Hi ... Has anyone else had a problem with the spell checker in
Yakkety? I noticed it in Libreoffice writer. The spell checker
settings say it is working, and it is set to the UK English dictionary.
I can write complete garbage, but nothing is offered by the checker. I
have made no
Hi ... I've no idea how else to report this. The 14.04 iso on the
Ubuntu website is broken. It's less than 50 GiB. I did take it twice,
just in case. I've managed to get it from another site. Hopefully,
that one will work OK.
Regards,Barry
--
http://barrydrake.co.nr/
On 18/06/16 16:21, Mark Fraser wrote:
I fixed these, but on running fsck a second time, these block differences were
back. Now this drive is currently sat in an external USB tray so that I could
copy
files across before replacing the one in the computer. Are these errors due to
it being on USB
Hi there I've reported Bug #1590652 - ubiquity crashes when
installing yakkety. Please could one of you try to install, and confirm
this bug? Thanks.
Kind regards,Barry.
--
http://barrydrake.co.nr/
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
On 27/02/16 16:15, Robert McWilliam wrote:
I'd look at what other functions are in the systemd.sh script, search
the other scripts for places they're called and make sure the logic
around that will pick the systemd option. Robert
Hi Robert ... I've just sent the below to the Symform team. I
On 27/02/16 16:15, Robert McWilliam wrote:
I'd look at what other functions are in the systemd.sh script, search
the other scripts for places they're called and make sure the logic
around that will pick the systemd option. Robert
Hi Robert I thought the easiest thing would be to
On 26/02/16 20:27, Simon Greenwood wrote:
That's the answer - there should be. There will be something in the
scripts that activates it. If you don't know, 127.0.0.1 is localhost,
your own computer, so it will always ping but it's unlikely that you
have anything running on it in normal use so
On 26/02/16 20:27, Simon Greenwood wrote:
That's the answer - there should be. There will be something in the
scripts that activates it. If you don't know, 127.0.0.1 is localhost,
your own computer, so it will always ping but it's unlikely that you
have anything running on it in normal use so
On 26/02/16 20:37, Barry Drake wrote:
Hi Simon I didn't know that. Looks like I have a few more
scripts to look through.
Hi Simon I've just found
http://linux-commands-examples.com/initctl It seems it isn't deprecated
- just missing from recent Ubuntu releases. I'll see if I
On 26/02/16 20:37, Barry Drake wrote:
Hi Simon I didn't know that. Looks like I have a few more
scripts to look through. There are a fair few of them. I might fire
up 14.04 again tomorrow and see what's happening on port 59234.
I've found out exactly where the problem exists. I've put
On 26/02/16 20:27, Simon Greenwood wrote:
That's the answer - there should be. There will be something in the
scripts that activates it. If you don't know, 127.0.0.1 is localhost,
your own computer, so it will always ping but it's unlikely that you
have anything running on it in normal use so
On 26/02/16 18:21, Simon Greenwood wrote:
It looks like there should be something listening on port 59234, which
you should be able to identify from sudo netstat -nlp. My guess is
that it's an ssh tunnel if the application is bash based. It may not
have been shut down previously or there might
Hi Any pointer for me in trying to solve a problem. When I attemp
to install the Symform cloud software, on 15.04, when it makes a call
to 127.0.0.1:59234 to register the user, Firefox comes up with a "Unable
to connect Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at
On 27/01/16 15:12, Will Cooke wrote:
Xenial, and it is not long to its release date.
Hi Will Colin, on the list, asked me a while ago when I had last
re-installed. I did re-install, and the problem went away. After the
update and upgrade yesterday, it came back. I know it won't go
Hi there I've just installed my printer on xenial. The printer I
have, is missing from the database in cups. I had to get the driver
from HP. The printer is an HP Deskjet 30558 all in one. Is this
something I should report as a CUPS bug, or is it an HP problem that I
need to report
Hi there ... Alan suggested re-installing my system. This, as he
thought, did cure the problem. Unfortunately, the daily build I took
this morning was badly broken. There is a bad package which is needed
for most of the apps I want to install. So for now, I'm back to Wily.
I'll leave it
On 13/01/16 20:37, Barry Drake wrote:
I have reported the missing menus in the top panel as bug #1533826 in
respect of Audacity.
I have just reported the identical bug as Libreoffice Bug #1535579.
Please can someone confirm it, as I have no idea how many other
applications it may effect
On 19/01/16 11:21, Colin Law wrote:
I am not seeing it in either app, there must be something a bit
different about your machine. Have you tried a fresh install?
Thanks Colin. No, I haven't reinstalled for over a couple or three
months. Thanks for letting me know. I'll re-install quite
>Not sure what you mean by gnome menus in the top panel. Can you be
>more explicit? Are you running Ubuntu with Unity?
Hi Colin . When you move the mouse pointer into the top panel,
many applications show a menu on the left of the top panel. Libreoffice
is one example, but the one I'm
I have reported the missing menus in the top panel as bug #1533826 in
respect of Audacity.
Regards,Barry.
--
http://barrydrake.co.nr/
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Hi In 16.04, currently all the gnome menus on the top panel seem
to have disappeared. This makes some applications, Libreoffice, not
fully useable as some functions can only be accessed from the menu. I
can't find an existing bug report for this. What program should I
report it
On 17/12/15 12:13, Liam Proven wrote:
Yes, that is what I thought happened.
Ctrl, LAlt/RAlt and Shift are all passed through to the OS for
handling -- whatever that OS is.
That's what I have found. I also found I had to rewrite the 'play'
scripts. 15.04 has changed some of its behaviour
On 17/12/15 11:16, Colin Law wrote:
Those seem to be talking about FN keys, whereas Barry said it was
F3 for suspend, which seemed particularly strange to me.
Not quite. I did say that. It was a slip of the finger. +F4
is the hardware suspend key combination, and was one of the key
On 16/12/15 20:20, Liam Proven wrote:
I think you either did not read my reply, or did not understand it.
Sorry not to respond sooner. I've booted into the BIOS settings. I
could not find anything that has to do with wake/sleep. The manual than
deals with the BIOS setup is at:
On 16/12/15 12:32, Liam Proven wrote:
I think this is a BIOS setting on your laptop. Look for options to
disable such things as sleep/wake and hibernate. Then Ubuntu's
software versions should still work.
There is such a BIOS setting, but I do occasionally want to use
'hibernate', so I'm not
On 16/12/15 08:06, Simon Greenwood wrote:
It may be specific to your model or make as Ctrl-F3 doesn't do anything
on my Asus S400CA by default. I would suspect that a keyboard driver for
your make has been installed so finding that and disabling it might work.
I'll take a look when I've got a
Hi there The +F3 is permanently hard-coded to sleep/wake. I
can't find anywhere a keyboard shortcuts conf file. The locations given
for earlier versions of Ubuntu on the internet are no longer valid for
15.04. I need all the F keys to play different pieces of Christmas
music (Carols)
On 16/12/15 07:01, Barry Drake wrote:
hibernate/wake really is hard coded into the +F3 combination. In
custom shortcuts, you can't grab that one. I'm going to see how many
others I am allowed to use.
The super key is hard coded too. You can set the custom shortcut to
+[anykey] just fine
On 16/12/15 07:29, Grant Phillips-Sewell wrote:
However, the fact that this combination wakes the machine up from sleep
leads me to ask whether the F3 key is the hardware sleep/wake key
No. +F4 on this laptop is the hardware sleep key combination.
The issue is definitely due to Ubuntu hard
On 04/12/15 15:16, Liam Proven wrote:
> I talked to the Tizen people at LinuxCon Europe in October.>
> It is not as locked-down as all that, not for developers. But bear in
> mind, it's for semi-embedded use, for locked-down single-function or
> narrow-function devices with a rich UI. It's not a
On 02/12/15 12:52, Barry Drake wrote:
TIZEN
They seem way ahead of Ubuntu in the phone market. I'm sad about that.>
I've subscribed to one of their mailing lists to keep informed.
I talked to some of the Tizen developer guys - The told me their OS is
so locked in, you wouldn't recogn
On 01/12/15 14:15, Alan Pope wrote:
No, other platforms (Jolla, Tizen) have it.
Thanks Alan. I've looked carefully at Tizen. Their site's a bit
strange to navigate around, but I found it quite fascinating. They are
now listing on ebay some Tizen OS smartphones, and they have a number of
On 01/12/15 16:45, Pete S wrote:
Too scared of bricking my phone to take the plunge and put Ubuntu on it!
One day..
It just so happens that I've scheduled a listing for my old phone on
ebay. I won't get a lot for it, and I'm very willing to risk that one.
I've just looked on the web
On 01/12/15 20:54, Barry Drake wrote:
It just so happens that I've scheduled a listing for my old phone on
ebay. I won't get a lot for it, and I'm very willing to risk that one.
I've just looked on the web site. There used to be a list of phones
that had been tried, and what to download from
On 01/12/15 22:57, Barry Drake wrote:
Found it. It doesn't have a Huawei in the list, but I might take a
chance anyhow.
Huawei is my new phone. I meant Samsung Galaxy Young2. The history
shows that Samsung worked well on early models, but everything remotely
recent; the Galaxy Note
Hi there I've just had to get a new Android phone. I still feel
very 'locked in'. I'd love to have an Ubuntu phone, but am wondering if
it will ever have an Android compatibility layer. Is it Google's policy
not to allow it?
With regard to the last few emails on the $5 computer
On 01/12/15 14:19, Liam Proven wrote:
On 1 December 2015 at 15:15, Alan Pope wrote:
No, other platforms (Jolla, Tizen) have it.
And Blackberry 10, which isn't even a version of Linux. (I have a
Passport, a new smartphone with an actual physical *keyboard*. There's
innovation
On 21/11/15 22:21, David King wrote:
Does anyone have any good recommendations, looking in the £300 to £400
price range? Dell still do Ubuntu laptops but they are way more
expensive than they used to be (the Inspiron only cost £300).
I can recommend Cougar - http://www.cougar-extreme.co.uk/
Hi there ... I wonder if any of you might take the time to confirm a
bug in Seahorse (linked to another bug I reported in Empathy) in Wily.
The seahorse bug is Ubuntu Bug #1512083 The test is very simple - set
up a new dummy address - say in an email client. When the password
manager is
On 24/10/15 10:21, Barry Drake wrote:
Hi there I have a Lenovo Thinkpad x201. I had 14.04 running on it
until recently. I did a complete re-install of 15.10. The audio out
used to work fine with 14.04
The last update, together with a bit of time spent cleaning a crackly
jack-socket
Hi there I have a Lenovo Thinkpad x201. I had 14.04 running on it
until recently. I did a complete re-install of 15.10. The audio out
used to work fine with 14.04, but won't work at all with Wily. Sound is
OK from the built-in speakers, but I can't seem to find a fix for the
audio
On 04/09/15 09:54, Dianne wrote:
That's the strangest thing - all the accounts are pop3, but all the
others are acting normally, including one that's on the same server. And
if I start in safe mode the problem persists, but goes away if I use
Help> restart in safe mode!
That is so weird, I
On 03/09/15 17:23, Dianne wrote:
> I'm using pop3 - it seems to be a problem with tbird, as they reappear
> when I go to safe mode.
I wonder if there is a bug in Thunderbird that causes a problem with
pop3 accounts? If the problem account is your only one using pop3, I'd
be inclined to think
On 03/09/15 09:07, Dianne wrote:
I've been playing with this - if I load in safe mode with no add-ons,
all emails reappear. I've tried disabling each add-on in turn (there are
only three) but the problem remains. If I load in safe mode but tell
tbird to always load without add-ons, the problem
On 30/08/15 21:49, Barry Drake wrote:
However (thankfully!) the bug I reported is still there. Newbie maybe,
but not the same amount of egg-on-face. Thank you Colin.
Just a final update on this problem. I've posted the below on the bug
report. I think it explains where I am at:
&quo
On 30/08/15 17:46, Colin Law wrote:
That's what is confusing me too. I don't see how there can be any
accounts unless they have been added by the user. I see none with
Wily.
I've been trying to take a screenshot, but the window I want to capture
has to be in focus, and without the dash, I
On 30/08/15 21:15, Colin Law wrote:
Make sure you use dist-upgrade not upgrade, or if you are using apt rather than apt-get
then sudo apt update sudo apt full-upgrade
Thanks Colin I feel like the ultimate newbie now. I'd never heard
of 'dist-upgrade'. It produced many upgrades
On 30/08/15 20:29, Alan Pope wrote:
Thanks Al. That's shown me how badly broken my system now is! Alt-F
give me the broken dash. I haven't re-assigned any quick keys on this
system, so I decided to check.
Alt f2, not alt f.
Sorry - my typo. Alt f1 gives the launcher, Alt f2 gives
On 30/08/15 18:45, Alan Pope wrote:
Alt-F2, gnome-screenshot, set Grab after a delay of to some value, then click
Take screenshot and make sure you have the dash or whatever you want to screenshot out
when the countdown finishes.
Thanks Al. That's shown me how badly broken my system now
On 30/08/15 15:14, Colin Law wrote:
You say in the bug [1] that you removed interaction with all Google
accounts (settings-online accounts) but I don't understand exactly
what you mean by that.
In the Online Account settings, it lists access by Ubuntu to the
following Google online accounts
On 30/08/15 17:01, Colin Law wrote:
How did you remove them?
In the Online Accounts settings window, on the Google account settings,
each of these accounts shows an 'on/off' switch. I turned all of them
off to block access. I didn't remove any software, or alter any other
parameters.
On 29/08/15 14:20, Colin Law wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1320539 (Dash search
of applications is randomly disabled when online searches have been
turned off)
Hi there I've reported it as: Ubuntu bug# 1490277 If any of you
feel like repeating it in in your
Hi there The dash on my 15.10 desktop 64 bit installation won't
show any applications. This happened immediately after I'd tried to
'de-google' the system as far as I was able. I've since allowed google
the same access as the default, but still can't get apps to show in the
dash. The
On 29/08/15 11:25, Alan Pope wrote:
Do you mean the launcher on the left is gone, or it is there but empty, or it's
there and you can open the dash (with the windows key) but no apps appear?
Hi Alan. Thanks for your quick response. The launcher hasn't changed.
The dash appears as normal,
Hi Colin Thanks for your reply which seems to have disappeared!
No, the online search is not disabled - but I think I had it disabled
when I was trying to avoid google interference. Re-enabling everything
did not cure the problem.
Kind regards, Barry.
--
On 11/08/15 21:22, Colin Law wrote:
What do you see in syslog when it disconnects?
Bless you Colin. Looks like a hardware problem, and I think I've
cracked it. Never thought to look at the syslog. Silly of me. Thanks.
Barry.
--
http://barrydrake.co.nr/
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi There ... Just about to go off for a couple of days with my netbook.
Haven't used it for a month or two. WIFI was just fine then. I'm
running 15.10. I did all the updates, and as always, copied the
.thunderbird directory over from my laptop. I got all the more recent
messages just
On 02/08/15 19:24, Gareth France wrote:
Today I have upgraded a family member's laptop from Windows 8.1 to
Windows 10.
I had Windows7 on a removable drive in a caddy on my desktop. A couple
of days ago, I downloaded the Win 10 iso and did the free upgrade. the
install process is painfully
On 03/07/15 09:24, Barry Drake wrote:
You'll be amazed how tiny the requirements of DSL actually are! But it
can actually be made to look really good - it looks just like a modern
desktop if you tweak it. And, yes, DSL (and Puppy) will go on a 5.25
floppy drive. If there's enough RAM
On 03/07/15 08:37, Gareth France wrote:
Just remember, my aim is to get an old 486, ideally with 5.25 drive,
yellowed and covered in marks. It should look like it's really had a
hard life. The aim is to say 'look, a modern desktop running even on
this old thing, imagine how well it would run on
On 25/06/15 11:12, Barry Drake wrote:
That's interesting! My old pentium 4 has only 256 Mb ram. I'm going to
try some old dimm cards to see if any are compatible
Hi there ... I've had a very interesting time since then. I didn't
have a pair of suitable dimm cards, so I've stuck
On 25/06/15 10:41, Simon Greenwood wrote:
I came across PeppermintOS[1] recently, which is an LXDE based
distribution but a nicely designed one that replaces Firefox with
Chromium and has an inbuilt system for Chrome app integration. I'm
running it on a four year old Lenovo AMD netbook which was
On 25/06/15 00:10, Tony Pursell wrote:
In order to report a bug, can you tell me what I should be seeing when
my PC boots in EFI mode. Is it a GRUB menu containing Ubuntu and Windows?
That should be exactly what you ought to be seeing. It possibly could
have been effected by the failed
Hi there ... I mentioned getting good results with Tori OS on an old
pentium 4. It didn't like Zorin, but since then I've resurrected a
newer computer that would run 14.04 Lubuntu, but was a bit stretched. I
tried Zorin. It has none of the freedom of Ubuntu. It is very heavily
branded
On 25/06/15 10:13, Colin Law wrote:
Have you tried ubuntu mate? I have found it good on old PCs
Thanks Colin I never even spotted it. I'm downloading it right
now! It looks as though it is well up to what I want to do.
Regards,Barry.
--
--
http://barrydrake.co.nr/
On 19/06/15 08:29, Stuart Ward wrote:
Wednesday evenings it is open to the public.
Yesterday, I collected a computer from someone the local Freecycle
group. It had no power supply or hard drive, but otherwise is OK. I
rigged it up with an old spare power supply and it booted from a DVD.
On 22/06/15 15:51, Tony Pursell wrote:
The installer (from the USB stick) was in EFI mode, and the installation
of Ubuntu is EFI as well. This is according to tests in
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI under Identifying if the
computer boots the HDD in UEFI mode and Identifying if the
On 22/06/15 12:27, Tony Pursell wrote:
I do, however, have a residual problem. When I start the computer up, I
do not get a GRUB menu. I can only start Ubuntu from the computer's F12
boot menu. It will then show a GRUB menu, which includes Windows Boot
loader. Is there a way to go straight
On 20/06/15 22:01, Tony Pursell wrote:
Well, its booted into Windows showing the reduced size Windows partition.
This is the first time I have installed on a PC with EFI - is there
something I should have done first?
Very definitely. You must boot in EFI mode. If you don't see a grub
On 20/06/15 23:42, Tony Pursell wrote:
Currently, it boots to Ubuntu from a USB, if I have it plugged in,
otherwise it boots into Widows 8.1.
When booted using the live USB, the Ubuntu partition installed on the
hard drive seems to be all there, although I wouldn't know if some files
The
On 12/06/15 21:44, Gareth France wrote:
Looks different. What is it based on?
Hey - I'm really interested in this. I quote from the Torios website:
ToriOS, a GNU/Linux Distribution based on Ubuntu LTS, will be
potentially one of the strongest systems available for NON-PAE machines.
--
On 06/06/15 18:29, Daniel Llewellyn wrote:
the grub menu is used when booting the disc via native EFI, whereas the
orange screen is for El Torito dvd boot. This difference will explain
the differences you see from the first install attempt and your
subsequent attempts.
Thanks for that.
I
Hi there I had a most annoying problem when installing the
testing version of Wily - 15.10. I have two internal drives. One
currently has Mint installed, and the other had 15.04 testing in use
until I installed 15.10.
Following the defaults, the installer warned me that it wanted to
On 06/06/15 11:07, Colin Law wrote:
On 6 June 2015 at 10:32, Barry Drake ubuntu-advertis...@gmx.com wrote:
On 06/06/15 08:31, Colin Law wrote:
I don't think 'sda' is a valid answer to all the questions, notably:
As originally setup how did you select which system to boot from? Did
you tell
On 06/06/15 11:50, Colin Law wrote:
You did not answer the other questions on my previous post. Apologies
if that is because you still have to sort out the answers. I thought
I had better say in case you had missed the questions.
Sorry Colin . I saw all the questions - the fact is I
On 06/06/15 12:19, Colin Law wrote:
How were you trying to boot off sdb (when it would not boot)?
What exactly happened when you tried?
The installer requested that I restart the system and ejected the DVD as
normal. On restart, I first allowed the normal grub screen (from sda)
to appear.
On 06/06/15 08:31, Colin Law wrote:
Assuming the drives were sda and sdb which is which?
As originally setup how did you select which system to boot from? Did
you tell the BIOS to boot off one disk or the other or did you get a
grub menu that allowed you to select which one?
If it was the
On 06/06/15 16:11, Colin Law wrote:
picture of a man and keyboard at the bottom of screen? If so what
happens if you immediately hit a key?
Yes there is. If I hit a key, I get a menu, but it is not the grub menu
I got on first boot from the disk. It does not include the OEM install
On 06/06/15 17:03, Colin Law wrote:
Is it possible, on your first attempt, that before selecting the erase
all option you had gone into the Something Else option and selected
sdb as the boot loader destination? Unfortunately I have not got a
spare machine at the moment and don't want to go
On 06/06/15 14:40, Colin Law wrote:
I that case perhaps, as I suggested, you did not tell the installer to
use sdb for boot.
As Ubuntu is now so quick and easy to install, I popped a spare 80GiB
drive into my caddy, and repeated the exact procedure to install onto
sdc (the 80GiB drive).
1)
On 02/05/15 22:30, Gareth France wrote:
Ok, I am really, really needing some help here. I have resolved all the
issues one by one, except for an issue with the format. It is set to 3.0
(quilt) but I keep getting this error:
Gareth Just over a year ago, I had a go at making a Debian Sword
On 03/05/15 20:04, Gareth France wrote:
As most people are now well aware I'm desperate to be able to work out
GUI programming, but it does not seem to be my fate. There must be a
correct way to submit a commercial command line only program. It is
virtually useless if each user must be taught to
On 30/03/15 00:22, James Morrissey wrote:
Doesn't seem to fix the problem mentioned in the bugs offered by Barry:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1414995
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1383214
Can someone tell me how to install an older version?
On 25/03/15 12:28, Tony Pursell wrote:
There is a ppa for up-to-date Wine versions, if you can enable it in Mint.
Thanks for that. I'm OK in Mint as it uses an older package. I can't
install a legacy package in the current Ubuntu, as the gnu dependencies
are what cause the problem.
I
Hi ...I'm currently using Mint more than Ubuntu because of the need
for Windows apps installed under Wine. The bug I reported way back,
that Wine cannot be made to open Microsoft .msi files, was fixed way
back. If any of you are in touch with the Wine packagers for Ubuntu,
you might
On 25/03/15 10:44, Colin Law wrote:
Can you provide more details of the package containing the fix. Is
that a specific version of wine or what?
Also the link to the relevant bugs might be useful.
It's a long time since it was fixed. I reported the bug at:
On 06/03/15 09:10, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
Just trying to get a straw poll of what phones people use here and why...
Mine's currently a Huawei Ascend Y300-100. I got it because it was a
cheap option, with a lot of internal memory (I thought). In practice, I
haven't found a way
On 27/01/15 12:42, Daniel Llewellyn wrote:
you mentioned earlier in the thread that you successfully ran the
installation on an copy of mint using the same ubuntu packages. Was
that possibly using a different .wine directory? Have you tried
against an entirely virgin .wine directory
Tried
On 20/01/15 10:50, Barry Drake wrote:
Hi there Some time ago, I mentioned that I could not install
.msi files using wine.
I've reported this as a wine bug at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1414995
Please, please would somebody take five minutes to repeat and confirm
this bug
On 27/01/15 14:54, Colin Law wrote:
In the working mint and the non-working ubuntu what do apt-cache
policy wine and apt-cache policy wine1.6 and which msiexec show? Colin
I think you've got it Colin. The packages appeared to be the same, I
hadn't spotted the '4' and the '6' after 'ubuntu'
On 27/01/15 11:53, Colin Law wrote:
I see from the bug report that you have used the command wine msiexec
-i ActivePython-2.7.8.10-win32-x86.msi What happens if you just use
msiexec -i ActivePython-2.7.8.10-win32-x86.msi Colin
Exactly the same happens. I think msiexec is becoming obsolete now.
On 27/01/15 17:14, Colin Law wrote:
I might suggest that high horses are out of order when complaining
about problems in an alpha release :) Colin
Oops! I hadn't realised I was giving that impression. Apologies to
anyone for my own misunderstanding. :(
Regards,Barry.
--
Hi there I quite like this:
http://view.email.telegraph.co.uk/?j=fe8917787060077572m=fe991570766c027975ls=fe1d1d70766c0d7f7d1176l=ff051570746503s=fe1b15767067037a7c1c76jb=ff991674ju=fe2615747c610774741c71r=0
Pity it doesn't mention Linux though.
Regards,Barry.
--
On 22/01/15 13:43, Dave Morley wrote:
Why would it mention Linux it is a report on the Windows 10 tech
review launch yesterday
Because it mentions Google Chrome and Android - both of which are
non-Windows operating systems (and both of which are Linux based).
Regards,Barry.
--
On 22/01/15 11:24, Stuart Ward wrote:
Be aware that some deluded people are using things like outlook that
top posts by default, making it hard for themselves..
Outlook? Ah yes, I remember amazed it's still around. I gave
Outlook Express up for Pegasus mail way back in the '80s. This
On 20/01/15 12:12, Paul Sladen wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Barry Drake wrote:
impossible to install .msi file using wine under Ubuntu
Which precise .msi file? (ie. URL)
Several - every single one I tried fails. One in particular is Python -
either Python 2.7 from https://www.python.org
Hi there Some time ago, I mentioned that I could not install .msi
files using wine. The suggestions were mostly things I's already
tried. I now confirm that it is impossible to install .msi file using
wine under Ubuntu - and I have proof that this is NOT a wine problem!
I've been
On 17/01/15 22:28, Gareth France wrote:
As for inline posting it just seems like a lot more effort and an
order of magnitude slower to delete the bits that aren't needed and
spread my reply out over umpteen different locations in the mail.
Hi folk Inline posting is sometimes a pain to
On 18/01/15 09:15, Colin Law wrote:
Also if that is the version of ibus then I deduce you are running
Ubuntu 14.10, whereas the new ibus is for 14.04, so it won't help
anyway. I don't know, but I suspect it may not be back ported for
14.10 as that will be superseded in a few months anyway.
Hi there I'm running 15.04 testing 64bit, on a desktop pc. For
month or two now, the Unity launcher bar loses icons after (usually) the
second launch of a particular program during a session. Firefox and
Thunderbird are two such icons. In each case, the specified icon is
replaced by a
1 - 100 of 609 matches
Mail list logo