[Bug 1715552] Re: VMWare does not start

2017-10-10 Thread javroch
After testing further, I actually see the same thing with VMWare Player
14.0.0:

Could not lock 790528 bytes of memory at 7FAB5BE8A000 (page 7FAB5BE8A000).
Cannot allocate memory.

I, as well, have plenty of memory available.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715552

Title:
  VMWare does not start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1715552/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1715552] Re: VMWare does not start

2017-10-10 Thread javroch
At the time VMWare Player 14 was unavailable for Linux at least. For the
record, I just tested VMWare Player 14.0.0 for Linux on Ubuntu 17.10 and
it launches fine for me now. Can anybody else confirm?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715552

Title:
  VMWare does not start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1715552/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 209103] Re: [Hardy][amd64] No sound, other than from Sample Cache, and login sound

2008-03-30 Thread javroch
If I change all of the playback devices in gnome-sound-preferences to
Multichannel Playback, then I can get all my application sounds and the
login system sounds, but the application sounds are not going through
PulseAudio as the Volume Meter for my Default Output device remains
motionless. It seems like this is just circumventing PulseAudio.

-- 
[Hardy][amd64] No sound, other than from Sample Cache, and login sound
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 209103] Re: [Hardy][amd64] No sound, other than from Sample Cache, and login sound

2008-03-30 Thread javroch
If I choose the secondary, onboard sound, which I thought I had disabled
in the BIOS, then the volume meter from the PulseAudio Device Chooser
shows that it is receiving the sound. Only when I choose my correct
sound card, do the bars remain motionless. But, the system login sound
and the sounds from the sample cache do work on my correct (Audigy2)
soundcard, just not other sounds.

** Summary changed:

- [Hardy] No sound, other than from Sample Cache, and login sound
+ [Hardy][amd64] No sound, other than from Sample Cache, and login sound

-- 
[Hardy][amd64] No sound, other than from Sample Cache, and login sound
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 209103] [NEW] [Hardy] No sound, other than from Sample Cache, and login sound

2008-03-29 Thread javroch
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: pulseaudio

To start off I have an Audigy 2 sound card. I get the normal login and
logoff sounds and from the Manager within the PulseAudio Device Chooser
the sounds in the sample cache work as well; however, if I try to use
any application whatsoever no sound is generated. I have opened up the
Volume Meter (Playback), also from the PulseAudio Device Chooser, and it
confirms that no sound is being registered, as the volume meters remain
motionless. If I return all my configuration to ALSA:

asoundconf unset-pulseaudio
System > Administration > Sound.. set everything to ALSA

then the sound works again, but then the login sound doesn't work. The
reason why I care is that Flash 9 in Firefox doesn't produce any sound
for me in ALSA and I hear that it works for PulseAudio. So, I have been
trying to get Pulse Audio to work. I noticed that the PulseAudio Output
device says "(ADC Capture/Standard PCM Playback)" which led me to
believe that this might be the problem. In my alsa-mixer or just the
Volume Control in gnome, when using ALSA, the PCM Front, PCM, Side, PCM
Center, PCM Surround, etc channels don't control anything. I use just
Front, Side, Center, Surround, etc. If you would like the output of any
specific commands, let me know.

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: pulseaudio
  
  To start off I have an Audigy 2 sound card. I get the normal login and
  logoff sounds and from the Manager within the PulseAudio Device Chooser
  the sounds in the sample cache work as well; however, if I try to use
  any application whatsoever no sound is generated. I have opened up the
  Volume Meter (Playback), also from the PulseAudio Device Chooser, and it
  confirms that no sound is being registered, as the volume meters remain
- motionless. If I return all my configuration to alsa:
+ motionless. If I return all my configuration to ALSA:
  
  asoundconf unset-pulseaudio
  System > Administration > Sound.. set everything to ALSA
  
  then the sound works again, but then the login sound doesn't work. The
  reason why I care is that Flash 9 in Firefox doesn't produce any sound
- for me in alsa and I hear that it works for PulseAudio. So, I have been
+ for me in ALSA and I hear that it works for PulseAudio. So, I have been
  trying to get Pulse Audio to work. I noticed that the PulseAudio Output
- device says "ADC Capture/Standard PCM Playback)" which led me to believe
- that this might be the problem. In my alsa-mixer or just the Volume
- Control in gnome, the PCM Front, PCM, Side, PCM Center, PCM Surround,
- etc channels don't control anything. I use just Front, Side, Center,
- Surround, etc. If you would like the output of any specific commands,
- let me know.
+ device says "(ADC Capture/Standard PCM Playback)" which led me to
+ believe that this might be the problem. In my alsa-mixer or just the
+ Volume Control in gnome, when using ALSA, the PCM Front, PCM, Side, PCM
+ Center, PCM Surround, etc channels don't control anything. I use just
+ Front, Side, Center, Surround, etc. If you would like the output of any
+ specific commands, let me know.

-- 
[Hardy] No sound, other than from Sample Cache, and login sound
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209103
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 95782] dual-head second monitor video

2007-03-24 Thread javroch
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xorg

ever since Dapper, video is displayed improperly on my second monitor in
a dual-monitor set-up. the second monitor is my TV.. running through
S-Video from my ATI Radeon 9600XT.. it worked in dapper, but does not
any longer in edgy and does not in feisty. any video, even after proper
codecs installed, displays with the y-axis stretched too far.. passed
the bottom of the video area in fact.. so everything is stretched
vertically and the bottom portion is not visible. in Dapper, in fact, I
had the same problem with the linux-generic (i386) kernel installed by
default, so I installed the linux-k7 flavor and it fixed the problem (i
have an amd k7 processor, now grouped into linux-generic)

if it matters, i set up the dual-head configuration using the aticonfig tool:
aticonfig --initial=dual-head
aticonfig --overlay-type=Xv

this was done directly on a clean install of feisty, and in fact i had
tried this on edgy also, but decided against it in the end so i could
get the video support i have in Dapper on the second monitor

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
dual-head second monitor video
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95782

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] Re: bring back k7 kernel

2007-02-20 Thread javroch
i think that the problem lies in xorg in edgy.. as i saw it was upgraded
from dapper to edgy

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] Re: bring back k7 kernel

2007-02-12 Thread javroch
would it be a bad idea to take the dapper fglrx and install it in edgy?

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] Re: bring back k7 kernel

2007-02-12 Thread javroch
well it's not the -k7 that did it, cuz it's still not fixed, so now i'm
lost.. upgrading to the ati provided drivers did nothing, switching to
the ubuntu provided drivers did nothing and switching to -k7 did
nothing.. but for some reason everything works perfectly on dapper but
not edgy.. the bottom like "inch" of video gets cut off on the second
monitor in mplayer, totem, etc

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] Re: bring back k7 kernel

2007-02-11 Thread javroch
just as an update.. i am attempting, for the first time, to build a -k7
kernel, which if i can get working, should hopefully prove that the
-generic kernel is the cause of my troubles

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] Re: bring back k7 kernel

2007-02-11 Thread javroch
i believe that the -generic kernel is not sufficient on the -k7
architecture and there is reason to keep the -k7 around

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] Re: bring back k7 kernel

2007-02-11 Thread javroch
i did a clean install of edgy, installed using fglrx provided, same
problem i was having before where the bottom portion of any video on the
second monitor (a tv) is cut off.. so, as suggested, i installed the ati
provided drivers.. same problem exactly.. this is the same problem i had
in dapper until i installed the linux-k7 kernel with fglrx.. so, it
seems that the lack of a proper k7 kernel could be the only answer to
this bug.. if someone will direct me on how to compile a k7 kernel i
will try myself and see if that is the problem, which i think it is.. we
need the k7 kernel back for k7 users

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] Re: bring back k7 kernel

2007-01-24 Thread javroch
installing the -i386 kernel in dapper gives me the same problem as i get
in edgy, however the -k7 kernel fixes it, in dapper.

i guess i will have to try upgrading to edgy again and see if using
latest ati drivers will help

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] Re: bring back k7 kernel

2007-01-23 Thread javroch
i'm using the version of fglrx provided by dapper / edgy respectably not
one compiled / provided by ATI

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 81072] bring back k7 kernel

2007-01-22 Thread javroch
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.17

i had reported a support request
(https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ticket/3248) and was told that
this was the place to post my request

using edgy, i get video issues with the -generic kernel with dual-head
support.. ordinarily i wouldn't necessarily think it was the kernel
change; however, when i installed the fglrx driver it specifically said
that i should make sure to have the correct kernel for my hardware.. and
in dapper, on k7 kernel, it works perfectly.. what happens is, on the
second monitor, the lower portion of the video gets cut off.. in any
movie player, mplayer, totem, anything.. i believe that the kernel is
the reason as nothing else i have tried other than going back to dapper
k7 has worked to fix it.. i don't really see why the k7 kernel was
discontinued in ubuntu anyway.. i had previously had this problem in
dapper, until i changed to the k7 kernel from the default..

** Affects: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.17
  
  i had reported a support request
  (https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ticket/3248) and was told that
  this was the place to post my request
  
- using edgy, i get video issues with the i386 kernel with dual-head
+ using edgy, i get video issues with the -generic kernel with dual-head
  support.. ordinarily i wouldn't necessarily think it was the kernel
  change; however, when i installed the fglrx driver it specifically said
  that i should make sure to have the correct kernel for my hardware.. and
  in dapper, on k7 kernel, it works perfectly.. what happens is, on the
  second monitor, the lower portion of the video gets cut off.. in any
  movie player, mplayer, totem, anything.. i believe that the kernel is
  the reason as nothing else i have tried other than going back to dapper
  k7 has worked to fix it.. i don't really see why the k7 kernel was
  discontinued in ubuntu anyway.. i had previously had this problem in
  dapper, until i changed to the k7 kernel from the default..

-- 
bring back k7 kernel
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81072

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs