Hi Rishi
You can follow this mailing list discussion to generate systemvm template for
different arch
https://lists.apache.org/list?users@cloudstack.apache.org:2023-1:Cloudstack%20on%20arm64%20and%20packer%20build%20systemvmtemplate%20success
Regards
Kiran
From: Rishi Misra
Date: Wednesday
Hi there,
Is there a recommended way of generating SystemVM images for new
architecture?
I tried using build.sh
<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/tools/appliance/build.sh>but
I'm not sure if there is an easy way of doing it since packer may require
tweaking on
Hi,
I would suggest you not to spend time on this... 4.16 is EOL
Please upgrade to cloudstack 4.18/4.19, or use old kubernetes versions ..
-Wei
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 2:25 PM benoit lair wrote:
>
> i succeded to install systemvm template 4.19 as serving template for
> control a
i succeded to install systemvm template 4.19 as serving template for
control and worker nodes with cks community iso 1.28.4
when cluster saying "starting", i connect to node controller via p, saw
that docker was not installed, but containerd.io yes
I've done the following :
a
Hi Wei,
Thanks for the sharing, i also tried to install the systemvm 4.19
I have control node and worker node under template systemvm 4.19 (
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/systemvmtemplate-4.19.0-xen.vhd.bz2
)
I tried with community cks iso 1.25.0 and 1.28.9
On systemvm 4.19 docker
RuntimeService"
> , error: exit status 1
> [preflight] If you know what you are doing, you can make a check non-fatal
> with `--ignore-preflight-errors=...`
> To see the stack trace of this error execute with --v=5 or higher
> Error: kubeadm init failed!
>
>
> Le jeu.
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 14:16
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev <
>> d...@cloudstack.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS
>>
>> Any advices ?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Le lun. 8 avr. 2024
y, April 11, 2024 14:16
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev <
> d...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS
>
> Any advices ?
>
> Best regards
>
> Le lun. 8 avr. 2024 à 16:53, benoit lair a écrit :
>
> > I am ope
Benoit,
I haven't tested it but could work - worth testing. CAPC was tested on
4.17/4.18+.
Regards.
From: benoit lair
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 17:09
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS
> https://cluster-api-cloudstack.sigs.k8s.io
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: benoit lair
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 14:16
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev <
> d...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: AC
-cloudstack.sigs.k8s.io
Regards.
From: benoit lair
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 14:16
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev
Subject: Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS
Any advices ?
Best regards
Le lun. 8 avr. 2024 à 16:53, benoit lair
work with K8s > 1.23.3 on acs
>> 4.16
>> How can i tell CS to take another system vm template, avoiding to mess
>> normal features with VR and VPC VR keeping the systemvm template issued
>> with CS 4.16 ?
>>
>> I am with XCP-NG 8.2.1 in production
>>
>> Thanks for your help or advises
>> Best regards,
>> Benoit
>>
>
mal features with VR and VPC VR keeping the systemvm template issued
> with CS 4.16 ?
>
> I am with XCP-NG 8.2.1 in production
>
> Thanks for your help or advises
> Best regards,
> Benoit
>
ell CS to take another system vm template, avoiding to mess
normal features with VR and VPC VR keeping the systemvm template issued
with CS 4.16 ?
I am with XCP-NG 8.2.1 in production
Thanks for your help or advises
Best regards,
Benoit
Hello Swen,
As mentioned, you can delete it by changing the type to USER. Additionally,
this Pull Request: (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8556) aims to add
a new parameter to the 'deleteTemplate' API to allow these templates to be
deletable without needing the extra step.
Kind
Thx again, Wei!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Wei ZHOU
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 20:39
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: delete old SystemVM Templates
No, you are free to remove any template which is not used any more.
for SYSTEM templates, there is a check
old templates when no instance is using
> it anymore?
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Wei ZHOU
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 16:58
> An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: delete old SystemVM Templates
>
> if it is not needed, of cours
Thx! Is there any reason to keep old templates when no instance is using it
anymore?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Wei ZHOU
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 16:58
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: delete old SystemVM Templates
if it is not needed, of course you can
if it is not needed, of course you can remove it
- update template type to USER
- delete the template from zones
-Wei
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:56 PM wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to delete old, not used anymore, SystemVM Templates via UI?
> And does it make sense to
Hello,
is it possible to delete old, not used anymore, SystemVM Templates via UI?
And does it make sense to delete them?
After upgrading from 4.18.1.0 to 4.19.0.0 we do have 2 systemvm templates
registered (as expected) in our CS. The first one is called "SystemVM
Template (KVM)" and
to SystemVM (Console Proxy and SSVM).
Anyone set up using VxLAN/VNI before? Below is our configuration:
#Hypervisor KVM: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS with LACP bond (ports 1 and 2), then bridge
interface network as cloudbr1.
#Management OS: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
Cloudstack version: 4.18.1.0 with VNI network method
Hi Suresh,
Thanks for the help. What we found is that if we use VLAN to setup Cloudstack,
it works fine.
But when we setup using VxLAN/VNI, we encounter the issue where we are unable
to create a network VNI interface to SystemVM (Console Proxy and SSVM).
Anyone set up using VxLAN/VNI before
725: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
90520732211830, via: 3(n2ncloudmy1cp04), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":*
Regards,
Suresh
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 12:47 PM Bryan Tiang
wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> We tried re-installing cloudstack and now we can’t bring up the SystemVM
> Control Proxy and SSVM.
>
> Could someone tell us what we’re missing out? Ive attached our management
> log files.
>
> Regards,
> Bryan
>
Hi Vivek,
no, there is no hack - CloudStack mgmt server would first check the VR
version vs. the minimal required version - and deny doing any changes to
the VR if the version requirement is not satisfied.
Since for all CloudStack releases there is (usually) a new systemVM
template (which means
Hello Guys,
We have multiple Cloudstack deployment across all environment, Whenever we
upgrade Cloudstack it’s required to upgrade the systemVM templates and routers,
sometimes it’s very hard to ask downtime for VR upgradation( for upgrading the
VR ).
So is there any way or hack so that we
We should add the access information on the UI page for a CKS cluster created
with a user-defined ssh public-key.
Regards.
From: Pieter Koorts
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 16:10
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: SSH to CKS SystemVM instances
Brilliant thank you. Brain shutting down before FridayPieterOn 2 Dec 2021, at 10:28, Wei ZHOU
wrote:Hi Pieter,try the username 'core' ?-WeiOn Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 11:18, Pieter Koorts
wrote:Hello,This may be a slightly silly question but trying to SSH to a
Kubernetesinstance (setup by CKS)
, 2021 3:48 PM
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: SSH to CKS SystemVM instances
Hello,
This may be a slightly silly question but trying to SSH to a Kubernetes
instance (setup by CKS) and when I do "ssh root@x.x.x.x" it reads my SSH key
and then responds with:
Plea
Hi Pieter,
try the username 'core' ?
-Wei
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 11:18, Pieter Koorts
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This may be a slightly silly question but trying to SSH to a Kubernetes
> instance (setup by CKS) and when I do "ssh root@x.x.x.x" it reads my SSH
> key and then responds with:
>
> Please
Hello,This may be a slightly silly question but trying to SSH to a Kubernetes instance (setup by CKS) and
when I do "ssh root@x.x.x.x" it reads my SSH key and then responds with:Please login as the user
"NONE" rather than the user "root".How do we access the CKS instance via console or SSH
for
Hi All,
In 4.16 we introduced an enhancement that provided support for auto upgrades,
where in one wouldn't have to register the systemVM template prior upgrading
their environments. This however led to an increased size of the
cloudstack-management package as the systemVM templates for all
.
From: David Larsen
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2021 9:17:14 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with
type otherLinux64Guest
Hi Wei,
My configuration:
Cloudstack 4.15
Vmware:
Vcenter: latest 6.7
Vsphere
Hi Wei,
My configuration:
Cloudstack 4.15
Vmware:
Vcenter: latest 6.7
Vsphere hosts: vsphere 6.7 u1
When we upgraded from 4.13 to 4.15 it was the same issue with systemvm
template. To complete the upgrade to 4.15, I manualy changed os type for
systemvm template in DB. But why...??? I know
OU
> Dato: 15.10.2021 09:18 (GMT+01:00)
> Til: users
> Emne: Re: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with
> type otherLinux64Guest
>
> Hi David,
>
> Which version of vmware do you use ?
>
> -Wei
>
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 16:20, David Lars
Hi
We use vcenter/vsphere 6.7
Sendt fra min Galaxy
Opprinnelig melding
Fra: Wei ZHOU
Dato: 15.10.2021 09:18 (GMT+01:00)
Til: users
Emne: Re: systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template - Did not find a guest OS with type
otherLinux64Guest
Hi David,
Which version of vmware do you
Hi David,
Which version of vmware do you use ?
-Wei
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 16:20, David Larsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have just tried to install systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template to prepare
> for cloudstack 4.15.2 upgrade. When I choose Hypervisor: VMware, I cannot
> choos OS
Hi
I have just tried to install systemvm-vmware-4.15.1 template to prepare for
cloudstack 4.15.2 upgrade. When I choose Hypervisor: VMware, I cannot choos OS
Type afterwards.
The template never become "Ready"
The Cloudstack system-vm upgrade documentation step 6 it says:
"W
The error you are seeing in you agent.log seems for me like an "old friend".
Take a look into this:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5491#issue-1003559121
You can check it quiet fast.
Connect to one of the hosts and try to mount the nfs-share manually to an
temp-folder.
suggest to use
It appears that it has the capability to use nfs4 (It's using Ceph Octopus),
but it is not clear whether it is using nfs3 or nfs4. I *think* it is using nfs4
On 2021/10/07 16:14:36, "vas...@gmx.de" wrote:
> reading the agent.log you have trouble mounting the storage properly.
> Does your
reading the agent.log you have trouble mounting the storage properly.
Does your nfs-server for providing secondary storage provide nfs4 ?
Am Do., 7. Okt. 2021 um 15:33 Uhr schrieb Peter Stine <
petrus.st...@gmail.com>:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I had to rework my network and reinstall cloudstack.
Hey everyone,
I had to rework my network and reinstall cloudstack. While I am getting the
hosts to appear, they will not start any system VMs. They keep failing and
iterating. It looks like there is an error in libvirtd (I am also using systemd
for my networking), but I can't quite seem to
would solve the issue of the size of the
package, we may still end up facing the same issue of missing systemVM
templates in scenarios where we start off with a zone with say, KVM hosts and
in due course of time, decide to add XenServer/ VMWare hosts and the admin
doesn't install the hypervisor
Hi Hean,
Thanks for your response. As mentioned, the usual upgrade procedure, of admins
registering template prior upgrade continues to be supported and if we find the
new systemvm template already registered the new logic for setting up the
templates doesn't kick in.
Thanks,
Pearl
individually and maintain that certain versions of SystemVMs
require certain cloudstack versions and vice-versa.
Thanks,
-Nathan McGarvey
On 9/2/21 9:29 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Hean,
>
> Yes I think the old approach of registering systemvm template prior to
> upgrade as well a
Hi Hean,
Yes I think the old approach of registering systemvm template prior to upgrade
as well as the option to switch between systemvmtemplate continues to be
supported. What this feature primarily aims is to make CloudStack turnkey
operationally.
May I ask if anyone has any objections
t; inputs.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Pearl
>
>
> From: Pearl d'Silva
> Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 5:49 PM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemVM template upgrade improvements
>
> Hi All,
>
> We have been wor
] SystemVM template upgrade improvements
Hi All,
We have been working on a feature that simplifies SystemVM template install and
upgrades for CloudStack. Historically we've required users to seed the template
on secondary storage during fresh installation and register the template before
e9-9a6b-1dc7915959f4","id":"335","format":"OV
A","accountId":"2","checksum":"{SHA-512}c369bc2cec47752ef5727fcf55fcb1f8277e
3f14e8aad3ba87158257fc263658bfd3cb9da6d29b3443e612f2d55c46737bf8bc76487509fd
adfcd7953679c16e","hvm":"tru
the issue with this :
"Copy System VM patch ISO file to secondary storage. source ISO:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/vms/systemvm.iso, destination:
/var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345049356158.5c045ec2/systemvm/systemvm-4.15.1.0.iso
2021-07-29 07:03:40,925 ERROR [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
(DirectAgent-
If possible, install the new Secondary Storage NFS server with the same IP,
and then mount it on mgmt server and run again the pressed systemVM
template script - it will download it to the same location, and you should
be good to go (restart mgmt and it should, hopefully, start SSVM/CPVM
SSVMs are not running, my secondary storage is physically unavailable.
I want to replace it with new secondary storage.
Best.
Le 24/02/2021 à 18:53, Andrija Panic a écrit :
In order for us to help, here's the question: WHY would you do this? Since
your SSVM are running (right?) that means the
In order for us to help, here's the question: WHY would you do this? Since
your SSVM are running (right?) that means the template is fine and no need
to download it again.
Best,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 18:13, Stéphane Racamier
wrote:
> HI,
>
> How i can download template for SVM after zone are
HI,
How i can download template for SVM after zone are initialized.
Can I use a script used by initial install?
My DB is separated from my management server.
Best regards.
for choosing: Huge community support, and most importantly – we
can modify the existing systemVM templates!
Considering the above, we propose using the Debian-based systemVM template for
apart from the fact that it has a huge community support, we already have it
registered in our CloudStack environments
/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/1295 CHOSEN: Huge community
support, and most importantly – we can modify the existing systemVM templates!
With the above, we propose using the Debian-based systemVM template for apart
from the fact that it has a huge community support, we already have
org
Subject: RE: Initial SystemVM Creation Failing
I appreciate the response, but I'm not sure where you are going.
My secondary and primary storage are mounts from a NetApp filer. Both the
CentOS (CloudStack Management) and the ESXi hosts can read/write to the
secondary volume. I don't understand w
I thought that you are using NFS. I had the same issue in 4.14 but I did the
copy manually for the systemvm and this has fixed the problem for me, maybe it
is a bug.
Regards,
Cristian
-Original Message-
From: Corey, Mike
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 9:11 PM
To: users
and permissions to nobody when it creates the systemvm folder. That doesn't
seem right.
Again, being new to CloudStack I'm not sure of the underlying mechanics of the
systemvm builds.
-Original Message-
From: cristian.c@istream.today
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 12:30 PM
To: users
Hello
If you check your NFS configuration you will see that somewhere you have :
/etc/idmapd.conf "nobody"
Regards,
Cristian
-Original Message-
From: Corey, Mike
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 7:01 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Initial SystemV
The system VM folder is being created as owner & permissions nobody:nobody. I
have to believe that is NOT SUPPOSED to be the case.
Because the directory /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345050029058.4f87a734 is locked
down, no other steps in the systemvm creation can continue.
I need help figuring
still getting weird storage/permission type issues.
>
> The permissions and ownership of the systemvm folder looks correct.
> [root@ ~]# ls -al /mnt/secondary/
> total 16
> drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Jul 8 11:15 .
>
Hi,
Has anyone replicated this error/issue I'm seeing? What part of the setup or
systemvm build sets or creates the /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/ directory and WHY
would it be restrictive?
[root@ ~]# ls -al /var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/345050029058.1f7af2bf
total 12
drwxr-xr-x. 4 nobody nobody 4096 Jul
Gone over the installation now twice (reverted to snapshot of CentOS VM) and
still getting weird storage/permission type issues.
The permissions and ownership of the systemvm folder looks correct.
[root@ ~]# ls -al /mnt/secondary/
total 16
drwxr
Mike,
are you using CentOS7 packages or Ubuntu?
I would delete the /systemvm/systemvm-4.14.0.0.iso file (does it actually
exist?) and restart mgmt server again (permissions on the "systemvm" folder
should be 644)
You can also verify being able to write as a "cloud" use
cloud owns the systemvm
folder on the secondary storage. However, now I'm getting a new error
regarding copying the ISO.
Should I just bag the 4.14 installation and try to get 4.13.1 running with
VMware?
2020-07-02 14:19:13,314 INFO [c.c.h.v.m.VmwareManagerImpl]
(DirectAgent-10:ctx-52902ebf usph
Hi Mike,
Mount you secondary storage on the management server to some temp folder,
then run:chown -R cloud:cloud /systemvm/
Other folders on Secondary Storage NFS are owned by root, but the
"systemvm" should be owned by "cloud".
I assume you got this after some ACS
Hi,
When I enable the zone, the systemvm creation begins but goes into a loop of
creating and deleting VMs in vCenter. I see in the logs there is an error for
creating the folder permissions on the secondary storage (see below). Running
this CHMOD manually from inside the CSM kicks the same
Hey Everyone,
I'm doing some cleanup on my main Cloudstack deployment which went live
circa 2016. Part of that is deleting deprecated templates and isos out
of secondary storage. I have a bunch of old SystemVM Templates in there
and have verified that there are no deployed vms using them
described in
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3654, however, I can’t seem
to get the system vm QCOW2 file to boot in virtual box. It tells me it
can’t find a boot device. Can anyone point me to some information on how to
do this, or maybe to another way to update a systemvm template?
I’m u
around described in
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3654, however, I can’t seem
> to get the system vm QCOW2 file to boot in virtual box. It tells me it
> can’t find a boot device. Can anyone point me to some information on how to
> do this, or maybe to another way to
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Altering systemvm templates - VirtualBox?
I was looking to manually update our 4.11.3 system vm templates to perform the
workaround described in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3654,
however, I can’t seem to get the system vm QCOW2 file to boot in virtual box
to some
information on how to do this, or maybe to another way to update a systemvm
template?
I’m using a Mac running VirtualBox (latest version), and attaching the QCOW2
file as the drive, specifying 64 bit Debian linux as OS.
Thanks!
--
Greg Goodrich | IP Pathways
Senior Developer
3600 109th
Hi,
I have a very strange error, all system machines are no deployed properly.
For example, the virtual router starts, receives the ip address in the link
local but is not configured.
The probable reason is that ssh does not work on the machine. After checking it
turns out that I get a
r SSVM and CP and I missed some
> > > > > > point?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Greetings,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Melanie
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 31.10.2019, 17:19 +0100 schrieb Andrija
> > > > > Panic:
> > > > > > tried restarting mgmt after tag change? Usually not required
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > might be
> >
> > might be
> > > > > for systemVMs.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, 15:21 Melanie Desaive, <
> > > > > m.desa...@mailbox.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
gt; > On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, 15:21 Melanie Desaive, <
> > > > m.desa...@mailbox.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just tried to set up storage tags for System VMs, but the
> > > >
> the
> > > > storage tag into account when deciding over the storage.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > The only storage with the tag "SYSTEMV" ist "ACS-LUN-SAS-01'
> > > > with
> > > > id=10
>
> > is not as expected. The deployment planner does not seem to take
> > > the
> > > storage tag into account when deciding over the storage.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > The only storage with the tag "SYSTEMV" ist "ACS-LUN-SAS-01' with
> > > i
gt; the
> > > storage tag into account when deciding over the storage.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > The only storage with the tag "SYSTEMV" ist "ACS-LUN-SAS-01' with
> > > id=10
> > >
> >
> >
> > mysql> select id,name,tag from storage_pool_view where cluster_name
> > =
> > 'cluster2' and status = 'Up' and tag = 'SYSTEMVM' order by
> > name,tag;
> > +----++--+
> > > id | name | tag |
> > +
seem to take the
> storage tag into account when deciding over the storage.
>
> --
>
> The only storage with the tag "SYSTEMV" ist "ACS-LUN-SAS-01' with id=10
>
> mysql> select id,name,tag from storage_pool_view where cluster_name =
> 'cluster2' an
mysql> select id,name,tag from storage_pool_view where cluster_name =
'cluster2' and status = 'Up' and tag = 'SYSTEMVM' order by name,tag;
+++--+
| id | name | tag |
+++--+
| 10 | ACS-LUN-SAS-01 | SYSTEMVM |
++
org
Subject: Re: Can't start systemVM in a new advanced zone deployment
Hi, Sergey:
I found more logs in vpxa.log ( the esxi hosts are using UTC time
zone, so I was looking at wrong time periods earlier). I have uploaded more
logs into
e 2019 23:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can't start systemVM in a new advanced zone deployment
Hi, Sergey:
I found more logs in vpxa.log ( the esxi hosts are using UTC time zone,
so I was looking at wrong time periods earlier). I have upl
Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Yiping Zhang
Sent: 05 June 2019 23:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can't start systemVM in a new advanced zone deployment
Hi, Sergey:
I found m
peblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Yiping Zhang
Sent: 05 June 2019 23:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can't start systemVM in a new advanced zone deployment
Hi, Sergey:
I found more logs in vpxa.log ( the
error file not found.
In case that the CloudStack attempted to create a systemVM, the destination
VMDK file path it is looking for is "//.vmdk",
see uploaded log at https://pastebin.com/aFysZkTy
In case when I manually created new VM from a (different) template in v
> migrate.hostLog =
"533b6fcf3fa6301aadcc2b168f3f999a-7d5d73de.hlog"
>
>
>
>
> That's all the data on the template VMDK.
>
>
> firmware = "bios"
> migrate.hostLog =
"533b6fcf3fa6301aadcc2b168f3f999a-7d5d73de.hlog"
>
>
>
>
> That's all the data on th
e = "bios"
> migrate.hostLog =
"533b6fcf3fa6301aadcc2b168f3f999a-7d5d73de.hlog"
>
>
>
>
> That's all the data on the template VMDK.
>
&g
gt; annotation = "systemvmtemplate-4.11.2.0-vmware"
> guestOS = "otherlinux-64"
> toolScripts.afterPowerOn = "TRUE"
> toolScripts.afterResume = "TRUE"
> toolScripts.beforeSuspend = "TRUE"
>
evitskiy" wrote:
Have you tried deleting template from PS and let ACS to recopy it
again? If the issue is reproducible we can try to look what is wrong with VMDK.
Please post content of 533b6fcf3fa6301aadcc2b168f3f999a.vmdk ,
533b6fcf3fa6301aadcc2b168f3f999a-01.vmdk an
That's all the data on the template VMDK.
Much appreciate your time!
Yiping
On 6/4/19, 9:29 AM, "Sergey Levitskiy" wrote:
Have you tried deleting template from PS and let ACS to recopy it
again? If the issue is reproducible we can
evitskiy" wrote:
Have you tried deleting template from PS and let ACS to recopy it again? If
the issue is reproducible we can try to look what is wrong with VMDK. Please
post content of 533b6fcf3fa6301aadcc2b168f3f999a.vmdk ,
533b6fcf3fa6301aadcc2b168f3f999a-01.vmdk and
533b6fcf3fa630
rote:
I would suspect the template is corrupted on the secondary storage. You
can try disabling/enabling link clone feature and see if it works the other
way.
vmware.create.full.clonefalse
Also systemVM template might have been generate
ne feature and see if it works the other way.
vmware.create.full.clonefalse
Also systemVM template might have been generated on a newer version of
vSphere and not compatible with ESXi 6.5. What you can do to validate this is
to manually deploy OVA that is in Seconda
I would suspect the template is corrupted on the secondary storage. You can try
disabling/enabling link clone feature and see if it works the other way.
vmware.create.full.clonefalse
Also systemVM template might have been generated on a newer version of vSphere
Hi, list:
I am struggling with deploying a new advanced zone using ACS 4.11.2.0 + vSphere
6.5 + NetApp volumes for primary and secondary storage devices. The initial
setup of CS management server, seeding of systemVM template, and advanced zone
deployment all went smoothly.
Once I enabled
figure out which storage host is causing the
time out error?
Regards,
Richard Persaud
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 3:53 PM
To: users
Subject: Re: SystemVM template - timeout waiting for response from storage host
⚠ EXT MSG:
Hi,
did you preseed the systemVM template
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
