Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

On 09/07/2018 06:55 PM, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote: You guys might be right, but I doubt it. Here's one reason why. I took some care to make the math test a true math test. Notice in Root Loops: local sQty=1234567 add 0 to sQty --> make it a true number* I could be wr

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Me: > I took some care to make the math test a true math test. P.S. - I was careful about binary optimization for the original Root Loops math test, but the alternate shift-click test I added later (big calculations) didn't have that. Doing so makes hardly any difference for

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Jerry: > Are the math routines doing unnecessary unicode interpretation? Mark: > Doing type conversion on the strings-that-are-not-strings > and then getting to the math functions. You guys might be right, but I doubt it. Here's one reason why. I took some care to make the math te

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

> On Sep 7, 2018, at 6:27 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode > wrote: > > On 09/07/2018 06:18 PM, Jerry Jensen via use-livecode wrote: >> Just a quick wild thought: Are the math routines doing unnecessary unicode >> interpretation? > > That's my guess as well. > Doing type conversion on the

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

On 09/07/2018 06:18 PM, Jerry Jensen via use-livecode wrote: Just a quick wild thought: Are the math routines doing unnecessary unicode interpretation? That's my guess as well. Doing type conversion on the strings-that-are-not-strings and then getting to the math functions. -- Mark Wieder

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Just a quick wild thought: Are the math routines doing unnecessary unicode interpretation? .Jerry > On Sep 7, 2018, at 6:11 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode > wrote: > > Otherwise (math especially) LC6 is much faster. ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

On 09/07/2018 01:04 PM, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote: Nice to know that bright spot for Linux on the bigger lists and 64-bits! Mac and Windows performance both got 1.7 times worse on those, at least on my machines. I appreciate you testing it. I misread some of my data yesterday,

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Mark: > For appending 5 item texts, I see a 3x slowdown in LC9, > similar to your results. Thanks for sharing your Linux results! So that means on 3 different platforms (Mac, Win, Linux) using item chunks is 3x to 4x slower in LiveCode today than it was 2 years ago, for a short list of

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

On 09/06/2018 03:15 PM, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote: Hello Everyone, Updated stack and more complete results - let me know if you get something very different on your machine. I've added two additional LC benchmark test variations to the "showdown" test stack.

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Hello Everyone, Updated stack and more complete results - let me know if you get something very different on your machine. I've added two additional LC benchmark test variations to the "showdown" test stack. That gives it empty loop (with i) and math-intensive options in the &

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Curry, sorry I overlooked the post with your download link > http://curryk.com/showdown.zip This is a *fine* comparison stack. You could think about adding for LC 8/9 a browser widget and in handler "work done", instead of copying to the clipboard, set htmltext of widget "browser" to the cJS

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

hh: > How did you do the JavaScript (in browser?) I wrote the JS code by hand, scripted the stack to copy it to clipboard after each test, and ran it on js.do > and how did you do the timing? It's in the test code; download and all will be revealed! ;) Later I will add the empt

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

How did you do the JavaScript (in browser?) and how did you do the timing? ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Richard: > Is that an actual test from the stack? The stack had (essentially) this: repeat with i=1 to 1234567 add sqrt(i) to n end repeat (LC 9 is 2.8 times slower.) So my latest experiment removed the inside line: repeat with i=1 to 1234567 end repeat (LC 9 is 2.8 times slower, ag

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Curry Kenworthy wrote: > repeat with i=1 to 1234567 > end repeat Is that an actual test from the stack? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web a

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

totally weird! On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:03 PM Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > PS - one more test that I will add later to the "showdown" stack: > > "Root Loops" tested both repeats and math (hence the name) bu

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

PS - one more test that I will add later to the "showdown" stack: "Root Loops" tested both repeats and math (hence the name) but I hadn't benchmarked an empty loop. I should have done that to try and separate math from loops to the extent possible. (on native Windows 10

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

any operations) or working with data. The speed of the code! Here is a complete table of my test results: http://curryk.com/lc-version-showdown-results.png Some highlights: LC 9 is 3x slower than LC 6 (and 49 times slower than JS) on a loop with math. LC 9 is 2x to 4.5x slower than L

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

the > projects I'm doing, and I'm sure others are in the same boat. Fellow > boat members: please join my bug report/feature request below! > > The slowdown can be demonstrated both in test code and in real-world > applications. The problem(s) may be in a specific area, but the ac

Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

be demonstrated both in test code and in real-world applications. The problem(s) may be in a specific area, but the actual effects on running code are widespread and fairly general, impacting multiple areas in my testing from math and loops to text, chunks, and arrays. I am posting some

Re: Standalone in IDE Test Works; But Not From SA

www.classroomFocusedSoftware.com > On Jul 9, 2018, at 8:43 AM, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi Brahmanathaswami, > > This does sound strange. I would expect either to successfully install the > app to your phone in both cases, or to fail in both, as the "Test

Re: Standalone in IDE Test Works; But Not From SA

Hi Brahmanathaswami, This does sound strange. I would expect either to successfully install the app to your phone in both cases, or to fail in both, as the "Test" button uses mergDeploy to install the app, which essentially does what Xcode does, but all in one button. Does the devic

Standalone in IDE Test Works; But Not From SA

LC 8.1.10 iOS 11.4 on the iPhone 1) I can been able to push update from the IDE Develop Test myIphone # it works on the phone 2) So know to go to SA build to create a version. Xcode Devices Select My Phone Add

Re: Just a list test

Oh BTW no false positive Phishing alert in the body of my email! Bob S > On Mar 23, 2018, at 10:47 , Bob Sneidar wrote: > > I can't. I'm looking right at it. ;-) > > Bob S > > >> On Mar 23, 2018, at 10:35 , Heather Laine via use-livecode >>

Re: Just a list test

I can't. I'm looking right at it. ;-) Bob S > On Mar 23, 2018, at 10:35 , Heather Laine via use-livecode > wrote: > > Please ignore. > > Heather > > Heather Laine > Customer Services Manager > LiveCode Ltd > www.livecode.com

Just a list test

Please ignore. Heather Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd www.livecode.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:

this is a test

Just a test, please ignore… (in case you were wondering, my mail client has just seen the first mail to this list since 3rd March, but I know that some are missing.) ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url

LCS vs PHP speed test?

Has anyone here had occasion to test relative speed of LC Server vs PHP for common tasks (file I/O, array splits, parsing, etc.)? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web

Re: Android build executable on test device fails

On 1/13/18 7:04 PM, Nicolas Cueto via use-livecode wrote: And now a new problem. The SDK and JDK paths have disappeared. Just now installed 8.0.2, pointed it to the SDK root path that worked with 8.1.8, but got the error "chosen folder not a valid Android SDK". And, opening 8.1.8 to confirm

Re: Android build executable on test device fails

m> > > To: How to use LiveCode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> > > Subject: Re: Android build executable on test device fails > > Message-ID: > ><cagetkxmjkwq-bzzxiwbg8dharwcsdxzbg3xqzjkrznp9btm...@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=

Re: Android build executable on test device fails

> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 09:15:48 +0900 > From: Nicolas Cueto <nicon...@gmail.com> > To: How to use LiveCode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> > Subject: Re: Android build executable on test device fails > Message-ID: ><cagetkxmjkwq-bzzxiwbg8dharwcsdxzb

Re: Android build executable on test device fails

Found the thread ("Error while saving standalone 8 & 9"), and, yes, widget problem. But my stack is simply a field and two buttons. No widgets. So, still stuck. -- Nicolas Cueto On 14 January 2018 at 09:15, Nicolas Cueto wrote: > The problem is on 8.1.8. > > Any idea what

Re: Android build executable on test device fails

The problem is on 8.1.8. Any idea what the subject of that thread was? -- Nicolas Cueto On 13 January 2018 at 20:15, MWCM via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > > Testing on an Android device, the "Standalone builder progress" window > > shows first "Building classes" and

Re: Android build executable on test device fails

> Testing on an Android device, the "Standalone builder progress" window > shows first "Building classes" and then for a brief moment "Building > executable", after which an error window reads "Unable to build app for > testing: could not open module file". > > Searched the forums but no mention

Android build executable on test device fails

Testing on an Android device, the "Standalone builder progress" window shows first "Building classes" and then for a brief moment "Building executable", after which an error window reads "Unable to build app for testing: could not open module file". Searched the forums but no mention at all of

Re: Weird thing I noticed with a graphics speed test

So, this is one of those moments where LiveCode is too good for my needs! You guys have done some optimizing to make LC handle graphics on Android, I think. My slow android device is almost as fast as my iPhone in this particular speed test. I know it does not have as much graphics processing

Re: Weird thing I noticed with a graphics speed test

This explains - thanks! So I need to compare performance between the android and iOS devices to get a valid comparison. The group has 20 small images. I will turn them into large images to increase the demand on pixel processing. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 11, 2017, at 5:37 AM, Mark

Re: Weird thing I noticed with a graphics speed test

On 2017-08-10 03:38, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode wrote: Actually, I had forgotten to set the layermode of the group. Now the number of passes on my Mac is 47 and on the android it is 31. This still seems rather close. I expected the slow android device to be like a quarter as fast. How

Re: Weird thing I noticed with a graphics speed test

Actually, I had forgotten to set the layermode of the group. Now the number of passes on my Mac is 47 and on the android it is 31. This still seems rather close. I expected the slow android device to be like a quarter as fast. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 9, 2017, at 9:27 PM,

Weird thing I noticed with a graphics speed test

I created a group with ten buttons. I have a function that scrolls this group as many times as it can in a second. With acceleratedrendering on, it can scroll 30 times on my Mac. My very slow android device also scrolls it 30 times. With accelerated rendering off, it can scroll the group 87

AW: like doing a short test for me?, was: No screenshot from LC video possible

My fault, obviously some people of you, who wanted to make the test couldn' even play my video. I forgot that a standard Windows machine doesn't have a codec for h.264 videos on board. So you would have had to install a codec (like the LAV filters). I now modified my test program, so that you can

like doing a short test for me?, was: No screenshot from LC video possible

, though I probably won't see the wood for the trees. Up to now, I only have two customers with this issue and so it is hard to search for "exotic" similarities. If you would like to help me and make a test for me, please download my little test program from http:// www.kestner.de/mater

Re: Help me test Levure

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:00 AM AndyP via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi Trevor, > > All installed and working as documented..excellent work. > > Windows 10 , LC 8.4 Great. Thanks Andy. -- Trevor DeVore > ___ use-livecode

Re: Help me test Levure

PointandSee is a FREE simple but full featured under cursor colour picker / finder. http://www.pointandsee.co.uk - made with LiveCode -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Help-me-test-Levure-tp4715700p4715725.html Sent from the Revolution - User

Re: Help me test Levure

Probably not: I have never tried: but it is a fairly antiquated system. Richmond. On 6/10/17 10:58 pm, Trevor DeVore via use-livecode wrote: On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 2:54 PM Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: Mac OS 10.7.5 At stage 5. Package

Re: Help me test Levure

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 3:25 PM, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In LC 8.1.4 (as this is the case starting from LC 8.1.2 IIRC) you need at > least OSX 10.10 to build iOS standalones. > Well that explains it. Thanks for the info Panos. --

Re: Help me test Levure

Hi all, In LC 8.1.4 (as this is the case starting from LC 8.1.2 IIRC) you need at least OSX 10.10 to build iOS standalones. Best, Panos -- On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Trevor DeVore via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 2:54 PM Richmond

Re: Help me test Levure

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 2:54 PM Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Mac OS 10.7.5 > > At stage 5. Package Application. > > Put this |levurePackageApplication "release" in to the > Message Box and got a number of rapidly flashing grey windows followed by >

Re: Help me test Levure

uded the description from the github page below. I have a test that I would like as many people as possible to run. If you could take a few minutes to try it out and report back that would be great. # Test: Create a new app In this test you will use the Create Levure Application stack to create a

Re: Help me test Levure

Trevor, I'm very interested in this. I'm on the road for a week, but will download and test it as soon as I get settled. Best, Bill P William Prothero http://es.earthednet.org > On Jun 10, 2017, at 9:35 AM, Trevor DeVore via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

Re: Help me test Levure

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Trevor DeVore <li...@mangomultimedia.com> wrote: > I have a test that I would like as many people as possible to run. If you > could take a few minutes to try it out and report back that would be great. > BTW, I forgot to mention that the test

Help me test Levure

Hi everyone, The first official release of the Levure application development framework is drawing nigh and I'm looking for help in testing it on various system configurations. For those unfamiliar with the framework I've included the description from the github page below. I have a test that I

Re: test

wtopic.php?p=154278#p154278 > > So what did you test? The full device or the end of the use-list? ;-) I have no access to the "device" (I'm assuming you mean server?), so I merely tested what I can test, to see if I was able to reproduce the error you'd reported. -- Richard Ga

Re: test

> Richard G. wrote: > (Apologies for the non-content post; testing a hypothesis reported by a > list user) Sorry for answering to the content of an non-content post: RG derived a "hypothesis" from http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?p=154278#p154278 So what did you te

test

(Apologies for the non-content post; testing a hypothesis reported by a list user) -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web ambassa...@fourthworld.com

Re: Kognition Beta Test - call for volunteers

Dear Kevin First, congratulations on reaching Beta stage of Kognition. Your description on if it is very intriguing. I think I can offer you an interesting beta test environment. At the moment, I have three primary projects (and a number of smaller ones), the data for each is stored

Kognition Beta Test - call for volunteers

Hi Everyone, A slightly unusual post from me today. For those of you that don¹t know, LiveCode has been working in partnership with a new company as a joint venture, to build an app to help manage information. We have built a system that uses artificial intelligence techniques to help organize,

RE: Speed test in LC application

Services rdim...@evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 6:33 PM To: Mike Kerner via use-livecode Cc: Peter Bogdanoff Subject: Speed test in LC

Speed test in LC application

Hi, I’m sometimes having trouble with my application downloading audio and image files from a remote server when they are requested. I’m thinking of adding some diagnostic tools to the application to see what is going on and I would like to know if anyone has experience with this and can give

AW: Re Quick Test for Tiemo

Sorry guys I didn't specified the stack format version, it was 7. Thanks for all testers. The test was very valuable for me, because I found that the sequence of MAC addresses wasn't the same as my old function produced on some machines. I have optimized my code now to get the same sequence

Re: Re Quick Test for Tiemo

On 2017-03-31 15:36, Francis Nugent Dixon via use-livecode wrote: Sorry Tiemo, Got a message that "MyMACs.livecode" is not a stack - can't open it with LiveCode I wonder why ? Using - 10.12 Sierra with LiveCode 5.5. It is a 7.0 format stackfile... The error message in older LiveCode

Re: Re Quick Test for Tiemo

> > > Message: 2 > > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:28:59 +0200 > > From: "Tiemo Hollmann TB" <toolb...@kestner.de> > > To: "LiveCode User Liste senden" <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> > > Subject: could you please make a quick test for

Re Quick Test for Tiemo

b...@kestner.de> > To: "LiveCode User Liste senden" <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> > Subject: could you please make a quick test for me? > Message-ID: <003b01d2a9f8$da238470$8e6a8d50$@kestner.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >

Re: could you please make a quick test for me?

On 2017-03-31 10:28, Tiemo Hollmann TB via use-livecode wrote: Thank you for your help Mine is forthcoming - btw, I suggest anyone doing this makes sure they only send the results to Tiemo privately - unless you want all your Mac addresses in a public forum :) Warmest Regards, Mark. --

could you please make a quick test for me?

to be the same list of MAC addresses and the same sequence of MAC addresses. Since I only have one Mac, I would like to ask you to test my two functions in a small test program and send me the results in a PM by email. (just copy the two result fields and the kind of Mac you have into an email). So I

AW: AW: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test this?

nn TB <toolb...@kestner.de> Betreff: AW: AW: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test this? Panos from LC solved the mystery. In my URL the password has a special character, which can't be handled in 8.1.2 and 8.1.3 on Windows. When doing urlencode(myPW), it also works in

Solved: Re: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

Many thanks to all of you who helped test LiveNet. Much appreciated. The problem appears to be specific to LC on Linux, and thanks to Charles Warwick's excellent support of tsNet he was able to deliver a possible fix, which I've confirmed works: http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id

AW: AW: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test this?

...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag von Paul Richards via use-livecode Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. März 2017 15:22 An: How to use LiveCode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> Cc: Paul Richards <p...@smarttsoftware.co.uk> Betreff: RE: AW: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test thi

RE: AW: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test this?

.au> Subject: Re: AW: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test this? I have not been able to replicate this issue here, but I am using an older version of Windows. Is there anyone that can try this on various versions of Windows to see if this problem is specific to Win 10

AW: AW: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test this?

Hi Charles, this test URL works for me also in 8.1.3 my URL still doesn't works in 8.1.3 (but in 9.0 and older versions) - what happened to tsnet in 8.1.3? your workaround with tsNetGetSync also works with my URL in 8.1.3 - whats the difference under the hood to put URL? interesting results

Re: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test this?

Tried it here with LC 8.1.3, Win 7 Pro, 64bit -> works LC 8.1.3, Win 10 Pro, 32bit -> works Matthias Rebbe Bramkampsieke 13 32312 Lübbecke Tel +49 5741 31 +49 160 5504462 Fax: +49 5741 310002 eMail: matth...@m-r-d.de BR5 Konverter - BR5 ->

Re: AW: tsneterr: (6) could not resolve host - can anyone else test this?

I have not been able to replicate this issue here, but I am using an older version of Windows. Is there anyone that can try this on various versions of Windows to see if this problem is specific to Win 10? Try typing the following into the message box: put URL

Re: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

Works very nicely with LC8.1.3 and 9.0.0(dp6) on mac 10.12.3 Dave ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:

Re: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

If you're using a proxy, can you temporarily turn it off and test again? On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Works fine in LC 8.13 and 9.0 DP6 Business on Windows 7 x64 and Mac OS X > 10.12.3 > > Best,

Re: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

Works fine in LC 8.13 and 9.0 DP6 Business on Windows 7 x64 and Mac OS X 10.12.3 Best, Steve MacLean ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:

Re: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

Fine in LC 9.0.0 dp6 OSX 10.12.3 Jim Lambert ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

OK on LC 8.1.3 Indy Mac OSX 10.12.3 Jerry > On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:07 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hello gang - > > I'm having a tough time figuring out why the GoLiveNet plugin shipping with > LC isn't working well for me (BZ#19026). > > If

RE: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

-livecode Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 5:07 PM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Richard Gaskin Subject: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9 Hello gang - I'm having a tough time figuring out why the GoLiveNet plugin shipping with LC isn't working well for me (BZ#19026). If you're using v8 or v9, could you

RE: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

:07 PM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Richard Gaskin Subject: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9 Hello gang - I'm having a tough time figuring out why the GoLiveNet plugin shipping with LC isn't working well for me (BZ#19026). If you're using v8 or v9, could you please run this recipe and email me

Re: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

Hi, LC 8.1.2, Win 10-> works LC 9.0DP6, Win 10 -> works LC 8.1.3, Mac Os X 10.12.3 -> works LC 9.0DP6, Mac Os X 10.12.3 -> works Regards, Matthias > Am 15.03.2017 um 22:07 schrieb Richard Gaskin via use-livecode >

Re: Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

Hi Richard, > Am 15.03.2017 um 22:07 schrieb Richard Gaskin via use-livecode > : > > Hello gang - > > I'm having a tough time figuring out why the GoLiveNet plugin shipping with > LC isn't working well for me (BZ#19026). > If you're using v8 or v9, could you

Help test please? GoLiveNet in v9

Hello gang - I'm having a tough time figuring out why the GoLiveNet plugin shipping with LC isn't working well for me (BZ#19026). If you're using v8 or v9, could you please run this recipe and email me if it doesn't work: 1. In the IDE, choose Development -> Plugins - GoLiveNet That's it.

Can you test: Send Back in 9 dp5 is broken

Can you test this -- open a card in Stack A with many groups on it. -- set select grouped object to true in the ID tool bar "Select Grouped" -- select an object # mine is corrupted graphic whose gradient keeps gettins "wacked" but the IDE. -- delete it -- go to another stack

Re: [ANN] XLSX Library ready for a test - Looking for testers

have. - reporting the result of their tests by dropping me a small note. We have prepared different versions of our test application: linux, mac and windows. All the versions are available by following this link: http://www.aslugontheroad.com/download/category/9-salestore-report-generator-xlsx

Re: [ANN] XLSX Library ready for a test - Looking for testers

ime for the Lib to create a report of about 700 lines * 8 columns > with styles and formulae. > - opening the generated xlsx file with the solution they have. > - reporting the result of their tests by dropping me a small note. > > We have prepared different versions of our test

Re: [ANN] XLSX Library ready for a test - Looking for testers

in case you want to help with the coming test: updating existing xlsx files. That way, I could notify you by a direct email when we will have something ready to try. I'm waiting for your feedbacks. Thanks! Best Regards, -- Zryip TheSlug http://www.aslugontheroad.com

Re: [ANN] XLSX Library ready for a test - Looking for testers

You know I am all in... I believe in the your products, Mr. Slug! SKIP On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > I'll give it a go later. > > Bob S > > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 15:36 , zryip theSlug > wrote:

Re: [ANN] XLSX Library ready for a test - Looking for testers

I'll give it a go later. Bob S On Nov 30, 2016, at 15:36 , zryip theSlug > wrote: Dear LiveCode Users, We are working on a new Library capable to read / write / update xlsx files without the help of MS Excel. The Library is dealing

Re: [ANN] XLSX Library ready for a test - Looking for testers

f about 700 lines * 8 columns >> with styles and formulae. >> - opening the generated xlsx file with the solution they have. >> - reporting the result of their tests by dropping me a small note. >> >> We have prepared different versions of our test application:

Re: [ANN] XLSX Library ready for a test - Looking for testers

t; the time for the Lib to create a report of about 700 lines * 8 columns > with styles and formulae. > - opening the generated xlsx file with the solution they have. > - reporting the result of their tests by dropping me a small note. > > We have prepared different versions of our test applic

[ANN] XLSX Library ready for a test - Looking for testers

xlsx file with the solution they have. - reporting the result of their tests by dropping me a small note. We have prepared different versions of our test application: linux, mac and windows. All the versions are available by following this link: http://www.aslugontheroad.com/download/category/9-salest

LC 9 Test Forum

Hi all. I've decided to get a bit more involved in the DP testing process this time around. Is there a forum to post results and get testing parameters from? Bob S ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to

Re: Strategies to test stacks in different platforms

+1. I got 2 new technicians whose struggles with Forms Generator made me rethink a few things. They also found bugs I had not yet discovered. Bob S On Sep 10, 2016, at 14:09 , J. Landman Gay <jac...@hyperactivesw.com<mailto:jac...@hyperactivesw.com>> wrote: Really the only

Re: test color question

Try this, it works for me: set the forecolor of char 1 to 10 of line 1 of field 1 to "red" set the styledText of field 2 to the styledText of line 1 of field 1 Regards Tore > 17. sep. 2016 kl. 20.00 skrev jbv : > > Hi list > > Please consider the following lines of

test color question

Hi list Please consider the following lines of script : set the forecolor of char 1 to 10 of line 1 of fld 1 to "red" put line 1 of fld 1 into fld 2 the text is in fld 2, but the color is gone... Is there a way to keep the color (and other style properties) whzn moving text between

Re: Strategies to test stacks in different platforms

ivesw.com/resources_testing.html> > Really the only way to test thoroughly is to find > someone else to do it, someone who has never seen > your stack before. As a developer, you know > too much to test in an unbiased way. Also, watching > a new user try to figure out what to do

Re: Strategies to test stacks in different platforms

On 9/10/16 2:14 PM, Alejandro Tejada wrote: Hi All, In this moment, I am testing an application (saved as an stack, not an executable) in Linux and Windows. As professional developers, many of you have to do this every day. Could you share some true and tried strategies to test stacks

Strategies to test stacks in different platforms

Hi All, In this moment, I am testing an application (saved as an stack, not an executable) in Linux and Windows. As professional developers, many of you have to do this every day. Could you share some true and tried strategies to test stacks as users (not as developers) in different platforms

Re: Line 6 of fld "test" works but the target does not

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 1:13 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Addendum: If I use "put target" instead of "put line 2 of target" I get > what you got, Kay. It returns the name. So apparently it requires forcing > text evaluation, which is what "get line 2 of target" does. > >

Re: Line 6 of fld "test" works but the target does not

Addendum: If I use "put target" instead of "put line 2 of target" I get what you got, Kay. It returns the name. So apparently it requires forcing text evaluation, which is what "get line 2 of target" does. Interesting. On 4/24/2016 12:05 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 4/23/2016 8:01 PM, Kay C

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >