On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:55:48AM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> On Di, 2013-04-02 at 16:45 +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> > OK, the reasons make sense, but do we need to advertise them as Apps?
>
> i think xdiagnose doesnt need to be shown in any menus (though that
> would be a matter of the m
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:21:03PM -0600, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
Ahem, gentlemen, let's keep this maillist to topical technical matters.
Bryce
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:43:34AM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Hi Xavier,
>
> I've targeted those bugs to 13.04, so they'll show up on the release
> team's charts, although I don't know what level of bug scrub is planned.
Also, I should add I don'
Hi Xavier,
I've targeted those bugs to 13.04, so they'll show up on the release
team's charts, although I don't know what level of bug scrub is planned.
(Fwiw, ubuntu-devel@ would be a better list for this email, since
several of those issues are foundations issues.)
Xavier, I would encourage yo
-1
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 09:49:29AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> One topic for UDS, since GNOME is talking about dropping their code
> for fallback to just use gnome-shell, we should make sure we stop
> relying on that (it would also be good to stop relying on not so
> ma
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:05:33PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi there Desktop and Dev teams,
>
> My name if Chris Wilson and I've recently taken over the leadership of the
> Hundred Papercuts project, and am exploring ways to revitalise it now that
> contributions have all but dried up. I'm dra
Quick update on last month's X meeting:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:32:54PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> We had a ubuntu-x team meeting today to coordinate tasks across several
> topics. Below is a brief summary of the discussions.
The xserver 1.12 stack was uploaded last wee
We had a ubuntu-x team meeting today to coordinate tasks across several
topics. Below is a brief summary of the discussions.
== X stack for LTS point release ==
The repository is up with the renamed X stack, and it is successfully
working as a proof-of-concept for the rename procedure. Next st
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:08:07AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I uploaded a new X server to precise-proposed as a 0-day SRU.
> It contains fixes for:
>
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/974887: Various touchscreen issues
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/930936: Xorg crashes after c
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:56:53AM +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> If this was going to be redesigned, I would rather see it as a "Hardware
> manager". Ubuntu is currently promoting drivers as an optional extra.
> But that's not true; drivers are always necessary for all hardware. One
> problem
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 03:51:02AM +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> Den 19. april 2012 03:11, skrev Jeremy Bicha:
> > Your topic mixes developer docs, entry-level user docs, and "power
> > user" docs. Each of those needs a different approach and I think it's
> > simpler to tackle them as three m
Back when everyone had an xorg.conf and a lot of the X bugs were due to
malformed config files, we would collect the files and run them through
checkers. Brian Murray ran a bot that'd test xorg.confs in bugs posted
to launchpad for instance. Found quite a few issues that way. These
days xorg.con
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 08:08:52PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 03/04/2012 19:33, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
> >An invitation to UDS wouldn't be out of place in this case.
> I'm unsure about that, it's expense (time and money) to invite
> somebody at UDS only
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:06:11PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Thanks for writing that email, I had that on my list as well, making
> sure we don't have another of those "default application selection"
> session like previous UDS ;-)
>
> - we should reach the concerned upstreams at least one
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 08:55:58PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> I'm beginning to think that this is all so complicated even when we
> try to be verbose and convey things as accurately as possible that
> nothing short of "it just works perfectly and exactly how I wanted"
> will be good enough. Alth
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:11:30PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sending this to both ubuntu-devel and ubuntu-desktop to try to
> get a larger pool of feedback.
Here's some random thoughts. I don't have a fully formed opinion on the
topic, but maybe these general observations can
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:58:11PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> I've spent some time working on making "ClickPad" trackpads work better.
> I have put the end result up at ppa:chasedouglas/clickpad. I would like
> some testing feedback for the changes.
>
> In this context, a "ClickPad" is any touc
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 16/12/2011 17:15, Sebastien Bacher a écrit :
> >Hi,
> >
> >The dx team worked on backporting some of the fixes available to
> >the Oneiric serie and rolled a 4.26.0 tarball.
> >
> >This unity version and an updated compiz with s
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 06:38:53AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Bryce Harrington [2011-12-05 16:16 -0800]:
> > Given this increased importance of the wiki status page, could it be
> > made policy to set up the following week's meeting page at the
> > conclusion of
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:18:54AM +1030, Jason Warner wrote:
> Hi Everyone -
>
> At UDS we discussed trying a new format for the desktop meeting. Here is
> what was discussed.
>
> Going forward we'll update the wiki[1] as usual, but we'll now add possible
> agenda items that warrant further disc
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 05:36:04PM -0500, Alexander wrote:
> Where can I get involved without directing me to developer.ubuntu.com
> or providing me suggestions?
Hi, this mailing list isn't really about development of Unity but more
focused on the overall desktop integration. For Unity-specific
m
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:11:08AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> [Sorry to those who receive this twice. I accidentally sent it out from the
> wrong e-mail.]
>
> On 09/11/2011 02:42, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > The launchpad guys say that GNOME had been on the todo list but t
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 01:51:26AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> P.S. One thing I've found particularly annoying when working on Banshee bugs
> is
> the lack of a comment-crossposting-bridge thing between GNOME Bugzilla and
> Launchpad. As a result, I have had to relay (manually) all the requests
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:59:47AM +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> > Like mpt said, it's been discussed now for a couple years but there
> > hasn't been that much progress.
>
> I did not say that, and it is not the case. (And even if it was the
> case, that would not be grounds for delaying it
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:44:41AM -0400, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 15:39 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > For Precise, I don't think we want to try to undertake implementation,
> > but it would be nice to get the design more fleshed out and perhaps do a
There's been discussions around establishing a crash database of sorts
(see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ErrorTracker).
The idea is to have a place to collect crash report data to view it in
aggregate, so we can track what the most common crashes are in the
release.
There are a lot of similarities to
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:00:29AM -0400, Dereck Wonnacott wrote:
> My laptop has an Nvidia card and I was not able to activate my external
> monitor with unity 3D. [BUG 864784]
>
> I miss the window snap function on the shared edge of the screens. Snap only
> seems to work on the far edges of the
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 05:17:56PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:46:10PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 12:41 -0700, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
> >
> > > But I think as a next action, I think I have all the hard
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 06:46:10PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 12:41 -0700, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
>
> > But I think as a next action, I think I have all the hardware I need to
> > test it myself, so I'll try and do that today or
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:33:32PM +1100, Robert Ancell wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to optionally run Wayland in 12.04 to try
> out the technology. This will involve:
> - Modifying LightDM to support Wayland
> - Writing a Wayland compositor
Would the demo compositor be sufficient? If no
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:59:43PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 11:17 -0700, Bryce Harrington a écrit :
> > It looks to me like it basically works, modulo maybe a bug or two.
> > So removing it seems unnecessary; just need to isolate and prioritize
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:58:21AM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> FYI, On Natty, I experienced the issue on my Intel laptop, but not on my
> Nvidia laptop. I've added the xdamage workaround before upgrading to
> Oneiric, so I don't know if it's fixed or not. I use the remote desktop
> functionali
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:54:02AM +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> One area that really needs extra attention, is multi-screen setups.
> There are currently numerous issues. Some are just plain bugs, whereas
> others need designed solutions. It is currently very inconsistent.
>
> For instance;
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 01:45:38PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey,
>
> That's not really a topic but we all know we need to fix bugs (a lot of
> those) for the LTS, we should make sure to budget time for that and have
> a driven focus on the goal. One thing we might want to discuss is how we
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 08:40:43PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That's a small topic but seems vino and compositing (i.e unity) don't
> work really fine together:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/+bug/772873
>
> Not sure if that's a driver issue, xorg, vino, other but
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:07:39AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey again,
>
> Continuing the work started with the login experience this cycle I think
> we should improve the screen locking, user switching experience. We
> should also revisit if we want to support screensaver graphics or rath
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:24:26AM +0100, Piotr Drozdek wrote:
> Dnia 2011-06-14, o godz. 21:00:31
> Sebastien Bacher napisał(a):
>
> > Since that work has been stalling for a while, we need CD space and we
> > want to get ride of the deprecated library we decided during the
> > meeting to drop t
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:45:38AM +0100, Matthew East wrote:
> On 8 June 2011 02:58, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:12AM +0100, Matthew East wrote:
> >> I'm taking this opportunity to post a link to this comment on the
> >> propose
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:12AM +0100, Matthew East wrote:
> On 7 June 2011 10:02, Alan Bell wrote:
> > yeah, I would very much hope that lightdm does not introduce more
> > accessibility regressions.
>
> I'm taking this opportunity to post a link to this comment on the
> proposed switch to li
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:46:51AM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
> > I'd like to know if Unity 2D will also be used for for FailsafeX sessions.
>
> Not sure about that one as different people means different things about
> "FailsafeX" sessions. if it's session without 3D acceleration, right,
> that's
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:33:27PM +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Bryce Harrington wrote on 15/04/11 06:48:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:00:31AM +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> > Also, these tests measure usability, but not their overall impression.
> > Did t
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 07:08:02AM -0700, Rick Spencer wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 22:48 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:00:31AM +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> > > * 8/10 people could find a window's menus, but 7/8 of them learned
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:00:31AM +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> * 8/10 people could find a window's menus, but 7/8 of them learned to
> * Only 4/11 worked out how to change the background picture.
> * 6/10 could easily find and launch a game that wasn't in the
> * Only 1/9 (P4) easil
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:06:54AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> So if we want to keep adding new features without removing
> others, we might also eventually reconsider moving to 1 GB USB images
> and entirely stop shipping CD images (on mirrors/shop/Loco
> distribution, etc.) This would be somethin
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:29:35AM -0700, Jane Doe wrote:
> On my machine that has integrated Intel 845G graphics Natty Alpha 3 defaults
> to Software Rasterizer and that means 3D acceleration is not available! The
> Mesa DRI Intel(R) 845G GEM 20090712, 1.3 Mesa 7.6 driver and those previous
> w
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:18:22PM -0500, Sean McNamara wrote:
> 5. Stability has been poor in my experience; I run into X crashes from
> time to time doing fairly mundane stuff that doesn't trigger a crash
> with Gnome2.
Can you provide a bug # (with a full backtrace if possible)? I'm
putting a
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:28:24AM +1030, Jason Warner wrote:
> I'd like to hear people's thoughts on Unity...and I'd like it to be pretty
> unfiltered and raw. In particular, I'm interested in seeing how people feel
> about:
>
> * The look and feel
>
> * Usability
>
> * Stability (knowing that
I've added summary reports for the unity-team and
indicator-applet-developers teams:
http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/
These provide the teams with three reports I've found useful in managing
the influx of xorg bugs:
Milestones - All bugs with milestone targets
Patches - All
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:04:22AM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
> Natty is currently NOT showing the Hibernate option in the list of
> shutdown choices. This is currently an experiment, but I thought it
> might be worth discussing the pros and cons on these lists as well.
>
> So, thoughts, discussio
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:36:55AM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:16 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Vishnoo [2011-01-21 20:41 +0530]:
> > > Is there a bug filed for this, which we could follow?
> >
> > I don't think we should bother. Session saving can't ever be perfect.
> >
X
http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/ubuntu-x-swat/totals-natty-workqueue.svg
Bryce
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:34:16PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Some new Arsenal bug listings:
>
> Audio
> http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/ubuntu-aud
Some new Arsenal bug listings:
Audio
http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/ubuntu-audio/workqueue-natty.html
Compiz
http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/compiz/workqueue-natty.html
Desktop
http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/desktop-bugs/workqueue
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:46:48AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Bryce Harrington [2010-11-30 23:23 -0800]:
> > Perhaps you could elaborate on your vision for how our audience would
> > use this blocker information in the report?
>
> I think the primary audience for th
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 07:51:20AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> Robert Ancell [2010-12-01 17:40 +1100]:
> > I propose we keep this format for now on. Yes/no/should we change it?
>
> Thanks for this initiative! I like the format as it is now, it's a
> much more interesting read.
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:40:12PM +1100, Robert Ancell wrote:
> So this concludes the trial of the desktop meeting summary... Results
> are here:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Meeting/2010-11-30
>
> I propose we keep this format for now on. Yes/no/should we change it?
One other thought
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:40:12PM +1100, Robert Ancell wrote:
> I also bolded some key words to make it easier to skim-read, these are
> easy to add in the wiki as you enter items (use three apostrophes
> '''), and/or they can be quickly updated during the meeting (only
> takes a minute or so).
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:11:09AM +1100, Robert Ancell wrote:
> In my opinion the current activity reports are more about proving
> you've done a weeks worth of work, than providing a good summary of
> what's happened in a week.
> * x new bugs were opened, y were closed
...
>
> Note that some of
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:32:49PM +0200, Sense Hofstede wrote:
> On 8 September 2010 19:22, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > "Good" is a fairly subjective measure with games. ;-)
> > I'd say, let all the games cycle in and out.
> >
> With good games I meant gam
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:07:19PM +0200, Sense Hofstede wrote:
> I'm in favour of swapping applications, but if a game is really good
> it should stay. The best should stay, lesser known games could be
> swapped.
"Good" is a fairly subjective measure with games. ;-)
(Is nethack "good"?)
Games w
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 06:26:49PM +0530, CA G Rajesh wrote:
> Dear All,
> I installed indicator-weather (applet being developed for maverick) from
> guido-iodice PPA. I added my city *Dindigul, Tamil Nadu* to it. On bug I
> found therein is that the sunrise/sunset is not correct. You can check
> i
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> IMHO, the correct stance on this would be: change if it turns out new
> apps are really better than the current one. If not, better be
> conservative. Adopting an app which is still in progress won't help
> making it better.
No
Hi all,
Here are some new reports, showing bugs that are open in launchpad but
marked as fixed upstream. I figure at this point in the release it's
useful to go through these to look for easy cherrypicks:
http://bryceharrington.org/X/Reports/compiz/upstream-fixed.html
http://bryceharrington.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:55:09AM +, Shane Fagan wrote:
> > I've tested both openarena and nexuiz.
> Nexuiz is dying upstream from what I hear so I wouldnt feature it
> myself. The development team had a big split recently and a lot of the
> developers are making forks of it. So id say Open Ar
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 08:42:04PM -0700, Rick Spencer wrote:
> > > Saying it in a simpler way:
> > > - Will an IDE encourage people to learn programming?
> > > - Will opportunistic developers be able to use it to complete their
> > > desired project?
> > > - Will experienced developers find the s
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:26:14PM -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> Desktop bare minimum = 640x480
> Desktop recommended = 1024x768
>
> Netbook Remix bare minimum = [not listed]
The original Asus Eee PC was 800x480. Don't think I've heard of
anything smaller in the netbook category.
> Netbook Rem
I've added a query to arsenal to gather bugs that either
1) have a milestone set, or 2) have been nominated for lucid.
HTML reports can be found here:
http://bryceharrington.org/X/Reports/*/milestone-bugs.html
JSON reports, suitable for use with Bughugger, are here:
http://bryceharrington
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:40:46AM +1100, Robert Ancell wrote:
> Sure. It was hovering at the top of the B-list for me :)
> >> yofrankie (3d platform, no clear objectives - boring!)
> >>
> > This game has been pretty popular when it was out and I think we
> > should really include it in the
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 06:04:13PM +1100, Robert Ancell wrote:
> The criteria from the specification are:
>
>* Is available in main or universe
Quick question, for applications that make the featured apps list, do
they need to get promoted to main?
Bryce
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubun
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:55:47AM +, Bob Hazard wrote:
> You can reload the panel without having to log out. Press Alt-F2 and
> type killall gnome-panel in the run dialog. The panel will reload
> automatically after you kill it.
>
> If you are short of resources you might want to try in
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:35:18AM +0200, Mikko Ohtamaa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I stopped thinking why nothing happens when you press the
> (physical) eject key of CD tray (Karmic Koala)
>
> 1. Physical CD eject button does nothing - no feedback. Actually I
> thought my eject button was broken.
>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 03:26:38PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Sebastien Bacher [2009-11-02 14:45 +0100]:
> > Karmic has seen lot of technologies changes (new gdm codebase,
> > pulseaudio required by GNOME, empathy by default, devicekit-disks and
> > devicekit-power used in GNOME, etc) so it was ex
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 08:00:27PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Bryan Quigley [2009-11-05 23:37 +0530]:
> > Maybe, I'm just being to optimistic but I plan on starting to roll out
> > Karmic to my users later next week.
>
> Conversely, I'm probably too pessimistic here since I have just dealt
> with
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:55:13PM -0700, Jono Bacon wrote:
> On 10/03/2009 11:39 AM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> >You know, in these cases the current +filebug is destroying information
> >we need. If the bug reporter already knows at time of filing that it is
> >a &#x
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:29:32AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> == Changed bug reporting process ==
>
> Feedback about the `+filebug` redirection:
> * many bugs can legitimately be filed without apport information (such as
> translation bugs), wishlist bugs, or UI problems
You know, in these ca
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
> > _like_ "Package Bazar". Given we already have a concept of 'packages'
>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:42:41AM -0700, ajmctaggart wrote:
> post, or bazzar? So what evokes this idea of a trading post or a bazaar in
Given that this word has been s
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:19:27PM +0530, mac_v wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:04 +0200, Siegfried Gevatter wrote:
> > I have to add my voice in that I strongly dislike the name containing
> > "Store", for the already echoed reasons. "Software Center" or even
> > "Add/Remove..." are much better
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:16:20AM -0700, ajmctaggart wrote:
> I definitely agree Bazaar could be confused with "bzr,"...But it is a word
> that seems to align well with Ubuntu and the goals, etc...maybe we just need
It does align nicely, although I think it'd be a strange name for anyone
not fami
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:37:48AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Rick Spencer [2009-06-23 17:00 -0700]:
> >* KMS on -intel is ready to switch on by default. -ati / -nouveau
> > WIP.
>
> With those fixes in place now, would it make sense to do a mass bug
> reply/set to "needsinfo" after alpha-3
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 01:26:02AM +0100, Andreas Moog wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What is the desktop-teams policy on bumping the standards-version in
> debian/control? Should we check everytime if the file complies to the
> current (3.8.0) version and update the information?
>
> IOW: When is it appropriat
Nevermind, found it: https://projects.ivija.com/canonical/pdr
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 05:12:54PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > == Performance Reviews and Goals ==
> > Performance reviews are coming up in about three months. To prepare,
> > everyone on the desktop team sh
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 03:09:45PM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
> * ACTION: bryce to set up an FFE for -ati 6.12.0, which will bring
> R6xx/7xx support.
Done: 334101
I also packaged a current git snapshot for regression testing, although
the kernel bits are still needed before validation testin
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:57:27PM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
> == Apologies ==
> * Bryce Harrington (bryce) - family emergency
Father is finally through the woods and doing well now.
> == Berlin Sprint ==
> We discussed possible topics for the upcoming sprint. These are all the
82 matches
Mail list logo
