Richard,
I believe stack MyData.rev would have to be open already in order to
get fld Whatever.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 07:47:04 -0700
Subject: Re: Stack
Richard, Jacque, et. al.,
By destroyStack don't we always mean purge stack?
PL
-Original Message-
From: Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:19:01 -0700
Subject: Re: Stack Switching Question
J. Landman Gay
Jeanne,
It got 5 of my votes as well.
But I think there is more confusion here.
A
I believe Open Stack and Close Stack should be symmetrical. In other
words, Close Stack should reverse the results of Open Stack. Open Stack
1. loads the stack into memory, 2. makes the stack visible on the
Richard,
I was also concerned about the legacy apps. My first thought was to
allow load by reference for some period of time (for example all
shipments of Rev. delivered after January 2007 would require the new
behavior). But it may be that only a very small group of current Rev
programmers
Mark,
I gave it five votes as well - with the understanding that there would
be one comprehensive solution that would address both bugs. It would be
welcome news to learn that destroyStack had disappeared with the next
version of Rev.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wieder
Robert,
1. Clicking the go away box in the window of a stack should close it
(and any substacks). In other words, clicking the close box should
close the stack. Clicking the box in a substack should hide it.
2. You can do whatever you want with modals - probably Show and Hide,
as needed.
3. If
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Dan,
I agree completely.
HyperCard hooked me with the Addresses stack. I added one field
(Birthdays, so when I looked up someone's phone number I could see if there
were any
birthdays or anniversaries in the family in the next week or so) and never
looked back.
It would be nice to have a
Or as good marketing people also say:
Sell the sizzle not the steak.
What it is counts for little, what it does is everything. Or as good
marketing people put it:
Never list a feature without describing its benefits.
What is different about TAOO? And why should I care?
Paul Looney
Xavier,
1. Give me an example of a stack more easily made in TAOO than in Rev.
2. Show me a specific example of auto-organizing
3. Show me an example of auto-relating
I really don't know what you are talking about.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: MisterX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'How
Jacque,
I wonder if Scott would come to the same conclusion today.
On modern computers messages can transverse the entire path in
nanoseconds. While Rev. definitely feels faster than HC on all the
computers where I've used it, HC was tolerable even on an 8 MHZ Mac
Plus of the mid 80's - so
Jacque,
I'm thinking primarily of menu commands (stored in a setup plugin)
which work differently if used in a single-users stack or a multi-user
database (things like new card, next card, etc.) In HC you could
change the behavior of a script depending on whether a netWorkOn
variable was
Dan,
I, for one, think you are being way too kind to the Rev IDE. The
debugger opens at random sizes. Buttons and bits of buttons float
around the script editor. Opening the Variable Watcher opens the Object
Inspector (on top of the VW window on my system). The Variable Watcher
doesn't watch
Spence,
Either your experiences with Rev or your expectations are different
than mine. I am not talking about perfection, just basics.
For example: Stability. If I save my work after every action, I can
get through an entire day without a crash. If I do not save my work
constantly (old
Michael,
You can also add zero to it; if it is a number then the result will be
empty.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:07:09 -0400
Subject: Re: Ensuring numeric input
Richard,
To make the world safe for Intel we could do the dirty work in a
variable:
on closeField
put me into temp
add 0 to temp--of course any number would do (0.1 or 10 or ?)
if the result is not empy
then answer This is not a valid number:
end closeField
Paul Looney
-Original
In the past I have commented on the instability I've experienced using
Rev for my work. I use it hard. Sixteen and eighteen hour days are
common. I regularly work with 20 to 30 meg. stacks. Some of the
routines I run take 30 to 40 hours. This is often done on computers
that have not been
On 32 bit systems is the 4G limit per each open stack or a total for
all currently open stacks?
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Wouter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 17:02:54 +0100
Subject: Re: question: how much
Does the limit of 65,536 characters per line in fields also apply to
lines in data stored as custom properties?
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Eric Chatonet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:55:05 +0100
Subject:
Richard,
I'm finding that the display of data becomes unreadable somewhere
around 40,000 characters (this may depend on the field width settings -
I have not experimented with that - that many characters could not be
shown on a a screen without scrolling anyway). And, as you said, sorts
tend
Richard,
You should be able to do anything you want to with your own stuff in
your own part of the world.
As long as your permissions don't interfer with the OS or other apps.,
I see no harm.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use
Xavier,
Thank you, again, for the suggestion that tabs might be causing the strange
display problems in large fields. I changed the delimiter from tab to | and
the display problems disappeared.
The original reason for the tabs was to make the data more transportable -
especially to
Richard,
Agreed. Sane people will seldom need to concern themselves with this. I have
over a hundred tabs in my lines (certainly not real world).
By the way, the vertical tab (ASCII 11) displays in the message box and in
fields but not in the script editor.
PL
Marty,
I have a number of data set similar to yours.
One of them required 2 minutes to build the selected list with repeat with;
it took less than 2 seconds with repeat for. It worth the effort to master
this type of repeat!
Paul Looney
___
Garrett,
Also remember that all fonts are not available on all platforms. For
example, you could do your layout on a Mac with Geneva, but this
typeface is Mac only. You may also find that some typefaces that are
common to all platforms, like Times or Helvetica, look different on
each. There
Modern times, modern needs, modern tools.
It is 1990 not 1970...oops, it is not even 1990 anymore :-)
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: David Burgun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:48:15 +
Subject: Re: Constant
Brian,
Your approach sounds good.
We have been doing something similar.
We started with HyperCard stacks with tens of thousands, and hundreds
of thousands, of records. Converting them to Rev stacks bloated them
significantly; 2 meg. HC stacks ballooned to almost 8 meg. Using a text
file for
Bill,
Thank you for the fresh, insider perspective.
I've used HC since it came out in 1987, believe I've read every book
on the subject, and never heard it put this way. Thank you again for
sharing it with us.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Michael,
If the field is hidden you may have no problem.
If the field containing the database is visible, you will probably
encounter two problems:
1. the maximum number of characters in a line in a visible field is a
little over 65,000
2. fields with lots of characters and tabs do not display
Jerry,
I would love to have a good variable watcher integrated into Constellation.
This is more important to me than the property list. Having everything together
in one place would be most helpful. And the Constellation layout, with the
attached and resizable panels, is almost ideal for
Jerry,
Looks like you are heading the right direction.
Paypal said they were experiencing temporary difficulties. I'll try
again. although I am a registered user I'd gladly pay an EXTRA $50 for
Constellation with the Variable Watcher you describe.
Thanks again for all of your work on this.
Fritz,
You should also be able to use:
put myVariable return into fld x
Paul Looney
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
Fritz,
I think you're really close to the solution. I suspect the cursor is still
flashing at the original insertion point - even though new characters were
added. Try rearranging the pieces.:
put myVariable return into fld x
select after fld x
So close you can feel it...
Paul Looney
Steve,
I would only add that Rev stacks on OS X make room for the VISIBLE dock
wherever it is, including sides (if the user is displaying it on either
the left or right side of the screen) - it does so by cutting off the
opposite edge of the stack or the bottom. If the dock is hidden (set to
Scott,
QIF is an old-style data format, it does not use tabs or commas as
delimiters. Instead it allocates aa specific number of characters per
field - and the fields have to be padded if they contain less than the
allocated characters.
About 10 years ago I wrote a QIF import/export routine in
Scott,
Here are a set of handlers I wrote a very long time ago in HyperTalk.
This is entirely reverse engineered (trial and error) and it was
written for import and export to the checkbook part of my business
system, so it may not handle all of the data you are dealing with.
Looking at it
Scott,
Ask the right questions I've got all the right answers ;-)
Glad to help.
PL
-Original Message-
From: Scott Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'How to use Revolution' use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:56:29 +1100
Subject: RE: Sample QIF Import and Export
Hi
Mike,
This command should fix it:
set the printMargins to 0,0,0,0
Check out the command in the docs.
Paul Looney
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
Chipp,
I have the same experience with nested conditionals. I have found the
following format (with the then below the if) helps.
if tResult is Error
then
answer Go Ahead anyway with Cancel or OK
if it is Cancel then exit to top
end if
There is sometimes still a problem, especially if the
Dave,
The location of then is mostly personal preference. To me, this is
more logical, consistent and easier to read:
ifthen... (for short statement, short response)
if (long statement)
then (long response)
if
then
(lots of responses)
end if
if
then
1
2
3
else
1
2
end if
if
then
Ken,
You didn't say which computers. If you are using a Mac with personal
file sharing, each computer could have it's own firewall - independent
of any network firewall - would account for the symptoms you described.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Terry,
I can't say enough good things about Navigator.
It is the ideal layering tool and indispensible for working with groups.
Get it, try it; when you like it, send some money to Geoff, he has
provided a very useful tool.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Canyon [EMAIL
I hope there is a simple answer to this. I have the following code in a
field:
on closeField
if fld Ship Date 1 is empty
then
ask Enter a date for this shipment: with the short date
if the result is Cancel then exit closeField
put it into fld Ship Date 1
end if
end closeField
If I step through
Jim,
Thanks for the suggestion... but it did not work here (Orlando tonight).
Activating the Message Watcher slowed the process down enough to get a
better look at what is happening:
I change a number in the field containing this script and press Enter.
The
ask plainEnter a date for this
Martin,
No, the original closedField field is Quantity Shipped 1.
I do have another handler called by this closeField but get the same
results when it is commented out.
What I am trying to do is make sure that a date is entered in a date
field if there is a quantity entered in the shipment
Peter,
Long ago all Macs used 72 DPI for screen resolution. Today it is more
like 90 DPI but can be more or less. Flat panels may be over 120 DPI.
And resolutions are bound to go higher as everyone tries to accommodate
pictures and movies.
More madness: most 17 screens and most 19 screens have
WOW Jim,
These are some really good (extremely creative) ideas! Thank you for
sharing them.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Jim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:59:36 -0800
Subject: Re: File sharing,
I started using Rev. 2.7 Studio yesterday.
I quit the program and came back to it later. If I now try opening a
stack with the Open Stack... menu from 2.7 all of the stacks previously
opened with 2.7 are disabled (grayed out, do not open).
If I try opening one of the stacks previously opened
Stephen,
Rebuild Mac permissions?
Or Rev permissions?
Thanks.
PL
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:46:07 -0800
Subject: Re: Disabled files in 2.7
Rebuild permissions?
also
Stephen,
I was a silly question ;-)
I repaired the OS X permissions and the problem persists.
I do appreciate your suggestion.
PL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:55:03 -0500
Subject: Re: Disabled files in 2.7
Sarah,
Good news: using All Files I was able to open the disabled stacks.
Somehow opening them in Rev 2.7 changed them from Rev files?!?
Bad news: Command-period does not work when the computer is hung trying
to get into the table options. I have tried that. I have tried just
letting it run
Hi Richard,
Yes, the standalone was made in 2.6.1 and that would explain those
issues (time permitting, I'll remake it in 2.7 tomorrow).
But why would the IDE not recognize 2.6.1 stacks that it had opened and
saved? Could it be due to the fact that they contain the Mac OS creator
code that
This only works if followed by revPrintField or revPrintText:
revShowPrintDialog true,true
Is there a way to get these two dialog boxes when printing a stack?
Paul Looney
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
Is the new pdf for the documentation in 2.7 missing chapters 8 9? I
can't find them in mine. If someone else has the same experience with
theirs, let me know and I'll Bugzilla it.
Paul Looney
___
use-revolution mailing list
PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:27:42 -0800
Subject: Re: Disabled files in 2.7
simplsol-
Thursday, February 16, 2006, 6:32:50 PM, you wrote:
Stack no longer exists in this location
...I absolutely hate this error message. I have
Worked perfectly!
Thank you, Sarah!
PL
-Original Message-
From: Sarah Reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:39:24 +1000
Subject: Re: How to get print dialogs when printing stacks
On 2/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin,
Thanks for the guidance.
PL
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:27:31 +
Subject: Re: Missing Chapter 8 9
On 17/2/06 04:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems Kevin Company are already aware of this, so I will not add it
to Bugzilla.
PL
-Original Message-
From: Kay C Lan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:44:18 +0800
Subject: Re: Missing Chapter 8 9
And I imagine
Documentation is always a work in process.
But the 2.7 doc has a table of contents that lists chapters which do
not exist.
Would be nice to have something like known problems. How could anyone
tell if these chapters were supposed to be in the current edition or
not. Other than this list, how
Yesterday I noted that opening some 2.6.1 stacks in 2.7 made it
impossible for 2.7 to recognize them again after they were closed. They
appeared grayed out from the Open menu. The only way that 2.7 would
open them was through the Recent Files menu. This is a problem with a
standalone - that
Yesterday I noted that opening some 2.6.1 stacks in 2.7 made it
impossible for 2.7 to recognize them again after they were closed. They
appeared grayed out from the Open menu. The only way that 2.7 would
open them was through the Recent Files menu. This is a problem with a
standalone - that
Judy,
Based on the numerous, fundamental and significant problems I've found
in a brief use of 2.7, I wouldn't recommend waiting for the new and
probably similar Media.
2.6.1 is a much more solid product, which your students should find
useful. And they will get a lesson in software evolution.
Jacque,
My pleasure:
It is now bug 3336
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: J. Landman Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:42 -0600
Subject: Re: Disabled files in 2.7 - Followup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
Sarah,
Are the new stacks still identified as Rev stacks in the Finder?
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Sarah Reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:22:00 +1000
Subject: Re: Followup on disabled files in 2.7
Before entering this in Bugzilla I'd like to know if others are having
the same problem:
Almost every time I click on the Table tab in the Object Inspector, Rev
hangs. If it doesn't hang on opening the panel, it hangs when I click
the first option (whatever it is).
Is anyone else
So far my experience with Rev 2.7 has left much to be desired.
The latest:
When I open a stack that has been automatically converted to the new
file format by Rev 2.7, with a new standalone (created with Rev 2.7) I
get the Windows appearance (blue hilights on buttons, raised scroll
bars,
Thank you, Sarah,
It appears that Rev 2.7 is changing both the file Type and the Creator
code when it opens existing stacks. Big problem when I try to edit
stacks that are designed to work wih a standalone.
PL
-Original Message-
From: Sarah Reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use
Mark,
What if the developer wants to use his own Creator code, so that stacks
open with a standalone. It appears that this code is being overwritten
when that stack is edited in Rev.?
Paul Looney
PS Thank you for responding so promptly.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Waddingham [EMAIL
Mark,
Meanwhile...
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Mark Waddingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:23:15 +
Subject: Re: Disabled files in 2.7 - Followup
Hi Richard,
The stackFileType is very helpful
Mark,
The question is academic at this point.
I've had to go back to 2.6.1
There are just too many blocker problems in 2.7 for me.
When the file paths are sorted out and the tab pane in the Object
Inspector is crashless, I'll look at the themes and other issues again.
I appreciate you continuing
Thanks Geoff,
Navigator is the second most important tool I use for Rev work. I do
not exaggerate when saying I could not run my business without it. Keep
up the good work.
PL
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Canyon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Use-Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com;
I have gone back to 2.6.1 so I can't speak directly to the issue.
However, be sure you have compacted your HC stack before trying to
convert it (sometimes two or even three times). This would help with
prior versions.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: BRAMI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Ken,
Indeed an excellent site. A must visit for non-pros, as well.
Propably a multiple must visit.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Use Revolution List use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:35:07 -0600
Subject: Re: Regular
Dan,
I use OS X and agree with David. New users should start with 2.6.x and
wait while 2.7 matures.
Version 2.6.1 was the best all-around release of Rev in the last three
years. In my experience 2.7 was one of the worst.
The missing documentation chapters, crashes when accessing the Table
Thom,
A CRM can be something as simple as a Rolodex-style card file or a
module in a fully integrated business system. We have done both. Rev
works well for either. Simple CRMs are done quite easily and will not
excessively challenge the skills of most Rev beginners. More
complicated CRMs
There have been some requests for info on the new Macs with the Intel
processors:
I've been using an Intel iMac for two days now. The only problem in
that time was a lockup trying to read from a flash drive. I restarted
and never had the problem again.
As for Rev in Rosetta:
I don't have
Camm,
If the repeat script is in a stack script, something like this might do
it for you:
on repeat...
if the hilite of button Stop this repeat is true
then
go to card x
exit repeat
end if
do repeat stuff
do more repeat stuff
end repeat
-Original
Francis,
Have you converted the HC stack to a Rev stack (by opening it)?
In my experience this makes all of the scripts (including button
scripts) accessible.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Francis Nugent Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Tue, 21
Sean,
Permit me an off the wall question...
Do you REALLY need to support OS 9?
Any computer Apple has made since 1998 (8 years!) will run some flavor
of OS X (although they probably need more RAM). The time and effort you
would put into supporting OS 9 could be invested in making your OS X
Hello from San Dimas,
I'm missing something here.
Why not just have Rev open the HC stack, this will convert it to a Rev
stack? You would be able to access all of the button and field scripts
- and do whatever you want with them. You could then write any Rev
script needed to import/export or
I thought this was entered in Bugzilla, but couldn't find it.
I'm hoping someone has come up with a good workaround.
When using the Enter key in a field, I get a return. I want the Enter
key to simply close the field without adding lines. If I put:
on enterInField
closeField
end
Dave Burgun wrote:
[snip]
I don't see how my way of doing things is in anyway not a standard
xTalk approach. What we are talking about it the basic Object-Oriented
programming. The concept of keeping all the house keeping of an object
in that object and not spread across many different layers
Mark,
on enterInField
select empty
end enterInfield
worked perfectly. Solved a host of problems.
Thank you.
Paul Looney
Everyone,
Isn't the current behavior of Enter (doing a return) wrong?
If I am the only one who thinks so, I'll work around it with Mark's
cure. Otherwise I'll bugzilla it
Richard,
I was not so much concerned with Return. It works as I'd expect. But it
has always seemed strange that Enter should also produce a return in
Rev.
I go back before the Mac/Windows wars. The spreadsheets of the late
70s, early 80s, and since use the following convention:
TAB = close
In a message dated 4/4/06 5:56:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
http://www.sagebusinessvision.com/
Jim,
BusinessVision sells their product on a subscription basis. Do you feel
comfortable with an accounting system that requires monthly payments - and
apparently stops working if the
OS X treats days that you go onto daylight saving time as having 23
hours - and days that you come off DST as having 25 hours. The former
have 23 hours of seconds, the latter have 25 hours of seconds.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Jim Ault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use
There is one limit to fields to be aware of (admittedly this is seldom
a problem):
Fields can only have 65536 characters per line.
Apparently Custom Properties do not have this limit.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Sarah Reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution
Marian,
I recently converted some large (30-40 meg.) HyperCard stacks to Rev. I
used my 1.67 GHz laptop and a 2.0 GHz Intel iMac. Even in Rosetta the
iMac was twice as fast as the laptop. Since the processors are about
the same speed, and since the hard drives are only used briefly to move
Richard,
A potential danger I see to this approach is if one of the duplicates
had been edited. The routine would have to check for modification date
(probably safe to keep the one most recently changed) - just not delete
any apparent duplicates that have different edit dates?
Paul Looney
Martin,
Is the don't search property set to true for this field? Is it a
sharedText set to true?
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Jeanne A. E. DeVoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:02:58 -0800
Subject: Re:
Mark,
For my personal computer, running OS X, I use SuperDuper, backing up to a
Firewire HD. SuperDuper erases the backup drive and copies everything from the
source drive - takes about 1 hour - and the Firewire HD is then a bootable HD.
Incremental updates take about 5 - 7 minutes. SuperDuper
Good point, Dave,
But I'm not sure why we are having this discussion at all.
Whether it takes one click or two clicks to close the script editor is
the least of the problems with the editor and, worse yet, the debugger.
It opens to random window sizes. Sometimes it opens almost off the
screen.
Herve,
I'm sorry I've taken so long to reply. I saw your post yesterday
morning but have been very busy.
Anyway, I'm sure everyone will get the same results you did with the
date conversion.
The problem is in OS X, not Revolution. In OS X days that go onto
daylight savings time (summer time,
Francis,
I wrote earlier that my experience with the Rev. Debugger was not as
positive as Jacque's (the little red button indicating the start of the
debugging process disappears occasionally; sometimes the marker does
not trigger the debugger; I have to click the Step into button to
begin
I presume you mean Rev with universal binaries to take full advantage
of the Intel chip.
Meanwhile, I have been using Rev 2.6.1 with a 20 Intel iMac and a Core
Solo Mac Mini for several weeks now. Both run fineand fast... today.
Paul Looney
-Original Message-
From: Xeubie Tsu
Ian,
We have card-style databases with over 70,000 records. These are primarily
archives - which don't need to be accessed frequently.
At about 5,000 records you'll notice a speed hit, particularly when opening
and closing the larger stacks.
There are advantages to each method but, for your use,
Jeanne et al.,
One area where I've found the transition from HC to Rev to be difficult is
the different ways they handle the clickLine.
I have two fields. The one on the left is a label field, shared text which
appears on all cards. The one on the right contains data that changes from card
to
Oddly enough, all of these new Xboxes, from MS, Sony, and Netindo, (which
will be using the PowerPC) are supposed to run faster than 3 GHz (in the first
version).
If I had seen a headline on a reputable newspaper that said: Macs to use
Intel, MS to use PPC I would have figured it to be an April
I also agree.
It would be especially nice to see how many of the high-vote, 2 year old bugs
have been fixed.
Paul Looney
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
My accountant had returned from a seminar. The presenter had suggested
everyone double their prices. One of the accountants in the room protested:
I'd lose half my business. The presenter smiled and said: Perfect, you'd get
the same revenue - with half the work.
The flaw in this is
1 - 100 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
