Manoj,
If you've isolated your bandwidth issue to Xrdp that's useful. My
comments around FreeRDP could be equally applied to Xrdp insofar as
there may be some tweaks available, or some useful resource your company
could provide the Xrdp project.
I've not had a lot to do with Xrdp myself so
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:15 PM Manoj Patil wrote:
> ...
> When at client side latency is 400-500 guacamole disconnected frequently .
>
> can you help in this to increased the parameter for checking the
> connection to keepalive and checking latency.
>
The timeout at all levels of the Guacamole
ivanmarcus,
Thanks for cooperation .
Xrdp observation--
As per observation and experience i think the measure issue at Xrdp side .
Xrdp send the images in bitmap and jpeg compression but i could not see the
compression is done or not.
second thing is when you move the mouse pointer on
Manoj,
On 11/03/2020 12:02 a.m., Manoj Patil wrote:
When connect to FreeRDP client-> xrdp ,bandwidth utilization is also
High in idle condition. In running condition using freerdp client
utilization is High.
Thank you for doing this test. From the above comment I take it that
what you
Dear,
When i am connecting through MSRD client to xrdp --
In idle mode Bandwidth utilization is low ,but when i move mouse pointer
over windows and run my application bandwidth is utilized high.
In reverse i am connect MSRD client to MSRD (windows) host in idle
condition bandwidth is low ,
Manoj,
I think the answer you're giving is 'yes' - ie. that the issue you're
experiencing is in fact between Guacamole and the Xrdp machine(?).
In that case, for the next step, could you try connecting to your Xrdp
machine directly via:
(1) MSRD client
(2) FreeRDP client
And compare the
Manoj,
Perhaps I'm struggling to understand completely, but maybe we should
just go through this one step at a time.
(1) Is the bandwidth issue you're presenty raising between Guacamole and
the local (Xrdp) client - NOT between Guacamole and the remote browser?
On 10/03/2020 4:20 p.m.,
Dear ivanmarcus,
To be specific. You say MSRDWC uses a lot less bandwidth than Guacamole,
however (if I understand correctly) from what you say you're using
Guacamole with a Xrdp client machine, and MSRDWC with a MSRD client
machine. I suggest you should first test with Guacamole to the MSRD
Dear
I know the discussion is going on .., but still we try to minimised the
bandwidth utilization. I see in xrdp code there is a bitmap and jpeg cache
and compression with respectively bpp(bit per pixel), width and height .
but guacamole can done the compression and cache the bitmap and jpeg.
Manoj,
We may have exhausted our ability to help. As Stefan has pointed out
there have been a number of suggestions and explanations around the
issue you raise; it could be useful if you were to pursue those in the
first instance.
One thing that strikes me from your latest post is that
Hi Manoj
Several Guacamole users have made useful suggestions over the course of the
discussion.
Ultimately, the resolution of your issues is in your own hands.
Stefan
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 08:58, Manoj Patil wrote:
>
> Dear,
>
> Any Resolution on my Issues.
>
> Please suggest any changes at
Dear,
Any Resolution on my Issues.
Please suggest any changes at guacamole server and Xrdp host server.
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear ivanmarcus/mike,
>
> The MSRDP setup is done at my end for testing purpose with same user ,same
> screen,same depth etc. we measure
Dear ivanmarcus/mike,
The MSRDP setup is done at my end for testing purpose with same user ,same
screen,same depth etc. we measure the bandith for singile session and it is
too low. i am already sharing a snapshot in preious mail.
*My point is if i used MSRDP web client to acees the server it
Manoj,
I've followed this thread with some interest, and have learnt something
from what Mike's been saying about how Guacamole handles image
compression etc.
I'm not able to contribute much from a softwarec perspective but there
are a couple of things that I wonder about.
In your tests
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 7:07 PM Manoj Patil wrote:
> What tool u used for measuring bandwidth.
>
AWS CloudWatch.
Is there any resolution?
>
There isn't really anything to resolve.
As already noted in this thread, the bandwidth you've measured for
Guacamole looks fine and the bandwidth we've
What tool u used for measuring bandwidth.
Is there any resolution?
As per your snanshot RDP take to much bandwidth utilization . if u also 600
active connwction then the bandwidth utilization is around 40- 45 mbps.
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, 00:45 Mike Jumper, wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 1:59 AM
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 1:59 AM Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear,
>
> I am deployed the Microsoft environment at my end and measure the
> bandwidth data send and received.
> using wireshark.
>
> please find the attached file one is microsoft web rdp bandwidth
> calculation using wireshark and second
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 23:07 Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear,
>
> Thank For your appreciation .
>
> The only thing that I noticed is that there is no compression between the
> server and the client.
> Meaning that full sized base64 encoded PNG images are send to the client,
> which causes a high
Dear,
Thank For your appreciation .
The only thing that I noticed is that there is no compression between the
server and the client.
Meaning that full sized base64 encoded PNG images are send to the client,
which causes a high network load.
i am try to find out why more bandwidth is required
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020, 20:57 Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear,
>
> Thanks your valuable replay .
>
> I observe that when data send from server to client in image/PNG and PNG
> take to much bandwidth rather than *Webp.*
>
No, whether WebP performs better than PNG depends on the content of the
image, and
Dear,
Thanks your valuable replay .
I observe that when data send from server to client in image/PNG and PNG
take to much bandwidth rather than *Webp.*
*Please guide us how i am enable or decode image data/PNG to image
data/Webp in guacamole server with tomcat with compression?*
On Sun, 1 Mar
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 6:17 AM Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear mike,
>
> We have captured the Guacamole screen recording as per your suggestions.
> please find attachment and guide us what data is sent .
>
Looking through the recording, everything looks absolutely fine. All
updates are incremental,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, 20:17 Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear Mike,
>
> I am capture the screen as per your suggestion , when i am opening the
> first screen of my app. this screen will download as image/png and again i
> am opening same screen again this screen will be download .
>
> all above i am
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 6:34 AM Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear Mike,
>
> Today we have measured bandwidth utilization using another verified tool
> on our server and had below observations :
>
> 1. It seems that whenever *single *user session is in idle mode (No
> screen change) , the bandwidth
Dear Mike,
Today we have measured bandwidth utilization using another verified tool on
our server and had below observations :
1. It seems that whenever *single *user session is in idle mode (No screen
change) , the bandwidth utilization is almost 707 B/s (which is low)
2. And whenever *single
Dear Mike/Nick,
For your below question, PF below reply.
Sean makes a really good point, and, really, it brings us back to one of
Mike's questions, Manoj: what problem are you trying to solve? Are you
seeing congestion on the network when you use Guacamole? Is the Guacamole
connection
Manoj, Guacamole will not send image data if the connection is idle. Images
are sent only when content on the screen is changing and only for the part
of the screen that changed.
Earlier in this conversation, you described 90 Kbps. This has now become
1.8 Mbps. I assume you are now measuring
Hi nick,
Yes , I am seeing encoded images at idle connection and frequently packet
send recive ACK and SYN through server to client and vice versa .
I am seeing high resource utilization for the Guacamole components on the
web browser.
I am also cross check bandwidth utilization RDP with using
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:35 PM Sean Reid wrote:
> Hi Manoj,
>
> Guacd has a few formats at its disposal to send images: PNG, JPEG, and
> optionally webp. PNG is lossless, JPEG and webp are lossy. Guacd chooses
> heuristically which it will use based on things like the current framerate,
> the
Hi Manoj,
Guacd has a few formats at its disposal to send images: PNG, JPEG, and
optionally webp. PNG is lossless, JPEG and webp are lossy. Guacd chooses
heuristically which it will use based on things like the current framerate,
the size of the image, and whether or not PNG is just better at
The only thing that I noticed is that there is no compression between the
server and the client. Meaning that full sized base64 encoded PNG images
are send to the client, which causes a high network load (~1.8mb/s)
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, 09:05 Mike Jumper, wrote:
> No, unless the RDP server is
No, unless the RDP server is horribly broken, Guacamole will receive only
incremental updates for the changed portions of the screen, and will only
forward incremental updates to the client.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 18:46 Manoj Patil wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I am really see on chrome when I am open a
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 10:35 Manoj Patil wrote:
> Hi mike
>
> Help me in that matter how I am decrypt the tcp packet. And find out what
> data is travel?
>
> I am using domain name with https connection.
>
You can't. You need to capture the data at a point where it is not
encrypted.
- Mike
Hi mike
Help me in that matter how I am decrypt the tcp packet. And find out what
data is travel?
I am using domain name with https connection.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, 23:44 Mike Jumper, wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 10:09 Manoj Patil wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I am see in browser Guacamole send
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 10:09 Manoj Patil wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I am see in browser Guacamole send full-screen images from the server to
> the client.
> Can this is utilized bandwidth?
>
No, Guacamole does not do this.
Guacamole sends incremental rectangles of image data, *not* full screen
images.
Hi ,
I am see in browser Guacamole send full-screen images from the server to
the client.
Can this is utilized bandwidth?
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, 06:08 Mike Jumper, wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020, 16:31 Manoj Patil wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mike ,
>>
>> I am continuously check http request and capture
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020, 16:31 Manoj Patil wrote:
> Thanks Mike ,
>
> I am continuously check http request and capture the packet I see ACK is
> continuously from server to client side and client to server s oh side in
> idle session .
>
ACK packets are just part of TCP. You need to actually look
Thanks Mike ,
I am continuously check http request and capture the packet I see ACK is
continuously from server to client side and client to server s oh side in
idle session .
Please help us in how can I check at my end to find out where is the
problem of high bandwidth utilization.
On Mon, 17
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020, 16:03 Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear mike,
>
> In last reply of Nick he said there is any traffic of audio and I am
> check the http traffic and send you I see the the word in this traffic is
> guac_audio . but I am not enable the audio settings .
>
That is not audio traffic.
Dear mike,
In last reply of Nick he said there is any traffic of audio and I am check
the http traffic and send you I see the the word in this traffic is
guac_audio . but I am not enable the audio settings .
Please check http request and guide us
GET
Manoj, what are you trying to ask? I'm confused about what is confusing
here. The last response to your question about disabling audio explains
exactly that, and points to documentation which also explains this.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020, 09:08 Manoj Patil wrote:
> GET
>
GET
/aceBankCBS/websocket-tunnel?token=010A36823D3FF22287309A8C592C1B046E50465362DC4F6B9CE1C2E53A2489CB_DATA_SOURCE=mysql_ID=274_TYPE=c_WIDTH=1366_HEIGHT=635_DPI=96_AUDIO=audio%2FL8_AUDIO=audio%2FL16_IMAGE=image%2Fjpeg_IMAGE=image%2Fpng_IMAGE=image%2Fwebp
HTTP/1.1
Host: 103.115.232.22:2790
Hi all
Today I am see in tcp and web socket packet there is audio traffic is
found but I am not enable the audio I think by default audio is enable
when guacamole is install .
Please guide us how to disable the audio communication from server to
client and viceversa .
I am using mysql
In the Guacamole GUI there's a tickbox 'disable audio'
You could also check this out:
http://guacamole.apache.org/doc/gug/configuring-guacamole.html
which explains how the audio works (and from that perhaps how you might
deal with it in your configuration).
On 16/02/2020 12:05 p.m., Manoj
Hi
I agree to we can not send u un- encrypted traffic for checking but as per
discussion I ask you how to check at guacamole end if audio is enabled? And
if enabled then give me solution for disable the audio streaming
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020, 22:19 Nick Couchman, wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:03 AM Manoj Patil wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> We have investigate further and there in we found that there's an
> continues ACK/SYN/PING traffic flows between server and client for an
> absolutely idle session.
>
>
Yes, this is by design - the Guacamole protocol has
Hello Mike,
We have investigate further and there in we found that there's an
continues ACK/SYN/PING traffic flows between server and client for an
absolutely idle session.
Due to which number of packets and in turn data exchange
increases continuously for an absolutely idle session.
Can you
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:23 AM Manoj Patil wrote:
> Dear,
>
> As per our observation we found that there is continuous send receive
> traffic from server to client and vise versa in every fractions of
> seconds(may be checking the network availability ) , however we are not
> doing any
48 matches
Mail list logo
