Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-12-11 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
Can simeone replay correctly to this topic please? http://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-Phoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/62687#M416?eid=1=1 On 9 Nov 2017 21:36, "Pedro Boado" wrote: > I'll open a Jira ticket and put together a pull

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-11-09 Thread Pedro Boado
I'll open a Jira ticket and put together a pull request in the next few days for Phoenix 4.11 + cdh 5.11.2 parcel. Then I'll start working on 4.12 Sorry, I couldn't work on this in the last two weeks. On 9 Nov 2017 15:51, "James Taylor" wrote: > I agree with JMS and

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-11-09 Thread James Taylor
I agree with JMS and there is interest from the PMC, but no bandwidth to do the work - we’d look toward others like you to do the work of putting together an initial pull request, regular pulls to keep things in sync, RMing releases, etc. These types of contributions would earn merit toward a

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-11-09 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
We "simply" need to have a place to host the file, right? From a code perspective, it can be another branch in the same repo? 2017-11-09 8:48 GMT-05:00 Flavio Pompermaier : > No interest from Phoenix PMCs to provide support to the creation of > official Cloudera parcels (at

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-11-09 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
No interest from Phoenix PMCs to provide support to the creation of official Cloudera parcels (at least from Phoenix side)...? On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote: > Anyone from Phoenix...? > > On 27 Oct 2017 16:47, "Pedro Boado"

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-27 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
Great! At this point we just need an official Phoenix mentor... On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > See below. > > 2017-10-27 8:45 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier : > >> I just need someone who tells which git repository to

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-27 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
See below. 2017-10-27 8:45 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier : > I just need someone who tells which git repository to use, the > branching/tagging policy, what should be done to release a parcel (i.e. > compile, test ok, update docs, etc). For example, I need someone who says:

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-27 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
FYI, you can also count on me for that. At least to perform some testing or gather information, communication, etc. Flavio, what can you leading do you need there? James, I am also interested ;) So count me in... (My very personal contribution) To setup a repo we just need to have a folder on

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-27 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
I can give it a try..is there someone who can lead this thing?

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-27 Thread James Taylor
Yes, that's the idea I was floating - if you and Pedro (and others) are interested, you could contribute the CDH compatible versions and these could be bundled in our source and binary releases. The community, including yourselves, would support it (in the same way we support Phoenix today). Not

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-27 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
I totally agree wrt some compatibility matrix. I think that CDH compatibility and parcels release should be something that people of Apache Phoenix could support somehow..am I wrong? On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Pedro Boado wrote: > There are problems regarding

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-27 Thread Pedro Boado
There are problems regarding version support and bugfixes. As HBase in CDH has been "enhaced" by Cloudera we'd need to mark certain specific cdh versions as supported (up to major.minor.fix version) . For instance CDH 5.11.1 doesn't pass tests because of an unsolved issue in Cloudera's HBase. I

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-27 Thread Pedro Boado
Well I'd say it's the only option left to some of us to use Phoenix in our clients/companies. Most of them only go for commercial distributions of Hadoop for obvious reasons and cannot afford keeping up with frequent platform update. In our case each platform migration is bigger (in terms of

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-26 Thread James Taylor
This is great, Pedro. Thanks so much for porting everything over. Would it make sense to try to have a CDH compatible release with each Phoenix release? Who would sign up to do this? Same question for HDP releases. Thanks, James On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Pedro Boado

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-26 Thread Pedro Boado
Sorry, it s provided "as is" . Try a "mvn clean package -D skipTests=true" . And grab the parcel from phoenix-parcel/target On 26 Oct 2017 22:21, "Flavio Pompermaier" wrote: > And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any documentation > about this? > > On 26

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-26 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any documentation about this? On 26 Oct 2017 20:37, "Pedro Boado" wrote: > I've done it for Phoenix 4.11 and CDH 5.11.2 based on previous work from > chiastic-security. > >

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-26 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this latest parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera? On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" wrote: It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a different format. It

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-26 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable... Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that for the

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-25 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
I'll take care of it ;) On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov" wrote: > Hi Flavio, > > It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about their > plan for further releases. > > Thanks, > Sergey > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier

Re: Cloudera parcel update

2017-10-25 Thread Sergey Soldatov
Hi Flavio, It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about their plan for further releases. Thanks, Sergey On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote: > Hi to all, > the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to