I have noticed that standard sliders/scrollbars seem to cause weird performance
problems. What I think is happening is a severe performance hit after (and only
after) saving AND quitting a stack with a new slider. Upon reopening the stack
performance is severely degraded. This happened to me tod
On 01/06/2017 04:29 AM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
Unless there a real advantage that I can't think of, or a need, for this
change, could I please plead with Heather to reverse that particular
change.
I believe the change that Heather (et al?) made to the MailMan
configuration is th
gotta say... looking at livecode.com it is very clear that livecode is
nearly hoping that people won't notice that there is an open source version
and buy a license because they didn't know any better.
shadyshady.. almost understandable, but why go open source if you
gonna pretend lik
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Heather Laine via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> "A bit like devs are being milked" seems a somewhat extraordinary
> statement. LiveCode is a business, with expenses and a stable of highly
> skilled and valuable developers. Which of them woul
Bouncy, bouncy, rubber ball . . .
30 seconds . . .
Not really the end of the world.
Richmond.
On 1/6/17 5:56 pm, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
-1 I plead with Heather to NOT reverse this recent change! Cmon, no one sees
that people getting bounced is MUCH WORSE than the inconvenience o
Thank you very much for that recipe Peter Brett; very useful as I use
Thunderbird on both Mac and Linux.
Returning to Macintosh I realise how much my experience on Mac has been
enriched by what I learnt from
a 10 year sojourn on Linux . . .
Richmond.
On 1/6/17 5:43 pm, Alex Tweedly via use-l
+1
Well said.
... there's no way I can justify the expense other than to tell myself I'm
supporting something worthwhile in about the only way I can.
Jim M.
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Sent:
I totally agree with you and could not have said it better.
> Am 06.01.2017 um 17:09 schrieb Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>>:
>
> Exactly what I was thinking when I read it. My greatest aprehension in using
> Livecode is that one day it will be gone, and
Exactly what I was thinking when I read it. My greatest aprehension in using
Livecode is that one day it will be gone, and I will have to learn to use C++
or Objective C, which is to say I will have to give up software development.
I'm not really sure how they stay afloat as is, but as I develop
-1 I plead with Heather to NOT reverse this recent change! Cmon, no one sees
that people getting bounced is MUCH WORSE than the inconvenience of what your
from address looks like??
Bob S
> On Jan 6, 2017, at 04:29 , Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>
> I know Heather has just made
Yes, and Yes. That does indeed solve the problem for me - I too now see
"Some Name via use-livecode" so all my functionality and preferred way
of working is restored.
And, as I said originally - if there's a need for this, then I would
have happily put up with (sorry - "accepted") it just fine
On 06/01/2017 12:29, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
Now that's impossible - all emails in the thread appear from the same
address, and need to be individually opened to see who they were from,
and so searching for a reply that I remember ws from (say) Richard is
much harder.
Hi Alex,
Do
The "via" for this gmail user doesn't pose any issues, so if this change
solves the unsubscribe problem, yay!
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I don't really see what all the fuss is about.
>
> I have been "bounced"/"blo
On 6 Jan 2017, at 12:49, Heather Laine via use-livecode wrote:
"A bit like devs are being milked" seems a somewhat extraordinary
statement. LiveCode is a business, with expenses and a stable of
highly skilled and valuable developers.
I meant this in the traditional 'online pushy chatty' manne
I don't really see what all the fuss is about.
I have been "bounced"/"blocked" or whatever it is called 7 times: but as
it takes about 30 seconds to reset things after the first one or two
times I couldn't be bothered getting annoyed with it.
Whether a posting i labelled as "via" or not seems
On 6 Jan 2017, at 12:55, Heather Laine via use-livecode wrote:
Well. That's the problem you see. DMARC rejects mail on the basis that
it does not come from the same address as the sender ie the posting
person's email is not the list address.
Actually, what *I* now see is emails being marked a
On 6 Jan 2017, at 12:29, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
> I please plead with Heather to reverse that particular change.
Seconded, with bells on! :(
k
---
Keith Martin
Senior Lecturer, LCC (University of the Arts London)
Technical Editor, MacUser magazine (1997-2015)
http://PanoramaPhot
On 2017-01-06 13:55, Heather Laine via use-livecode wrote:
Well. That's the problem you see. DMARC rejects mail on the basis that
it does not come from the same address as the sender ie the posting
person's email is not the list address. Reversing this change will
reinstate that issue. There is n
Well. That's the problem you see. DMARC rejects mail on the basis that it does
not come from the same address as the sender ie the posting person's email is
not the list address. Reversing this change will reinstate that issue. There is
no good solution here, which is why I'm wondering if the li
"A bit like devs are being milked" seems a somewhat extraordinary statement.
LiveCode is a business, with expenses and a stable of highly skilled and
valuable developers. Which of them would you like us to fire? We need to pay
for LiveCode's development so that all of the users in the community
I know Heather has just made some changes to try to solve the 'bounce'
problem. But I think in doing so a new problem has arisen.
It used to be that email from the list showed up as
'from' : someu...@theiraddress.com
'reply-to' : use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
They now show up as
'fro
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
> And my first stint of practicing law led to Hawkins' Second Law: There is
> no lower bound to human intelligence.
>
> (I've forgotten the first law; it was a special case of the second)
>
I'm assuming the old "The difference between genius and
On 30 Dec 2016, at 12:41, Skip Kimpel wrote:
+1
LC needs to reconsider breaking up functionality based upon licensing.
Indeed! I haven't looked in depth at the differences, but I thought it
was more (or even entirely) about support, which makes sense for
high-level business requirements, pl
Hi Bill and others,
I appreciate the feedback regarding the feature breakdown between the
different licenses.
The decision to split the features (and how they were split) across
Business and Indy was decided on by the LiveCode team.
I expect that some of them may have seen this thread, howe
24 matches
Mail list logo
