Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall Schor closed UIMA-153.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed. Only thing left to look at here is the Swing
Adam Lally wrote:
I put up a Wiki page giving the suggested breakdown of methods between
the existing interfaces CommonCas, CAS, JCas and new interfaces
CommonCasView, CasView, and JCasView. Please take a look:
http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/casandcasviewinterfaceredesign.html.
-Adam
I would
add snowball annotator project
--
Key: UIMA-154
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-154
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Sandbox
Affects Versions: 2.1
add cas editor (tae) project
Key: UIMA-155
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-155
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Sandbox
Reporter: Jörn Kottmann
1) Upload
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz reopened UIMA-37:
-
Found at least one additional occurrence.
Track down and replace remaining occurrences of IBM
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
snip
How did you arrive at the numbers you put in the file?
It was ugly. 1) make up a guess for the width=. 2) run the build, and
looked at the HTML output using FireFox or IE.
3) take a ruler, measure the size of the box
4) edit the html being
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
PDF looks ok now, but the Swing html viewer still has the same problems.
I suspect this viewer isn't handling the CSS. I'll take a look, maybe
later today.
Another approach might be to get the javahelp generation of DocBook to
work. I tried that
The LICENSE file is the Apache 2.0 license.
The README says The Snowball stemmers are licensed under
the BSD License (see http://snowball.tartarus.org/license.php), with
Copyright (c) 2001,
Dr Martin Porter, and (for the Java developments) Copyright (c) 2002,
Richard Boulton.
The license
I wonder if things like the Whitespace Annotator in the sandbox should
use org.apache.uima as the start of their package names.
I think this is fine if the thing is destined to be an incorporated part
of the uima java project.
Should it be something else, otherwise?
-Marshall
On 1/4/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would propose the following changes:
- Leave createFeaturePath() and friends at the CAS. These methods
require/return CAS-specific data structures and don't need to be
accessible anywhere else.
Marshall had already moved these to CommonCas,
Adam Lally wrote:
On 1/4/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Another open issue is the createFS method and variants. I have left
them off of the view API for now in deference to Thilo's no
convenience methods suggestion, but I'm still a little unsure.
Basically the situation now is
Adam Lally wrote:
The process call would take a CAS. Inside the body of the process()
method there would be no issue, but I'm thinking about other methods
that the user has implemented that need access to the indexes and also
need to create new FS. I'm sure there are tons of these. IMO having
On 1/4/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
The process call would take a CAS. Inside the body of the process()
method there would be no issue, but I'm thinking about other methods
that the user has implemented that need access to the indexes and also
need to create
On 1/4/07, Marshall Schor (JIRA) uima-dev@incubator.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462251]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-94:
Lev - is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462251
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-94:
Lev - is the -tae command line option something that existed before this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-156.
Resolution: Fixed
CVD now brings its own Logger.properties file. This is not ideal, but it's the
only way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jörn Kottmann updated UIMA-155:
---
Attachment: net.sf.tae uima-155.zip
add cas editor (tae) project
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
The LICENSE file is the Apache 2.0 license.
The README says The Snowball stemmers are licensed under
the BSD License (see http://snowball.tartarus.org/license.php), with
Copyright (c) 2001,
Dr Martin Porter, and (for the Java developments) Copyright
Adam Lally wrote:
On 1/4/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would propose the following changes:
- Leave createFeaturePath() and friends at the CAS. These methods
require/return CAS-specific data structures and don't need to be
accessible anywhere else.
Marshall had already moved
CVD uses deprecated API for setting log file.
-
Key: UIMA-156
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-156
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Thilo Goetz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462259
]
Noel Winstanley commented on UIMA-124:
--
I'd object to closing this issue - as the work-around doesn't really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thilo Goetz updated UIMA-156:
-
Component/s: Tools
CVD uses deprecated API for setting log file.
Adam Lally wrote:
On 1/4/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
The process call would take a CAS. Inside the body of the process()
method there would be no issue, but I'm thinking about other methods
that the user has implemented that need access to the indexes and also
This note is really from Marshall. He's having email trouble so I
posted it on his behalf.
On 1/4/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would propose the following changes:
- Leave createFeaturePath() and friends at the CAS. These methods
require/return CAS-specific data structures and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462262
]
Greg Holmberg commented on UIMA-151:
May I suggest using the ICU Unicode package: http://icu.sourceforge.net
It
Eddie Epstein wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current parameter group design requires replicating all
configuration
parameters for each language. This is neither elegant nor easy to
maintain. A better design would use common configuration paramters with
the provision to override
On 1/4/07, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- On the JCas interface, can we remove some of the APIs and just make
them available on the impl object? I'm thinking of things like
putJfsFromCaddr(int, FeatureStructure) and getType(int).
I think these may be called from JCas
On 1/4/07, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lev Kozakov wrote:
snip
No, the '-tae' option did not exist before, it was the default option.
The
reason for checking this option in a command line and throwing
exception is
your previous comment (if the user specifies the old -tae
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall Schor reassigned UIMA-120:
---
Assignee: Marshall Schor
Logical Structure view of CAS: show view name in unexpanded form of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-12:
--
Assignee: Marshall Schor
Assigning to Marshall so we don't lose track of it.
Change JCas impl to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-116:
---
Assignee: Adam Lally
Always deliver the base CAS to the process method
Lev Kozakov wrote:
snip
I thought that your intention was to emphasize that the old TAE output
format is not available any more.
I'm not trying to emphasize. I thought, from previous comments, that
there
was a flag, called -ae, which could be set true or false.
So I thought there might be
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
snip Currently there is a distinction made for single view and multiple view
components. The UIMA architecture standard proposes that all components are multiple view components and be
delivered a handle to the base CAS, and the component retrieves views as required.
On 1/4/07, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
FYI I made updates to the Wiki page - see my comments on the page for
details.
-Adam
I probably just missed it, but given a JCasView, how do get the
corresponding JCas?
Thanks for catching that omission. I have added
On 1/4/07, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lev Kozakov wrote:
snip
I thought that your intention was to emphasize that the old TAE output
format is not available any more.
I'm not trying to emphasize. I thought, from previous comments, that
there
was a flag, called -ae, which could
On 1/4/07, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
snip Currently there is a distinction made for single view and multiple view
components. The UIMA architecture standard proposes that all components are multiple view components and be delivered
a handle to the base
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462335
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-116:
-
Update:
There is related discussion currently onging about refactoring the CAS
There's another issue with JCas we haven't considered yet - the
addToIndexes() method on JCasGen-erated classes. When this is called,
it needs to know what index repository (what view) to index them in.
Currently, this uses whichever view (meaning a JCas instance) was
passed to the constructor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462355
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-138:
-
Fixed issue (b). Sofa mapping for sofa-unaware CollectionReaders is now
Adam Lally wrote:
There's another issue with JCas we haven't considered yet - the
addToIndexes() method on JCasGen-erated classes. When this is called,
it needs to know what index repository (what view) to index them in.
Same for removeFromIndexes() of course :-)
Currently, this uses
the ASF secretary to let me know when he records the sofware
We will sign it next week, our CTO is currently on vacation.
41 matches
Mail list logo
