On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 15:10 +0530, Prateek Jadhwani wrote:
it says free brushes
i dont think dey hv copyright issues
But, Nintendo might.. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Vish
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 00:34 -0400, Saleel Velankar wrote:
Hey all,
I like the faenza shape, but I don't like the icons, so I started
making my own. If you know how to work inkscape, and you know icon
design I would like to here your feedback. I am focusing naming based
on oxygen since its
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 07:08 -0400, Saleel Velankar wrote:
I know we kinda fell apart through the last cycle. Well these things
happen.
Looking forwards I would like to suggest this:
1. A regular meeting, every so often during the oneiric cycle.
2. We move away from wallpaper, interface
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:44 -0400, Saleel Velankar wrote:
As today is the due date for a spectacularly boring research paper of
mine, I will be spending the day looking up and rechecking pointless
MLA rules. Please post a link to summary/actionables/what happened.
--Saleel
We ended up
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:22 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 12:39 -0400, Saleel Velankar wrote:
Fine, we need a new team leader as well. I don't want to miss another
cycle. I hate being subscribed here and not feeling useful.
Until we get the council to sort it all out,
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 16:21 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:03 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Hi,
The idea was never really dropped but it's not likely it will be an
official focus for the team, contributions to help getting it working
better are welcome
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:25 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, April 08, 2011 05:19:30 PM Loïc Minier wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
Do we have something similar to debian-private in Ubuntu?
God forbid :p
Eh; yet it would still be less private than the
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 17:27 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
Please note, I was suggesting not having Firefox or Chromium as the
default, but a webkit based browser with a normal release cycle like
Epiphany (which uses webkitgtk :)).
If I'v understood that right, what you are suggesting is we use
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:32 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 19:53 +0530, Stereotactic wrote:
First, they move towards Unity instead of supporting Gnome,
Support is too broad a term and using Unity as default does not mean
not supporting GNOME.
then they refuse to contribute much to the code,
Do you have any evidence to
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:16 -0700, Jono Bacon wrote:
Hi all,
Some of you may have seen http://jimmac.musichall.cz/log/?p=1145 - some
fantastic work on the icon theme going into the next GNOME release.
I wanted to see if there is any possibility of bringing those icons into
Natty?
Hi
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:32 -0700, Dylan McCall wrote:
Hello,
Something I've noticed lately has me a little concerned. I am hoping
you folks can put my fears at ease! When I look at bug reports for
Unity, I often encounter links to what I assume are design documents
internal to Canonical.
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 09:27 +0530, Stereotactic wrote:
Is Ubuntu Tweak really required?
It's not really required, most of it is available via gconf-editor.
Why not ship with the enhancements
built in?
AFAIK, most of the enhancements are available by default. You don't
really need Ubuntu
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 12:18 +0100, Dani Gutiérrez Porset wrote:
Hi, Ubuntu friends,
first of all thanks a lot for your good and hard work in favour of
free software for the whole world.
I'd like to share with you this post where I [weakly] analyse some
statistics. Feel free to disagree or
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 20:59 -0400, John Baer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Erin Estes e...@estes.com wrote:
John,
I did post my submissions to that gallery, but I read over
some posts
here that said that gallery was no longer official and
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 17:15 -0700, ErinOfEarth wrote:
I've had Ubuntu for a while now and have made a number of non-photographic
(mostly Ubuntu-themed) wallpapers for personal use. I was searching for some
way to get them recognized by the design team at Ubuntu when I read about
the Bright,
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 20:38 +0530, Manish Sinha wrote:
On 03/09/2011 06:53 PM, Kingsly John wrote:
Focus your efforts on the Indian Loco alone and keep it active. And if
possible see if we can get those other groups disbanded. We barely have the
numbers/strength to keep the momentum going
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 02:40 +0530, Manish Sinha wrote:
On 03/11/2011 12:06 AM, Vishnoo wrote:
So should we go ahead and get them removed? It can be done. Just want
to know if everyone is fine with it. We can ask popey or jcastro and
they can get it done directly or through someone
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 12:18 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 02:40 +0530, Manish Sinha wrote:
Yes, creating millions of teams is allowed in Launchpad. Not an
issue, but randomly creating and listing them down in the list
of LoCos is what I was saying was bad..
Maybe
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 11:29 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 11:34 +0100, rAX wrote:
Hello Vishnoo,
As for sending the sketches to Marcus Haslam, I
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 15:27 +0300, Сергей wrote:
people messing up the official wiki without discussing the changes
first as a consequence.
Let me ask this first, When should content/tasks be added to the
official wiki?
--
Cheers,
Vish
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
/22 Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 15:27 +0300, Сергей wrote:
people messing up the official wiki without discussing the changes
first as a consequence.
Let me ask this first, When should content/tasks be added to the
official
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 08:44 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
I asked for critique on a wallpaper idea I was playing with, and other
than yourself I got 0 feedback. Again what is the point? I could have
--no I should have just asked for your opinion over IRC. It would have
been a heck of a lot
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 08:44 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
If I have to go to the blog to find out about important changes, then
what exactly is the point of being here?
Regarding Communications from the design team, IMO, this cycle they have
improved this multifold.
We have an increased
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 00:36 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 19:30 -0500, coz DS wrote:
We all need to do our part in trying to talk with jbaer,
other
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 19:55 +0300, Сергей wrote:
On the other hand, a separate group for artwork makes much more sense
than mixing it with photography. Participators can look for
inspiration and judges won't have to separate artwork from photos.
Yep, thats why submissions were in a separate
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 21:10 +0300, Сергей wrote:
2011/2/18 Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com
People want to have fun and be productive, and not to
constantly have to
worry about people creating their own sub-groups and
sabotaging existing
process
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:17 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 13:47 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote:
I don't like the way this is discussion is turning out
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 19:30 -0500, coz DS wrote:
Hey guys
Bad taste.. wrong timing...or just plain being an ass... the
links offered by jbaer came at an inappropriate time.
Let the judging of the included wallpapers finish..then do what you
like... but official stuff needs to have a
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 13:41 -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
Thanks for all your work thorwil,
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 18:40 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Our combined inability or unwillingness to deal with repeated
misrepresentations and incredible ignorance from one member pisses me
off to
Hi,
In case folks have not seen Thorsten's post about this:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/watch-out-regarding-natty-wallpaper-submissions/
The submissions for the natty wallpaper illustration *should* be in the
Ubuntu Artwork Group : http://www.flickr.com/groups/ubuntu-artwork/
and
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 18:46 +, Chris Coulson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:22 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
it's 30s of editing. Arguably, my bad for not providing
a patch; but again, I thought that would be a waste of time, because
it would take longer for me to produce a patch, be
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 22:55 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
I actually get some stuff down when my internet goes down. This is
nathan, he enjoys cold water, and fighting with his tooth.
but seriously could use some critique here. email me directly if you
want the source, last time I threw
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 00:50 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Сергей shnat...@gmail.com wrote:
Shall we add this to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Tasks ?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi,
A wise Canadian dropped by the #ubuntu-artwork channel and shared this
link :
http://uxmag.com/strategy/the-importance-of-designing-an-experience-culture
Though a little beyond the scope of what we usually talk here, A nice
read for all... :-)
If anyone finds any such interesting links,
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 10:40 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
1. I love the idea of a pattern, I am stealing from you
;-)
2. Why not use the dots from the branding pack? it may help with
consistency, although I am not sure whether to use the developer or
the enterprise dots.
Well, I did think
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 21:52 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
While we're doing all those things, we would also like to make USC
prettier. As part of that, we're considering adding some custom artwork
to each of the individual department screens -- Games, Internet,
Sound Video, and so on.
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:22 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
IIRC this years FCS will be focused on an overarching theme of
light(?) and ubuntu specific stuff will be turned down. Here is the
thing, my proposal for new non photo pool covers stuff that was
clearly made for Ubuntu, yet not made
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:27 -0500, John Baer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
However, It is not clear what this alternative wallpaper
task is meant
for?
Is this aimed as an addition to default wallpaper
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 09:48 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 19:52 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Exactly for this reason the submissions should be in the pool,
where the
jury will see them in any case.
Not to mince my words here, but the jury is a
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:22 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
I didn't think that this is such a radical proposal as all that.
Right, you did switch the focus of the initial proposal(which aims at
the default install). The initial proposal though is an unnecessary
duplication of efforts, with
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 15:46 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
I'll focus on stuff that is achievable right now, but my opinions on
the original idea still stand I am afraid, I really do think that
there ought to be a separate pool for abstract and nonphoto default
wall proposals, and they do
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 02:38 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 15:46 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
I'll focus on stuff that is achievable right now, but my opinions on
the original idea still stand I am afraid, I really do think that
there ought to be a separate pool for abstract
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 11:44 -0500, John Baer wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I added to the project board a very exciting proposal for the team.
The proposal is to create graphic designs to be used as alternate
Ubuntu wallpapers for the Natty release. It is important to remember
this is a proposal
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 13:08 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 19:34 -0500, John Baer wrote:
Saleel,
I see your point and agree. The only confusion in my mind is their
spec permits posting submissions to where-ever you want. In itself
this is Ok but if you wanted to compare
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 19:34 -0500, John Baer wrote:
Saleel,
I see your point and agree. The only confusion in my mind is their
spec permits posting submissions to where-ever you want. In itself
this is Ok but if you wanted to compare/review there is no list to
reference unless you scan the
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 09:02 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
We need to get more eyes on the submissions.
More people expressing their views/opinions/critique on the
submissions.
Announcements
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 11:55 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
As I mentioned, it does not take long for the 20 people who
are active.
Are other's viewing the submissions? How do we get others
excited
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 11:55 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote:
An interest approach is what John is doing with his weekly summary of
what's going on in the community (The Brickyard). Maybe we should
think of creating an official weekly newsletter for this group with
links to new submissions?
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 12:33 -0600, Leandro Gómez wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
This is again only creating more work on the active members,
rather than
growing the community.
I see
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:08 -0500, John Baer wrote:
2010/12/10 Leandro Gómez leo.tel...@gmail.com
I completely understand your reasoning and your intentions
behind this. I'm just annoyed to see yet another bureaucratic
process being added to the
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 00:04 -0500, Saleel Velankar wrote:
While I agree that we need spec for generalized tasks, looking at the
wiki page Matthew linked to is pretty detailed and clear as to what is
needed as to the scope, artwork aspects etc. Only thing we really need
is a general date. I
Hi,
While we are getting new submissions for each task, there seems to be
less activity here regarding the submissions and it is not clear that
there were submissions even.
If anyone had to check the new submissions they will have to keep
checking the respective flickr groups *daily* for
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:09 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 07:47 -0500, John Baer wrote:
The deadline to the new Artwork Team Logo project is extended to
2011-01-02 (...)
I messed up the date on the wiki and just fixed that. Like I said
earlier, 1st of February, so
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 14:43 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 18:52 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
Instead, for months we use Jan/Feb/Mar.../Dec . And yrs/dates are
numerical /DD?
Numerical dates are short and make calculations more obvious
I'm not sure I see any need for us
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 18:11 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 20:27 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-date-format
Since obviously option 1 has its pit-fall of not being
international-friendly, let's go with option 2 : 1 February 2010
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:33 -0200, Blau Araujo wrote:
First of all, I apologize for not participating so actively in this
discussion. Not only because my English is not good enough to develop
full arguments, but mainly because I've had a season with many shows
(I am also a musician in a blues
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 16:30 -0800, j_baer wrote:
Hello everyone,
I collected all of the submissions ( 41 :- ) and created a wiki page based
on the Launchpad use case.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/TeamLogoSubmissions
#37 seems interesting , but wonder how it would look in smaller
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 18:15 -0800, j_baer wrote:
j_baer wrote:
Hello everyone,
I could not be more pleased with the submissions and thank you to everyone
who contributed. Please upload any last minute creations today
(2010-12-01).
Cheers,
John
Just an update to
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:32 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Would scale better and is less busy than the other submissions.
That's a ridiculous claim, given submissions like
http://www.flickr.com/photos/j_baer/5142173763/in/pool-uawt-1#/photos/j_baer/5142173763/in/pool-1507...@n25/
Right,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:07 +, Ivanka Majic wrote:
There is something about this one that I like:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/55752...@n05/5166498982/in/pool-1507...@n25/
but fear that a compass is an outdated idea. A paintbrush really says
artwork.
As i mentioned in my earlier mail,
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 09:32 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 22:05 +, Jakub Jankiewicz wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/56196...@n08/5221489829/
http://images.jcubic.pl/xubuntu-wallpaper.svg
Thank you for your contribution.
I think we should avoid text and
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 16:58 -0800, j_baer wrote:
Charlie Vish,
This task has submissions posted for your review. Will one of these meet
your needs? If not, please advise on how they can be better.
* https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs//0003_Bugsquad_Icon Submissions
Hey,
We
Hi,
So, we do have a default artwork task open :
The OpenOffice Splash Screens Need Updating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645819
Anyone interested in updating the default OOo splash screens? :-)
--
Cheers,
Vish
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 17:06 -0800, j_baer wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I put a some love into this spec and added a couple of submissions just to
get things started. Don't be shy to add yours!
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs/Request-3 Specification
In addition to being 'bugsquad', The logo
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 04:44 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
As regards any apology, well, anyone who puts forward a controversial
idea in an Open Source project had better be thick-skinned, and had
better be ready with good arguments! I know how these things go, so no
worries there. ;-)
In open
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 10:52 -0800, j_baer wrote:
For the members who participate on this team may I remind you that your
actions are to always reflect the Ubuntu code of conduct and to represent
the community in the best possible manner.
Hi John,
Lets *not* blow things out of proportion
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 12:58 -0500, coz DS wrote:
Hey John,
These are ideas for compiz/unity.. no one proposed them...
well...other than myself. however,
considering that unity now has compiz as backend, I felt it needed a
new logo/icon.
So, essentially I am asking that these be
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 00:31 +0300, Сергей wrote:
2. update Ubuntu brainstorm look and feel
** This community site is run on ideatorrent software. This request should
come from the community as it may involve some coding.
Actually, it does: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/26349/
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 13:00 +0530, Maitraya Bhattacharyya wrote:
Hi everyone, vote for the new Ubuntu-in logo.
To do so, go here:
http://polldaddy.com/poll/4079461/
or my blog
http://openfreedom.wordpress.com/2010/11/13/ubuntu-india-new-logo/
Great start!
One odd thing i noticed
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 21:31 +0530, Maitraya Bhattacharyya wrote:
Our main concerns with every logo on the poll is the chakra. When your
logo is too small, you cannot really make out if its a chakra. Any
suggestions for any alternative symbol?
How about if we run this as a logo-contest of
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 15:52 -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, j_baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:
Сергей-33 wrote:
Yes, checkbox-gtk is the System Testing application found in System
Administration System Testing
There is an open bug report for this
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:54 +, Ivanka Majic wrote:
Hi all,
1) At UDS we talked about me putting out 'briefs' in a place where
everyone could pick them up.
2) I have put a brief up here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/buttons/+bug/673488
Questions:
- does this work for everyone?
-
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 15:41 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
Hi, :-)
I'm a member of the LibreOffice community.
[...]
Notably, right now, we urgently need creative talent to help us design
artwork for our websites. We need to develop a logo, and - hopefully -
a MASCOT along the lines of Linux's
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:29 +0530, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
Hi!
... and another inactive member!
No, you are not. :-)
Even welcoming new members and directing them in the right direction
makes you part of the team, no need to consider yourself as
inactive. :-)
We do *not* have a designated
Hi,
The blueprint for our session at UDS-N :
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-design-n-reinvigorate-artwork-team
Everyone pls subscribe and do feel free to use the whiteboard to add
your suggestions and plans.
If anyone can make it personally to the UDS it would be
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 22:15 -0400, John Baer wrote:
I noticed someone is using Foopics to host artwork titled spread
ubuntu.
http://www.foopics.com/show/0990f45cf5843a7deaacbcbea579a5ce
Nice!
I'm the Guilty party! ;)
The trigger was thorwil's blog and my latest iteration for Spread
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 23:53 +0100, Ronnie Tucker wrote:
Hi all,
I doubt I'd be any use in creating themes, but I could certainly create
wallpapers, booklets, posters etc.
[...]
So, if there's anything I can do, just gimme a shout :)
Hi and welcome!
We usually do not assign tasks over
Hi,
Humanity icon theme was not much discussed here. It was basically 3
people who worked on it and its been down to only 2 for more than a year
now.
Many may already know that Humanity and elementary icon theme are
siblings. Most of the icons are same. Daniel was incharge of elementary
and I
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 11:48 -0400, Saleel Velankar wrote:
The xubuntu peeps are looking for artwork for Natty Narwhal (11.04)
I'v informed the Xubuntu team to think about a theme/direction/goal for
their Natty wallpaper. We should have that too..
In the mean time we can continue to brainstorm
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 15:35 -0400, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
What would I not like to be doing? Also simple, being the sole
decision maker for what goes into the community-themes package or
other community artwork efforts.
Yes! I'v noticed you havent been very comfortable being the
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 01:47 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
Well this group competes against Mark's own thoughts and preferences,
Who else thinks this?!
There is no competition with Mark or Canonical Design team and
considering this official artwork team as a competition is a *very* bad
labeling.
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 20:28 +, Martin Owens wrote:
Hey Art Team,
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 23:16 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
Trim the list to contributors only, only those that post and
contribute regularly.
I would _highly_ advise against trimming a community, so long as the
silent
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 22:21 +0530, S. Kartik wrote:
Hi
was starting to download 64 bit at
http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/get-ubuntu/download
then saw this message along side the button to check for which version to
download
64-bit - Not recommended for daily desktop usage
so
Hi,
While going through the Ubuntu Development wiki [1] , I noticed a few
things that struck me as out of place, the mention of bugsquad and the
communication subsections. However, I was enlightened to the usefulness
of those subsections being present there.
Which made me wonder if we can have a
On Friday 18 Jun 2010 5:57:31 pm K Ramnarayan wrote:
A college student is asking me for any project. Is there any
open source project is waiting for contribution? Need a list projects and
tasks
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 10:58 +0530, Rajat Khanduja wrote:
In case there are some people
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 11:40 +0200, Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
Hello, I've opened some bugs (with patches) [1] [2] [3] long ago, to
make some small tweaks to adium-theme-ubuntu.
I really need someone to review them, since the patches are small and
ready to be looked at, but apparently
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 11:27 +0300, Сергей wrote:
Thank you for your feedback, I'll try to recolor it to purple. What
about those white dots and lines on the surface? Shall I move them
closer to the center to make them more visible, or it's unneeded?
Humanity theme sometimes replaces upstream
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 10:30 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 07:04:53 am Vishnoo wrote:
Now that it was fixed[in Humanity] for Lucid , the design team _again_
has a new icon far worse than what was earlier.
Again not an Ubuntu decision? Now where is the decision being
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 19:03 +0100, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
On 7 March 2010 22:56, Alex Launi alex.la...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that new users will crap their pants over the window
controls
being on the left, I think we've all seen OSX before.
I'm pretty sure this whole
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:54 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote on 06/03/10 16:14:
...
In my opinion, this is the worst design change since the decision to
hide incoming IMs and phone calls from the user, and instead
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:21 -0600, Richard JOHNSON wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:45:53AM -0500, Alain-Olivier Breysse wrote:
Bonjour,
The motivation of your decision is already being talked about around the
net in many different languages, and because it is the net, will continue
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:21 -0600, Richard JOHNSON wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:45:53AM -0500, Alain-Olivier Breysse wrote:
Bonjour,
The motivation of your decision is already being talked about around the
net in many different languages, and because it is the net, will continue
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
one. I'm asking why any existing Word icon was copied at all.
It is a mimetype and as such
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm not asking why the OS X was directly copied instead of either Windows
one. I'm asking why any existing Word
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:44 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
Vishnoo a écrit :
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:18 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:04 +0100, François Degrave wrote:
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 07:38:23 am Merk wrote:
I'm
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:36 +, Andrew wrote:
On 13/02/10 10:23, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Hi!
Máirín (Fedora Art-Team Lead) created a mockup of one page of the kind
of web application she’d like to use to manage the artwork process:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 20:56 -0800, Chris Tooley wrote:
Hello all,
Is there a specific site that lists all the official Ubuntu artwork
the Ubuntu artwork team has put into Karmic? I found this site here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Official but more specifically, I'm
looking for the
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:09 +, Liam Wilson wrote:
Hey all;
Some of us on the Ubuntu-uk LoCo have come up with an idea for a new
project - creating a marketing campaign for Ubuntu using Viral Videos
- short little videos that get a message across, similar to
Microsoft's efforts, we also
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 08:36 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
if i drag any icon onto the desktop, it just goes to a random place it seems.
please make sure it ends up under my cursor when i drop it.
Known bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/246981
--
Cheers,
Vish
--
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
