I would be very pleased if this was added fast
since I have a stack which crashes the engine
immediately when opened and this could be a way to
open and correct that stack.
Regards
Larry
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Hi Mark,
thanks, I got it (ten times looked for, yet no found...)
I would be interested for your keyboard definition for the backslash
workaround
Tiemo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Mark Wi
The docs, for 'absolute file path':
The full name and location of a file, beginning with the disk the file is
on, including
The 'Tip' for defaultFolder includes the above plus points out that UNIX
naming convention is used so the path MUST begin with and folders separated
by "/".
The exampl
On 9/24/08 1:43 AM, "Lynn Fredricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> william humphrey wrote:
>>> Nothing lacking in Valentina's API it is incredible. It is the lack of
>>> completed solutions for common tasks. So it's not libraries but more example
>>> code like you find for PHP or other more popula
On 9/23/08 8:38 PM, "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Richard,
Hi William,
> william humphrey wrote:
>> Database specific libraries like Trevor's but simpler for
>> common database functions. They should also be for the different
>> databases that RunRev supports especially Valentina
What does the error say when it stops?Perhaps you can try putting before
that line:
put tStackName
so we can see what stack name is being used...
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:40 PM, william humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> When I choose "pallete toggle" it stops at
>
> *set* the priv_ResizeCon
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Jeff Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> also does anyone know if there is a list of the set of features that the
> 2.6.1 engine cannot do so i can make sure to try to avoid them if i do go to
> 3.0 for these projects?
Sorry for the late reply.
One option, in
When I choose "pallete toggle" it stops at
*set* the priv_ResizeControlList of stack tStackName to tControlList
I'm RunRev 3.0 on Mac 10.4.11
I will test it on my Intel Mac too.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please v
Hi David,
Is it a group of images or a group of mixed objects?
Joe Wilkins
On Sep 23, 2008, at 4:45 PM, David Bovill wrote:
In the IDE if you select an image in a group and try to paint - it
creates a
new image. Is there any way to to set things up / script it so that
a user
can paint in
In the IDE if you select an image in a group and try to paint - it creates a
new image. Is there any way to to set things up / script it so that a user
can paint in an image inside a group?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
P
It's doing quite well now - Ctrl keys are even working - except it
still does not play my music files as the Mac Version does. As Chipp
suggested, I'm looking into the AT&T Natural Voices for the Windows
version. The 1 voice it now provides is pretty gross. I tried to check
out your StackRu
Hi Eric,
If you look at the script you might be fooled into thinking
I am checking for a mouseDown but it is the mouseUp I
was checking.
Here is why I wrote it. I was using the mouseUp and if
a person clicked on some text it would bring up a dialog
displaying the text with the line and item num
> This sounds similar in some respects to the Finder's column view, in
> which a single click opens a new pane in the right-most column
> displaying info about the file, while a double-click triggers the most
> common verb, to launch the file. The first click is always handled in
> the same manner
> Thought I'd try using the StackRunner (Revolution Play.exe) instead of
> my Splash Screen standalone. Resolves most all of my issues. Will keep
> you informed as to my additional progress. Thanks everyone.
Actually "StackRunner" (
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/downloads/StackRunn
> william humphrey wrote:
> > Nothing lacking in Valentina's API it is incredible. It is
> the lack of
> > completed solutions for common tasks. So it's not libraries
> but more
> > example code like you find for PHP or other more popular
> environments.
> > The example code saves you from re
william humphrey wrote:
Nothing lacking in Valentina's API it is incredible. It is the lack of
completed solutions for common tasks. So it's not libraries but more example
code like you find for PHP or other more popular environments. The example
code saves you from re-writing stuff someone much
Le 24 sept. 08 à 00:15, Mikey a écrit :
Well, for an experiment that they ultimately let fail, they sure
nurtured it for a long time first.
Jobs shot the gun on HC (but kept AppleScript), Jobs launched the
iPhone.
And judging from
http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/09/23/androids-fir
Hi Eric,
In the stack Dynamic Table Field I use a script the allows different
actions for single and double mouseclicks. It uses a local variable
clickFlag and the script mixed in a few different handlers.
-=>JB<=-
On Sep 23, 2008, at 6:23 AM, Eric Chatonet wrote:
Bonjour à tous,
I just w
Nothing lacking in Valentina's API it is incredible. It is the lack of
completed solutions for common tasks. So it's not libraries but more example
code like you find for PHP or other more popular environments. The example
code saves you from re-writing stuff someone much more skilled has already
d
Err... no... because Revolution has a lot of cross platform code in
it, I bet that is not a matter of recompile with new target from
XCode. Remember, a common core is built for windows, linux and macs,
both x86 and ppc. XCode is great, I've developed stuff with it that
still amaze me till today, bu
Eric Chatonet wrote:
Eric Chatonet wrote:
I just want to make something that was easy with HC: e.g. allow the
user to use simple and double clicks on the same button but with
different actions.
MouseUp is always sent by the engine first then mouseDoubleUp is sent
if appropriate.
Is that not h
The same thing can be accomplished in a simple plugin. No need to add
more obscurity to the interface.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Mark Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore, it would be nice to be able to do the same in RunRev, to not
> execute the preOpenStack and/or the openStack
Well, for an experiment that they ultimately let fail, they sure
nurtured it for a long time first.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
Hi Jacque, I had just discovered that for myself. Prior to that it was
just finding an older version that I had squirrel away on the C drive
and forgot all about it. Dragging and dropping assured that it was
getting the right one; and, except for not playing music yet, and the
Ctrl keys not
François Chaplais wrote:
But my point is elsewhere and it is the same point that gave
Hypercard its appeal: the ability to bypass the classic development
scheme.
Sadly, the answer is the same for both HyperCard's demise and the
difficulty in developing for iPhone: the technology is availa
Le 23 sept. 08 à 19:04, Eric Chatonet a écrit :
Sure but I wonder: in many apps when does exist this ability, it
does not seem there is an extra delay: how is this possible?
Actually, I don't think it's possible without extra delay...
I am note versed in computer science, but I am pretty
So, I tried running the Mac version with the StackRunner and it works
perfectly using the latest version. Of course, I had to show it which
one to use; whereas the Revolution Player.exe just runs the stack it
THINKS is there in the same folder with it on Windows.
Good thing I love a mystery
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
I don't quite understand what you've suggested I try. As I noted in my
last post, the Player is definitely managing to find a 2.9 Version. I
tried replacing the 2.9 version with my new one, but for some reason
that didn't change anything. This is some real behind the sc
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Well, I put in an Answer Dialog into the OpenCard handler of the stack,
but does not do anything under XP, so I'm still in the dark about "the
platform"
This would't be related to the platform. Answer dialogs behave
identically on any of them. The most likely reason f
I don't quite understand what you've suggested I try. As I noted in my
last post, the Player is definitely managing to find a 2.9 Version. I
tried replacing the 2.9 version with my new one, but for some reason
that didn't change anything. This is some real behind the scenes
activity over wh
Le 23 sept. 08 à 22:26, Thomas McGrath III a écrit :
This is what I was saying. These elements are coming from Interface
Builder and as such can not be built on the fly or at runtime. And
new controls can not be added either.
Tom
It is an important point, indeed. I do not have many Phone
This is what I was saying. These elements are coming from Interface
Builder and as such can not be built on the fly or at runtime. And new
controls can not be added either.
Tom
On Sep 23, 2008, at 4:17 PM, François Chaplais wrote:
Now the only issue that I see is whether the iPhone SDK all
Having gone back and run the Splash screen standalone instead of the
Revolution Player.exe, I find that IT shows the correct new version of
the stack, so someway the Player is resurrecting (from the very same
stack) an older version. I believe the older version was what I had
been working o
Joe,
Try to find out the filepath of the original stack. For instance, put
it at C:/test.rev, then open it in the Windows player and ask the
message box:
put the filename of the topstack
See if they are the same.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-rev
Le 23 sept. 08 à 20:53, Andre Garzia a écrit :
It's worse than that... the processor is ARM, and if there's an
architecture that we never had an engine, well that is arm... we had
x86, ppc and sparc for a while...
The SDK will take care of this within XCode.
Best regards,
François
Le 23 sept. 08 à 19:24, Thomas McGrath III a écrit :
François,
Stacks will not run natively on the iPhone with any version of the
Rev player. This is because most of the controls on the iPhone are
not compatible with the controls in Revolution. This means that
buttons, fields, images, pl
I've run this stack through two other hard drives before making the
transfer and it is STILL this different, older version. I've also
restarted everything, thinking that something needs to be dumped from
memory. But?
I'm at my wits end. Half wit, perhaps! (smile)
Joe Wilkins
On Sep 23
Thanks for the post Richard - got me thinking about how common using double
click is, and essentially it is not that common with applications that fit
the noun verb metaphor, but becomes more common in situations where you are
navigating information structures with a default browsing / information
Well, after quite a few attempts and tweaks I can now send AS do
script to the IDE and I can also send it to a Standalone.
One point:
I have to send to the stack name if the command is located on the
stack and/or to the card if the command is located on the card. This
seems very odd to me.
Hi Gang,
I've got a really good one for you now. My main stack is fine and
works on OSX, BUT when I open the VERY same stack with the Revolution
Player.exe in WindowsXP, it is NOT the same stack, it is a much older
version; one of the cards is totally different and other things as
well. I
Thought I'd try using the StackRunner (Revolution Play.exe) instead of
my Splash Screen standalone. Resolves most all of my issues. Will keep
you informed as to my additional progress. Thanks everyone.
Joe Wilkins
___
use-revolution mailing lis
It's worse than that... the processor is ARM, and if there's an
architecture that we never had an engine, well that is arm... we had
x86, ppc and sparc for a while...
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Thomas McGrath III
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> François,
>
> Stacks will not run natively on the
Ken, thanks for some other things to think about AND TRY. (smile)
I guess my biggest problem right now is to figure out why the ask and
answer dialogs are not working in the "real stack", though I'm
fiddling with the standalone Splash Screen settings - which may help.
(smile - still!)
Jo
Bernd or BNig, smile
That worked. I am not sure why a simpler version worked for others
Since that worked I am going to adapt it to my project and see how it
goes.
Thanks again,
Tom
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:15 PM, BNig wrote:
Hi Tom,
I only get it to work if I set the calling apples
Thanks, Chipp, but is it still "Win32" when being used under VMWare
Fusion?
One of the other problems I'm having with this now, is that none of
the Dialogs work. It's this blasted Splash Screen Standalone. YUK! Not
a simple problem it would seem.
Joe Wilkins
On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:15 AM,
> 1. Since I'm testing by running XP under VMWare Fusion, I'm wondering
> what "platform" is returned by Rev. I had assumed (unfortunately) that
> using an "if the platform is not MacOS" would cover me for just about
> any eventuality, but it would seem this may not be the case with this
> config
The platform for WinXP is "Win32"
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Hi Tom,
I only get it to work if I set the calling applescript to
tell application "Revolution"
activate
do script "send \"testIt \" to stack \"NameOfYourStack\""
set x to the result
end tell
x
the last x optional to see the result
in the stackscript of my stack "NameO
Hi Mathias,
My problem is that I cannot use the msg box, since I'm running XP
under VMWare Fusion, and I don't know how that affects "the Platform".
Thanks, anyway,
Joe Wilkins
On Sep 23, 2008, at 10:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i do not know, if i understood your question right.
Hi,
i do not know, if i understood your question right.
Under Windows XP a "put the platform" in the messagebox gives "Win32" back.
Regards,
Matthias
Original Message
Subject: Re: Control X in Windows XP (23-Sep-2008 19:16)
From:Joe Lewis Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Tiemo-
Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 9:21:02 AM, you wrote:
> Jerry, I have the same problems, went to the http://glx2help.ning.com
In addition, the download links for the GLX2 installers are on the
right-hand side of the web page in the section labeled "GLX2
Installers".
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAI
william humphrey wrote:
> Database specific libraries like Trevor's but simpler for
> common database functions. They should also be for the different
> databases that RunRev supports especially Valentina which is the
> fastest and most powerful one but also the one with no third
> party support m
Is anyone else experiencing a problem with the Revolution (do script)
from applescript???
I am getting the IDE and Standalone to activate but not the 'do script'.
Revolution stack script:
on testIt
put "Hello" into msg
return "got it in Rev"
end testIt
Applescript:
tell application "Revol
Instead there is an item; Scriptable
Tom
On Sep 19, 2008, at 6:35 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
Still no result...
Also the NSAppleScriptEnabled does not seem to be there in the
info.plist from Revolution.
TOm
On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Jim Ault wrote:
Try this version and see what
François,
Stacks will not run natively on the iPhone with any version of the Rev
player. This is because most of the controls on the iPhone are not
compatible with the controls in Revolution. This means that buttons,
fields, images, players, etc. will not port over. The code might since
t
Well, I put in an Answer Dialog into the OpenCard handler of the
stack, but does not do anything under XP, so I'm still in the dark
about "the platform"
Joe Wilkins
On Sep 23, 2008, at 9:36 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Hi Gang,
I've reached the stage where I'm testing the XP version of my
Bonsoir Graham,
Le 23 sept. 08 à 18:18, Graham Samuel a écrit :
Thanks Eric, to the rescue again!
NP :-)
It seems counterintuitive to me that the selectedChunk returns a
meaningful result when nothing is selected, e.g. when the cursor is
flashing in a field but none of its contents are h
I hadn't even realized that calling "answer" was what was slow. That
explains it. I've noticed that in other things now too. Thanks for pointing
it out.
I'm building an app that has all the common task done with "control this or
control that" so that your fingers don't need to leave the key board.
Bonsoir Richard,
Le 23 sept. 08 à 17:48, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Eric Chatonet wrote:
I just want to make something that was easy with HC: e.g. allow the
user to use simple and double clicks on the same button but with
different actions.
MouseUp is always sent by the engine first then mouseDo
Database specific libraries like Trevor's but simpler for common database
functions. They should also be for the different databases that RunRev
supports especially Valentina which is the fastest and most powerful one but
also the one with no third party support materials (for SQLite there are
even
william humphrey wrote:
> The other complaint I get is that RunRev doesn't have libraries
> of code to use.
Au contaire, there are dozens of libs floating around the Revsphere,
some commercial ones like Animation Engine and a good many freeware ones
like stdLib and the goodies from Sarah, Andre
Hi Rob,
Hi Klaus,
I would expect all that multiuser functionality to be built into
whatever implementation of SQL you employ;
it IS, but that's not my problem.
but relational DBs are not my strong suit.
Same here ;-)
If, however, you're trying to allow multiple users to access a
"sin
Hi Gang,
I've reached the stage where I'm testing the XP version of my program;
but I'm running into few anomalies:
1. Since I'm testing by running XP under VMWare Fusion, I'm wondering
what "platform" is returned by Rev. I had assumed (unfortunately) that
using an "if the platform is no
Tiemo,
I've posted the answer to you problem on the GLX2 support site just
now. Simple problem; simple solution. You are using an older version
of GLX2 this is (understandably) not compatible with Rev 3.0.
There is a dandy installer on the GLX2 support site (www.glx2.com) for
installing o
Hi Len,
FWIW, I remember playing around with MS Access a few years ago, that
while holding down the left shift key and opening the application mdb
file, the startup scripts did not execute.
Therefore accomplishing what you want to do here.
Recently I tried the same in Rev, but obviously did n
Jerry, I have the same problems, went to the http://glx2help.ning.com
support site, but didn't found any download link for the new installer. I
found only a "buy" link at Runrevs site. Could you point me to the download
link please?
Tiemo
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks Eric, to the rescue again!
It seems counterintuitive to me that the selectedChunk returns a
meaningful result when nothing is selected, e.g. when the cursor is
flashing in a field but none of its contents are highlighted, or it is
even empty! Similarly to use 'select' to put the focu
Paul Looney wrote:
My first thought, years ago, was "revTalk" also.
But "talks" are not preceived as "real" languages - remember when
Apple went through all those contortions to use "scripting" instead
of "coding". Dropping "talk" helps Rev transcend its heritage and
paradigm - will result
Phil Davis wrote:
> ...you can store images as objects in a 'library' stack, and when
> you start using the stack, those images become available as icons
> in your app's buttons. Of course, your app has to know their IDs
> to take advantage of them.
>
> I use this in one product I maintain. It has
My first thought, years ago, was "revTalk" also.
But "talks" are not preceived as "real" languages - remember when
Apple went through all those contortions to use "scripting" instead
of "coding". Dropping "talk" helps Rev transcend its heritage and
paradigm - will result in more sales, too.
The other reason why I like it is for the same reason I liked
HyperTalk as a name back in The Day. The name describes the language
as being something completely different than you're used to, namely
more conversational, easier to learn, and less cryptic.
___
Eric Chatonet wrote:
I just want to make something that was easy with HC: e.g. allow the
user to use simple and double clicks on the same button but with
different actions.
MouseUp is always sent by the engine first then mouseDoubleUp is sent
if appropriate.
Is that not how HyperCard works?
If
There have been stories on the web of the difficulty of publishing an
application on Apple's App Store for the iPhone. Getting paid is
another story.
Here I think revolution can have an original position: if a stack
runner/player is made available on the iPhone (for free or for a
small pr
Mikey wrote:
I liked RevCode originally, but I think, to be true to the paradigm,
revTalk is probably better, because it is clearer which dialect we're
referring to.
I generally avoid "me too" posts, but this is the first time I can
recall "RevTalk" being mentioned here, and I like it for the s
Personally, I still prefer 'transcript' (I think that's what it was
called when I first encountered it), but surely the point is that it
is called "revolution".
In the context of deciding what to call it for the purposes of
inclusion in sites like stackoverflow, it really won't help if we
Hi Klaus,
I would expect all that multiuser functionality to be built into
whatever implementation of SQL you employ; but relational DBs are not
my strong suit.
If, however, you're trying to allow multiple users to access a
"single user" [ie. non-client/server] SQL DB, you will probably need
Calling the program "Revolution" and calling the programming language
"Revolution" is certainly confusing. The name "Revolution" is not all
that great to begin with.
I call the program "Rev" and the language "Revcode". I use "Revcode"
as both a noun and a verb.
I like "Rev" because it means g
I think it's common enough a GUI technique for a feature request - though
I'm not sure how? Maybe something like:
insert the mouseDoubleUp of btn 1 to front
>
or
set the messageOrder of btn 1 to "mouseDoubleUp,mouseDouble"
but it may be hard to implement in the engine?
2008/9/23 Eric Chatonet <
Originally they called in Transcript - but I guess somewhere along the line
they had an in-house marketing talk and decided to get the name out more.
It's all a bit confusing. I use Revcode as short hand, and to distinguish it
from the Revolution IDE. It's also easier to search for on the web -
som
Hi Rob,
Hi Klaus,
FWIW, here is the information SDB maintains internally to handle
multiuser access:
A list of DBs currently open by the user or client:
local clientDbList -- array by clientId:dbId1, dbId2, etc
A list of the current record position and access privileges for each
user/cl
Hi Klaus,
FWIW, here is the information SDB maintains internally to handle
multiuser access:
A list of DBs currently open by the user or client:
local clientDbList -- array by clientId:dbId1, dbId2, etc
A list of the current record position and access privileges for each
user/client current
RunRev call it "revolution", so I'd think that would be the right
tag, though perhaps "revolution/transcript" might be more useful.
Best,
Mark
On 16 Sep 2008, at 23:28, Alex Tweedly wrote:
I saw on slashdot a link ( http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/
2008/09/15.html ) to Joel on Software'
Thanks David: I was afraid of ;-)
Le 23 sept. 08 à 15:49, David Bovill a écrit :
That's what I do. Logically there is no way out of delaying the
mouseUp
until after the the mouseDoubleUp. I think you can improve it for
machines
of different speeds and look at things like the doubleclickinter
i think you have explicitvariables set to true. That's ot some sort of
sensorship - but does force Rev to declare variables. Not sure but in the
IDE it may be the menu item "Edit => Variable Checking" ?
2008/9/23 Rolf Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello all
>
> I haven't followed the beta cyc
Bonjour Rolf,
Le 23 sept. 08 à 15:42, Rolf Kocherhans a écrit :
Hello all
I haven't followed the beta cycle closly so it is new to me that
puting contents into local variables report a script error now.
eg. put 3 into varTest
It only works if I declare the local Variable first !
local varT
That's what I do. Logically there is no way out of delaying the mouseUp
until after the the mouseDoubleUp. I think you can improve it for machines
of different speeds and look at things like the doubleclickinterval - but I
never really got it working / sound it to be needed except on very old
machi
Hello all
I haven't followed the beta cycle closly so it is new to me that
puting contents into local variables report a script error now.
eg. put 3 into varTest
It only works if I declare the local Variable first !
local varTest
put 3 into varTest
Is this a new behavior in 3.0 ?
Can I disabl
I liked RevCode originally, but I think, to be true to the paradigm,
revTalk is probably better, because it is clearer which dialect we're
referring to.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, un
Just taken a quick look - doesn't look much more than what you'd get with a
blog and a post rating system - or am I wrong? It work OK but the forum /
blog posting metaphor doesn't help much as the site scales - even with
keywords (which IMO are probably the most important navigation if you can
get
Bonjour à tous,
I just want to make something that was easy with HC: e.g. allow the
user to use simple and double clicks on the same button but with
different actions.
MouseUp is always sent by the engine first then mouseDoubleUp is sent
if appropriate.
So the question is how to not execu
Just taken a quick look - doesn't look much more than what you'd get with a
blog and a post rating system - or am I wrong? It work OK but the forum /
blog posing metaphor doesn't help much as the thing scales - even with
keywords (which IMO are probably the most important navigation if you can
get
Len Morgan wrote:
I'm trying to debug a stack and I'd like to stop not have it come up
running when I open it from the IDE. Other than setting a breakpoint in
the preOpenStack script, is there a way to keep it from executing code
when it's loaded?
Another approach is to have your preOpenStac
Bonjour Graham,
The clickCharChunk function returns a chunk expression of the form
char charNumber to charNumber of field fieldNumber:
it's not a point you can click at.
Anyway, probably you might prefer to store the selectedChunk instead
and use do "select" && gRememberedInsertionPoint
Thi
I'm still trying to create a simple Undo mechanism for a succession of
fields acting as cells in a grid-like structure, a bit like a
spreadsheet. I am not using table fields. It is easy to implement Cut,
Copy, Paste and Clear functions for these fields, to be operated by
conventional menu i
Bonjour Chipp,
Le 23 sept. 08 à 10:23, Chipp Walters a écrit :
Hi Eric,
I've had mixed results with pushing that button in past Rev versions,
as sometimes parts of the IDE quit working even after messages are
turned back on.
I had a look at the code in revMenubar:
This action suppresses a l
Hi Eric,
I've had mixed results with pushing that button in past Rev versions,
as sometimes parts of the IDE quit working even after messages are
turned back on.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to sub
Bonjour Len and Chipp,
Or just lock messages by clicking on the corresponding button in Rev
toolbar and use File/Open Stack... menu item :-)
Le 23 sept. 08 à 09:22, Chipp Walters a écrit :
create a button:
on mouseUp
lock messages
go stack "C:/test.rev"
unlock messages
end mouseUp
Hi Graham,
Graham Samuel wrote:
Yes, but any explanation of libraries should also include
**components**: my recent attempts to employ libraries consistently
for the first time (embarassingly this was many years after I started
scripting) revealed soon enough that a library in the sense of
so
create a button:
on mouseUp
lock messages
go stack "C:/test.rev"
unlock messages
end mouseUp
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
Am 23.09.2008 um 01:20 schrieb Kurt Kaufman:
Bob Sneidar wrote:
...Sorry for the lengthy post.
Not at all! This is a fascinating discussion.
Yes, very interesting and appreciated, Bob!
I was under the false impression that the automatic record-locking
mechanisms would handle everything
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
