On 12/05/2020 17:11, Greg Choules wrote:
> However, allowing for the granularity of the various reporting
> systems the dips do appear to be slipping later in the day, which
> might fit with the sunset theory. Though given previous comments I'm
> not completely convinced.
Now, if you combine
Here's a thought.
Industry leading bodies* should announce that from 2026 all internet
connections sold in the UK will be IPv6 only, and thus all CPEs must
support IPv6 on the WAN and the LAN side, with no IPv4 on either. ISPs
can then offer a DNS64/NAT64 service for customers, particularly
Hi everyone,
I am looking for a someone who can offer optical spectrum from Docklands (any
of the usual subjects) to Equinix Williams House in Manchester. My client wants
to put a 50Ghz coherent device at either end, so the supplier would allocate a
channel on their existing infrastructure.
Hi All,
I have a customer who is concerned that his mobile devices have been
compromised on his home WiFi but this is not an area I have much knowledge
of.
Are there any Mobile Device Cyber Security experts out there that could
assist him with some investigations?
Thanks
--
Paul Bone
Network
I can see the meme generator is going to be busy today! :D
On 22/05/2020, 14:06, "uknof on behalf of Christian"
wrote:
Another question. If all Internet connections (capital "I" please note)
have to have a public IP provided that is stable and are able to
initiate and respond to
https://imgflip.com/i/42fn8j
On 22/05/2020, 13:26, "uknof on behalf of Paul Mansfield"
wrote:
Here's a thought.
Industry leading bodies* should announce that from 2026 all internet
connections sold in the UK will be IPv6 only, and thus all CPEs must
support IPv6 on the WAN
something for the weekend :-)
On 22/05/2020 14:16, Neil J. McRae wrote:
I can see the meme generator is going to be busy today! :D
On 22/05/2020, 14:06, "uknof on behalf of Christian"
wrote:
Another question. If all Internet connections (capital "I" please note)
have to have a
>I am tempted to argue that anybody without a public IP is not actually
>being given Internet access but mediated Internet "connection".
>
>So rather than deprecating IPv4 which I don't think is workable. Then
>"Internet access" should be sold as a separate product offer to Internet
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 13:21, Aled Morris wrote:
>
> Hi BT GEA customers.
>
> Has anyone managed to order a GEA Cablelink with external presentation i.e.
> not to an Access Locate rack inside the exchange but to a footway box outside?
>
> This is clearly shown as an option (top blue line) on the
On Fri May 22, 2020 at 02:48:41pm +0100, James Bensley wrote:
> Where are you ordering the external variant cable-link to/from? I
> presume you're requesting that one end is a handover chamber outside,
> where are you requesting the other end be? They are a mixture of an
> internal variant 3 (from
> On 22 May 2020, at 15:49, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>
> As I'm not allowed to use any more Friday memes :D
>
> I'll just move all my IPv4s to be assets in a company in Luxembourg.
Google reports a higher percentage of IPv6 accesses in Luxembourg (40%) than
the UK (31%).
Tim
Why would that happen Pete? Nobody would even know that you had even done it.
It wouldn't take a very bright tax inspector to notice that she's bought
an internet service from ISP A which included an IPv4 address, and ISP A
doesn't pay any IPv4 address tax because it claims it has no
A notice to all…
Play nicely folks.. this is UKNOF, not UKNOT.. just in case anyone had
forgotten. ;-)
Yes, you can disagree with someone’s viewpoint, but also remember that the
whole point of UKNOF is to foster a learning and knowledge sharing environment…
and the list is not only made up of
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 14:52, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
> You're confusing "Cablelink" with "GEA Cablelink". They're two very different
> things.
Ah sorry yeah you're right, it's even in the subject line!
I have no excuse.
Cheers,
James.
Is this really not UKNOT?!
Why would that happen Pete? Nobody would even know that you had even done it.
Regards,
Neil.
On 22/05/2020, 16:05, "Pete Stevens" wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2020, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> As I'm not allowed to use any more Friday memes :D
>
> I'll just
How long until Hard Brexit?
On 22/05/2020 16:34, Neil J. McRae wrote:
And this wouldn't change that, nor anything else. It would be a legal tax
efficient way to avoid Pete's tax.
Neil.
On 22/05/2020, 16:30, "Tim Chown" wrote:
> On 22 May 2020, at 15:49, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>
And this wouldn't change that, nor anything else. It would be a legal tax
efficient way to avoid Pete's tax.
Neil.
On 22/05/2020, 16:30, "Tim Chown" wrote:
> On 22 May 2020, at 15:49, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>
> As I'm not allowed to use any more Friday memes :D
>
> I'll
Pete - I'm impressed with your perseverance on this idea even though it's got
more flees than a Worf's pet targ.
all the cable systems are registered in Bermuda, yet none of them go anywhere
near the place
On 22/05/2020, 16:39, "Pete Stevens" wrote:
> Why would that happen Pete?
As I'm not allowed to use any more Friday memes :D
I'll just move all my IPv4s to be assets in a company in Luxembourg.
Neil.
On 22/05/2020, 15:35, "uknof on behalf of Pete Stevens"
wrote:
> Here's a thought.
Make IPv4 addresses taxable assets and have them declared on balance
On Mon May 18, 2020 at 12:48:32pm +, Catalin Dominte wrote:
> I am looking for a someone who can offer optical spectrum from Docklands (any
> of the usual subjects) to Equinix Williams House in Manchester. My client
> wants to put a 50Ghz coherent device at either end, so the supplier would
>
Here's a thought.
Make IPv4 addresses taxable assets and have them declared on balance
sheets as part of equity. That way you've an incentive to stop using
them and give them back even if you believe in EBITDA because it lowers
your RoCE. It's not like HMRC isn't about to need a massive influx
Pete Stevens said:
> Maybe it's impossible to legislate to make the tax not avoidable, but
> tax avoidance isn't something I've experience with.
Tax avoidance is legal. Tax evasion isn't.
--
Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler,
Email: cl...@davros.org | it will get its
Until EU says they can't be exported to a "third country" (like using a
.eu domain for instance) :-)
On 22/05/2020 16:54, Neil J. McRae wrote:
On the government list of Brexit issues:
1: Be able to import food
2: Be able to import Medicine
3: Be able to import Beer/wine
4: Be able to land
Your welcome Will; I'm glad my forthright comment saved you having to learn to
play the guitarrón and join a different Mariachi band.
But on your question - God no.
I would have been a consultant to the clowns^w civil servants who would have
ended up running it and charged the taxpayer an
On 22/05/2020 14:23, Paul Bone wrote:
>I am tempted to argue that anybody without a public IP is not actually
>being given Internet access but mediated Internet "connection".
>
>So rather than deprecating IPv4 which I don't think is workable. Then
>"Internet access" should be sold as a
> On 22 May 2020, at 12:00, Christian wrote:
>
>>
>> I am currently building a new network for a small ISP and we are going to be
>> running IPv6 only services with DNS64/NAT64 as much as possible, but at this
>> stage we still do require some public IPv4 for business with on-prem
>>
You mean like this Will?
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/media-releases/2019/fairer-prices-for-broadband-customers
and nobody with half a brain thought Corbyn's idea (and not just this one but
all of them) would make any service issues, or anything else better.
Neil.
On
Imagine having business practices deemed so unfair that even a Tory
government’s regulator saw fit to step on them! Not a great look!
Did you not fancy the job of running the nationalised British National
Broadband PTT or Post Office Internet or whatever it was going to be
called? I thought
28 matches
Mail list logo
