Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

On 19.07.2023 18:30, Juanjo Pablos via unattended-devel wrote: On 19/7/23 15:54, Johan Ho via unattended-devel wrote: I completely forgot about this for a while, what is the status of switching to Strawberry Perl? I was too afraid to break things up, so I made the modifications internally.

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

On 19/7/23 15:54, Johan Ho via unattended-devel wrote: I completely forgot about this for a while, what is the status of switching to Strawberry Perl? I was too afraid to break things up, so I made the modifications internally. Here is my copy. If everyone is ok, I can update the repository

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

Hello Juanjo, I completely forgot about this for a while, what is the status of switching to Strawberry Perl? I see that the perl.bat script in the repository still points to an old ActivePerl package that is no longer available for download. I tested now using Strawberry Perl in our own unatt

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

Hello Juan, thanks a lot, that solved the problem. Below is the perl.bat file that is now working for me. Please add it to SVN if you like (maybe as other filename strawberryperl.bat ?) One little annoyance remaining, see PNG attachment. I will have to tell Windows that Strawberry Perl should b

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

On 26/6/19 14:37, Johan Ho via unattended-devel wrote: I think I solved this in my Windows 10 unattended script by setting the "ApplicationAssociationToasts" entries for .pl files to 0 in the registry: I have found a bug on this, but it said that this was f

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

Den 26.06.2019 13:29, skrev Juanjo Pablos via unattended-devel: > On 26/6/19 13:15, Hofmann, Gerhard wrote: >> One little annoyance remaining, see PNG attachment. I will have to tell >> Windows that Strawberry Perl should be used to handle the PL file extension. >> But this problem I already had w

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

On 26/6/19 13:15, Hofmann, Gerhard wrote: One little annoyance remaining, see PNG attachment. I will have to tell Windows that Strawberry Perl should be used to handle the PL file extension. But this problem I already had with ActivePerl. I saw this error o

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

On 25/6/19 11:56, Hofmann, Gerhard wrote: The ptar command unpacks the .tar.gz archive not into %TEMP%\Win32-NetResource-0.057 like wanted / expected, but instead into c:\windows\system32\Win32-NetResource-0.057 maybe we need to add cd %TE

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

Hello Juan, thanks a lot, I tested this and I think we are near a working state. The ptar command unpacks the .tar.gz archive not into %TEMP%\Win32-NetResource-0.057 like wanted / expected, but instead into c:\windows\system32\Win32-NetResource-0.057 The commands cd %TEMP%\Win32-Net

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

, 31. Dezember 2018 07:57 An: Hofmann, Gerhard via unattended-devel Cc: Juanjo Pablos Betreff: Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl? Just a comment: ::This code should be equilavent to "cpan Win32::NetResource" ::But it works Offline cd %TEMP% p

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

On 24/6/19 21:57, Hofmann, Gerhard wrote: You suggested me some commands (ptar… make…) that also should do the job offline and indeed when I run them in a cmd this works very well.   But when having it in the perl.

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

Just a comment: ::This code should be equilavent to "cpan Win32::NetResource" ::But it works Offline cd %TEMP% ptar zxf %Z%\packages\strawberryperl\Win32-NetResource-0.057.tar.gz cd Win32-NetResource-0.057 perl Makefile.PL gmake gmake

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Experiences with Strawberry Perl instead of ActivePerl?

On 27/12/18 13:53, Hofmann, Gerhard via unattended-devel wrote: 1) installing Win32::NetResource library online using cpan command - any offline alternative possible for PCs not connected to the Internet or behind http proxys? Added this line: :: URL|A

Re: [Unattended-Dev] suggestion for todo.pl / variable $os / handling of new Windows versions

On 13/12/18 13:46, Hofmann, Gerhard via unattended-devel wrote: I’m not so familiar with the Sourceforge SVN stuff anymore, could someone else add it to the repository? added. Please test it when you can. Thanks! __

Re: [Unattended-Dev] suggestion for todo.pl / variable $os / handling of new Windows versions

Betreff: Re: [Unattended-Dev] suggestion for todo.pl / variable $os / handling of new Windows versions Hello, okay, to be on the safe side we should do it like before: add some lines to todo.pl whenever a new Windows version is released. In the attached file, I have added Windows Server 2016 and

Re: [Unattended-Dev] suggestion for todo.pl / variable $os / handling of new Windows versions

Sourceforge SVN stuff anymore, could someone else add it to the repository? Regards Gerhard Hofmann Von: Juanjo Pablos Gesendet: Montag, 3. Dezember 2018 22:21 An: unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Unattended-Dev] suggestion for todo.pl / variable $os / handling of new Windows

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Should I remove AdobeFlashPlayerUpdateSvc as default

El 4/12/18 a las 9:33, Johan Ho escribió: Sounds like a good idea to me at least! I assume those commands should work the same across all Windows versions? As far as I know yes. But I guess that the best way to to publish them and report back

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Should I remove AdobeFlashPlayerUpdateSvc as default

Den 03.12.2018 10:12, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > Hi, > > I wonder if I should add these lines on the flash.bat script. > > +:: Delete Tasks autoupdate: > +todo.pl "SchTasks /Delete /TN \"Adobe Flash Player Updater\" /f" > +todo.pl "SchTasks /Delete /TN \"Adobe Flash Player PPAPI Notifier\" /f" > + >

Re: [Unattended-Dev] suggestion for todo.pl / variable $os / handling of new Windows versions

El 3/12/18 a las 10:45, Hofmann, Gerhard escribió: What do you think? I must mention that my sole usage for the Unatteded software are application only installs using appsonly.bat / appsonly.pl which I contributed years ago to the project. So it might be that $os va

Re: [Unattended-Dev] How do I enable smbv1 using command line

See: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2696547/how-to-detect-enable-and-disable-smbv1-smbv2-and-smbv3-in-windows-and -- Shenan T. Stanley shen...@tamu.edu IT Manager Research Security Office - Texas A&M University System Information Systems

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

El 04/11/15 a las 09:25, Johan Ho escribió: > Anyways, to be honest I'm not overly impressed by DC / v12. There are a > few "premium function" buttons that nags people to buy the "full version"... > > Maybe it would be good to give people the option to choose which version > they want? That is why

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

Den 10.09.2015 02.23, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > El 09/09/15 a las 15:41, Johan Ho escribió: >> Huh, but the DC/12 version of Adobe Reader is also 32-bit? It is >> installed in %PROGRAMFILES(x86)% and the executable is also called >> AcroRd32.exe. > I did notice just on the XP machines, I do not know.

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

El 09/09/15 a las 15:41, Johan Ho escribió: > Huh, but the DC/12 version of Adobe Reader is also 32-bit? It is > installed in %PROGRAMFILES(x86)% and the executable is also called > AcroRd32.exe. I did notice just on the XP machines, I do not know. > I'm guessing DC just checks the OS version when

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

Huh, but the DC/12 version of Adobe Reader is also 32-bit? It is installed in %PROGRAMFILES(x86)% and the executable is also called AcroRd32.exe. I'm guessing DC just checks the OS version when installing and stops if it's not at least Windows 7. That's why I thought it was just as well to cal

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

Hi, This change does not work on Windows XP. We need to split adobe-reader.bat into x86-adobe-reader.bat and AMD64-adobereader.bat what do you think? El 09/09/15 a las 13:20, Unattended, A Windows deployment system SVN repository escribió: > > Adobe Reader DC (v12), new file. > > By mythrix on

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dotnet Requieremen on cdburnerXP

Den 10.11.2014 12:55, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > El 10/11/14 a las 10:42, Johan Ho escribió: >> I've been messing around so much with the dotnet.bat file that I stopped >> updating it to the version in the repo, that's why I missed that update. > maybe the dotnet stuff is incomplete. Feel free to add a

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dotnet Requieremen on cdburnerXP

El 10/11/14 a las 10:42, Johan Ho escribió: > I've been messing around so much with the dotnet.bat file that I stopped > updating it to the version in the repo, that's why I missed that update. maybe the dotnet stuff is incomplete. Feel free to add any changes.

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dotnet Requieremen on cdburnerXP

Den 10.11.2014 10:04, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > There is a dotnet-win7sp1.bat that updates the dotnet stuff. and ignore > if is already installed. > > Is not that correct? Ah right! I see that you have added an OS check in dotnet.bat now! I've been messing around so much with the dotnet.bat file that

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dotnet Requieremen on cdburnerXP

El 10/11/14 a las 09:13, Johan Ho escribió: > Oh! It is possible I removed it because dotnet is preinstalled in > Windows 7, so I didn't think about keeping it for Windows XP when I was > editing the file. > > Feel free to add it back for compatibility! > > Johan Ho There is a dotnet-win7sp1.bat th

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dotnet Requieremen on cdburnerXP

Den 08.11.2014 12:44, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > Is there any reason of why the dotnet stuff was removed from this > application?: > > > http://sourceforge.net/p/unattended/code/3686/ > > > in my environment, i do not install the dot net stuff unless necessary. > > -

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Unattended logo

Den 23.09.2014 12:24, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > El 23/09/14 10:39, Johan Ho escribió: >> Hey, I'm no artist either, but I think the colors you used might be a >> bit "too much"? The blue background seems to kind of overpower the >> "unattended" title text. > I choose the colors from the text install o

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Unattended logo

El 23/09/14 10:39, Johan Ho escribió: > Hey, I'm no artist either, but I think the colors you used might be a > bit "too much"? The blue background seems to kind of overpower the > "unattended" title text. I choose the colors from the text install on windows. blue backgroup yellow the progress b

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Unattended logo

Hey, I'm no artist either, but I think the colors you used might be a bit "too much"? The blue background seems to kind of overpower the "unattended" title text. I made a rough edit using colors reminiscent of old terminals just as a test of other colors, but it is also a suggestion. In any ca

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Stand Alone Driverpack utility for all OS

Hi Juanjo, feel free to ask if you questions. As the uranos bootcd is (basicly) based on unattended it might be easy to copy the wimlib into the unattended boot stuff: http://sourceforge.net/p/uranos/code/HEAD/tree/bootcd/Makefile You can find the rest of the wim installation part here: http://so

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #1: boot from USB memory

#1: boot from USB memory -+-- Reporter: jjp3 | Owner: parasytic Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Version:

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #1: boot from USB memory

#1: boot from USB memory -+-- Reporter: jjp3 | Owner: parasytic Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Version:

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #3: windows 7 support

#3: windows 7 support -+-- Reporter: jjp3 | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Version: Keywords:

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Perl update

On 25/04/13 22:38, Mary Huey wrote: > As my colleague Ben has pointed out, Active Perl has a newer version: Added to the repository. Thanks! -- ¡Siendo de dos una tristeza, ya no es tristeza, es alegría! -- Francisco Villaespesa. -

Re: [Unattended-Dev] LibreOffice link change

On 25/04/13 23:56, Mary Huey wrote: > > My colleague Ben has this to add to the malicious software tool .bat: This was fixed already: r3597 | mythrix | 2013-04-16 12:38:28 +0200 (mar 16 de abr de 2013) | 1 line Updated Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool to v4.19 -- Sólo en las ciencias ma

Re: [Unattended-Dev] LibreOffice link change

Hi Juanjo, Thanks for the update to the subversion URLs! They've fixed a lot of the issues we found. My colleague Ben has this to add to the malicious software tool .bat: diff -r 94c78b874be4 install/scripts/win_malicious-software-removal-tool.bat --- a/install/scripts/win_malicious-software-re

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Thunderbird updating

On 25/04/13 21:42, Mary Huey wrote: > Thunderbird 17.0.2 does not appear to be readily available anymore; it's > now 17.0.5: I think that maybe we should start using: http://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/ As is seems those urls stay longer. -- ¡Siendo de dos una

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Java update

On 25/04/13 22:37, Mary Huey wrote: > Is there a reason why the installer downloads both the version 6 and 7 > installers, but only installs the 6? so you can change last line and get java 7 if you wish. Someone on the list said that we had an application that needed java6. So I try to stay as lon

Re: [Unattended-Dev] PDFCreator updating

On 25/04/13 21:34, Mary Huey wrote: > It looks as if PDFCreator has changed its mechanism for downloading > packages; > "http://cdn.download.pdfforge.org/pdfcreator/1.6.1/PDFCreator-1_6_1_setup.exe"; > does not work. > > However, > "http://download.pdfforge.org/download/pdfcreator/1.7.0/PDFCreator-

Re: [Unattended-Dev] LibreOffice link change

On 25/04/13 20:56, Mary Huey wrote: > Apologies if this has been mentioned before, but the current package > updater appears to be trying to pull down LibreOffice 4.0.0, which is no > longer available; it's been superceded by 4.0.2. > > Mary Mary, Thanks for the info, is nice to know who is using i

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #17: disable UAC on windows7

#17: disable UAC on windows7 +--- Reporter: jjp3 | Owner: Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: packages | Version: 4.8 Resol

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #64: common "include"-file for KB890830 (Malicious Software Removal Tool)

#64: common "include"-file for KB890830 (Malicious Software Removal Tool) --+- Reporter: sam-0815 | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: trivial | Milestone:

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Firefox and Thunderbird Extended Support Release

Thanks for your job! You have spare a lot of time. Happy new year! > Hi, > Before this year ends, I had upload a script for Thunderbird and Firefox > Extended Support Release. > I hope is ok for everyone :-) > > Happy New Year. > > > > -

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Time to think on Win7

Den 03.11.12 16:50, skrev Doug: > I have a Win7 unattended going. Well, kind of. > > I boot from a USB drive with an unattended xml file on it, which does > the basic install and then starts a modified "apps only" type of install > after windows is done. We prefer to use PXE boot, I got PXE boot

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Time to think on Win7

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Chris McClimans wrote: > I have something similar to unattended working at hh.github.com. > It starts from ISO and ends up with a working system. > (internally it creates a floppy image containing the > Autounattended.xml, and boots the iso) > I think it would be i

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Time to think on Win7

I have something similar to unattended working at hh.github.com. It starts from ISO and ends up with a working system. (internally it creates a floppy image containing the Autounattended.xml, and boots the iso) I think it would be interesting to use the built in pxe and install.wim files on the wi

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Time to think on Win7

I have a Win7 unattended going. Well, kind of. I boot from a USB drive with an unattended xml file on it, which does the basic install and then starts a modified "apps only" type of install after windows is done. I have to create/modify the unattended xml by hand every time - it has my computer

Re: [Unattended-Dev] DotNet.bat update

Den 06.10.12 00:10, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > El 01/10/12 10:00, Johan Ho escribió: >> I have tested .NET v4 a few times before, but went back to v3.5 because >> some software we used didn't yet work with v4, and I didn't want to >> install both v3.5 and v4. >> > According with this document instaling

Re: [Unattended-Dev] DotNet.bat update

El 01/10/12 10:00, Johan Ho escribió: > I have tested .NET v4 a few times before, but went back to v3.5 because > some software we used didn't yet work with v4, and I didn't want to > install both v3.5 and v4. > According with this document instaling 3.5 and 4.0 seems safe. http://msdn.microsoft.co

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Time to think on Win7

Den 21.09.12 02:34, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > Hi, > I just saw that win7 had become Nº1 in the operations Systems market share. > http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=10 > > I do not see myself with enough time to accomplish this task. So I beg > for some help on th

Re: [Unattended-Dev] DotNet.bat update

Den 29.09.12 00:01, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > Hi, > I am getting from time to time some app that needs a Dotnet 4.0 update. > I wonder if our dotnet.bat file is a bit incomplete: > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/unattended/browser/trunk/install/scripts/dotnet.bat > > can anyone tell me what other pa

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Unattended: build from source

Hello Juanjo, hello everybody, I have some ideas to make unattended architecture simpler so that unattended could be easier improved in future. Idea is to separate completely boot disk and installation scripts. That would allow to use installation scripts on any Linux distribution just like an app

Re: [Unattended-Dev] patch for missing / updated avg viusdefinition

El 27/08/12 04:29, Sven Roederer escribió: > as I had not updated the scripts for some time, I missed to download the > definition-file of "avg.bat". It gives a 404-http-error ... ok. Fixed, and updated to a 2013 version thanks! -- El mundo no fue hecho en el tiempo, sino con el tiempo.

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dell OptiPlex 9010 - unable to access HDD

On 08/16/2012 04:43 AM, shouldbe q931 wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Paul Griffith wrote: >> On 08/15/2012 03:36 PM, Paul Griffith wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Before I start down a path I don't want to go down. Has unable to >>> able to get the Unattened 4.9 to install on a dell Op

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dell OptiPlex 9010 - unable to access HDD

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Paul Griffith wrote: > On 08/15/2012 03:36 PM, Paul Griffith wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Before I start down a path I don't want to go down. Has unable to >> able to get the Unattened 4.9 to install on a dell Optiplex 9010. It is >> a fairly new system based on the

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Dell OptiPlex 9010 - unable to access HDD

On 08/15/2012 03:36 PM, Paul Griffith wrote: > > Hi, > > Before I start down a path I don't want to go down. Has unable to > able to get the Unattened 4.9 to install on a dell Optiplex 9010. It is > a fairly new system based on the Q77 Express chipset. I can PXE boot > without any issues but i

Re: [Unattended-Dev] JAVA 6 vs JAVA 7

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Timothy J Massey wrote: > Juanjo Pablos wrote on 07/10/2012 11:27:10 AM: > > > > Hi, > > I just wonder if people want me to update java to version 7 or rather > > stay on java 6 a bit longer. > > > > Please replay to the list and let me know > > > We have several

Re: [Unattended-Dev] JAVA 6 vs JAVA 7

Juanjo Pablos wrote on 07/10/2012 11:27:10 AM: > Hi, > I just wonder if people want me to update java to version 7 or rather > stay on java 6 a bit longer. > > Please replay to the list and let me know We have several apps that will not work with Java 7--they are hard-coded to work with Java

Re: [Unattended-Dev] JAVA 6 vs JAVA 7

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Juanjo Pablos wrote: > Hi, > I just wonder if people want me to update java to version 7 or rather > stay on java 6 a bit longer. > > Please replay to the list and let me know > > Cheers, > Juan > 7 please :-) --

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Question

sourceforge.net" cc "unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject Re: [Unattended] Question Okay I read through the following and could do it but the only issue I have is I don’t have debian or fedora box mine would be Ubuntu. Is there anyone that could rebuild this

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Question

It's kinda old, but this web page has some details about how to do that. I haven't needed to edit the initrd in several years myself. http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/unattended/wiki/ModifyingTheBootDisk Brandon Aho 06/22/2012 08:49 AM Please respond to "All things concerning http://unatte

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Question

It's kinda old, but this web page has some details about how to do that. I haven't needed to edit the initrd in several years myself. http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/unattended/wiki/ModifyingTheBootDisk Brandon Aho 06/22/2012 08:49 AM Please respond to "All things concerning http://una

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Question

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Brandon Aho wrote: > Okay I read through the following and could do it but the only issue I > have is I don’t have debian or fedora box mine would be Ubuntu. Is there > anyone that could rebuild this for me and include the latest Broadcom 5709C > netXtreme II Gig

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Question

2-808-6685 Desk > 952-992-0502 Cell > > > -Original Message- > From: Juanjo Pablos [mailto:jua...@apertus.es] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:07 PM > To: All things concerning http://unattended.sourceforge.net/ > Subject: Re: [Unattended] Question > > El 22/0

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Question

o:jua...@apertus.es] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 1:07 PM To: All things concerning http://unattended.sourceforge.net/ Subject: Re: [Unattended] Question El 22/06/12 16:31, Brandon Aho escribió: > > It's too bad it still not being actively developed on it's a great > tool. I have it worki

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Question

r the help, Brandon [Description: NTELogo] Brandon Aho Retail Systems Manager brandon@northerntool.com 952-808-6685 Desk 952-992-0502 Cell From: Ben Greenfield [mailto:b...@cogs.com] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:28 AM To: All things concerning http://unattended.sourceforge.net/ Subject: Re: [

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Question

Manager brandon@northerntool.com 952-808-6685 Desk 952-992-0502 Cell From: Ben Greenfield [mailto:b...@cogs.com] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:13 AM To: All things concerning http://unattended.sourceforge.net/ Subject: Re: [Unattended] Question you should ask this question on the list for the os you

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] Adding Nic to Initrd file

2-992-0502 Cell From: Ben Greenfield [mailto:b...@cogs.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:19 PM To: All things concerning http://unattended.sourceforge.net/ Subject: Re: [Unattended] Adding Nic to Initrd file I don't know if you saw this http://linuxnextgen.blogspot.com/2011/07/manually

Re: [Unattended-Dev] LibreOffice link change

El 04/05/12 20:18, Mary Huey escribió: > Apologies if this has been mentioned before, but the current package > updater appears to be trying to pull down LibreOffice 3.5.1, which is no > longer available; it's been superceded by 3.5.3. > > Mary ok thanks for heads up. I did change the local reposit

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Thunderbird and Firefox ESR (Extended Support Release)

Huh strange, I had subscribed to the e-mail digest for this mailing list, but I didn't get any of your replies! Couldn't even find any mention of them in our maillog. Tried turning off digest mode for now. Anyways, I decided to try out Thunderbird 11, but had some problems with lagging possibly

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Thunderbird and Firefox ESR (Extended Support Release)

Johan Ho wrote on 04/12/2012 08:15:30 AM: > Any thoughts on these? I myself is still not quite sure which one is the > "best" for our school to use. I guess the advantage of using the ESR > versions is addon compatibility (for users with less maintenanced > addons) and less frequent GUI chang

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Thunderbird and Firefox ESR (Extended Support Release)

El 12/04/12 14:15, Johan Ho escribió: > Any thoughts on these? I myself is still not quite sure which one is the > "best" for our school to use. I guess the advantage of using the ESR > versions is addon compatibility (for users with less maintenanced > addons) and less frequent GUI changes? I usua

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Should I add some AV software?

El 26/03/12 09:47, Ronan SALMON escribió: > ClamWin is based on ClamAV engine, but it is not same software I know but it offers real time scanning http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/faq/faq-win32/ -- Una chincheta es un Lacasito en erección. -

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Should I add some AV software?

Juanjo Pablos a écrit : > El 23/03/12 09:18, Ronan SALMON escribió: >> And if it helps, here is a script for clamwin > but that is already on our repository > https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/unattended/browser/trunk/install/scripts/clamav.bat ClamWin is based on ClamAV engine, but it is not s

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Should I add some AV software?

El 23/03/12 09:18, Ronan SALMON escribió: > And if it helps, here is a script for clamwin but that is already on our repository https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/unattended/browser/trunk/install/scripts/clamav.bat -- No es pobre el que poco tiene, pero sí lo es el que vive con gran avidez. ---

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Should I add some AV software?

Juanjo Pablos a écrit : > Hi, > > I stop using clamav a while back, mainly because was not effective doing > something for me, so I had search for alternatives. I found panda cloud > as a light Antivirus software, but is not working with this new wave of > rootkit virus. So I am trushing AVG free

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #65: Several busybox build bugs for linuxboot

#65: Several busybox build bugs for linuxboot ---+ Reporter: oliveroms | Owner: jjp3 Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Ver

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #65: Several busybox build bugs for linuxboot

#65: Several busybox build bugs for linuxboot ---+ Reporter: oliveroms | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Version: 4.8 Key

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #65: Several busybox build bugs for linuxboot

#65: Several busybox build bugs for linuxboot ---+ Reporter: oliveroms | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Version: 4.8 Key

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Window 7 support

Hi, You can use OPSI. Regards, kartnico On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Ari Constancio wrote: > Hello, > > I need a clarification about whether it's possible to install Windows > 7 or not through unattended. We'd really like to use it for desktop > deployments (XP works great). > I've checked

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Build linuxboot: pciutils

El 15/12/11 18:33, Timothy J Massey escribió: > > It seems that kernel.org is going to be a hassle for this build > process. Next up: pciutils. Kernel.org has only older versions. > According to this site (http://mj.ucw.cz/pciutils.html), the master > site is: ftp://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Build linuxboot: kbd version is missing

El 15/12/11 18:27, Timothy J Massey escribió: > The Makefile for linuxboot wants to download kbd-1.15.2.tar.bz2. > However, at the URL listed > (http://www.all.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kbd/) the latest version is > 1.12, and the only format is tar.gz. Might this have something to do > with

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Build linuxboot: usbutils

El 15/12/11 18:44, Timothy J Massey escribió: > Another casualty of kernel.org: usbutils. Switched to a mirror, and > updated to 0.91. Patch below. Done, but it would not surprise me if this breaks again.. maybe we need to download directly using git. -- Criticar es más fácil que imitar.

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Build linuxboot: new mirror for MySQL

El 15/12/11 18:27, Timothy J Massey escribió: > It seems that wisc.edu is no longer a mirror for MySQL. I have > modified the Makefile to point to Hurricane Electric's mirror. Patch > included below. Done thanks -- Criticar es más fácil que imitar. -

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #3: windows 7 support

#3: windows 7 support -+-- Reporter: jjp3 | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Version: Keywords:

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #3: windows 7 support

#3: windows 7 support -+-- Reporter: jjp3 | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Version: Keywords:

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [Unattended] #65: Several busybox build bugs for linuxboot

#65: Several busybox build bugs for linuxboot ---+ Reporter: oliveroms | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bootdisk | Version: 4.8 Key

Re: [Unattended-Dev] Speeding up the applying of service packs (just tested with winxpsp3)

El 27/08/11 02:25, Chris McClimans escribió: > for file in /var/unattended/install/scripts/winxpsp3-*.bat > globally substitue 'reboot-on' for 'ignore-on' > > Seems to work fine for me, and I rebooted much less. > well, quite possible you do not need to reboot so much, but I let the patch to

Re: [Unattended-Dev] SVN repo

El 27/08/11 02:35, Chris McClimans escribió: > I > s > > there a list of public developer repo's similar to the network graph > component of github for unattended? Something like this?: http://ww

Re: [Unattended-Dev] 512e - 4k sector drives

On 08/11/2011 07:57 AM, Bradley Watson wrote: > Hi All, > Were having a lot of difficulty building a machine based on the newer 4k > sector "512e" drives. > Has anyone run into this issue? I've installed XP using Unattended on such as machine without any trouble. Did not changed anything about the

Re: [Unattended-Dev] bnx2 driver firmware doesn't load on 4.9

El 30/07/11 02:29, Timothy J Massey escribió: > From my understanding, compiling in the firmware runs into both > licensing problems (GPL and non-Free code) and technical problems > (because it's not legal, a method has not really been created for this). Well, I do not have any problem using ude

Re: [Unattended-Dev] bnx2 driver firmware doesn't load on 4.9

Timothy J Massey wrote: > From my understanding, compiling in the firmware runs into both > licensing problems (GPL and non-Free code) and technical problems > (because it's not legal, a method has not really been created for this). Sure, was thinking for my own personal modification rather than

Re: [Unattended-Dev] bnx2 driver firmware doesn't load on 4.9

>From my understanding, compiling in the firmware runs into both licensing >problems (GPL and non-Free code) and technical problems (because it's not >legal, a method has not really been created for this). But like I said, my problem was the everlasting delay, and once I fixed that my interest

Re: bnx2 driver firmware doesn't load on 4.9

Timothy J Massey wrote: > It's not. Loadable firmware requires udev/hotplug, in my understanding, > and the Unattended boot CD doesn't support udev/hotplug Thanks for the explanation. > No. AFAICT, loadable firmware has *never* worked with the Unattended boot > CD. > > I asked about this s

Re: bnx2 driver firmware doesn't load on 4.9

Paul Civati wrote on 07/29/2011 04:46:16 PM: > I'm trying to boot on a Dell R210 but the bnx2 driver fails to > load the firmware on 4.9. > > This is what happens: > > # modprobe -v bnx2 > insmod /lib/modules/2.6.38.6/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko > bnx2: Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Dri

Re: 7-zip.bat

El 07/07/11 14:56, Werner Maes escribió: > I think something's wrong with this batch file. > At some point there is a line like this: > > REG ADD %SC%\7-Zip.%%j\DefaultIcon /VE /D > "\"%PROGRAMFILES%\7-Zip\Formats\%%j.dll\"" /F > > but the installation has NO subfolder Format under %PROGRAMFIL

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >