smo@dell-smo:~$ grep VBOXGUEST /boot/config-4.16.0-041600rc4-generic CONFIG_VBOXGUEST=m ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1749015] [NEW] 4.16 - VBOXGUEST not built

2018-02-12 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Reporting by recommendation by apw on #ubuntu-kernel http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.16-rc1/ refers to 0006 -configs-based-on-Ubuntu-4.15.0-9.10.patch which, at line 1771 has +# CONFIG_VBOXGUEST is not set I am not in any position to demand a rebuild ahead

[Bug 1656921] Re: DKMS fails to build on current kernels

2017-01-17 Thread Fjodor
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1629870 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629870 How is it a duplicate, when the error message is a completely different one? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1629504] [NEW] Compiles, but brings on Oops on load with 4.8-rc

2016-09-30 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: I shall leave it to more Makefile-knowledgeable people to edit the Makefile to make certain that compilation fails on wrong pointer types, but what I saw was kernel Oopses when booting 4.8-rc on 16.04, specifically referencing wl. Having done some work on another wifi driver

[Bug 1484027] Re: systemd-tmpfiles-clean warns about duplicate /var/log line

2015-10-16 Thread Fjodor
Attached ignore rule - /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/systemd-tmpfiles should fix the issue (have yet to test), but whether this should be shipped by logcheck or by you guys, I really don't know. ** Attachment added: "/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/systemd-tmpfiles"

[Bug 1484027] Re: systemd-tmpfiles-clean warns about duplicate /var/log line

2015-08-31 Thread Fjodor
Please allow me to request for this to be reopened. When having logcheck installed, this "harmless warning" results in unnecessary, daily emails. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1484027

[Bug 1484027] [NEW] systemd-tmpfiles-clean reports warning in logs

2015-08-12 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Triggered by the two /var/log entries that were reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1434295, I get daily log messages from systemd-tmpfiles-clean saying: Aug 10 15:04:13 seraph systemd[1]: Starting Cleanup of Temporary Directories... Aug 10

[Bug 1230917] Re: php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

2014-11-11 Thread Fjodor
A bit over a year since the original report, fix is offered in the comments. What is keeping the responsible devs from fixing or explaining not fixing it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1230917] Re: php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

2014-11-11 Thread Fjodor
A bit over a year since the original report, fix is offered in the comments. What is keeping the responsible devs from fixing or explaining not fixing it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1325785] Re: UM discloses dark presence

2014-06-03 Thread Fjodor
Hi Marc, and thank you for answering. Being tired, annoyed and stupid precluded me from taking a screenshot, but on the upside, Update Manager seemed to work just peachy today. I wonder if what I saw might have been a rare code path that was meant to be removed, or whatever else caused it, but

[Bug 1325785] [NEW] UM discloses dark presence

2014-06-02 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: After a lot of back-and-forth, we finally managed to get update-manager to accept I'll restart later (bug reports abound, go look them up). Having savoured the bliss of seemingly getting back in control of my own system, I was most dismayed to find an update-manager window

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-05-30 Thread Fjodor
To be perfectly honest, in order to be able to defend this UX-wise atrocity, I think the persons responsible have a moral duty to explain in great detail to the developers and maintainers of every single other package manager - especially apt and dpkg - why they also need to implement this

[Bug 1182247] [NEW] check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-05-20 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: It would seem that check_ide_smart is defunct on my server, giving the following results when run manually: sune@jadis:~$ sudo /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_ide_smart -d /dev/sda -i -n CRITICAL - SMART_ENABLE: Input/output error CRITICAL - SMART_CMD_ENABLE Normal SMART

[Bug 1182247] [NEW] check_ide_smart fails with i/o error

2013-05-20 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: It would seem that check_ide_smart is defunct on my server, giving the following results when run manually: sune@jadis:~$ sudo /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_ide_smart -d /dev/sda -i -n CRITICAL - SMART_ENABLE: Input/output error CRITICAL - SMART_CMD_ENABLE Normal SMART

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-02-07 Thread Fjodor
Mathhew: I still can't thank you enough for actually working on this, but I'm afraid I still disagree with some of the premises: 1) No update (except kernel if you aren't running ksplice) should require a restart for it's own sake. dpkg does provide for restarting daemons, in which case they will

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-02-07 Thread Fjodor
Observe in the above comment that we shift the responsibility to ourselves, as developers, instead of just dictating that we want the user to, essentially, throw away most of the context and focus of whatever work was done since the last reboot, just because we are lazy... -- You received this

[Bug 1080818] Re: Sanitize and decouple dependencies - cover all scenarios

2013-02-01 Thread Fjodor
xnox: I hope you will accept my apologies for the lateness of my reply, but I hope the following will answer your question: 1) It doesn't add value to my use case 2) It increases complexity 3) It seems to introduce a tight coupling to a non-related component (upstart) 4) Have you ever looked at

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-01-23 Thread Fjodor
thedanyes: As will be apparent from my comments above, you and I agree on this problem, but UX-wise, there should not be exactly *one* button - OK, since some people might wonder whether that will trigger said reboot. Thus, as I think has been covered above, there should be exactly two buttons,

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-01-17 Thread Fjodor
Matthew: It's really great to see you put so much work into this - though we may disagree, you are actually doing something! I'd have to say that the upper left version appeals to me the most, although I disagree a bit with the phrasing. To the best of my knowledge, most *nix software doesn't

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-01-15 Thread Fjodor
Matthew, well, you are correct, of course, that the dialog asking for a reboot has been improved with an option to minimise it, but I still fail to see what the point in not making it closeable might be. This, to me, constitutes suggesting an immediate reboot. Anyway, barring a simple,

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-01-14 Thread Fjodor
Mathhew: Would it be reasonable for me to assume, then, that you will quit the nagging if you, somehow, magically, detect that I run Ksplice? Regardless, a very valuable part of security assessment is possible attack vectors, and I'd be hard pressed to agree that prompting me to restart my

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-01-10 Thread Fjodor
First of all, Matthew, thank you for actually working on this! However, the following fresh idea might be based on a lack of knowledge about a change in the state of affairs of Linux software (possibly attributable to sky-rocketing complexity), but except for upgrades to large swaths of core

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2013-01-08 Thread Fjodor
Re the past 3 comments, I'd like to suggest no repeat nagging, but instead of the text Restart Later, we might say I'll restart (by my?) myself or something to that effect. Not only does that mimic the earlier behaviour of restart later, but it actually and actively gives the message that the

[Bug 1048792] Re: org.freedesktop.Dbus error while trying to erase USB key with Startup disk creator

2012-11-26 Thread Fjodor
I noticed what appears to be symptoms of https://bugs.launchpad.net/udisks/+bug/689593 when this happened. This bug might depend on that... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048792

[Bug 1080818] [NEW] Sanitize and decouple dependencies - cover all scenarios

2012-11-19 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Scenario: Trying a lot of different ways to disable plymouth, I find system shutdown to print umount: / busy on reboot/shutdown, with a subsequent forced fsck at boot. Current status of disable project is adding plymouth.enable=0 to GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX in /etc/default/grub

[Bug 1033226] Re: No close option, only restart

2012-11-17 Thread Fjodor
One of my main selling points when encouraging my friends and family to switch to Linux (and Ubuntu in particular) has been that restarts are seldom necessary - hitherto proudly displayed by the Restart Later button. Incidentally, I'm not aware of any equivalent to the workaround mentioned in #2

[Bug 934471] Re: vlc crashed with SIGSEGV in dvdnav_describe_title_chapters()

2012-04-04 Thread Fjodor
I can confirm that this patch works for me -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934471 Title: vlc crashed with SIGSEGV in dvdnav_describe_title_chapters() To manage notifications about

[Bug 730990] Re: Super/windows keypresses always present

2012-03-29 Thread Fjodor
Confirmed January 18th, still unassigned... Really? Incidentally, with 0.9.3 here, pressing Super once, as suggested in the above link, does nothing. Super is on from login to logoff for me, connecting to a local VM running 12.04 Beta from an 11.10 host. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 632696] Re: libvirt won't start a VM with serial or console

2012-03-19 Thread Fjodor
Seeing this in Oneiric stock, as well as Oneiric with libvirt etc. from Precise. Even tried ln -s /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.libvirtd /etc/apparmor.d/disabled to no avail. Seems to focus on opening a fd and pt_chown'ing it: Mar 19 16:03:51 jekaterina kernel: [ 2029.039478] type=1400

[Bug 926156] [NEW] Warning: Hidden file found: /dev/.initramfs: symbolic link to `/run/initramfs' (fixed upstream)

2012-02-03 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: rkhunter reports the warning in the summary - it would appear that thisis caused by a bug that Ubuntu's non-standard way of doing things exposed, and according to http://rkhunter.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rkhunter/rkhunter/files/CHANGELOG?view=log this was fixed 3,5 months

[Bug 776952] Re: wpa_supplicant ior NM crashes wireless router (dd-wrt)

2011-11-21 Thread Fjodor
Hmmm, status is Confirmed but it is still unassigned. I have presented a full and working workaround, namely pulling a commit from 3.1 that undoes a change from 2.6.38 but no one seems interested? What's up with that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 776952] Re: wpa_supplicant ior NM crashes wireless router (dd-wrt)

2011-10-17 Thread Fjodor
commit 2249b011432ca3dcce112f0f71e0f531b4bb9347 in the 3.1 series fixes it for me. See https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/28/666 for discussion. Thus I suggest pulling said commit. What is interesting for me, and the reason why I reported it as a wpa_supplicant/NM bug is, that the original commit that

[Bug 864968] Re: libgdk_pixbuf2.0.so.0 2.22 has undefined symbol from libglib 2.28, but maverick is 2.26

2011-10-05 Thread Fjodor
Hmmm, apparently a newer version had sneaked in during a manual recovery of the system. Sorry about the noise :-$ ** Changed in: gdk-pixbuf (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 864968] [NEW] libgdk_pixbuf2.0.so.0 2.22 has undefined symbol from libglib 2.28, but maverick is 2.26

2011-10-02 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: sune@jadis:~$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 [snip the libs] undefined symbol: g_simple_async_result_take_error (/usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0) sune@jadis:~$ g_simple_async_result_take_error was introduced in GLib 2.28, but the official maverick version is

[Bug 776952] Re: wpa_supplicant ior NM crashes wireless router (dd-wrt)

2011-06-10 Thread Fjodor
Anyone? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776952 Title: wpa_supplicant ior NM crashes wireless router (dd-wrt) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 776952] [NEW] wpa_supplicant ior NM crashes wireless router (dd-wrt)

2011-05-04 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wpasupplicant Upon upgrade to Natty, wifi-connection to my gf's router (Buffalo WZR- HP-G300NH with dd-wrt) drops with no possibility to reconnect until after a router power cycle. Since rsyslogd in Natty is non-functional atm, I can't provide logs, and

[Bug 683016] Re: emacs23/rxvt/xawtv/vlc crash Xorg w/ proprietary NVIDIA driver

2011-04-01 Thread Fjodor
Ashley's suggestion of removing xfs worked for me... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683016 Title: emacs23/rxvt/xawtv/vlc crash Xorg w/ proprietary NVIDIA driver -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 744583] Re: upgradeprovision crashed with LdbError in connect(): (80, 'Failed to load modules from: /usr/lib/samba/ldb\n')

2011-03-29 Thread Fjodor
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728840 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728840 Incidentally, the link to bug #728840 goes to an error page stating that no such page exists... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 744581] [NEW] package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-03-28 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba4 Just issuing report from upgrade... ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-rc4-sune-1 x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 28

[Bug 744581] Re: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-03-28 Thread Fjodor
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744581 Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation

[Bug 650539] Re: SRU: Launching a Qt app crashes X when using Xinerama

2011-02-24 Thread Fjodor
Neither fixed in 7.3 nor in packages from xorg-edgers for me. Could some of us be seeing a different problem with the same symptoms? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650539

[Bug 601964] [NEW] package virtualbox-ose-guest-dkms 3.2.0-dfsg-1ubuntu1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: virtualbox-ose-guest kernel module failed to build

2010-07-05 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose Just reporting through bug reporter. Kernel is custom-built 2.6.35-rc3 with ureadahead patch ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: virtualbox-ose-guest-dkms 3.2.0-dfsg-1ubuntu1~lucid1 Uname: Linux

[Bug 601964] Re: package virtualbox-ose-guest-dkms 3.2.0-dfsg-1ubuntu1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: virtualbox-ose-guest kernel module failed to build

2010-07-05 Thread Fjodor
** Attachment added: DKMSBuildLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51419125/DKMSBuildLog.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51419126/Dependencies.txt -- package virtualbox-ose-guest-dkms 3.2.0-dfsg-1ubuntu1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 578527] Re: map serial port throws chardev: opening backend tty failed

2010-05-27 Thread Fjodor
I request that the importance be heightened, as this also affects installation of new VMs, effectively making that impossible. I'd say that approaches a major fault... -- map serial port throws chardev: opening backend tty failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578527 You received this bug

[Bug 578527] Re: map serial port throws chardev: opening backend tty failed

2010-05-27 Thread Fjodor
I request that the importance be heightened, as this also affects installation of new VMs, effectively making that impossible. I'd say that approaches a major fault... -- map serial port throws chardev: opening backend tty failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578527 You received this bug

[Bug 496334] Re: boxbackup-client complains about /home/*/.gvfs

2010-05-10 Thread Fjodor
Would anyone please, at least, acknowledge this report? -- boxbackup-client complains about /home/*/.gvfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 533549] Re: package yaml-mode 0.0.4-2 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-04-27 Thread Fjodor
Got it too... -- package yaml-mode 0.0.4-2 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533549 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 496334] [NEW] boxbackup-client complains about /home/*/.gvfs

2009-12-13 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: From /var/log/daemon.log : Dec 13 23:40:32 jekaterina bbackupd[25755]: NOTICE: Box Backup Client v0.11rc2+2502, (c) Ben Summers and contributors 2003-2008 Dec 13 23:40:32 jekaterina bbackupd[25757]: NOTICE: Starting daemon, version: 0.11rc2+2502 Dec 13 23:40:32 jekaterina

[Bug 355155] Re: Clocksource tsc unstable leads to lockups in Ubuntu Jaunty

2009-07-24 Thread Fjodor
No freezes for a week since I started booting with maxcpus=1, though that, naturally, isn't a solution, but only more of a fix until this gets resolved. Also, I'd like to share the info that the last time I had this sort of uptime, was during a period of a severely degraded internet connection.

[Bug 402186] Re: No icons with Kopete

2009-07-22 Thread Fjodor
Short explanation given on 88818. Sorry for the inconvenience :-$ -- No icons with Kopete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 355155] Re: Clocksource tsc unstable leads to lockups in Ubuntu Jaunty

2009-06-21 Thread Fjodor
For what it's worth, my problems sound very much like the original report, however, I have noticed that I usually get an uptime of a couple of days with 2.6.28, but only half or whole hours with 2.6.29 or 2.6.30. Based on those (admittedly informal) numbers, I should perhaps note that I have just

[Bug 234975] Re: hostname not recognised in /etc/sudoers

2008-11-20 Thread Fjodor
I'll fire up the machine later and check, but are you saying that I should make an entry in /etc/hosts, mapping tommelise to 127.0.0.1, if there isn't such a mapping already? Mapping it to any other IP address would be weird, since it's a laptop that I use on a number of nets, getting different

[Bug 226328] Re: Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process

2008-06-24 Thread Fjodor
Bump? -- Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 229929] Re: amcheck-clients is missing

2008-05-25 Thread Fjodor
Anyone? -- amcheck-clients is missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 229920] Re: chg-multi too new (calls amdevcheck_status)

2008-05-25 Thread Fjodor
Anyone? -- chg-multi too new (calls amdevcheck_status) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 229920] [NEW] chg-multi too new (calls amdevcheck_status)

2008-05-13 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: chg-multi tries to call amdevcheck_status, which is defined in later versions' chg-lib.sh (where it, in turn, calls said versions' amdevcheck). In 2.5.2, however, neither is amdevcheck available, nor is amdevcheck_status defined... I see this in Hardy's amanda 2.5.2p1-1

[Bug 229929] [NEW] amcheck-clients is missing

2008-05-13 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amanda-server [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/amanda/DailySet1$ amcheck DailySet1 Amanda Tape Server Host Check - Holding disk /dumps/amanda: 35249 MB disk space available, using 35149 MB slot 1: read label `DailySet101', date `X'

[Bug 229929] Re: amcheck-clients is missing

2008-05-13 Thread Fjodor
Indeed amcheck-clients seem not to be a part of 2.5.2, or at least it isn't called from amcheck.c *in their own 2.5.2 repo*. Wouldn't it be nice if server-src/amcheck.c in a package purporting to be 2.5.2 actually contained 2.5.2 code? -- amcheck-clients is missing

[Bug 116290] Re: No choice of language for spell checking

2008-05-08 Thread Fjodor
This indeed a lack of an incredibly basic and, I imagine, most useful feature. I have seen other apps miss this point too, though. In light of this, wouldn't a panel app for changing the current (or default) language for GtkSpell be a neat idea? Best regards, F -- No choice of language for

[Bug 226328] Re: Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process

2008-05-04 Thread Fjodor
I think I traced that one to an attempted access to /dev/vbi0. Why, and for what purpose, I don't know, though. It's just that the message disappears if I set the vbi device to blank. The code even seems to take this as a sign that the card is bt878 (which it is), and does something else instead.

[Bug 226328] [NEW] Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process

2008-05-03 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mythtv-backend Attempting to Watch Live TV results in black screen for a number (10-ish?) of seconds and then I get the initial mythfrontend menu. That one complains, though, that the connection to the backend is lost. Any attempt to restart the backend

[Bug 226328] Re: Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process

2008-05-03 Thread Fjodor
** Attachment added: Zombie process http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14182248/ps.txt -- Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 226328] Re: Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process

2008-05-03 Thread Fjodor
** Attachment added: Excerpt from backend log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14182258/backend.txt -- Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 226328] Re: Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process

2008-05-03 Thread Fjodor
** Attachment added: lspci output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14182259/lspci.txt -- Watching or recording - backend crashes to zombie process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 215196] Re: [gutsy] Edit - Current Profile - Title and Command - Run command as login shell isn't honoured

2008-04-18 Thread Fjodor
As said, I'm closing it. I guess it should be marked invalid, since it was a borked .bash_profile that caused it. I do wonder, however, if I should file a bug for bash... ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = (unassigned) Status:

[Bug 215196] Re: [gutsy] Edit - Current Profile - Title and Command - Run command as login shell isn't honoured

2008-04-18 Thread Fjodor
Hey, thanks for the comment. However, I found out late last night, that I had an error in .bash_profile, attempting to source .bashrc twice. Why exactly that left me with unset variables, I can't explain, but it works now. Thus, I'll close the bug, or ask one of you guys to do it, if it turns

[Bug 215196] [NEW] [gutsy] Edit - Current Profile - Title and Command - Run command as login shell isn't honoured

2008-04-10 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal 1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 7.10 Release:7.10 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy gnome-terminal gnome-terminal: Installed: 2.18.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.18.2-0ubuntu1 Version table:

[Bug 123078] Re: System - Quit takes a long time to appear

2007-12-18 Thread Fjodor
from last beta of 7.10 and upgraded accordingly. Something is clearly wrong! /Fjodor -- System - Quit takes a long time to appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 160166] Re: update-manager checks for updates instead of upgrading

2007-11-16 Thread Fjodor
Nope, just plain Ubuntu... -- update-manager checks for updates instead of upgrading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 160166] update-manager checks for updates instead of upgrading

2007-11-05 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Installation from last beta, now fully updated... When I launch the update-manager and click on Install Updates, the Checking for Updates-dialog appears, completes, and nothing further happens, in other words, it behaves exactly as when I

[Bug 160166] Re: update-manager checks for updates instead of upgrading

2007-11-05 Thread Fjodor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo do-release-upgrade [sudo] password for sunem: Checking for a new ubuntu release No new release found -- update-manager checks for updates instead of upgrading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 160166] Re: update-manager checks for updates instead of upgrading

2007-11-05 Thread Fjodor
Usual behaviour. As a matter of fact, that is how I upgrade, since update-manager isn't working... -- update-manager checks for updates instead of upgrading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact

[Bug 136653] Re: emacs22 does not install (upgrade) properly

2007-09-10 Thread Fjodor
Removing yatex does not solve the problem :-( Thanks, though... -- emacs22 does not install (upgrade) properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 136653] Re: emacs22 does not install (upgrade) properly

2007-09-10 Thread Fjodor
It didn't work, because there was also a problem with xae. Removing both solved the problem. However, xae seems to be removed from the repo, but subsequently reinstalling yatex also worked :-) /Fjodor -- emacs22 does not install (upgrade) properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136653 You

[Bug 136653] Re: emacs22 does not install (upgrade) properly

2007-09-09 Thread Fjodor
** Attachment added: emacs22.DU8914 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9199274/emacs22.DU8914 -- emacs22 does not install (upgrade) properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 96566] Re: movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions

2007-06-18 Thread Fjodor
I also opened https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384774 Also, I think the importance is set a bit too low at low, as it is effectively preventing reading local mail with thunderbird, unless one sets up a pop3 or imap4 server, which I would see as overkill... -- movemail account does

[Bug 96566] Re: movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions

2007-06-18 Thread Fjodor
I would most certainly advice against disabling it! The problems _can_ be worked around by the (more or less) knowledgeable and the option should thus remain. Preferably, one should make the problematic setup better instead! -- movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions

[Bug 96566] Re: movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions

2007-06-16 Thread Fjodor
While I too can reproduce in Feisty, I am not convinced it's a problem with permissions on /var/mail, unless thunderbird studpidly checks the permissions instead of having movemail do it. I base this on the fact that I am perfectly able to run movemail stand-alone... -- movemail account does not

[Bug 96566] Re: movemail account does not work with default /var/mail permissions

2007-06-16 Thread Fjodor
Yes, so I found out. However, I also found out that the external movemail uses other locking techniques when unable to create a lock file, and have thus commented on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56671 to ask to have support for an external movemail. That bug is only almost 7 years

[Bug 110585] Re: 7.04 Server install fails on Compaq Proliant DL360

2007-06-11 Thread Fjodor
Hehe, that is actually exactly what I did. However, I think ubuntu ought to work on those machines too... -- 7.04 Server install fails on Compaq Proliant DL360 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 110585] Re: 7.04 Server install fails on Compaq Proliant DL360

2007-06-09 Thread Fjodor
Same on dl380... -- 7.04 Server install fails on Compaq Proliant DL360 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 110585] Re: 7.04 Server install fails on Compaq Proliant DL360

2007-06-09 Thread Fjodor
Problem persists with gutsy server installer... -- 7.04 Server install fails on Compaq Proliant DL360 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 49955] Re: depmod -ae isn't run on user built install

2007-06-01 Thread Fjodor
Hi Jérôme, Actually, I wouldn't know, as I have switched to install nVidia drivers via nVidia's own install packages. Sorry. -- depmod -ae isn't run on user built install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 116648] internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

2007-05-24 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcc-4.1 To reproduce: try building madwifi-0.9.3.1 on feisty. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/madwifi$ make Checking requirements... ok. Checking kernel configuration... ok. make -C /lib/modules/2.6.20-15-generic/build SUBDIRS=/home/sune/src/madwifi-0.9.3.1

[Bug 97092] Re: Conflicting declarations in libc6-dev and libpthread-dev

2007-05-22 Thread Fjodor
I see the same trying to compile seamonkey-1.1.1 /Fjodor -- Conflicting declarations in libc6-dev and libpthread-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 36014] Re: kernel can't scale cpu frequency

2006-09-22 Thread Fjodor
PROTECTED]:~$ sudo modprobe speedstep-centrino FATAL: Error inserting speedstep_centrino (/lib/modules/2.6.17.11-ubuntu1-pentium4m-7/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.ko): No such [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /Fjodor -- kernel can't scale cpu frequency https://launchpad.net/bugs/36014

[Bug 36014] Re: kernel can't scale cpu frequency

2006-09-22 Thread Fjodor
Sorry, didn't see the Don't paste into comments. -5 karma points to me :-( -- kernel can't scale cpu frequency https://launchpad.net/bugs/36014 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 54804] Re: I/O slow on sata/xfs

2006-08-27 Thread Fjodor
Then I guess you have to reject it, as it self-compiled. Is there any chance for me to drop by the devel channel and have a chat about it anyways? Best regards, Fjodor -- I/O slow on sata/xfs https://launchpad.net/bugs/54804 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 54804] I/O slow on sata/xfs

2006-08-01 Thread Fjodor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.17 Compiled as per http://molgaard.org/ubuntu/config-2.6.17.6-ubuntu1-pentium4m-1 Source is ubuntu 5.16 I use the linux-source-2.6.17 dir as reference. Size is 447M in all. Copying to a new dir took over 10 minutes. Removing that dir

[Bug 18465] Re: gksudo ignores NOPASSWD

2006-07-18 Thread Fjodor
gksu 1.3.7 (current dapper) works on 386, but still shows the dialog on amd64, same version. gconf-editor apps/gksu shows sudo mode to be default. -- gksudo ignores NOPASSWD https://launchpad.net/bugs/18465 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 49955] Re: depmod -ae isn't run on user built install

2006-06-19 Thread Fjodor
Didn't see this was restricted-modules (had the link sent to me). It is actually nvidia-kernels-source, and thus resulting packages. Is it possible to move bugs, and would someone be kind enough to do it? /Sune -- depmod -ae isn't run on user built install https://launchpad.net/bugs/49955 --