To my knowledge yes, but then I never tested it thoroughly, never having needed
to. But I did test your stack and found that clearly send in time sent right
away and ignored the in time argument.
Bob S
On Feb 17, 2015, at 23:48 , Richmond
Yeah, looks like something broke with send in time. It’s clearly ignoring the
in argument, because attempting to delete the card at all when the send in time
is in a running script fails to delete the card, but deleting the card from the
message box works fine. If I were you, I’d file a bug
On 2/17/2015 7:43 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Bob Sneidar wrote:
That should not be the case. Send in time means execute next idle
message plus time. If it doesn’t work with 0 seconds, that means
there is something triggering an Idle message before the script
is finished. The only other
Bob Sneidar wrote:
That should not be the case. Send in time means execute next idle
message plus time. If it doesn’t work with 0 seconds, that means
there is something triggering an Idle message before the script
is finished. The only other explanation is that the way we all
thought send
On 18/02/15 00:52, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Yeah, looks like something broke with send in time. It’s clearly ignoring the
in argument, because attempting to delete the card at all when the send in time
is in a running script fails to delete the card, but deleting the card from the
message box works
On 17/02/15 21:05, Bob Sneidar wrote:
That should not be the case. Send in time means execute next idle message plus
time. If it doesn’t work with 0 seconds, that means there is something
triggering an Idle message before the script is finished. The only other
explanation is that the way we
On 17/02/15 20:50, Richmond wrote:
On 16/02/15 23:00, BNig wrote:
Hi Peter,
the point is that in a button on a card
---
on mouseUp
put the long id of this card into tLID
send delete tLID to this stack in 0 milliseconds
end mouseUp
But, this was, indeed joyous:
A BIG, BIG 'Thank You' to all and everyone for their very great help
snowing me under with wonderful suggestions for this problem.
Confirming my opinion, yet again, that this Use-List and the LiveCode
community as a whole consists of a great bunch of people.
Love you lot, Richmond.
That should not be the case. Send in time means execute next idle message plus
time. If it doesn’t work with 0 seconds, that means there is something
triggering an Idle message before the script is finished. The only other
explanation is that the way we all thought send in time worked is not
On 16/02/15 23:00, BNig wrote:
Hi Peter,
the point is that in a button on a card
---
on mouseUp
put the long id of this card into tLID
send delete tLID to this stack in 0 milliseconds
end mouseUp
No joy with this one:
on mouseUp
answer Do you want to delete
On 16/02/15 22:30, Eric Corbett wrote:
use
send mouseUp to btn DELL of card “INPUTTER” in 1 milliseconds
Nope!
On Feb 16, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/02/15 21:54, Roger Eller wrote:
try this:
click at the loc of btn DELL of card INPUTTER
try this:
click at the loc of btn DELL of card INPUTTER
~Roger
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:
This CANNOT be done, as such.
I am currently working up a moronically simple flashcard program for
people to learn words in a new language.
It
On 16/02/15 21:54, Roger Eller wrote:
try this:
click at the loc of btn DELL of card INPUTTER
~Roger
Thanks, but no joy: because that line still has to be inside a script in
an object on the card
to be deleted.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com
use
send mouseUp to btn DELL of card “INPUTTER” in 1 milliseconds
in the first mouseU
On Feb 16, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/02/15 21:54, Roger Eller wrote:
try this:
click at the loc of btn DELL of card INPUTTER
~Roger
Thanks, but no joy:
into cardNo
send getridofcard to this stack in 100 millisecs
end mouseUp
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:36:36 +0200
From: richmondmathew...@gmail.com
To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Re: Deleting cards from within themselves.
On 16/02/15 22:30, Eric Corbett wrote:
use
send
This CANNOT be done, as such.
I am currently working up a moronically simple flashcard program for
people to learn words in a new language.
It features a card where end-users can add terms.
Now, for every new term a templet card is cloned and 2 fields on the
cloned card are filled.
No
from within themselves.
On 16/02/15 22:30, Eric Corbett wrote:
use
send mouseUp to btn DELL of card “INPUTTER” in 1 milliseconds
Nope!
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
this, actually I may have read it somewhere or
stumbled upon it when fooling with the evaluation of the the quotes in a
send in time message?. No idea.
Kind regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Deleting-cards-from-within-themselves
Am 16.02.2015 um 22:00 schrieb BNig bernd.niggem...@uni-wh.de:
Hi Peter,
the point is that in a button on a card
---
on mouseUp
put the long id of this card into tLID
send delete tLID to this stack in 0 milliseconds
end mouseUp
you don't need any handler
You have to put the delete card handler in a higher level script in the message
path. For instance.
put this into the stack script:
on deleteMyCard cdID
delete card id cdID
end deleteMyCard
then put this into the button:
on mouseup
send (deleteMyCard the short id of this card) to
You can have a card button that deletes the card if you make the button a group
background button. While you see the button on the card, it is not actually on
the card but behind the card and can be used to delete the card.
on mouseUp -- script on background group button
delete this card
end
Bernd...
You show us all up every time...:-)
Again, 'nice one!'...
Dixie
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:43:28 -0800
From: bernd.niggem...@uni-wh.de
To: use-revolut...@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Re: Deleting cards from within themselves.
Or even a bit easier
---
on mouseUp
?. No idea.
Kind regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Deleting-cards-from-within-themselves-tp4688894p4688912.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Deleting-cards-from-within-themselves-tp4688894p4688926.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please
Hi Bernd,
Am 17.02.2015 um 00:15 schrieb BNig bernd.niggem...@uni-wh.de:
Hi Klaus,
...
---
on mouseUp
put the long id of this card into tLID
send delete tLID to this stack in 0 milliseconds
end mouseUp
you don't need any handler anywhere. Just tested on LC 5.5, it
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now, for every new term a templet card is cloned and 2 fields on the
cloned card are filled.
Bernd's solution is correct if you really want to create/delete cards. It
would be better/more scalable to just maintain a
in the stack script:
on delcd pCd
delete cd id pCd
end delcd
in the script of the btn of your card:
on mouseUp
send (delcd the id of this cd) to this stack in 0
end mouseup
Best
Günter
Am 16.02.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Richmond:
This CANNOT be done, as such.
I am currently working up
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Deleting-cards-from-within-themselves-tp4688894p4688908.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use
28 matches
Mail list logo
