[Bug 929522] Re: apt.conf.d/20packagekit fails to check for gdbus being installed

2012-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929522 Title: apt.conf.d/20packagekit fails to check for gdbus being

[Bug 886967] Re: projectm crash

2011-12-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Yes, the SVN version has a patch for this, which I will backport to projectM asap. Sorry, I forgot to mention this on this bug here :P ** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion

[Bug 916955] [NEW] Sync projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-12 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-01-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
* Unbind FBO when done (might fix some OGL errors) -- Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:31:08 +0100 ** Affects: projectm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 898891] Re: Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.PackageKit timed out

2012-01-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! :) You don't need to confirm this bug anymore, it has been validated now. As soon as the new PackageKit is available, this bug will be gone. (Although it will be a workaround, since this could also be an issue with Ubuntu's toolchain, since Debian and Fedora don't have this problem) You can

[Bug 886173] Re: Refresh software updates produces unexpected error

2012-01-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Is this issue still valid? It should not happen with newer versions of PK. ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886173

[Bug 521789] Re: Backend crash trying to install local file

2012-01-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521789 Title: Backend crash trying to install local file To manage notifications

[Bug 880520] Re: internal system error Ubuntu 11.04

2012-01-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880520 Title: internal system error Ubuntu 11.04 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 886173] Re: Refresh software updates produces unexpected error

2012-01-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886173 Title: Refresh software updates produces unexpected error To manage

[Bug 917872] Re: PackageKit not provided

2012-01-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Did you install the packagekit package? ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917872 Title: PackageKit not provided To

[Bug 917872] Re: PackageKit not provided

2012-01-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I just checked it: The PK GStreamer plugin should pull in PackageKit, so this is okay. The question is: Do you have a PackageKit frontend, like Apper or GNOME-PackageKit, installed? Thanks for the report kind regards, Matthias -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 917872] Re: PackageKit not provided

2012-01-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, thanks for the response! Making the package recommend at least one of the frontends might be a good idea indeed, I'll put this on my TODO. Unfortunately I haven't enough time at the moment to resolve the second issue, but I will have the time in ~3 weeks. If nobody else took this report

[Bug 918096] [NEW] Sync packagekit 0.7.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-01-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
libpackagekit-glib2 from dbus-glib to GDBus (Richard Hughes) - apt: Reintroduce apt backend (Sebastian Heinlein) - aptcc: Add Multi-Arch support (Daniel Nicoletti) - aptcc: Fix crash on get-categories, backend does not support that (Matthias Klumpp) - aptcc: Support

[Bug 915755] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in pk_dbus_init()

2012-01-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This looks like a bug in GLib/GIO: g_dbus_proxy_new_sync () returns NULL without setting a GError. According to the documentation, if this function returns NULL it has to set a GError... Is this bug still valid with newer versions of GIO? ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New =

[Bug 496290] Re: Doesn't support actions to handle a broken cache

2012-01-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Upstream is working on this at time :) ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496290 Title: Doesn't support

[Bug 871602] Re: gpk-prefs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_settings_is_writable()

2012-01-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: gnome-packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871602 Title: gpk-prefs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_settings_is_writable() To

[Bug 897246] Re: Debconf KDE frontend is unable to run

2012-01-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Thanks for this bug report! LibDebconf-KDE is a C++ library used by Apper and Muon to display Debconf dialogs. It also is used to make PackageKit tools display KDE debconf dialogs. The thing you're talking about looks like the old Perl-based Debconf-Qt implementation, which is AFAIK not

[Bug 918967] [NEW] Sync packagekit 0.7.2-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-01-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
yet * Compile with --as-needed again * Make libs recommend installation of the PackageKit daemon * Fix segfault if there are no cached properties (Closes: #656376) * Make GStreamer- and browser plugin suggest a PK frontend -- Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:51:41

Re: [Bug 918967] Re: Sync packagekit 0.7.2-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-01-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thank you for this quick update! :) Cheers, Matthias 2012/1/22 Micah Gersten launch...@micahscomputing.com: This bug was fixed in the package packagekit - 0.7.2-2 Sponsored for Matthias Klumpp (ximion) --- packagekit (0.7.2-2) unstable; urgency=low  * Solve override

[Bug 791304] Re: projectm version 2.0.1+dfsg-12 failed to build on armel armhf

2012-01-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It would be great if someone with ARM OpenGL experience could look at this... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791304 Title: projectm version 2.0.1+dfsg-12 failed to build on armel

[Bug 913153] [NEW] Sync clementine 0.7.1+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

2012-01-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported: Please sync clementine 0.7.1+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian testing (main) Changelog entries since current precise version 0.7.1-0ubuntu3: clementine (0.7.1+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Artur Rona ] * Merge changes from Ubuntu: - Use wrap-and-sort script -

[Bug 871602] Re: gpk-prefs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_settings_is_writable()

2012-01-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks strange... Is this still valid with GPK 3.2? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871602 Title: gpk-prefs crashed with SIGSEGV in g_settings_is_writable() To manage notifications

[Bug 913153] Re: Sync clementine 0.7.1+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian testing (main)

2012-01-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thank you for the information! The build error above is because Ubuntu uses a newer Gio than Debian. (but it's easy to fix) But it will be cool to have 1.0 in Ubuntu and Debian :) Cheers, Matthias -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 898891] Re: Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.PackageKit timed out

2011-12-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Just to provde an update: We are working on a sane solution for this in PackageKit 0.7.2, which will be present in Ubuntu Precise as soon as it is released. For some reason this issue is Ubuntu-specific and does not appear on Debian or Fedora. If you want to get PK working again very soon, you

[Bug 886967] Re: projectm crash

2012-01-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Can you please check if this issue is still valid with projectM revision 12? (in my PPA or from Debian Sid - or wait until it is synced with Ubuntu) ** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 886967] Re: projectm crash

2012-01-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hmm... Please install the debug package (projectm-dbg), run the tool in GDB and then when it crashes make a full backtrace. (command bt full in gdb) and attach it here! Do you get this problem with the newest SVN snapshot too? (If yes it might be possible that I broke something...) ** Changed

[Bug 886967] Re: projectm crash

2012-01-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886967 Title: projectm crash To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 886967] Re: projectm crash

2012-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thanks! This still looks weird... On your SVN snapshot, can you please update it and then completely remove your build direktory and create it again? Or are you doing an in-tree build? I added some patches to trunk which should fix at least the Qt warning. (and maybe display more information)

[Bug 886967] Re: projectm crash

2012-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is extremely strange - I don't apply any patches to the Debian version which could cause this error, and SVN works... Do you really have the debug symbols installed? Because your GDB backtrace does not contain the expected information... (no symbols available for libprojectM...) Well, at

Re: [Bug 886967] Re: projectm crash

2012-01-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The package is called projectm-dbg - are you sure it is installed? For old times sake do you know of a 'geiss' that wold run in GNU/Linux? with all the same keystrokes 8) Or is this as close as it gets? What dou you mean? ;-) ProjectM tries to make presets look as much as the original DX

[Bug 901093] Re: Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.PackageKit timed out

2011-12-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 898891 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898891 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 898891 Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.PackageKit timed out -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 898891] Re: Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.PackageKit timed out

2011-12-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hmm... What happens if you run sudo killall packagekitd sudo /usr/lib/packagekit/packagekitd --verbose in a terminal? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898891 Title: Error

[Bug 898891] Re: Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.PackageKit timed out

2011-12-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
For some reason, building PK on Ubuntu's buildd leads to a strange daemon crash (PkProc type is registered twice) There is a workaround for this in PKs main development tree, as soon as PK 0.7.2 is out, it will work again (at least that's what I expect) Could you maybe install the PackageKit

[Bug 898891] Re: Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.PackageKit timed out

2011-12-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
plugin: sudo rm /usr/lib/packagekit-plugins/libpk_plugin-update-check-processes.so Thank you for your test and your bug report! This bug will be fixed soon. ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias

[Bug 905415] Re: Hangs when doing full upgrade after fresh oneiric install

2011-12-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Please open a Terminal and run sudo /usr/lib/packagekit/packagekitd --verbose. Then repeat the steps and please attach the terminal output and the contents of /var/log/apt/term.log to this bug. It looks like aptcc is handling an error wrong or some debconf/conffile stuff is blocking this.

[Bug 831271] Re: libqt4pas version 2.1Qt4.5.3-5 failed to build in oneiric

2011-08-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Multiarch breaks it... I'll try to fix this on Debian and Ubuntu. ** Changed in: libqt4pas (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 766046] Re: packagekit version 0.6.11-2ubuntu3 failed to build on amd64

2011-04-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Oh... I'm currently on holiday, so I cannot do any testing or bug- solving here, but this build log looks sane to me... No failures. Could you please add it to build queue again and check if it fails? (The only bad thing is a pointer issue in pk-main, but this does not cause the build failure. -

[Bug 831271] Re: libqt4pas version 2.1Qt4.5.3-5 failed to build in oneiric

2011-09-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Fixed. Please perform sync-request LP: 845004, so the fix reaches Oneiric. :) ** Changed in: libqt4pas (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 845004] [NEW] Please sync libqt4pas 2.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-09-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported: Changelog entries since current oneiric version 2.1Qt4.5.3-5: libqt4pas (2.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Convert package to multiarch (LP: #831271) -- Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:19:25 +0200 libqt4pas (2.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New

[Bug 613412] Re: packagekit in maverick causes error in apt operations

2011-09-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
What does $ grep DefaultBackend /etc/PackageKit/PackageKit.conf give you? The default backend should be APTcc, I'm going to remove the APT backend in the next release (0.7.x series). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 845004] Re: FFe: Please sync libqt4pas 2.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-09-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
this package fixes an FTBFS, a freeze-exception would be okay, IMO. + Changelog entries since current oneiric version 2.1Qt4.5.3-5: libqt4pas (2.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Convert package to multiarch (LP: #831271) -- Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:19

[Bug 845004] Re: FFe: Please sync libqt4pas 2.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-09-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Oh no... Looks like my sponsor made the debhelber dependency a little bit too tight... - generally, this is a good thing, but in this case it makes it impossible to sync this package... I'll backport the important change and provide a (simple) patch for the FTBFS. Sorry for the noise. (I guess

[Bug 845004] Re: FFe: Please sync libqt4pas 2.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-09-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hmm... Where can I find the status of the debhelper merge request? If debhelper is updated, qt4pas can safely be updated too (and Oneiric would benefit of some debhelper improvements for multiarch) But I'm not sure if a merge request for something as important as debhelper is granted so late in

[Bug 805511] [NEW] Sync debconf-kde 0.1+git20110702-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
; urgency=low * Transfer package to pkg-kde-extras team * Update to new Git revision, which contains lots of improvements. * Fixed get-orig-source rule * Updated package description * Added Vcs-* fields -- Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org Sat, 02 Jul 2011 19:40:26 +0200 debconf-kde

[Bug 819025] Re: clementine FTBFS due to wrong linking glew in projectm

2011-08-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I'll take a look at it, but at time I'm not able to reproduce this bug... ** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 819025] Re: clementine FTBFS due to wrong linking glew in projectm

2011-08-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819025 Title: clementine FTBFS due to wrong linking glew in projectm To manage

[Bug 819763] [NEW] Sync projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-10 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-08-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
-address * Update projectM-Qt dev package dependencies * Fix projectM linking (LP: #819025) * Rebuild for libglew1.5 - libglew1.6 transition -- Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:40:08 +0200 ** Affects: projectm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Bug 808992] Re: FTBFS on amd64

2011-08-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This will be fixed in GNOME-PackageKir 3.2, which will land in Oneiric. If I see that this new upstream version cannot make it in time, I will provide a patch for Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 779148] Re: Removal request for packagekit-gnome from Oneiric

2011-08-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
What is the current status of this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779148 Title: Removal request for packagekit-gnome from Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 811210] Re: kpackage kit errors when updating in lucid

2011-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Please remove the package packagekit-backend-apt and install packagekit-backend-aptcc instead. The Python APT backend is completely unsupported and will be removed very soon. (And unfortunately, if you're experiencing this error on Lucid, I can't do very much to solve it. Maybe the APTcc backend

[Bug 878138] Re: misleading error from apt-get :kpackagekit : Depends: apper but it is not going to be installed

2011-10-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
and it will be auto-removed) Sorry for this issue, was in a way my fault. :( ** Changed in: apper (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed ** Changed in: apper (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) ** Patch added: fix-878138.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu

[Bug 878138] Re: misleading error from apt-get :kpackagekit : Depends: apper but it is not going to be installed

2011-10-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@debfx: Oh, sorry - I somehow missed your post... @dantti: KPackageKit is no longer present in the archive, the kpk package is only there for a smooth transition to Apper. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 880520] Re: internal system error Ubuntu 11.04

2011-10-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The PK APT backend is completely outdated, so this issues won't be fixed, I guess. You might want to switch to the APTcc backend (install packagekit-backend-aptcc and set the DefaultBackend in /etc/PackageKit/PackageKit.conf to aptcc) Alternatively, you can upgrade PK to a newer version. I will

Re: [Bug 879938] Re: Things that should be mere warnings block apper

2011-11-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You can use pkcon refresh to refresh the cache. If you execute this in a terminal, do you get the same error messages AND does Apper still complain about an unrefreshed cache? (If yes, this is a issue in the aptcc backend) 2011/11/18 Sergio Callegari sergio.calleg...@gmail.com: apt-get gives an

[Bug 893743] Re: Invalid signature for extras.ubuntu.com

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This looks bad... (The repo signature is probably broken) Does a simple apt-get update work for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893743 Title: Invalid signature for

[Bug 893743] Re: Invalid signature for extras.ubuntu.com

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Also affects: muon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: muon (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to muon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893743 Title: Invalid

[Bug 893743] Re: Invalid signature for extras.ubuntu.com

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Is the package ubuntu-extras-keyring installed? There has to be something wrong on your machine, because I don't get this error. (and everyone would have it, if it was a server-side broken signature) Maybe the extras-keyring maintainers know more. Please don't install a package from extras

[Bug 893743] Re: Invalid signature for extras.ubuntu.com

2011-11-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This one could also be one of APTs hard-to-handle broken cache issues. If extras-keyring people say that everything is okay, I can give you some commands to fix your cache. (If this does not work, I don't have any idea anymore :P) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 893743] Re: Invalid signature for extras.ubuntu.com

2011-11-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Does executing these commands help? $ cd /var/lib/apt $ sudo mv lists lists.old $ sudo mkdir -p lists/partial $ sudo apt-get update This will rebuild the cache. Another question: Are you behind a proxy-server? Cheers, Matthias -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 389766] Re: Gtk-Message **: Failed to load module pk-gtk-module: libpk-gtk-module.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory at

2011-11-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #642910 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642910 ** Changed in: packagekit (Debian) Status: Confirmed = Unknown ** Changed in: packagekit (Debian) Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #646319 = Debian Bug tracker #642910 -- You

[Bug 893743] Re: Invalid signature for extras.ubuntu.com

2011-11-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 24061 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24061 Okay, thanks for the report! I really hate this kind of Apt issues... Cheers, Matthias ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 24061 GPG error with apt-get/aptitude/update-manager behind proxy

[Bug 799209] Re: Failed to load module pk-gtk-module

2011-11-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799209 Title: Failed to load module pk-gtk-module To manage notifications

[Bug 885555] Re: Apper does not display as installed all installed packages

2011-11-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The problem is multiarch support, which makes Apper act like crazy, as it is not implemented in AptCC yet. I'll try to do something about it in future releases (or Daniel will, it depends...), but this won't go into Oneiric. If you disable multiarch, everything should be fine. ** Changed in:

[Bug 886967] Re: projectm crash

2011-11-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Well, I can take a look at this as soon as I have time. The problem with projectM crashes is that they don't occur on every system, and if I make a change on the renderer which fixes an issue on one system configuration, it sometimes creates one on other systems. But this one looks PulseAudio

[Bug 756125] Re: projectm version 2.0.1+dfsg-6 failed to build on i386

2011-04-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, I think I know how to fix this. ** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 756516] [NEW] FFe: Sync projectm 2.0.1+dfsg-7 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-04-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
; urgency=low [ Matthias Klumpp ] * Bump debhelper version dependency * Make more use of dh-auto commands * Patch projectM cmake script to find FreeType * Set LC_NUMERIC to C in libprojectM (LP: #737915) [ Alessio Treglia ] * Correct team's name. [ Reinhard Tartler ] * add myself

[Bug 756125] Re: projectm version 2.0.1+dfsg-6 failed to build on i386

2011-04-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
If the sync request of bug #756516 is granted and the package is rebuild, the issue should be gone. This problem appeared because projectM shipped an own version of a FinFreetype cmake macro, which stopped to work with new Freetype and cmake versions. I added a patch which makes projectM use

[Bug 756125] Re: projectm version 2.0.1+dfsg-6 failed to build on i386

2011-04-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Build works now for i386, but somehow fails on ARM... (I guess this is an issue with Ubuntu's Qt packaging, I'll take a look at it) ** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 756125] Re: projectm version 2.0.1+dfsg-6 failed to build on i386

2011-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is a problem with OpenGL on ARM on Ubuntu... From what I see not related to projectM directly, and working on Debian, so there's something wrong with GL on ARM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 506001] Re: Error Type: Error Value: 'NoneType' object is unsubscriptable File

2011-05-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Fixed in latest PackageKit in Maverick/Natty/Oneiric. ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506001 Title: Error Type:

[Bug 571906] Re: Kpackagekit does not recognize network connection

2011-05-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
PackageKit is configured to check network-manager for working connections. If someone uses another configuration, modifying the PK config file is necessary. Maybe we should add an easier solution for this, but at time a fix won't happen. (People who set special network configurations are usually

[Bug 696686] Re: packagekit segfaulting every time new updates are retrieved

2011-05-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Does this issue still occur with the latest PackageKit in Natty? If so, could you please install PK from my PPA and check agains PK == 0.6.14 too? I still don't know why I can't reproduce this crash... ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug

[Bug 569564] Re: KPackageKit error when searching for packages

2011-05-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Please use the APTcc backend instead of the APT backend to avoid this issue. (Development of APT backend seems to have stopped now...) ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 696686] Re: packagekit segfaulting every time new updates are retrieved

2011-05-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I'm leaving this bug in Opinion state. I think this is a bug in APT itself, reading a broken cache, but that's just a guess. If this issue happens again, we'll have this backtrace here for more information. Thanks for your work! ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete =

[Bug 760710] Re: package python-packagekit 0.5.7-0ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I think this is a problem with python-central, not python-packagekit. What is the output of python -V? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760710 Title: package python-packagekit

[Bug 760710] Re: package python-packagekit 0.5.7-0ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Also affects: python-central (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760710 Title: package python-packagekit 0.5.7-0ubuntu2.2 failed to

[Bug 760710] Re: package python-packagekit 0.5.7-0ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thanks for reporting this bug Neil, I think it will be fixed soon. I *guess* this bug happens because you have installed two conflicting Python versions. If you're familiar with Synaptic package manager or aptitude, search for python and check which Python versions you have installed. Remove all

[Bug 770937] Re: libqt4pas version 2.1Qt4.5.3-4 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

2011-06-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Fixed in r5. ** Changed in: libqt4pas (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: libqt4pas (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 791497] Re: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2011-06-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
A suitable version of PackageKit is in the archives now :) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791497 Title: Sync gnome-packagekit

[Bug 779148] Re: Removal request for packagekit-gnome from Oneiric

2011-06-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779148 Title: Removal request for packagekit-gnome from Oneiric --

Re: [Bug 791497] Re: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2011-06-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
this before, but I can't remember where. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 791497] Re: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2011-06-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This problem exists because of a different dependency-chain in Ubuntu. Build-dependening on rarian-compat solves this problem. I merged this Ubuntu-specific change with the Debian sources and attached a patch for Ubuntu. If you apply this to the (new) Ubuntu package, the issue will be gone :)

[Bug 791497] Re: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2011-06-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: Fix Ubuntu version of GPK (add rarian-compat dep) https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/791497/+attachment/2160965/+files/gpk_ubuntuftbfsrarian.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 791497] Re: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2011-06-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This should work :) The additional changes might have been inside the diff because they will be in the next Debian revision of the GPK package. (and I just diff'ed the new version against that one in Debian experimental (and forgot about the few additional changes, which don't do anything good

[Bug 722185] Re: Regression: Does not list available WLAN networks (p54)

2011-04-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Tags added: patch regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722185 Title: Regression: Does not list available WLAN networks (p54) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 722185] Re: Regression: Does not list available WLAN networks (p54)

2011-04-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@Jason: Thanks for you great work! The patch works excellent here :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722185 Title: Regression: Does not list available WLAN networks (p54) --

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner

[Bug 737915] Re: projectM starts with a black screen instead of the visualization

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737915 Title: projectM starts with a black screen instead

[Bug 737915] Re: projectM starts with a black screen instead of the visualization

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hmm... I can't reproduce this bug here, but I'll ad a workaround to libprojectm to set LC_NUMERIC to C. ;aybe this solves this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737915 Title:

[Bug 737915] Re: projectM starts with a black screen instead of the visualization

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Added a patch which sets LC_NUMERIC to C in LibProjectM itself. I was unable to reproduce this bug (tried with three different locales, with installed language packs), so this is merely a blind shot - Maybe this solves this issue. ** Changed in: projectm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix

[Bug 737915] Re: projectM starts with a black screen instead of the visualization

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Oh, forgot to mention: This patch will be in Oneiric (- wow, strage codename!). Natty is in FF at time, and I don't think the new revision would get an FFe. Packages will be built for Debian Sid soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Solving this in PackageKit is a bit difficult: Ubuntu and Debian share the same packaging, which is nice cause it's easy to maintain. Cause Debian has no Firefox, I cannot simply depend on firefox-dev without breaking Debian compatibility. I'll wait for a nice solution (package NPAPI headers

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@Micah Gersten: How can I make sure Ubuntu does not choose xulrunner-dev then? (I haven't thought about this option first, I'm currently playing around with firefox-dev | iceweasel-dev) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 737915] Re: projectM starts with a black screen instead of the visualization

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I will provide backports in my Testing PPA soon, so you can try it with these packages. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737915 Title: projectM starts with a black screen instead of

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main --

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-03-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: Patch against PackageKit package https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-2.0/+bug/740815/+attachment/1936588/+files/packagekit_0.6.11-2ubuntu2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-03-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@Martin Pitt: Thanks! I could change this dependency upstream... I'll take a look how this is handled in Iceweasel and Firefox on other distributions and then maybe change it, if the name is the same everywhere. (But I don't really think this will be the case...) I accidentally build PK in my

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-03-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, the mozilla-plugin file is necessary, cause it's named differently everywhere. Chris' changes will solve this without much noise :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title:

[Bug 737915] Re: projectM starts with a black screen instead of the visualization

2011-03-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
See https://launchpad.net/~ximion/+archive/tests Maybe these packages work for you. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737915 Title: projectM starts with a black screen instead of

[Bug 740815] Re: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main

2011-03-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main --

[Bug 791497] Re: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2011-06-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thanks! If there are any updates on this, I will notify you :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791497 Title: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >